Jorge's Ship of Fools

The rapidity of the counterfeit church of conciliarism’s becoming a parody of even the zaniest “mainline” Protestant sect should come as no surprise whatsoever. We are merely witnessing the manifestation of the inherent degeneracy of conciliarism’s false doctrines and sacramentally barren liturgical rites. Jorge Mario Bergolio is only accelerating the pace at which the evolutionary process of accustoming Catholics to the conciliar revolt against Catholic Faith, Worship and Morals becomes impossible for any “counterrevolutionary” within the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism to turn back. The die has been cast. Public opinion, such as it is, is squarely on the side of what appears to be Jorge’s revolution but is only the “final act” of a play that opened to reviewers when Angelo Roncalli stepped out on the balcony of the Basilica of Saint Peter on Tuesday, October 28, 1958, the Feast of Saints Simon and Jude.

The madness of the present moment is such that the seriousness of Mortal Sin and its consequences upon the souls of sinners and upon the good order of men and their nations is now a subject of derision not only by the worldly wise but by Jorge Mario Begoglio and his crew aboard what can be called Jorge’s Ship of Fools. Those who sin unrepentantly are to be shown “mercy” without reforming their lives. Those who seek to denounce sin, especially the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, must be mocked with scorn as “cold-hearted,” “rigoristic” “Pharisees” who seek to “cage” or to “tame” the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost.

As noted in At The Mercy of the New Herods four days ago now, the demonization of those who, despite their own sins and failings, believe in the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law has become an open, two-front war waged by the lords of Modernity in the world and the lords of Modernism in Jorge’s Ship of Fools that is truly without parallel before in the history of the Catholic Church. Believing Catholics who seek to defend moral truth in the midst of the world now have no allies in the quarters of what passes for the “hierarchy” of what they believe to be is the Catholic Church. Sin and its celebration is “in.” Condemnation of sin and its enshrinement in civil law and celebration in popular culture is “out,” forbidden.

Although there have been times of persecution from the lords of the world and from various heretics and infidels throughout Holy Mother Church’s history, Catholics who believe in moral truth are now being attacked by what they think is the “pope” from inside the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber. There are no “friends” in the Vatican to come to the “rescue” of such Catholics.

Much like police forces in the Western world who have been trained to protect baby-killers and harass and threaten those praying Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary and/or engaging in sidewalk counseling outside of the killing centers, the conciliar cavalry has ridden off to the defense of those who used to be the objects of occasional slaps-on-the-wrist for putting into question or denying truths contained in the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law.

Gone are the days when Catholics can “write to Rome” to complain about some outrageous statement or action by a conciliar “bishop” or one of his priests/presbyters,  although some truly poor souls continue to grasp at straws whenever the “pope” issues a perfunctory statement that is said to be “pro-life.”

No, these are the days of the neo-Montinians, the days of those who are the direct successors of Joseph “Cardinal” Bernardin, John Cardinal Dearden, Richard “Cardinal” Cushing, Francis Cardinal Spellman, Francis Mugavero, John Quinn, John Roach, John Cody, Joseph Fiorenza, Daniel Pilarczyk, Peter Rosazza, William Borders, Matthew Clark, Daniel Leo Ryan, John May (of Saint Louis, Missouri), Raymond Hunthausen and, among so many others, Walter Sullivan. Jorge’s Ship of Fools has finally dumped its “bilge” of the “no church” into the depths of the abyss as it sails confidently off on its final voyage to the land of the One World Ecumenical Church.

It was but a scant thirty years, nine and one-half months ago now that some of us who were “conservatives” were heartened when “Bishop” John J. O’Connor had been appointed by “Saint John Paul II” to be the conciliar “archbishop” of New York and began to speak openly about how “sick and tired” he was of hearing politicians claim that there were “personally opposed” to abortion but could not “impose their morality” upon their constituents. This inflamed Cuomo, who has quite a temper, who started a war of words with the new "archbishop." Things escalated rather rapidly, and O'Connor refused to recognize Cuomo's presence at his installation "Mass" on March 19, 1984, while recognizing Mayor Edward Irving Koch of the City of New York, the Mayor of Scranton, Pennsylvania, James Bernard McNulty, and the United States Abassador to the Holy See, William Wilson.

Cuomo was livid.


I know.

I was there, dressed in a cassock and surplice as a seminarian from Holy Apostles Seminary (how a group of us from Holy Apostles managed to get into the service is a story in and of itself as we had no tickets and most of the group had no official sponsorship to study for a particular diocese or religious community), watching as the red-faced Cuomo stormed passed me on the right transept of the Cathedral of Saint Patrick after the end of the joke-fest that was O'Connor's Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo "installation" service. (O'Connor was telling so many jokes at various points during the service that the late Father Vincent Miceli told me, "He's a comedian. He thinks he's Johnny Carson.") Cuomo never forgot that snub. Never.

The late “Monsignor” Michael Wrenn, who wrote a very interesting article to refute the claims of Modernist Scripture “scholars” that the four Gospels were written decades after the Passion, Death and Resurrection of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ (see Dating of the Gospels), was the conciliar pastor of Saint John the Evangelist Church on First Avenue and Fifty-fifth Street in the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York, New York, in 1997 when he told me that he believed that “Cardinal” O’Connor had an unwritten “understanding” with former Governor Mario Matthew Cuomo to refrain from receiving what purports to be Holy Communion in the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service. Wrenn said that Cuomo, who had moved from Hollis Heights, Queens, New York, to an apartment in the fashionable Sutton Place part of Manhattan’s Upper East Side, would attend the conciliar liturgical service on Sundays at Saint John the Evangelist without approaching to receive what purported to be Holy Communion.

Those days are gone as in Melvin Allen Israel’s signature home run call, “Going, going, gone.”

Look how times have changed under Jorge:

It was a silent night for Mayor de Blasio, but Timothy Cardinal Dolan spoke directly to the city's divisions at a packed midnight Mass.

De Blasio settled into a pew at St. Patrick's Cathedral as Dolan addressed the Christmas crowd.

"I'm sure that's why you're here, Gov. Cuomo. I'm sure that's why you're here, Mayor de Blasio. As we face tensions and divisions in our beloved city ... to work together," Dolan said, adding, "To join together and say, 'We want God.

"Might I suggest that's the most fundamental prayer lodged deep in the human heart."

Up to 300 people without tickets waited in the rain, many lined up four hours in advance.

Gov. Cuomo and Sandra Lee attend midnight Mass at St. Patrick's Cathedral.

Dolan addresses city's divisions at midnight liturgical travesty.

Although it is not known whether Cuomo presented himself for what purports to be Holy Communion in the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service as it is something of a custom in the City of New York for the powerful and the famous to be at the Cathedral of Saint Patrick for what they think is Christmas Midnight Mass (which I attended about six times between 1984 and 1994; even as a former Mayor of the City of New York, Edward Irving Koch, a Talmudist, was front and center every year), the fact that he, a divorced man without a conciliar decree of nullity, could openly bring his concubine to a putative offering of a Catholic Mass is a significant sign of the times in the counterfeit church of conciliarism.

Figlio di Sfachim's father, Mario Matthew Cuomo, never showed his face for the Christmas Midnight liturgical service during the days of the Talmudic-friendly John “Cardinal” O’Connor. He knew that he was not welcome. Not so today.

The public flaunting of sin is “in” to such an extent in the counterfeit church of conciliarism that a public sinner who supports the surgical and chemical execution of innocent preborn children and whose lobbying efforts helped to convince the legislature of the State of New York to endorse “gay marriage” in 2011can be seated front and center at one of the most prominent Catholic cathedrals in the United States of America nearly a year after he had told New Yorkers opposed to the evils of the day to get out of the Empire State:

Gov. Andrew Cuomo says the current “schism” in the state Republican party is a smaller version of the split causing so much damage in Washington, D.C., and that “conservative Republicans … have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are.”

In conversation with Susan Arbetter on “The Capitol Pressroom” Friday morning, Cuomo said:

You have a schism within the Republican Party. … They’re searching to define their soul, that’s what’s going on. Is the Republican party in this state a moderate party or is it an extreme conservative party? That’s what they’re trying to figure out. It’s a mirror of what’s going on in Washington. The gridlock in Washington is less about Democrats and Republicans. It’s more about extreme Republicans versus moderate Republicans.

… You’re seeing that play out in New York. … The Republican Party candidates are running against the SAFE Act — it was voted for by moderate Republicans who run the Senate! Their problem is not me and the Democrats; their problem is themselves. Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are.

If they’re moderate Republicans like in the Senate right now, who control the Senate — moderate Republicans have a place in their state. George Pataki was governor of this state as a moderate Republican; but not what you’re hearing from them on the far right.”

The governor’s suggestion that, for example, those who hold anti-abortion views have no place in the state prompted Dennis Poust, spokesman for the state Catholic Conference, to observe on Twitter, “My governor thinks there’s no place in NY for people like me. Can I get a state grant to relocate?” (And where to — New Hampshire, maybe?) (Capitol Confidential: Cuomo: ‘Extreme conservatives … have no place in the state of New York’).

Timothy “Cardinal” Dolan’s merriment, of course, precedes Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s ascent to power on Wednesday, March 13, 2013. Nevertheless, however, the “happy bishop” has gotten in lockstep with the Argentine Apostate to such an extent now that all of his former pretense of “conservatism” and a “fortnight of prayer for religious liberty,” which is the very heresy that gave us the likes of Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro and other statists, has been dropped. Timothy Michael Dolan’s star power may have dropped in the past twenty-one and one-half months. However, he is making it clear that he can be as “merciful” as “Pope” Francis.

Similarly, another conciliar “cardinal” whose coddling of pro-aborts and other miscreants was very well-established before the “election” of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Sean Patrick “Cardinal” O’Malley, O.F.M., Cap., will never be outdone in his celebration of the lives of Catholics in public life who died without the least trace of repentance for their open and enthusiastic support for child-killing and sodomy.

Here is a report of what O’Malley said two months ago now during the so-called “Mass of Christian Burial” for the late Thomas Menino, the pro-abortion, pro-sodomite Mayor of Boston, Massachusetts, from July 12, 1993, to January 6, 2014:

Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley remembered former mayor Thomas M. Menino on Sunday as a man of deep religious faith, who regularly attended Mass and prayed daily to St. Joseph, a humble carpenter.

“St. Joseph is the patron saint of a happy death, having died in the arms of Jesus and Mary at his home in Nazareth,” O’Malley said during a Mass of Remembrance for Menino at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.

O’Malley drew a comparison to Menino’s death, at age 71, last Thursday. “Tom died having received the sacraments of the church and surrounded by his beloved [wife] Angela and their close-knit family,” he said.

The Mass fell on All Souls Day, a holy day when Catholics remember those who have died.

O’Malley asked the estimated 400 mourners from across Boston who filled the pews of Boston’s grandest Catholic church to pray for Menino, their loved ones, and the lonely.

On All Souls Day, we implore God’s loving mercy for all the faithful departed . . . both those whom we loved and also for those who have no one to pray for them,” O’Malley said.

For some, remembering Menino on All Souls Day was fitting for a man deeply devoted to helping others.

“It seems appropriate,” said Marilyn Morrissey, 61, a public school nurse from Jamaica Plain who said the Mass was “an opportunity for me to give thanks to the mayor for his service.”

In his homily, O’Malley noted Menino’s deep love for his family and “his extended family, the people of Boston.”

"He was very close to the people, especially in times of trouble or tragedy, like the Marathon bombings,” the cardinal said as mourners listened in silence.

O’Malley recalled his encounters with Menino at groundbreakings for affordable housing, at homeless shelters, and in neighborhoods hit by violence.

“He cared deeply for people, especially the poor and disenfranchised,” O’Malley said. “Mayor Menino cared deeply about Boston and its very diverse population and worked tirelessly to make this city the very best, safe place possible.’’

In brief remarks to reporters after the Mass, O’Malley recalled a moving visit with Menino to a homeless shelter one Thanksgiving Day.

“Just to see the kindness and the real concern he expressed for people,” O’Malley said. “It wasn’t a politician going through some kind of ritual. It was someone who recognized in the homeless a brother, a sister, and was truly concerned about them. He had that humanity that touched people.” (O'Malley Stages Travesty in honor of Pro-Abortion, Pro-Perversity Thomas Menino.)

Ah, the “humanity that touched people.”

What about the innocent preborn, Sean?

The poor and disenfranchished?

Who is more poor and disenfranchised than innocent children in the sanctuaries of their mothers’ wombs?

Sean Patrick O’Malley, who is neither a true priest nor a true bishop, has given us this kind of will before.

Here is a little reminder:

On Saturday morning I attended the funeral Mass for Senator Edward M. Kennedy.  Father Donald Monan, S.J., former president of Boston College, celebrated the Mass and Father Mark Hession, pastor of Our Lady of Victories in Centerville, preached the homily.

The music was outstanding with the Tanglewood Festival Chorus enriching the liturgy along with mezzo-soprano Susan Graham who later sang an absolutely striking rendition of Schubert’s “Ave Maria.”  Cellist Yo-Yo Ma graced us with his beautiful solo performance of Bach and later joined Placido Domingo, who sang the “Panis Angelicus.”  Placido has a superb voice.  I told him how much I like the Zarzuela, the Spanish classical musical theater productions.  His family had a troupe that presented Zarzuelas in Mexico and he promised to arrange a performance.

The venue for the funeral Mass was Mission Church, the magnificent Redemptorist Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help.

Senator Kennedy prayed often in this church when his daughter, Kara, was stricken with cancer.  It is a church where countless faithful have gone to pray and ask for healing, grace and forgiveness.

In light of these themes, I wish to address our Catholic faithful who have voiced both support and disappointment at my having presided at the Senator’s funeral Mass.

Needless to say, the Senator’s wake and Catholic funeral were controversial because of the fact that he did not publicly support Catholic teaching and advocacy on behalf of the unborn. ­­­Given the profound effect of Catholic social teaching on so many of the programs and policies espoused by Senator Kennedy and the millions who benefited from them, there is a tragic sense of lost opportunity in his lack of support for the unborn.  To me and many Catholics it was a great disappointment because, had he placed the issue of life at the centerpiece of the Social Gospel where it belongs, he could have multiplied the immensely valuable work he accomplished. (Cardinal Seán's Blog)

Framing Kennedy's unwavering support for abortion as a failure to "publicly support Catholic teaching and advocacy of the unborn."

A "disappointment," "Cardinal" O'Malley?

A "disappointment"?

The very way that “Cardinal” Sean, as he likes to call himself, framed Kennedy's public dissent from the Deposit of Faith was intellectually dishonest.

 Edward Moore Kennedy did not sin against the preborn by omission. He sinned against them by one act of commission after another.

Edward Moore Kennedy was a virulent, aggressive, combative and fierce supporter of the nonexistent "right" of women to kill their preborn children.

How many women chose to kill their children because Edward Moore Kennedy reaffirmed them in the false belief that it was their "right" to "choose" to do so?

"A failure to publicly support Catholic teaching and advocacy of the unborn”?

Sean “Cardinal” O’Malley, O.F.M., Cap., who is, of course one of Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s chosen Commissars is an intellectually dishonest coward and hypocrite.

Edward Moore Kennedy gave bad example to others. So did Thomas Menino.

Kennedy preached a false "gospel" to others. So did Thomas Menino. So does Sean O’Malley and his boss, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

Kennedy, for instance, helped to make possible the daily slaughter of the preborn by voting for Federal funding for abortifacient contraceptives and for surgical baby-killing in the "hard" cases. He voted in favor of the use of Federal taxpayer monies to fund fetal tissue experimentation. He supported pro-aborts for public office. He nominated pro-aborts to serve as judges on the Federal bench. He confirmed pro-aborts to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

Edward Moore Kennedy supported two of the four sins that cry out to Heaven, willful murder and the sin of Sodom. He did so unapologetically. Humberto "Cardinal Medeiros never threatened to excommunicate him for doing so. Bernard "Cardinal" Law never threatened to excommunicate him for doing so. O’Malley never threatened to excommunicate him for doing so, thereby communicating to Catholics and non-Catholics alike that one can remain a "Catholic" in "good standing" in the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism, that which appears to most people to be the Catholic Church, despite being an active participant in and support of the American genocide of the preborn.

For his part, Thomas Menino was just as much an enemy of Christ the King as his political mentor and enabler, Edward Moore Kennedy:

Since an abortive run for Congress in 1992 while still a City Councilor, Thomas Menino has supported legal abortion and the public funding of abortion. In his first campaign for Mayor in 1993, he indicated that he would continue the practice of taxpayer financed abortions at Boston City Hospital.

  • On May 17, 2004, the first day that same-gender marriage ceremonies could be legally performed in the Commonwealth, Mayor Menino, a supporter of same-sex marriage, personally welcomed homosexual and lesbian couples to Boston City Hall amid much fanfare and media attention.
  • From 1996 to 1998, Mayor Menino lobbied the Massachusetts Legislature to pass a home rule petition which would allow the Boston City Council to enact a domestic partners ordinance. In August, 1998, when Acting Governor A. Paul Cellucci vetoed the measure, Mayor Menino, against the advice of his own corporation counsel, arbitrarily and unlawfully instituted a domestic partners benefits program for municipal employees by executive order. This order was challenged in Suffolk County Superior Court by the American Center for Law and Justice and the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts. On July 8, 1999, the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth, in a unanimous decision written by then-Associate Justice Margaret Marshall, overturned the executive order in Connors vs. the City of Boston.
  • Since 1994, Mayor Menino has boycotted Boston’s Saint Patrick’s Day Parade because the organizers, the South Boston Allied War Veterans Council, have refused to allow a militant homosexual group, including participants in the infamous 1990 condom throwing incident at Holy Cross Cathedral, to march in the parade. Mayor Menino has also in the past forbidden Boston Police officers, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians from marching in the parade, describing it as "a discriminatory event."
  • In June of each year, Mayor Menino leads Boston’s Gay Pride Parade, welcomes marchers to Boston, and allows Boston Police officers, in uniform, to march in the parade.
  • In 2001, Mayor Menino’s Fire Commissioner, Paul Christian, ordered the Boston Fire Department to remove all shamrocks and other expressions of Irish-Catholic identity from Boston fire apparatus, deriding them as "symbols of tribalism."
  • Each year in June, Mayor Menino allows the pink triangle homosexual flag to be flown over Boston City Hall Plaza as part of Gay Pride celebrations, often personally participating in the flag raising ceremony.
  • Each year during Gay Pride Week, Mayor Menino sponsors a gay prom for teenagers at Boston City Hall, where condoms have been distributed.
  • In January 1994, Thomas Menino became the first Boston Mayor to appoint the members of the Boston School Committee. Among his initial appointees was Dr. Elizabeth Reilinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of Crittenton Hastings House, then a major Massachusetts abortuary, which performed over 4000 abortions per year. Since 1998, Dr. Reilinger has been the Chairwoman of the School Committee. Another original appointee by Mayor Menino was the pro-abortion left-wing activist Felix Arroyo, now a member of the Boston City Council.
  • In March 1994, in its first significant order of public business, Mayor Menino’s appointed School Committee instituted a condom distribution program in the Boston Public Schools.
  • Under Mayor Menino’s appointed School Committee, the Boston School Department has embraced such homosexual programs as the Safe School Initiative and Gay/Straight Alliances, which teach that homosexual relationships ought to be affirmed. During this same period, the School Department reprimanded and eventually terminated former Boston Latin School teacher Owen O’Malley, a Catholic critic of homosexual ideology.
  • Mayor Menino is a supporter of needle exchange programs.
  • Mayor Menino declared June 3, 2005 to be Queer Eye Day in the City of Boston.
  • Mayor Menino is a supporter of both gay rights and transgendered rights, whereby sexual orientation and identity are included in the protected categories of civil rights legislation. In 2002, Mayor Menino signed into law a City Council ordinance which would force homeowners, including Catholics with children, to rent apartments in their homes to transvestites and persons who have surgically mutilated themselves through so-called sex change operations.
  • Mayor Menino has maintained at public expense a gay and lesbian liaison office at Boston City Hall.
  • In 2005, Mayor Menino castigated th Archdiocese of Boston for the closing of Our Lady of Presentation School in Brighton, calling the actions of the Archdiocese "unconscionable" and "reprehensible." Mayor Menino went on to hold a sham graduation cermeony for Our Lady of Presentation students at Faneuil Hall.
  • Mayor Menino is a longstanding opponent of tuition tax credits and publicly funded tuition vouchers for the parents of Catholic school students.
  • Mayor Menino’s spouse, Mrs. Angela Menino, has publicly criticized the Catholic Church, telling The Boston Globe that she opposes what she describes as the Church’s "unjust treatment of women."

Thomas M. Menino is an adversary of the Catholic Church, an opponent of Catholic morality, and a supporter of the culture of death, who has carried on a campaign of aggressive de-Christianization in the municipal government of Boston. Under Mayor Menino’s anti-Catholic and family-unfriendly policies, the flight of the Catholic middle class and the Catholic working class from Boston has continued. By the time Mayor Menino completes his fourth full term in January 2010, the Catholics of Boston, who once comprised a 72% majority, will likely be reduced, for the first time in more than a century, to the status of a minority in this historically Catholic city. (Catholic  Action League Documentation.)

Unfortunately for Mr. C. Joseph Doyle, who is to be commended for compiling such a truly extensive list of Thomas Menino’s warfare against the Catholic Faith, the false religion of conciliarism is the religion of Antichrist, which makes men such as the conciliar “popes” and their “bishops” the true adversaries of the Catholic Church as it is they who have “reconciled” themselves with the very errors of Modernity that made possible the rise to power of men such as Edward Moore Kennedy and Thomas Menino and so many others in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts alone. Menino was enabled by Bernard “Cardinal” Law and Sean Patrick Cardinal O’Malley in life and celebrated by the latter in death. This kind of behavior is part and parcel of the “false gospel” of conciliarism, especially as it is incarnated today in the person of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and his commissars, which include, of course, the egregious Oscar Andres Maradiaga “Cardinal” Rodriguez (see Commissar of Antichrist Speaks, part one, Commissar of Antichrist Speaks, part two, Commissar of Antichrist Speaks, part three and Commissar of Antichrist Speaks, part four and Jorge and Oscar's False Gospel of False Joy, part one, Jorge and Oscar's False Gospel of False Joy, part two, Jorge and Oscar's False Gospel of False Joy, part three, Jorge and Oscar's False Gospel of False Joy, part four, Jorge and Oscar's False Gospel of False Joy, part five, Jorge and Oscar's False Gospel of False Joy, part six and Jorge and Oscar's False Gospel of False Joy, part seven).

Jorge’s Commissar Sean Patrick “Cardinal” O’Malley, O.F.M., Cap., is the same big, brave conciliar “prince” who went to a Talmudic synagogue to denounce Bishop Richard Williamson on February 23, 2009:

Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley, facing a group of local Jewish leaders upset by the Vatican's decision to lift the excommunication of a Holocaust denier, yesterday declared the Holocaust to be "the worst crime in human history" and pledged to move a Holocaust memorial to the new Braintree headquarters of the Archdiocese of Boston.

O'Malley and his top advisers on interfaith relations met for about 75 minutes late yesterday with about 20 Jewish leaders at the downtown office building that serves as the headquarters for many Jewish community organizations. Two Holocaust survivors, Israel Arbeiter and Stephan Ross, told the cardinal about their experiences during World War II, and the group then discussed the ramifications of Pope Benedict XVI's decision to lift the excommunication of four traditionalist bishops, including Richard Williamson, who denies that the Nazis used gas chambers to kill Jews.

In a telephone interview after the meeting, O'Malley was unusually forceful in his condemnation, not only of Holocaust denial, but of the leadership of the Society of St. Pius X, the ultraconservative and schismatic organization to which the four bishops belong.

"I sincerely believe that many of the Catholics who have gravitated toward this movement have done so because of nostalgia and a desire to participate in the old Mass, but in some of their leadership there's a broader agenda that's very poisonous," O'Malley said.

But the cardinal reiterated his support for the pope's decision to lift the excommunications, saying it opens the door for the Catholic church to reconcile with as many as 1.5 million members of the society, most of whom live in Europe. One of its congregations worships in Woburn.

"The Holy Father lifted this excommunication unaware of the statements that Bishop Williamson had made, and his intention was to try and begin a dialogue that might lead to reconciliation with this group," O'Malley said. "The alternative is that this group is going to evolve farther and farther away from the Catholic church and probably embrace more and more of an anti-Semitic agenda."

Jewish community leaders said they are particularly sensitive to anti-Semitism now because they perceive a rise in the behavior globally. They noted that there has been a very strong relationship between the Catholic and Jewish communities in Boston for several decades, and said they were pleased by yesterday's meeting.

"It was a good conversation, and obviously the next steps really have to come out of the Vatican," said Alan Ronkin, the deputy director of the Jewish Community Relations Council. "The cardinal understands the pain of the community, and we walked out of there feeling that both sides had been heard."

The current crisis presents the first real opportunity for O'Malley to publicly demonstrate leadership on Catholic-Jewish relations in Boston.

At yesterday's meeting, O'Malley said he had been planning to move a large outdoor menorah that commemorates the Holocaust from the grounds of the former chancery building in Brighton to the new pastoral center in Braintree. He suggested a Holocaust memorial service to mark the transfer. The Jewish community leaders agreed to participate in the ceremony.

O'Malley also said that he would travel this week to Washington for a memorial service for Rabbi Leon Klenicki, the longtime interfaith-affairs director for the Anti-Defamation League and a friend of the cardinal for the past several decades. O'Malley said that after the memorial service, he would meet with national leaders of Jewish organizations to discuss "improving communications."

O'Malley also said the pope's expected trip to Israel in May "will be a wonderful occasion for him to be able to clarify before the world the church's strong feelings about the Holocaust and our special friendship with the Jewish community." (Cardinal reaches out to Jewish leaders)

The worst crime in human history? It is necessary to examine this apostate's blasphemous statement in depth before examining others of his statements that were designed to curry favor with the people who deny the Sacred Divinity of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and who make war about His Holy Faith by promoting all manner of evils, including abortion, under cover of civil law and in every aspect of popular culture.

Such is the nature of the apostasy wrought by the ethos of conciliarism that a man who thinks himself to be a cardinal-elector of the Catholic Church and the archbishop of a major metropolitan see in the United States of America blurts out such a blasphemous remark without thinking for one moment that the worst crime in history is that which we committed by putting Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, the Son of God made Incarnate in Our Lady's Virginal and Immaculate Womb by the power of God the Holy Ghost, to death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday.

Our sins motivated the crowd on Good Friday to cry out "Give us Barabbas! Give us Barabbas!"

The weight of our sins caused Our Lord to fall three times as He walked the Via Dolorosa from Pontius Pilate's praetorium to Calvary.

Our sins prompted the Roman soldiers and the Pharisees to mock at Our Divine Redeemer as He was stripped of His garments and the unspeakably horrific wounds our sins imposed upon Him during His bloody scourging at the pillar were exposed for all to see.

Our sins helped to give force to the pounding of the nails into the flesh of Our Lord's hands and feet onto the gibbet of the Holy Cross, the very instrument upon which He wrought our salvation.

Our sins inspired the Pharisees to mock Him as He suffered on the wood of the Holy Cross to pay back in His Sacred Humanity what was owed to Him in His Infinity as God, the debt of our sins.

Our sins put God to death.

Deicide is the worst crime ever committed in human history. Deicide, "Cardinal" O'Malley, is the worst crime ever committed in human history?

What was the attitude of the One Who was killed on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday in this worse crime ever committed in human history? Did He hunt down His executioners to the far corners of the earth? Did He nurture hurt and resentment over the fact that He, the God-Man, had to come into contact in His Sacred Humanity with the very antithesis of His Sacred Divinity, sin?


This is what the God-Man said as our sins put Him to death in the greatest crime ever committed in human history:

And Jesus said: Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do. (Lk. 23: 34.)

Did Our Divine Redeemer revoke these words of forgiveness? Did He renege on these words? Was His forgiveness as fleeting as the morning dew? Did He, who knows the intentions of all hearts and the circumstances of all lives, "think better" of having forgiven us, His executioners, in light of the fact that we would fall into sins again and again even after we had availed ourselves of His ineffable Mercy in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance?


Yet it is that the only “sin” in conciliar circles is to offend anyone other than believing Catholics. Heretics and infidels must be praised. Public sinners must be celebrated and treated with “pastoral concern.”

Timothy Michael Dolan and Sean Patrick O’Malley are far from alone in this regard. Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who has posed for smiling photo-ops with one pro-abortion and pro-perversity politician after another, including Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., French President Francois Hollande, Argentine President Christine Kirchner and Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and embracing the pro-abortion President of Ecuador, Jose Alberto Mujica Cordano, an atheist, and the pro-abortion President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, who is a former conciliar "bishop," has provided those of the Bernardin school here in the United States of America with plenty of cover to indemnify pro-aborts who demonstrate their "care" about the poor by means of one statist program after another and by means of welcoming illegal immigrants and heralding a president who "changes the law" without Congressional authorization to do so.

This is, of course, the approach that has been taken by most of the conciliar “bishops” in the world even prior to Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s “election.” Now, however, even any criticism of men and women in public life who support grave evils is forbidden and they are to be welcomed to the “communion line” without exception.

Blase Cupich, who was installed as the conciliar “archbishop” of Chicago, Illinois, on November 18, 2014, the Feast of the Dedication of the Basilicas of Saints Peter and Paul, has certainly made his voice very clear in this regard, which is exactly as Jorge Mario Bergoglio desires it to be:

As Blase Cupich settles into his role as the archbishop of Chicago, some are wondering whether the man Pope Francis selected to head America's third-largest archdiocese will carry the pope's brand of inclusive Catholicism into American life.

One way he may differ from other leaders in the Catholic Church is by staying away from the issue of denying communion to Catholic politicians who support abortion rights.

"I would not use the Eucharist, or as they call it 'the communion rail,' as a place to have those discussions or a way in which people would be either excluded from the life of the church," he told CBS News' Norah O'Donnell in an interview that aired on "Face the Nation" Sunday. "The Eucharist is an opportunity of grace and conversion. It's also a time of forgiveness of sins, so my hope would be that grace would be instrumental in bringing people to the truth."

He also weighed in on immigration reform and gay marriage, two politicized issues that command a great deal of public attention.

He said Catholic leaders in the U.S. view President Obama's executive action to remove the threat of immigration for several million immigrants in the U.S. illegally as "an important first step" that could jump-start comprehensive immigration reform, which has the support of Catholic bishops across the country.

"My concern would be that we would have a policy and a procedure that would have a confidentially provisions because if people come out of the shadows and sign up and give their names and information, they want to make sure that is going to be protected in the future should that executive order change by another administration. So I think it's very important that this be done very carefully," he said. "But we applaud it as a good first step but more needs to be done and we encourage the president and members of Congress to get this work done."

And with same-sex marriage becoming legal in more and more states, Cupich said it is very important that those who oppose it not say or do anything that might provoke violence against gays and lesbians.

He shied away from condoning or condemning same-sex marriage itself, and instead said "the real issue" is whether states should have legislation "that supports, protects and upholds those people who take the risk of those people actually bringing those children into the world and preserving the human race."

Gay couples, grandparents and single people who adopt children can be good parents and need support, he said, "but I do think there's something unique about a man and a woman coming together and bringing children into the world and preserving the human race."

Cupich also weighed in on the so-called "Francis Effect," or the way that the new pope is shaping the church.

"People do have a sense that the church is listening to them and also that he is speaking to their deepest desires and if I can in some way emulate that example then I think I am probably on the right track," he said. "And I think when he continues to speak in that way he really is going to allow himself to speak to more difficult issues of the day, challenge us in terms of our economic policies, how we live our lives personally. But people really believe as though he is respecting them. And I think that is something I want to continue to do in my ministry." (Blase is Blasé About Child-Killing and Sodomy.)

Leaving aside the fact that there is no Sanctifying Grace to be found in a staging of the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service, the teaching of the Catholic Church clearly forbids anyone who is in a state of Mortal Sin to receive Holy Communion. One who receives Holy Communion in a state of Mortal Sin commits a sacrilege and makes an offering of the consecrated species that he has received to the devil.

Far from indemnifying Catholics in public life who support the execution of the innocent preborn, Pope Pius XI explained that pro-aborts must face the Avenger of innocent blood, Christ the King, at the moment of their Particular Judgment:

Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 30, 1930.)

Pope Pius XII was no less sparing in his condemnation of baby-killing and those who support it:

If there is another danger that threatens the family, not since yesterday, but long ago, which, however, at present, is growing visibly, it can become fatal [to societies], that is, the attack and the disruption of the fruit of conjugal morality.

We have, in recent years, taken every opportunity to expose the one or the other essential point of the moral law, and more recently to indicate it as a whole, not only by refuting the errors that corrupt it, but also showing in a positive sense, the office the importance, the value for the happiness of the spouses, children and all family, for stability and the greater social good from their homes up to the State and the Church itself.

At the heart of this doctrine is that marriage is an institution at the service of life. In close connection with this principle, we, according to the constant teaching of the Church, have illustrated a argument that it is not only one of the essential foundations of conjugal morality, but also of social morality in general: namely, that the direct attack innocent human life, as a means to an end - in this case the order to save another life - is illegal.

Innocent human life, whatever his condition, is always inviolate from the first instance of its existence and it can never be attacked voluntarily. This is a fundamental right of human beings. A fundamental value is the Christian conception of life must be respected as valid for the life still hidden in the womb against direct abortion and against all innocent human life thereafter. There can be no direct murders of a child before, during and after childbirth. As established may be the legal distinction between these different stages of development life born or unborn, according to the moral law, all direct attacks on inviolable human life are serious and illegal.

This principle applies to the child's life, like that of mother's. Never, under any circumstances, has the Church has taught that the life of child must be preferred to that of the mother. It would be wrong to set the issue with this alternative: either the child's life or that of mother. No, nor the mother's life, nor that of her child, can be subjected to an act of direct suppression. For the one side and the other the need can be only one: to make every effort to save the life of both, mother and child (see Pious XI Encycl. Casti Connubii, 31 dec. 1930, Acta Ap. Sedis vol. 22, p.. 562-563).

It is one of the most beautiful and noble aspirations of medicine trying ever new ways to ensure both their lives. What if, despite all the advances of science, still remain, and will remain in the future, a doctor says that the mother is going to die unless here child is killed in violation of God's commandment: Thou shalt not kill!  We must strive until the last moment to help save the child and the mother without attacking either as we bow before the laws of nature and the dispositions of Divine Providence.

But - one may object - the mother's life, especially of a mother of a numerous family, is incomparably greater than a value that of an unborn child. The application of the theory of balance of values to the matter which now occupies us has already found acceptance in legal discussions. The answer to this nagging objection is not difficult. The inviolability of the life of an innocent person does not depend by its greater or lesser value. For over ten years, the Church has formally condemned the killing of the estimated life as "worthless', and who knows the antecedents that provoked such a sad condemnation, those who can ponder the dire consequences that would be reached, if you want to measure the inviolability of innocent life at its value, you must well appreciate the reasons that led to this arrangement.

Besides, who can judge with certainty which of the two lives is actually more valuable? Who knows which path will follow that child and at what heights it can achieve and arrive at during his life? We compare Here are two sizes, one of whom nothing is known. We would like to cite an example in this regard, which may already known to some of you, but that does not lose some of its evocative value.

It dates back to 1905. There lived a young woman of noble family and even more noble senses, but slender and delicate health. As a teenager, she had been sick with a small apical pleurisy, which appeared healed; when, however, after contracting a happy marriage, she felt a new life blossoming within her, she felt ill and soon there was a special physical pain that dismayed that the two skilled health professionals, who watched  her with loving care. That old scar of the pleurisy had been awakened and, in the view of the doctors, there was no time to lose to save this gentle lady from death. The concluded that it was necessary to proceed without delay to an abortion.

Even the groom agreed. The seriousness of the case was very painful. But when the obstetrician attending to the mother announced their resolution to proceed with an abortion, the mother, with firm emphasis, "Thank you for your pitiful tips, but I can not truncate the life of my child! I can not, I can not! I feel already throbbing in my breast, it has the right to live, it comes from God must know God and to love and enjoy it." The husband asked, begged, pleaded, and she remained inflexible, and calmly awaited the event.

The child was born regularly, but immediately after the health of the mother went downhill. The outbreak spread to the lungs and the decay became progressive. Two months later she went to extremes, and she saw her little girl growing very well one who had grown very healthy. The mother looked at her robust baby and saw his sweet smile, and then she quietly died.

Several years later there was in a religious institute a very young sister, totally dedicated to the care and education of children abandoned, and with eyes bent on charges with a tender motherly love. She loved the tiny sick children and as if she had given them life. She was the daughter of the sacrifice, which now with her big heart has spread much love among the children of the destitute. The heroism of the intrepid mother was not in vain! (See Andrea Majocchi. " Between burning scissors," 1940, p.. 21 et seq.). But we ask: Is Perhaps the Christian sense, indeed even purely human, vanished in this point of no longer being able to understand the sublime sacrifice of the mother and the visible action of divine Providence, which made quell'olocausto born such a great result? (Pope Pius XII, Address to Association of Large Families, November 26, 1951; I used Google Translate to translate this address from the Italian as it is found at AAS Documents, p. 855; you will have to scroll down to page 855, which takes some time, to find the address.)

Those who are aboard on Jorge’s Ship of Fools believe that the “better” world can be “created” and maintained absent a due subordination of men and their nations to the teaching offices of the Catholic Church in all that pertains to the good of souls. Similarly, Captain Bergoglio and his officers and seamen believe that it is not necessary for men to have belief in, access to and cooperation with Sanctifying Grace to live virtuously, that all is required is do “good.”

The reality, though, is that unrepentant Mortal Sins impede the pursuit of the common temporal good, which must be undertaken in light of man’s Last End—the possession of the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity in Heaven, and make men and their nations enemies of Christ the King and of their own social order. Silvio Cardinal Antoniano noted this very clearly in the latter part of the Sixteenth Century:

The more closely the temporal power of a nation aligns itself with the spiritual, and the more it fosters and promotes the latter, by so much the more it contributes to the conservation of the commonwealth. For it is the aim of the ecclesiastical authority by the use of spiritual means, to form good Christians in accordance with its own particular end and object; and in doing this it helps at the same time to form good citizens, and prepares them to meet their obligations as members of a civil society. This follows of necessity because in the City of God, the Holy Roman Catholic Church, a good citizen and an upright man are absolutely one and the same thing. How grave therefore is the error of those who separate things so closely united, and who think that they can produce good citizens by ways and methods other than those which make for the formation of good Christians. For, let human prudence say what it likes and reason as it pleases, it is impossible to produce true temporal peace and tranquillity by things repugnant or opposed to the peace and happiness of eternity. (Silvio Cardinal Antoniano, as quoted by Pope Pius XI in Divini Illius Magistri, December 31, 1929.)

This means nothing to Jorge and his crew aboard the conciliar ship of fools. Nothing whatsoever.

As noted in At The Mercy of the New Herods several days ago, those who are steeped in personal sins of one sort or another, including the sins of heresy, which Jorge and his crewmates have endorsed and propagated with such ready and wanton abandon, must strive to show the world how much “better” they are than the “narrow-minded” “bigots” who cling, perhaps even “bitterly,” to “outdated” beliefs and practices that are said to be lacking “relevance” in this time of supposed “mercy.”

One of the ways that Jorge is trying to demonstrate his own “goodness” is to make opposition to “global warming” a cornerstone of his false “pontificate.” In this, however, Jorge is only bringing this issue to the forefront after his predecessors in the conciliar church have discussed it peripherally now and again.

Indeed, Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI showed forth his own “inner Teilhard de Chardin” many times during his own false “pontificate,” including in 2009 when he told us to “listen to the earth”:

“We all see that today man can destroy the foundation of his existence, his Earth,” he said.

“We cannot simply do what we want with this Earth of ours, with what has been entrusted to us,” said the Pope, who has been spending his time reading and walking in the scenic landscape bordering Austria.

World religions have shown a growing interest in the environment, particularly the ramifications of climate change.

The Pope, leader of some 1.1 billion Roman Catholics worldwide, said: “We must respect the interior laws of creation, of this Earth, to learn these laws and obey them if we want to survive.”

“This obedience to the voice of the Earth is more important for our future happiness ... than the desires of the moment.

"Our Earth is talking to us and we must listen to it and decipher its message if we want to survive,” he said.

Last April the Vatican sponsored a scientific conference on climate change to underscore the role that religious leaders around the world could play in reminding people that wilfully damaging the environment is sinful. (Ratzinger and Evolution.)

As I noted almost exactly two years ago now, the earth is not the foundation of human existence.

God is the foundation of human existence. Neither the earth or anything on it, including the human beings whose first parents, Adam and Eve, were created specifically and specially by God Himself, exists without having been willed in to existence by God, Who is Omnipotence. The earth was created by God to be the temporal home of His visible creation, including the crowning glory of His creative work, man, who was given the power by Him to use the earth responsible for his good purposes. Man does not exist for the earth. The earth exists to serve man as he seeks to save his immortal soul as a member of the Catholic Church and thus return to his true home, Heaven, in the presence of the Beatific Vision of God: Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.

God created the earth. He alone has the power to end its existence. Those who contend that man can destroy the earth demean the omnipotence of God and do not understand Catholic teaching on eschatology.

Listen to the "Voice of the Earth"? We are not pantheists, thank you. We listen to the voice of God, Who has spoken to us in Divine Revelation, which consists of Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, which speaks to us of how God created the world. Even honest secular scientists have disproved evolutionism as the prototype of junk science (see the late Mr. Gerard Keane's masterful collection of data on this subject in Creation Rediscovered, TAN Books and Publishers). This is beyond any serious argument at this late date. The facts of true science are all arrayed against evolutionism.

Modernist theologians in the Catholic Church, not wanting to be considered "irresponsible scholars" by their peers in the Protestant and secular worlds. sought to "reconcile" the Catholic Faith with the junk science of evolutionism, seeking to use all manner of false exegetical methods to deconstruct the Book of Genesis of its plain meaning. Consider just one sentence from Pope Saint Pius X's Pascendi Dominci Gregis, September 8, 1907:

Lastly, maintaining the theory that faith must be subject to science, they continuously and openly rebuke the Church on the ground that she resolutely refuses to submit and accommodate her dogmas to the opinions of philosophy; while they, on their side, having for this purpose blotted out the old theology, endeavor to introduce a new theology which shall support the aberrations of philosophers. (Pope Saint Pius X, Pascendi Dominci Gregis, September 8, 1907.)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s upcoming encyclical letter on the ideology of environmentalism, which will place special emphasis on “global warming” (it’s not very warm at this time where we live!), is just a continuation of the pantheistic work of his predecessors. It is necessary for those who are in rebellion against God to create a sterile substitute for the true Faith, and pantheism fits the bill just as well as anything else.

Yes, of course, there is pollution of the air, land, and waterways. This is undeniable. This pollution, which is not tied directly to "global warming" despite the claims of junk scientists, is the result of the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King wrought by the Protestant Revolt and institutionalized by Judeo-Masonry that has given birth to Calvinist materialism in the West and Marxist dialectical materialism in many other parts of the world that have given men license to do as they please for the sake of personal and/or national gain without regard to the consequences.

Absent a conversion to the true Faith and the use of the things of this earth in due proportion and with a just care for the needs of man according to the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law, no amount of even justifiable measures to limit pollution will ever achieve their goals as men and their nations must first understand that the more that sin abounds in the world will be the more that they must be chastised by God with all manner of calamities in order to prompt them to convert and to make reparation for their sins. Part of the chastisement that men must suffer for their promotion of all manner of vile evils under cover of the civil law and abroad in popular culture is the worsening of the physical environment in which they live. The stench of the physical world at present represents only a small degree of the stench of the souls of men who are steeped in one unrepentant sin after another.

I know. I know. This is utter madness to naturalists in the world and to Modernists in the counterfeit church of conciliarism. Such people do not think supernaturally and many revel in their lives of unrepentant sin very publicly sometimes..

I would entreat you, good readers, to consider how Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ Himself told Mother Mariana de Jesus Torres that the sins of men in Ecuador, a country favored with the visits of Our Lady of Good Success and ruled for twelve years (1859 to 1865 and 1869 to the time of assassination in 1875) by that great exemplar of the Social Reign of Christ the King, Gabriel Garcia Moreno, would diminish the luster of the sunsets in that country on the equator:

She saw that when this would happen, the beautiful dawn that each morning would break forth with refulgence over this land--so enchantingly spectacular that some persons would rise at daybreak just to see the day break--would lose some of its brilliance. Thus does earth reflect Heaven, and the earth's beauty and vitality diminish with sin and infidelity to grace. This favor of beautiful dawns should cease, Mother Mariana was given to understand, because the Republic [of Ecuador, which was then only a Spanish colony] would become corrupt and ungrateful for the benefits it received from God. (Marian Therese Horvat, Ph.D., Stories and Miracles of Our Lady of Good Success, Tradition in Action, Inc., 2002, p. 68.) 

Men must quit their sins and repent of them in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance. They must treat each other as they would treat Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Who was made Flesh in Our Lady's Virginal and Immaculate Womb, where He spent nine months growing to the point of His Nativity in poverty and anonymity in Bethlehem on Christmas Day.

No one can say that he loves Our Lord and yet supports His dismemberment mystically in the persons of innocent preborn children. And it is impossible to provide for any element of  the common temporal good on an enduring basis as long as the innocent preborn are attacked with legal impunity, as long as the Sovereignty of God over the sanctity and fecundity of marriage is denied by means of contraception, as long as perversity is promoted under the slogans of "diversity" and "human rights," as long as men live as though there is no true Church and that they do not have to face Christ the King as their Judge at the moment of their Particular Judgments.

Try as the lords of world, supported by the lords of conciliarism, might even with legitimate measures that fall within the realm of prudence and due proportion to improve the quality of the air and the land and the water, they will continue to fail miserably over the course of the long term as long as you prove yourselves to be rebels against Christ the King and to be contemptuous of the public honor due to His Most Blessed Mother, Mary our Immaculate Queen.

Environmentalism is nothing other than yet another weapon in the arsenal of statists, including socialists and out-and-out Communists, to restrict the legitimate liberty of individuals while moral evils are promote under cover of the civil law and celebrated widely throughout popular culture. The ideology of environmentalism is designed to make citizens more enslaved to national and supranational governing bodies than has been the case up to this point.

The late Dr. George O'Brien noted that Catholicism is the only means given us by God to know order and due proportion in our lives and in the larger life of our nations and the world:

There is one institution and one institution alone which is capable of supplying and enforcing the social ethic that is needed to revivify the world. It is an institution at once intra-national and international; an institution that can claim to pronounce infallibly on moral matters, and to enforce the observance of the its moral decrees by direct sanctions on the individual conscience of man; an institution which, while respecting and supporting the civil governments of nations, can claim to exist independently of them, and can insist that they shall not intrude upon the moral life or fetter the moral liberty of their citizens. Europe possessed such an institution in the Middle Ages; its dethronement was the unique achievement of the Reformation; and the injury inflicted by that dethronement has never since been repaired. (George O'Brien, An Essay on the Economic Effects of the Reformation, first published in 1923, republished by IHS press in 2003, p. 132.)

We are suffering the results of that dethronement and not even legitimate measures to limit pollution can undo the harm caused by the moral pollution let loose by the Protestant Revolution against the Divine Plan that God Himself personally instituted to effect man's return to Him through the Catholic Church.

Pope Saint Pius X speaks to the fools aboard Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s conciliar ship of apsostasy and, of course, to us all.

Listen to him:

Here we have, founded by Catholics, an inter-denominational association that is to work for the reform of civilization, an undertaking which is above all religious in character; for there is no true civilization without a moral civilization, and no true moral civilization without the true religion: it is a proven truth, a historical fact. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)  

Saint Vincent Ferrer, O.P., exhorted the Mohammedans and Jews and fallen-away Catholics to whom he preached in the Iberian Peninsula and southern France at the end of the Fourteenth and the beginning of the Fifteenth Centuries to convert lest they die, meaning that those who died outside of the bosom of the Catholic Church faced the prospect of eternal hellfire.

Similarly, we will all suffer the continuing effects of mankind's rebellion against Christ the King as He has revealed Himself to us through the Catholic Church unless men and their nations convert. Not even the physical world around us is exempt from the effects of our sins and our refusal to make reparation to them as the consecrated slaves of Our Lord through the Immaculate Heart of Mary, eager to pray as many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permit.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio does not believe a word of this. Neither do his shipmates about the conciliar ship of fools. We must never lose sight of the necessity of viewing the world and all things in it through the eyes of the Catholic Faith at all times as we try as best we can to fulfill Our Lady's Fatima Message in our own lives on a daily basis in our homes that are consecrated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and of the Immaculate Heart whose triumph is tied to the fulfillment of that Fatima Message.

Penance is indeed better than ever in the year of Our Lord 2015.

Let us lift high the Cross of the Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, in this New Year, beginning today, the Feast of His Circumcision, the day on which His Most Precious Blood was shed for the first time.

Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Our Lady, Mother of God, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us

Saint Stephen the Protomartyr, pray for us.

The Holy Innocents, pray for us.