After the Meeting of the Killer B's--Biden and Bergoglio

Well, the long-anticipated lovefest between the Killer “B’s­­—the pro-abortion, pro sodomite, pro-statist, pro-repression of “dissenting” convictions, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., and the pro-abortion politician, enabler and apologist for sodomy, apostate, and killer of souls, Jorge Mario Bergoglio—has gone as was predicted in my Keep This Up Jorge, and God Will Never Forgive YOU! And the “conservatives” who believe that the counterfeit church of conciliarism is the Catholic Church are howling and baying at the moon

Look, it took me long enough to come to realization of the true state of the Church Militant. I am not about to cast stones at those whose eyes have not yet been opened to the truth.

However, there does come a time when it is not unreasonable, objectively speaking, to ask how much more proof does one need to understand the following words of Saint Paul the Apostle have come true since the emergence of Angelo Roncalli on the balcony of the Basilica of Saint Peter on October 28, 1958, the Feast of Saints Simon and Jude. Readers of this site do not need another recitation of all that the conciliar “popes” and their “bishops” have done to attack the Catholic Faith, starting with a direct, frontal attack on the nature of dogmatic truth, which is nothing other than on attack on the very essence of God’s immutability, with what has become a frank endorsement of dogmatic evolutionism, which is a cornerstone of Modernism, and has included public prayers with Protestants and the Orthodox as well as the rank heresy that the Old Covenant was not abrogated by the New and Eternal Covenant that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ instituted at the Last Supper on Maundy Thursday and ratified by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday as the earth quaked and the curtain in the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom.

For present purposes, therefore, it will suffice to note that adversary, who is busy at work these days in the anti-Incarnational world of Modernity and in the counterfeit church of conciliarism of which he was and remains the principal architect and guiding “spirit,” is using Jorge Mario Bergoglio to make a mockery of what most, whether Catholic or non-Catholic, alive today thinks is the papacy. Even some so-called evangelical, fundamentalist, and non-denominational Protestants are repelled by Bergoglio’s “outreach” to pro-abortion politicians, his constant enabling of the homosexual collective and endless screeds on behalf of the “global reset of humanity,” which has the Argentine Apostate’s full endorsement to such an extent that he appointed the pro-abortion apostle of depopulation, Jeffrey Sachs, to Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences and permitted a supposedly “private” conference that featured speakers who promote “transhumanism” (which is an important goal of the gene therapy jabs, aka “vaccines) that is gnostic to its very core to take place within the walls of the Occupied Vatican on Saturday, October 23, 2021 (the Feast of the Holy Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, that is particular to the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer and to the city of Naples, Italy). See, for example,  Transhuman code | A new initiative that highlights the growing intersection of humanity and technology, its impact on our daily lives, and long-term implications.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a walking, talking scandal, who let the decrepit, morally and criminally corrupt, venal demagogue from Wilmington, Delaware, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., do his bidding for him to the ground out from beneath the feet of those American “bishops” who want to prohibit the Wilmington Cipher from receiving what purports to be Holy Communion within the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical abomination:


VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — After their much-anticipated meeting in the Vatican, President Joe Biden said to reporters Pope Francis had told him to “keep receiving Communion,” despite the politician’s continued, public support for abortion and LGBT ideology.

Biden asserted that the pontiff “was happy I’m a good Catholic,” and that the president should “keep receiving Communion.” (BREAKING: Pro-abortion Joe Biden says Pope Francis told him to 'keep receiving Communion'.)

This is very interesting.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not a Catholic. He is a heretic who has mocked the truths of the Holy Faith, blasphemed both Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and His Most Blessed Mother, and who has enabled hardened sinners aplenty in the name of “accompaniment.” Jorge Mario Bergoglio hates believing Catholics. He hates Catholic doctrine. He even hates the fact that there is a conciliar code of canon law. It thus natural for him to call a reprobate supporter and enabler of the daily slaughter of the innocent preborn by chemical and surgical means to be a “good Catholic.” Bergoglio would have called Martin Luther and Henry VIII “good Catholics” if he had met them after their break from the true Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order.

Although it is a slogan that used to be featured on bumper stickers during the days of the “pro-life” “pope,” Karol Josef Wojtyla/John Paul II, it is worth repeating once again that “No One Can Be Catholic and Pro-Choice.” Even that slogan is a misnomer as no one has the right from God to choose to do what is evil. One has the ability to do what is evil. However, no one has the moral authority to do so. No one is morally free to choose to sin, and it is an excommunicable sin to support the slaughter of the innocent preborn, whether by surgical or chemical means, and it is also a sin to support the sin of Sodom or to enable it in any manner whatsoever.


It gets worse:

The 75-minute, private meeting was described by Biden as “wonderful,” a word which was echoed by his wife in her own comments made to the press, before meeting French first lady Brigitte Macron in Rome.

Pope Francis and Biden met Friday, October 29, in a much-hyped meeting, as media outlets speculated whether the Pope would speak to Biden about his staunchly pro-abortion position.

Early press releases from both the White House and the Holy See Press Office briefly noted that the conversation revealed around the “world’s poor,” as well as the “climate crisis” and issues regarding COVID-19 and refugees.

Biden “thanked His Holiness for his advocacy for the world’s poor and those suffering from hunger, conflict, and persecution,” stated the White House. “He lauded Pope Francis’ leadership in fighting the climate crisis, as well as his advocacy to ensure the pandemic ends for everyone through vaccine sharing and an equitable global economic recovery.”

‘Keep receiving Communion’

As for whether the issue of abortion came up during the meeting, Biden said “it didn’t.” (BREAKING: Pro-abortion Joe Biden says Francis told him to 'keep receiving Communion'.)

Interjection Number One:

Anyone who thought that Jorge Mario Bergoglio would speak to Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., about abortion is living in as much a fantasy world as those thought that the Argentine Apostate was going to speak to Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro about the American genocide of the preborn when the two met at the Vatican on March 27, 2013, the Feast of Saint John Damascene, and again on Wednesday, September 23, 2013, the Feast of Pope Linus I and the Commemoration of Saint Thecla. Indeed, both the Biden White House and the Vatican made it clear in advance that the matter would not be addressed when the two apostates met today, and it is thus absolutely no surprise that they talked about climate change and “global vaccine sharing” without mentioning a word about slaughter of the preborn.

For all of Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s chatter now and again about terrible abortion is, the practical truth is that he does not believe that those who support it in public life, whether Catholic or non-Catholic, are disqualified from holding any office of public trust, whether elected or appointed.

The late Dr. Charles E. Rice, one of the foremost contemporary defenders of the Natural Law, who was a professor of law at Fordham University and then at Notre Dame Law School for over four decades, elaborated on the disqualification of pro-aborts to hold public office in an article he wrote for The Wanderer on August 27, 1998, at a time that a sincere associate editor of that newspaper was running against then United States Senator Alfonse M. D’Amato for the senatorial nomination of the New York State Right to Life Party:

Sen. D'Amato will face a pro-abortion Democratic opponent in the fall. While a voter could morally vote for a pro-abortion candidate who is less objectionable on abortion than his opponent, he should not. The tactic of voting for the less objectionable of two pro-abortion candidates is a tactic of incremental surrender. The incremental strategy of accepting the legalization of abortion in some cases concedes that some innocent human life is negotiable after all. The pro-death movement is a guaranteed winner against an opposition that qualifies its own position by conceding that there are some innocent human beings whom it will allow to be directly and intentionally killed. That approach in practice has mortgaged the pro-life effort to the interests and judgment of what Paul Johnson called "the great human scourge of the 20th century, the professional politician." (Modern Times, 1985, p. 510.)

When a politician says he favors legalized abortion in life of the mother, rape and incest, or other cases, he affirms the nonpersonhood of the unborn child by proposing that he be subjected to execution at the discretion of another. The politician's pro-life rhetoric will be drowned out by the loud and clear message of his position, that he concedes that the law can validly tolerate the intentional killing of innocent human beings. Apart from exceptions, of course, Sen. D'Amato is objectionable as well for some of his other stands on abortion and for his positions on other issues, including especially the homosexual issue.

Pro-lifers could increase their political impact if they were single-issue voters, treating abortion as an absolutely disqualifying issue. Any candidate who believes that the law should treat any innocent human beings as nonpersons by tolerating their execution is unworthy to hold any public office, whether President, trustee of a mosquito abatement district, or senator. (Dr. Charles E. Rice, "Pro-Life Reflections on Sen. D'Amato, The Wanderer, August 27, 1998.)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio believes not a word of this of course, and thus he is perfectly content to let the likes of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., and Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi send themselves to hell, along with himself, I should add, as one of the duties of a man who thinks himself to be a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter is to admonish the sinner, while they sing the same old “I am personally opposed to abortion but can’t impose my views on others” canard that Biden himself was among the first to sing back in 1973 following the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States of America in the cases of Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, January 22, 1973. The following refutation of such specious reasoning made by Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885, has been flushed down the conciliar memory hole along with almost everything else having to do with the true Catholic Faith prior to the death of Pope Pius XII on October 9, 1958, the Feast of Saints Dionysius, Rusticus, and Eleutherius:

Hence, lest concord be broken by rash charges, let this be understood by all, that the integrity of Catholic faith cannot be reconciled with opinions verging on naturalism or rationalism, the essence of which is utterly to do away with Christian institutions and to install in society the supremacy of man to the exclusion of God. Further, it is unlawful to follow one line of conduct in private life and another in public, respecting privately the authority of the Church, but publicly rejecting it; for this would amount to joining together good and evil, and to putting man in conflict with himself; whereas he ought always to be consistent, and never in the least point nor in any condition of life to swerve from Christian virtue. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)

Unfortunately, not even “conservative” voices within the “hierarchy” of the counterfeit church of conciliarism are the least bit familiar with the Social Teaching of our true popes and are thus left to do battle with an antipope who they think is a true Successor of Saint Peter. No one seems to notice that the respect and filial submission due a true Sovereign Pontiff has been eclipsed by rebellion and disobedience nor that it would never be necessary to rebel against a true pope as he would defend the Faith and refuse to suborn Catholics in public life who had expelled themselves from the bosom of Holy Mother Church for their suborning sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, including willful murder and the sin of Sodom.

This spirit of outright rebellion is quite evident in the rest of the LifesiteNews report about the meeting of the Killer B’s, Biden and Bergoglio. I will interject at various points:

LifeSiteNews contacted Matteo Bruni, director of the Holy See Press Office, for comment on the matter, but did not hear back.

The Catholic News Agency reported that Bruni had told reporters, “I would consider it a private conversation, and it [the Vatican’s press release] is limited to what was said in the public statement.”

Theorizing after the event, Brother Martin of the Oblates of St. Augustine, suggested, “If the Pope told Biden to *continue* to receive Communion, then abortion *was* brought up. The Pope approves a Catholic to have an active part in legislation permitting infanticide with no canonical penalties whatsoever.” (BREAKING: Pro-abortion Joe Biden says Francis told him to 'keep receiving Communion'.)

Interjection Number Two:

This theorizing is without foundation.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perfectly capable of reaffirming pro-abortion politicians in their access to receive what purports to be Holy Communion in the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service all on his own without saying anything explicitly about abortion.

As a reminder, Jorge Mario Bergoglio spoke about respecting human life before the Congress of the United States of America on Thursday, September 24, 2015, the Feast of Our Lady of Ransom, as then Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., and then Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, John Boehner (R-West Chester, Ohio), a Catholic, sat behind him as he, Bergoglio, proclaimed himself to be a defender of human life before pivoting to condemn the death penalty. I will reprise what I wrote at the time, starting first with Bergoglio’s remarks, which are double-indented:

This Rule points us in a clear direction.  Let us treat others with the same passion and compassion with which we want to be treated.  Let us seek for others the same possibilities which we seek for ourselves.  Let us help others to grow, as we would like to be helped ourselves.  In a word, if we want security, let us give security; if we want life, let us give life; if we want opportunities, let us provide opportunities.  The yardstick we use for others will be the yardstick which time will use for us.  The Golden Rule also reminds us of our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every stage of its development. (Bergoglio's Address to U.S. Congress.)

Primal Scream Comment:



Christ the King will judge us at the hour of our death, not “time,” and He will judge us by the standard of our being Catholics in a state of Sanctifying Grace who adhere to everything contained in the Sacred Deposit of Faith.

What a naturalist!’

All right, back to his segue to the death penalty:

This conviction has led me, from the beginning of my ministry, to advocate at different levels for the global abolition of the death penalty.  I am convinced that this way is the best, since every life is sacred, every human person is endowed with an inalienable dignity, and society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes.  Recently my brother bishops here in the United States renewed their call for the abolition of the death penalty.  Not only do I support them, but I also offer encouragement to all those who are convinced that a just and necessary punishment must never exclude the dimension of hope and the goal of rehabilitation. (Bergoglio's Address to U.S. Congress.)

Reiterating what has been said before:

To avoid using the word “abortion” was clearly evil.

Why the subtlety when he was so direct on the death penalty, on the “rights” of those who enter nations illegally, on income inequality, on the need for “dialogue” on everything under the sun?

Bergoglio is oblivious to the horrors of the killing of the innocent preborn. His silence before lawmakers yesterday stands in sharp contrast to the following oft-quoted passage found in Pope Pius XI’s Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930:

Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.)

Really, what more can be said? The man has not a Catholic bone in his body. Not one.  (For a conservative estimate of the number of preborn babies killed by surgical means each day, please see Number of Abortions Each Day.)

Additionally, as noted in my summary yesterday, the morality of the death penalty, imposed by a duly constituted authority against those convicted of heinous crimes after the administration of the due process of law, is founded in the Natural Law, something was taught by none other than the Angelic Doctor himself, Saint Thomas Aquinas:

I answer that, As stated above (Article 1), it is lawful to kill dumb animals, in so far as they are naturally directed to man's use, as the imperfect is directed to the perfect. Now every part is directed to the whole, as imperfect to perfect, wherefore every part is naturally for the sake of the whole. For this reason we observe that if the health of the whole body demands the excision of a member, through its being decayed or infectious to the other members, it will be both praiseworthy and advantageous to have it cut away. Now every individual person is compared to the whole community, as part to whole. Therefore if a man be dangerous and infectious to the community, on account of some sin, it is praiseworthy and advantageous that he be killed in order to safeguard the common good, since "a little leaven corrupteth the whole lump" (1 Corinthians 5:6).

Reply to Objection 1. Our Lord commanded them to forbear from uprooting the cockle in order to spare the wheat, i.e. the good. This occurs when the wicked cannot be slain without the good being killed with them, either because the wicked lie hidden among the good, or because they have many followers, so that they cannot be killed without danger to the good, as Augustine says (Contra Parmen. iii, 2). Wherefore our Lord teaches that we should rather allow the wicked to live, and that vengeance is to be delayed until the last judgment, rather than that the good be put to death together with the wicked. When, however, the good incur no danger, but rather are protected and saved by the slaying of the wicked, then the latter may be lawfully put to death.

Reply to Objection 2. According to the order of His wisdom, God sometimes slays sinners forthwith in order to deliver the good, whereas sometimes He allows them time to repent, according as He knows what is expedient for His elect. This also does human justice imitate according to its powers; for it puts to death those who are dangerous to others, while it allows time for repentance to those who sin without grievously harming others.

Reply to Objection 3. By sinning man departs from the order of reason, and consequently falls away from the dignity of his manhood, in so far as he is naturally free, and exists for himself, and he falls into the slavish state of the beasts, by being disposed of according as he is useful to others. This is expressed in Psalm 48:21: "Man, when he was in honor, did not understand; he hath been compared to senseless beasts, and made like to them," and Proverbs 11:29: "The fool shall serve the wise." Hence, although it be evil in itself to kill a man so long as he preserve his dignity, yet it may be good to kill a man who has sinned, even as it is to kill a beast. For a bad man is worse than a beast, and is more harmful, as the Philosopher states (Polit. i, 1 and Ethic. vii, 6).  (Summa Theologiae.)

Pope Saint Pius V, a Dominican and hence a student of Saint Thomas Aquinas, also understood that the civil state had the immutable precepts of the Natural Law to impose the death penalty upon malefactors found guilty of heinous crimes after the due process of law, whether ecclesiastical or civil, had been followed and run its course. It is no more possible for any true pope of the Catholic Church to declare the death penalty as "unnecessary" and "in opposition to the Gospel message" as Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II did in a message on the "World Day of the Sick" in 2003, than it is to deny an article contained in the Sacred Deposit of Faith. (As found in  Polluting the Atmosphere With the Smoke of Antichrist, part three.)


A thousand times yes.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perfectly capable of reassuring Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., as “good Catholic” and telling him to keep “receiving communion” all on his own as he used the hapless fool with hair plugs that went as bad over time as he has gone bad over time to send a very firm message to the conservative “bishops” in the United States of America. This was Bergoglio’s “Who am I to judge?” moment about pro-aborts Catholics in public life. The Argentine Apostate knew exactly was he was doing, and he is taking, as per usual, great diabolical glee in cutting the conservative American “bishops” off at the kneecaps.

I will return now to the LifeSiteNews commentary:

The absence of any live video stream of the meeting was notable, for while the meeting was initially scheduled to have live press coverage, in line with Vatican norms for meetings with heads of state, one day before the Vatican announced that no press coverage would be permitted, providing no clear reason for the sudden change and causing consternation among the Vatican press corps.

Pope is ‘damning Biden and himself’

News of the Pope’s alleged comments have caused instant consternation amongst Catholics, while the mainstream media simultaneously heralded the event as being one between a politician and a Pope who has provided “familial comfort and ideological inspiration to a President whose faith has long underpinned his public and private lives.”

The news was welcomed by heretical group “Women’s Ordination Conference,” who shared America Magazine’s report on Twitter with the hashtag “Who would Jesus deny.”

In contrast, Br. Martin wrote briefly: “When the Divine Moral Law is treated beneath the authority of any bishop, he has placed himself above God.”

Interjection Number Three:

A true pope would never do such a thing.

The LifeSiteNews article gets worse:

Speaking to LifeSiteNews, Matt Gaspers, managing editor of Catholic Family News, stated: “Today in the Vatican, the deep state warmly embraced the deep church, to borrow terms frequently used by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò.”

“The former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States has aptly described the villainous relationship between Joe Biden and Pope Francis on several occasions, but perhaps most succinctly in his interview with Steve Bannon (Jan. 1, 2021), stating that ‘Biden is the equivalent of Bergoglio.’ Ultimately, as His Excellency told Italian Vaticanista Marco Tosatti (Sept. 12, 2020): ‘The self-styled Catholic Joe Biden, who supports partial-birth abortion, i.e., infanticide, and who even before Obama supported gender ideology and celebrated the ‘marriage’ of two men, is not Catholic. Period.’”

“I wholeheartedly agree and absolutely condemn the diabolical notion that Biden is ‘a good Catholic’ and ‘should continue receiving Communion,’” added Gaspers.

Interjection Number Four:

Of course, Biden and Bergoglio are joined at the hip.

This is news?

A true pope would never enable a pro-abortion politician.

A true pope does not do the work of the devil.

Boys and girls in the “conservative” wing of the conciliar church, your “popes” have been antipopes and your supposedly “pro-life” “pope,” Karol Josef Wojtyla/John Paul II, continued Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonia Maria Montini/Paul VI’s overthrow of the ends proper to marriage and even codified this revolution against both the Divine and Natural Laws in his 1983 “code of canon law.” Consider the contrast between the 1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of the Catholic Church and the 1983 code of canon law of the counterfeit church of conciliarism:

856. The primary object of marriage is the procreation and education of offspring; the secondary purpose is mutual assistance and the remedy of concupiscence. (This can be found on page 205 of the following link, which is the 1917 Code of Canon Law in English:  1917 Pio-Benedictine Code of Canon Law.)

Here is what the conciliar revolutionaries teach:

Can.  1055 §1. The matrimonial covenant, by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring, has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament between the baptized. (Canon 1055.1.)

The entire work of the counterfeit church of conciliarism has been diabolical.

All right, to the next to final excerpt from the LifeSiteNews article:

U.K. commentator and author Deacon Nick Donnelly was equally critical of the news, stating that the Pope “tells pro-abortion Biden to keep receiving Holy Communion. Thereby, damning Biden and himself.”

EWTN host Raymond Arroyo noted how the Pope was going “against his own US bishops on this (and canon law). Interesting to see how this plays out…” Arroyo also noted, “The major caveat is: did the Pope actually say this?”

Interjection Number Five:

To paraphrase the coarse stumble-bum and mumble-mouthed puppet of White House Chief of Staff Ronald Klain, “Come on, man.”

Raymond Arroyo, asking whether the “pope” actually told Biden that he was a “good Catholic” and to keep “on receiving communion” is rather stale at this late stage of things.

Bergoglio has let all manner of statements attributed to him by the atheist Eugenio Scalfari go entirely unchallenged and unrefuted. Matteo Brunei, Jorge’s current spokesflack, refused to comment on a “private” discussion. Bergoglio said what Biden attributed to him and Bergoglio said this to punch the conservative American “bishops” in the jaw.

We return now to the final part of the LifeSiteNews article:

Rhode Island’s Bishop Thomas Tobin was also swift to react, commenting that “I fear that the Church has lost its prophetic voice. Where are the John the Baptists who will confront the Herods of our day?” Tobin had previously written to the Pope on Twitter, asking him to “challenge” Biden for his support for abortion, which “is an embarrassment for the Church and a scandal to the world.”

Final Interjection:

“Bishop” Tobin, you mean well.

However, the Catholic Church is in the errant, spotless mystical bride of her Divine Founder, Invisible Head and Mystical Spouse, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. She can never lose her prophetic voice as this is part of her Divine Constitution.

The Catholic Church makes no terms with error:

As for the rest, We greatly deplore the fact that, where the ravings of human reason extend, there is somebody who studies new things and strives to know more than is necessary, against the advice of the apostle. There you will find someone who is overconfident in seeking the truth outside the Catholic Church, in which it can be found without even a light tarnish of error. Therefore, the Church is called, and is indeed, a pillar and foundation of truth. You correctly understand, venerable brothers, that We speak here also of that erroneous philosophical system which was recently brought in and is clearly to be condemned. This system, which comes from the contemptible and unrestrained desire for innovation, does not seek truth where it stands in the received and holy apostolic inheritance. Rather, other empty doctrines, futile and uncertain doctrines not approved by the Church, are adopted. Only the most conceited men wrongly think that these teachings can sustain and support that truth. (Pope Gregory XVI, Singulari Nos, May 25, 1834.)

Just as Christianity cannot penetrate into the soul without making it better, so it cannot enter into public life without establishing order. With the idea of a God Who governs all, Who is infinitely Wise, Good, and Just, the idea of duty seizes upon the consciences of men. It assuages sorrow, it calms hatred, it engenders heroes. If it has transformed pagan society--and that transformation was a veritable resurrection--for barbarism disappeared in proportion as Christianity extended its sway, so, after the terrible shocks which unbelief has given to the world in our days, it will be able to put that world again on the true road, and bring back to order the States and peoples of modern times. But the return of Christianity will not be efficacious and complete if it does not restore the world to a sincere love of the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. In the Catholic Church Christianity is Incarnate. It identifies Itself with that perfect, spiritual, and, in its own order, sovereign society, which is the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ and which has for Its visible head the Roman Pontiff, successor of the Prince of the Apostles. It is the continuation of the mission of the Savior, the daughter and the heiress of His Redemption. It has preached the Gospel, and has defended it at the price of Its blood, and strong in the Divine assistance and of that immortality which has been promised it, It makes no terms with error but remains faithful to the commands which  it has received, to carry the doctrine of Jesus Christ to the uttermost limits of the world and to the end of time, and to protect it in its inviolable integrity. Legitimate dispenser of the teachings of the Gospel it does not reveal itself only as the consoler and Redeemer of souls, but It is still more the internal source of justice and charity, and the propagator as well as the guardian of true liberty, and of that equality which alone is possible here below. In applying the doctrine of its Divine Founder, It maintains a wise equilibrium and marks the true limits between the rights and privileges of society. The equality which it proclaims does not destroy the distinction between the different social classes. It keeps them intact, as nature itself demands, in order to oppose the anarchy of reason emancipated from Faith, and abandoned to its own devices. The liberty which it gives in no wise conflicts with the rights of truth, because those rights are superior to the demands of liberty. Not does it infringe upon the rights of justice, because those rights are superior to the claims of mere numbers or power. Nor does it assail the rights of God because they are superior to the rights of humanity. (Pope Leo XIII, A Review of His Pontificate, March 19, 1902.)

For the teaching authority of the Church, which in the divine wisdom was constituted on earth in order that revealed doctrines might remain intact for ever, and that they might be brought with ease and security to the knowledge of men, and which is daily exercised through the Roman Pontiff and the Bishops who are in communion with him, has also the office of defining, when it sees fit, any truth with solemn rites and decrees, whenever this is necessary either to oppose the errors or the attacks of heretics, or more clearly and in greater detail to stamp the minds of the faithful with the articles of sacred doctrine which have been explained. (Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.) 

Please note that Pope Gregory XVI wrote that the truth can be found in the Catholic Church without "even a slight tarnish of error."

Please note that Pope Leo XIII stressed that the Catholic Church "makes no terms with error but remains faithful to the command which it has received, to carry the doctrine of Jesus Christ to the uttermost limits of the world and to the end of time, and to protect it in its inviolable integrity."

Please note that that Pope Pius XI explained that the Catholic Church brings forth her teaching "with ease and security to the knowledge of men."

Anyone who says that this has been done by the counterfeit church of conciliarism, which has made its "reconciliation" with the false principles of Modernity that leave no room for the confessional Catholic civil state and the Social Reign of Christ the King, is not thinking too clearly (and that is as about as charitably as I can put the matter). If the conciliar church has brought forth its teaching "with ease and security to the knowledge of men," why is there such disagreement even between the "progressive" conciliarists and "conservative" conciliarists concerning the proper "interpretation" of the "Second" Vatican Council and its aftermath? Or does this depend upon what one means by "ease and security"?

Alas, those caught up in the passions of the moment tend to have very short memories as the so-called “restorer of tradition,” Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, was all smiles and affirming of none other than Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro on July 10, 2009. Here is what was contained in an article I wrote at the time, noting once again that the double-indented material is taken from the source cited at the end of the quotation:

Pope Benedict XVI welcomed American President Barack Obama to the Vatican today, and the two discussed world issues addressed at the Group of Eight summit.

As they met, Mr Obama told the Pope: "It's a great honor; thank you so much."

The two sat down at a desk in the papal library and began discussing the G8 summit which concluded that morning in L'Aquila, Italy. The summit focused on the economic crisis, climate change and global tensions.

Pope Benedict told the president: "You must be tired after all these discussions."

The president replied that the meetings marked "great progress" and "something concrete". The private meeting lasted more than 30 minutes.

At the end of the meeting, Pope Benedict told the president: "A blessing on all your work and also for you." (Benedict XVI meets Obama - Catholic Herald Online)

A "blessing on all your work and also for you." This is what the false "pontiff" said to the de facto President of the United States of America yesterday, July 10, 2009, at the Apostolic Palace in the State of Vatican City. "A blessing on all your work and also for you."

Yes, sure, the false "pontiff," Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, discussed the inviolability of innocent human life with the putative President of the United States of America. Ratzinger/Benedict gave Caesar Obamus a document, Dignitatis Personae, produced by the conciliar Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith. Here is the official communique issued by the Vatican press office:

This afternoon, Friday 10 July 2009, His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI received in audience the president of the United States of America, His Excellency Mr. Barack H. Obama. Prior to the audience, the president met His Eminence Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, secretary of state, and also His Excellency Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, secretary for relations with states.

In the course of their cordial exchanges, the conversation turned first of all to questions which are in the interests of all and which constitute a great challenge for the future of every nation and for the true progress of peoples, such as the defense and promotion of life and the right to abide by one’s conscience.
Reference was also made to immigration with particular attention to the matter of reuniting families.

The meeting focused as well upon matters of international politics, especially in light of the outcome of the G8 Summit. The conversation also dealt with the peace process in the Middle East, on which there was general agreement, and with other regional situations. Certain current issues were then considered, such as dialogue between cultures and religions, the global economic crisis and its ethical implications, food security, development aid especially for Africa and Latin America, and the problem of drug trafficking. Finally, the importance of educating young people everywhere in the value of tolerance was highlighted.” (Benedict Focuses on Life Issues

It is nevertheless the case that officials in the conciliar Vatican, including Ratzinger/Benedict himself, believe that they can work to advance "peace in the Middle East and to realize some of the far-reaching, utopian, globalist goals expressed by Ratzinger/Benedict in Caritas in Veritate (see Give Me Two Bayers, Please and Two More Bayers, Please). Ratzinger/Benedict, who does not believe that Catholicism is the one and only foundation and personal and social order and who rejects the immutable doctrine of the Catholic Church concerning the Social Reign of Christ the King, believes that a man who has issued executive orders to use Federal taxpayer dollars to fund the surgical and chemical assassination of children internationally has a "work" that is entitled to a "blessing."

This is simply more madness from the mad hatter from Germany who is posing as a Successor of Saint Peter at this time, madness from a man who has offended the honor and majesty and glory of God by entering into places of false worship and esteeming the nonexistent "ability" of the "values" of false religions to "contribute" to the building of a "better" world and to the cause of world "peace," madness from a man who has called mosques as "jewels" that stand out on the face of the earth and as "sacred" places, madness from a man who has personally esteemed the symbols of false religions with his own priestly hands. "A blessing on all of your work and on you."

How can a man who is committed to the destruction of innocent preborn human life as a matter of principle and who believes that pregnancy in and of itself places a woman in the midst of an "agonizing" choice be an instrument of pursing the common temporal good undertaken with respect to man's Last End. He cannot. It is that simple. No one who promotes grievous sin under cover of the civil law can be an instrument in the pursuit of the common temporal good. It is that simple.

Sin is what caused Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to suffer once in time in His Sacred Humanity during His Passion and Death. Sin is what caused His Most Blessed Mother's Immaculate Heart to be pierced through and through with Seven Swords of Sorrow. Sin is what wounds His Mystical Body, the Church Militant, here on earth in this passing, mortal value of tears. No one who is an agent in the promotion of grievous sin, no less sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, is a fit holder of the public weal. While such a person is an object of our prayers and while his actions must prompt us to make much reparation to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, he is not deserving of a "blessing" from a putative "pontiff" for his "work" of evil, a "work that retards the common temporal good and places into jeopardy the sanctification and salvation of immortal souls upon which the whole of social order must be premised:

The more closely the temporal power of a nation aligns itself with the spiritual, and the more it fosters and promotes the latter, by so much the more it contributes to the conservation of the commonwealth. For it is the aim of the ecclesiastical authority by the use of spiritual means, to form good Christians in accordance with its own particular end and object; and in doing this it helps at the same time to form good citizens, and prepares them to meet their obligations as members of a civil society. This follows of necessity because in the City of God, the Holy Roman Catholic Church, a good citizen and an upright man are absolutely one and the same thing. How grave therefore is the error of those who separate things so closely united, and who think that they can produce good citizens by ways and methods other than those which make for the formation of good Christians. For, let human prudence say what it likes and reason as it pleases, it is impossible to produce true temporal peace and tranquillity by things repugnant or opposed to the peace and happiness of eternity. (Silvio Cardinal Antoniano, quoted by Pope Pius XI in Divini Illius Magistri, December 31, 1929.) 

Has something changed? Is it now possible to "produce true temporal peace and tranquility by things repugnant or opposed to the peace and happiness of eternity"?

"A blessing on all your work and also for you"?

Supporting, promoting, and funding surgical and chemical baby-killing is part of Caesar Obamus's "work." 

"A blessing on all your work and also for you"?

Supporting and promoting the sin of Sodom, another of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance? (From A "Blessing" on a Murderer and His Work.)


While I readily concede that Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s warm embrace of Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., which stands in contrast with the sour face he affected when posting with President Donald John Trump in 2017, is scandalous, I remain bewildered as to why “conservative” and resist-while-recognize Catholics do not think that it is scandalous for a man they accept to be their Sovereign Pontiff to praise false religions, to eschew the conversion of non-Catholics, to esteem the symbols of false religions and to enter their places of false worship to be treated as inferiors to their non-Catholic hosts. The entire work of the counterfeit church of conciliarism is scandalous from its very beginnings to the present day.

Moreover, for all the talk about how the killer of souls, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, and the killer of the innocent preborn, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., share such a kinship of false beliefs, it is nevertheless true that none of Jorge’s predecessors (Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonia Maria Montini/Paul VI, Albino Luciani/John Paul I, Karol Josef Wojtyla/John Paul II, Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI) who have presided over the conciliar structures since Roe v. Wade, January 22, 1973, have excommunicated a single, solitary pro-abortion Catholic in public life. Among those who were left to die in their steadfast support for abortion were Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America William Brennan, former Speakers of the United States House of Representatives Thomas P. O’Neill and Thomas Foley, United States Senators Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Edward Moore Kennedy, former United States Representative Geraldine Anne Ferraro-Zaccaro, and former Governor of the State of New York Mario Matthew Cuomo.

It is my surmise—and only a surmise—that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is trying to provoke his “conservative” “bishops” in the United States of America into issuing a statement in defiance of his open support for Biden as a “good Catholic” who can keep “receiving” what purports to be Holy Communion in the Novus Ordo service. Bergoglio might find such defiance as the pretext he needs to declare the sees of such “bishops” to be vacant (which, of course, they are in the objective order of things) and to threaten them with excommunication. Penalties would imposed upon those who oppose Biden rather than the career-long enabler of the slaughter of the innocent preborn himself.

There is no such thing as a prophetic voice in a false religious sect. There is, however, a whole lot of  bowing and scraping to the enemies of Christ the King and thus to the enemies of the souls for whom He shed every single drop of His Most Precious Blood to redeem. Then again, those who kill souls have a whole lot in common with those who support the killing of the innocent preborn.

It is time for the "conservatives" within the counterfeit church of conciliarism to wake up and realize that Saint Paul's Epistle to the Thessalonians speaks to us about these very times:

And now you know what withholdeth, that he may be revealed in his time. [7] For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way. [8] And then that wicked one shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming, him, [9] Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, [10] And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying[11] That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity. [12] But we ought to give thanks to God always for you, brethren, beloved of God, for that God hath chosen you firstfruits unto salvation, in sanctification of the spirit, and faith of the truth: [13] Whereunto also he hath called you by our gospel, unto the purchasing of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. [14] Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle[15] Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God and our Father, who hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation, and good hope in grace, [16] Exhort your hearts, and confirm you in every good work and word. (2 Thessalonians 2: 6-16.)

Truth does not change over time. Our understanding of truth may deepen over time, never in a way, however, that it can be contradicted.

We will be persecuted.

We will be hated.

We will be blamed for the problems caused by the revolutionaries of Modernity and Modernism.


What have we to fear?

Well, Friday night has turned into Saturday morning, which is the anticipated Vigil of the Feast of All Saints.

Tomorrow is the Feast of Christ the King.


Every Rosary we pray helps to plant the seeds for what seems to be humanly impossible: the restoration of the Social Kingship of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and of His Most Blessed Mother, she who is our Immaculate Queen.

Does not the Blessed Virgin Mary have her very eyes on us?

Has she not given us the weapon of her Most Holy Rosary and the shield of her Brown Scapular?

Has she not given us Sacramental aids such as the Miraculous Medal and the Green Scapular?

Has she not us repeatedly to pray her Holy Rosary and to be devoted to her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart?

What have we to fear?

For in the end, of course, her Immaculate Heart triumphs.

What have we to fear?


Isn’t time to pray a Rosary now?