Thomas A. Droleskey
The so-called "Arab Spring" of early-2011 was exalted by a man who has a Mohammedan name and had a Mohammedan father and stepfather, Barack Hussein Obama, and by a supposed Catholic, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who has taken off his shoes to enter into two Mohammedan mosques and even once assumed the Mohammedan "prayer" position at the behest of his Mohammedan host as he turned in the direction of Mecca, something that a true Successor of Saint Peter would have never done. See Blood Flows Freely in America and Libya, Refusing to Read the Signs of the Times, Idols to the Left, Idols to the Right, part 1, Hey, Buddy, Don't You Know That There's a War Going On Now?, Sitting Atop Mount Olympus, Above the Law of God and Man and Want to Reconsider the Lesser of Two Evils Business, Folks?.
Some commentators believe that Arab "students" (remember the supposed "student militants" who took over the American Embassy in Teheran, Iran, on Sunday, November 4, 1979, and then, after releasing some hostages between November 19, 1979, and held fifty-two Americans as hostages for the next four hundred forty-four days as the former nuclear engineer and peanut farmer named James Earl Carter, Jr., tried appeasement an ill-fated rescue effort on April 24, 1980) who rioted in several Mohammedan nations early last year were inspired by an address delivered by United States President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetero in Cairo, Egypt on June 4, 2009, that included praise of Mohammedanism and apologies for past policies of the United States of America:
I've come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one
based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the
truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in
competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles --
principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all
I do so recognizing that change cannot
happen overnight. I know there's been a lot of publicity about this
speech, but no single speech can eradicate years of mistrust, nor can I
answer in the time that I have this afternoon all the complex questions
that brought us to this point. But I am convinced that in order to move
forward, we must say openly to each other the things we hold in our
hearts and that too often are said only behind closed doors. There
must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each
other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground. As the Holy
Koran tells us, "Be conscious of God and speak always the truth."
(Applause.) That is what I will try to do today -- to speak the truth
as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that
the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the
forces that drive us apart.
Now part of this conviction is rooted in my
own experience. I'm a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan
family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several
years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn
and at the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago
communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.
As a student of history, I also know
civilization's debt to Islam. It was Islam -- at places like Al-Azhar
-- that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment.
It was innovation in Muslim communities -- (applause) -- it was
innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra;
our magnetic compass and tools of navigation; our mastery of pens and
printing; our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be
healed. Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring
spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and
places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history, Islam has
demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality. (Applause.)
I also know that Islam has always been a
part of America's story. The first nation to recognize my country was
Morocco. In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second
President, John Adams, wrote, "The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims."
And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United
States. They have fought in our wars, they have served in our
government, they have stood for civil rights, they have started
businesses, they have taught at our universities, they've excelled in
our sports arenas, they've won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building,
and lit the Olympic Torch. And when the first Muslim American was
recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our
Constitution using the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers
-- Thomas Jefferson -- kept in his personal library. (Applause.)
So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed.
That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America
and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't. And I
consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States
to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.
(Applause.) (Remarks by Caesar Obamus at Cairo University, 6-04-09)
The "Holy Koran" to Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetero was called "that dear book" by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict in 2008 as he received a copy of the blasphemous writing in the Apostolic Palace in 2008 just a short time after having received one with his own priestly hands at the John Paul II Cultural Center in Washington, District of Columbia, on Thursday, April 17, 2008.
"Where is was first revealed"? By whom, Mister President? The devil, that's who.
Events have proved that the "Arab Spring," which brought down the governments of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen, provoking also an ongoing civil war in Syria that is being suppressed by the government of dictator Bahar al-Assad, whose father, Hafez al-Assad, was a stooge of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was quite a springboard for believing Mohammedans to use to seek to create Mohammedan states patterned after the "Islamic Republic of Iran" that has been open for business for thirty-three years now. That springboard" has also seen Coptic Christians attacked in Egypt at the same time that Chaldean Rite Catholics and other Christians in Iraq continue to come under attack in the "liberated" Iraq (see Unity and Peace Cannot Be Based in Error and Falsehood, part two, More Serendipity From the "Religion of Peace", More Zeal for a False God Than Catholics Have for the True God and Killers Rejoicing At The Death Of Killers.)
Although mostly lower-level officials at the United States Department of State have issued the most guarded of statements upon attacks upon Catholics and other Christians in Egypt and Iraq and elsewhere in the world of Musselmen, Barack Hussein Obama has said not a word about such attacks as to do so would be to "offend" the adherents of what his predecessor, George Walker Bush, called "the religion of peace." It should be pointed out for the sake of fairness to the current caesar that his predecessor was just as "sensitive" as he has been to the "feelings" of Musselman, which is why "Dubya" never said a word about attacks upon Catholics and other Christians in his "liberated," occupied and decimated Iraq that he made a sieve for various Iranian-trained, financed and armed terrorists to enter so as to target our co-religionists of the true Faith and to attack American diplomatic, civilian and military personnel there.
The fear of offending Mohammedans has caused officials in the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama and Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., to be paralyzed when faced with unquestioned evidence of foreign-based Mohammedan plots against American citizens at home and abroad.
The Obama administration refused at first to term
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, M.D., U.S.A., who shot forty-three people and
killed thirteen of these people at Fort Hood, Texas, on Thursday,
November 5, 2009, as a Mohammedan terrorist (see Killing In The Name of The Religion of Peace).
It was only much later that the officials of the current presidential
administration used the word "terrorism" to refer to Nidal's killing
spree even though he was in contact with an American born jihadist,
Anwar al-Awlaki, who is now based in Yemen who has urged his followers
to kill Americans. Officials of the United States Army and in the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.) knew of this connection in
advance of the Nidal Malik Hasan's shootings and did nothing as they did
not consider him a threat. (See U.S. Knew of Fort Hood Suspect’s Tie to Radical Cleric )
The administration of Caesar Barackus Obamus
Ignoramus has even gone so far to ban the words "Islamic terrorism" from
being used by officials of the Federal government of the United States
of America (see Awash In A Flood of Errors and Lies).
It came as no surprise to me twenty-eight months ago, therefore, that
Michael Bloomberg, the pro-abortion, self-professed "billionaire
playboy" who supports every manner of moral evil imaginable under cover
of the civil law while serving as a glorified "nanny" of the bodily
health of the City of New York (forcing restaurants to eliminate the use
of saturated fats, imposing smoking bans of various sorts, seeking now
to force restaurants to cut their use of salt in their entrees. see Killing Us With Their "Concern"), sought
to pin blame for the failed bombing in Times Square on someone who was
"mentally deranged," someone who was probably angered by ObamaCare:
CBS Evening News Anchor Katie Couric asked New York's Mayor Mike
Bloomberg if the bombing attempt could be a precursor to a bigger
"There is no credible evidence so far that this attack was more than at
least one person, the driver," said Mayor Mike Bloomberg. "After that
there is no evidence that anyone else was involved. It may be, but we
can't say that it is."
"There is some speculation that the materials in the Nissan Pathfinder
were similar to ones that were found to some failed attacks in the
U.K.," Couric asked.
"There's a limited number of things you would need," Bloomberg said.
"You'd need a timer, you'd need a battery as an energy source you'd need
some explosive and you'd need something to enhance it. That's going to
be true no matter where or when the...another attack took place. So,
anything would have enough commonalities for the conspiracy theorists to
blow it up if you don't mind the pun and make something out of it."
"Are you concerned about the impact this might have on tourism?" Couric asked.
"I think people today understand we live in a dangerous world,"
Bloomberg said. "And you can't let the terrorists win by locking
yourself in a room. What I can guarantee you is we're doing everything
that we can. Whether or not we will have somebody in exactly the right
place at exactly the right time to prevent something down the future
nobody can do that - nobody can guarantee you."
"But there is no evidence here of a conspiracy. There is no evidence
that it's tied in to anything else. It looks like an amateurish job,
done by at least one person," Bloomberg added.
But if another attack were to occur, Mayor Bloomberg and the heads of
all emergency response agencies would be in the city's situation room.
It's powered by its own generator and allows the team to monitor video
feeds, television coverage - even the corner of 45th and Seventh Avenue,
where a crisis was averted.
Law enforcement officials don't know who left the Nissan Pathfinder
behind, but at this point the Mayor believes the suspect acted alone.
"If I had to guess, twenty five cents, this would be exactly that," Bloomberg said. "Homegrown
maybe a mentally deranged person or someone with a political agenda
that doesn't like the health care bill or something. It could be
anything." (Bloomberg: "No Evidence" Anyone Else Involved - CBS Evening.)
Michael Bloomberg is a reprobate. He is always eager to disparage those in the "religious right" for the nation's problems,
including, a la United States Homeland Security Secretary Janet
Napolitano, the belief that there is a growing danger of "homegrown,"
"domestic" terrorism from those who criticize "the government." (See All Hail! Caesar Obamus.)
Bloomberg and Obama are both spineless, gutless cowards who speak out exclusively in behalf
of abject moral evils and in favor of a radical form of social
engineering designed to curb legitimate human freedoms.
The truth is, of course, that the would-be Times
Square bomber, Faisal Shahzad, a naturalized citizen of the United
States of America who was born in Pakistan, which has become a key base
of operations for the Taliban, was indeed a Mohammedan and was intent on
carrying out the desires of the Pakistani-based
Taliban, something that the Obama administration later had to admit, albeit quietly and not at the presidential level. All this to avoid the use of the words "Islamic terrorism."
This calls to mind the prophetic insight of Dr. Aleskandr I. Solzhenitsyn on the paralysis of reason and action caused by political correctness:
A decline in courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in
the West in our days. The Western world has lost its civil courage,
both as a whole and separately, in each country, each government, each
political party and of course in the United Nations. Such a decline in
courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the
intellectual elite, causing an impression of loss of courage by the
entire society. Of course there are many courageous individuals but
they have no determining influence on public life. Political and
intellectual bureaucrats show depression, passivity and perplexity in
their actions and in their statements and even more so in theoretical
reflections to explain how realistic, reasonable as well as
intellectually and even morally warranted it is to base state policies
on weakness and cowardice. And decline in courage is ironically
emphasized by occasional explosions of anger and inflexibility on the
part of the same bureaucrats when dealing with weak governments and
weak countries, not supported by anyone, or with currents which cannot
offer any resistance. But they get tongue-tied and paralyzed when they
deal with powerful governments and threatening forces, with aggressors
and international terrorists.
Should one point out that from ancient times decline in courage has
been considered the beginning of the end? (A World Split Apart, Harvard University Commencement Address, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 6, 1978.)
Although Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was referring the James Earl Carter, Jr. (see Ever the Appeaser, written in 2002), his trenchant remarks apply just as much to Barack Hussein Obama and to his equally tongue-tied predecessor, George Walker Bush, when it comes to understanding that it is not "radical Islamists" that are perpetrating attacks on American citizens abroad and have done so here at home. It is faithful, believing Mohammedans who are doing so. Mohammedanism is of its very demonic nature a religion of violence and bloodshed.
Go tell that to the tongue-tied and paralyzed staff at the American Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, who were responsible for issuing this horrific statement as the embassy was under siege by a not-so-spontaneous Mohammedan uprising that had been planned for twelve days to coincide with the eleventh anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks here in the United States of America:
""The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims -- as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions."
"Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others." (Press Release - Embassy of the United States in Cairo, Egypt.)
In other words, "Please, pretty please, do not blame the government of the United States of American that an Israeli citizen by the name of Sam Bacile, who lives in southern California, raised five million dollars to promote a film that you find "insulting" to your false, blasphemous "prophet," Mohammed [I will leave it to others who have more time, money and resources than I do to mine this not insignificant aspect of the current violence as there seems to be an Israeli hand behind a lot of these events]. We understand your anger. Don't hurt us. We're on your side. We're on the side of the Arab Spring. We know that Mohammedanism is a 'revealed religion' and we respect your beliefs more than we respect those of any other religion, including the hate-mongers who call themselves Christians whom you have rightly attacked here in Egypt. Just leave us alone. Put up your black flag. Just take your stones and leave us alone."
No indignation on the part of the American Embassy staff in Cairo, which Willard Mitt Romney mistook at first as an official statement of the Obama administration, which it is not. If one looks at the website of the United States Department of State, however, one will find that there is no official statement made by "Madame," as Robert Gigante (Bob Grant) called Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 1990s listed anywhere. And it is Egypt where the problem of the "Muslim Brotherhood" represents a a more cohesive and government-endorsed and supported force for similar attacks in the future than in Libya, something that, it appears, even the Obama administration realizes after the caesar had called upon the military junta serving as interim leaders to quit after the first "free" election in Egypt wound up electing the leader of the "Muslim Brotherhood" as president (see Spotlight Is on Libya, but Egypt May Be Bigger Concern for White House).
There has also been no official comment by Obama/Soetero about the attack on the American Embassy in Cairo. Look for yourself at: Speeches and Remarks. Obama/Soetero did, support the statement made by the staff in Cairo as, after all, unlike Benghazi, Libya, no one got killed there and we just have to be "sensitive" to the feelings of Mohammedans in Egypt, whose "spontaneous" demonstration had been planned for twelve days, Mister President, you fraud, you:
Obama defended the messages sent out by U.S. diplomats in Cairo, who
early Tuesday released a statement criticizing an American-made film
that depicts the Prophet Muhammed, Islam's founder, in a derogatory way.
The film touched off the protest at the Cairo embassy and may have
played a role in the lethal Benghazi attack. It also prompted Romney's
"It came from people on the ground, who are potentially in danger,"
Obama said. "You know, my tendency is to cut folks a little bit of slack
when they're in that circumstance, rather than try to question their
judgment from the comfort of a campaign office."
The president added, "I think that if you look at how most Republicans
have reacted, most elected officials, they've reacted responsibly,
waiting to find out the facts before they talked...making sure that our
number one priority is the safety and security of American personnel." (Obama Says Romney 'Shoots First and Aims Later')
The White House response to the brutal murder of a career diplomat, J. Christopher Stevens, who was the American ambassador assigned to the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and three members of his staff as believing, orthodox, faithful Mohammedans attacked stormed the consulate and dragged the body of Mr. Stevens through the streets, was stronger and much more pointed, although Obama/Soetero went to great lengths to praise the government of Libya for its own condemnation of the assault (see Remarks by the President on the Deaths of U.S. Embassy Staff in Libya). However, no matter the tragedy of the killing of American diplomats by a Mohammedan mob, it is not insensitive to point out that the fact that American security efforts in Libya have been premised upon faulty intelligence reports that understate the seriousness of the threat posed by the sort of well-armed mob that attacked the embassy with rocket-launched grenades and other sophisticated weaponry.
Although Willard Mitt Romney and Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetero have sparred on events of the last two days in Egypt and Libya, they are absolutely united in their refusal to accept the simple truth that Mohammedanism is a false religion of death and violence. To utter such a reality would be unthinkable, which is why neither utters it as neither believes it. For a review of the facts about Mohammedanism, please read see Hillaire Belloc, The Great and Enduring Heresy of Mohammed.
Sure, Christians and Mohammedans have lived in relative peace in places such as Iraq, Jordan and Lebanon and even Palestine before the Zionist takeover in 1948. There has been relative peace in Egypt over the years largely because of the strong men who have led the country prior to the ouster of President Hosni Mubarak last year. Note that I used the phrase "relative peace." Egyptian President Anwar Sadat had the Coptic "pope," Shenouda III, who died at the age of eighty-eight on March 18, 2012, arrested and banished to a desert monastery, where he stayed for four years until the man who succeeded Sadat after the latter's assassination on October 6, 1981, Hosni Mubarak, ended the exile and developed a good working relationship with him. Much like Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Hosni Mubarak abused his powers. However, it is Arab strong men such as Mubarak who protected Christians from being attacked by Mohammedans. Not so now. Not so in the future.
Remember, we did celebrate the Feast of the Holy Name of Mary yesterday. It was the Holy Name of Mary and her Most Holy Rosary that helped turn back the Mohammedans at the Gates of Vienna on September 12, 1683, and that had vanquished the Mohammedan fleet in the Battle of Lepanto on October 7, 1571. After all, the Mohammedans have been trying to conquer Europe since the Eighth Century. That they are the verge of doing so now in one European country after another without firing a shot is the result of the combined forces of Modernity's embrace of contraception and abortion and perversity and conciliarism's praising Mohammedans for "restoring God to Europe" (see Vatican thanks Muslims for returning God to Europe and So Much For Charles Martel, So Much for the Crusades, So Much for Pius V and Jan Sobieski, So Much for Catholic Truth.)
The Arab strong men are mostly gone, noting that Bahsar al-Assad continues his bloodletting in Syria. Believing, faithful, orthodox Mohammedans who want nothing of "dialogue" or "peaceful coexistence" with those they consider infidels are on the rise. Does Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetero care? No. Such Mohammedans are simply "radicals." This is also the belief of the conciliar "Master of Dialogue Without Peer," Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who is preparing to embark upon a three day journey to Lebanon that starts on the Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, Friday, September 14, 2012, where he will, after decrying the violence in Syria and Libya, call for "inter-religious dialogue" and respect for "religious freedom."
Ratzinger/Benedict has praised Mohammedans during his three other visits to the Middle East, doing so in the belief that such overtures would secure the safety of Catholic minorities who live in Mohammedan nations, which means that he might as well be an employee of the American embassy in Cairo, Egypt.
Here is a little trip down memory lane for you:
My visit to Jordan gives me a
welcome opportunity to speak of my deep respect for the Muslim
community, and to pay tribute to the leadership shown by His Majesty the
King in promoting a better understanding of the virtues proclaimed by
Islam. Now that some years have passed since the publication of
the Amman Message and the Amman Interfaith Message, we can say that
these worthy initiatives have achieved much good in furthering an
alliance of civilizations between the West and the Muslim world,
confounding the predictions of those who consider violence and conflict
inevitable. Indeed the Kingdom of Jordan has long been at the forefront
of initiatives to promote peace in the Middle East and throughout the
world, encouraging inter-religious dialogue, supporting efforts
to find a just solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, welcoming
refugees from neighboring Iraq, and seeking to curb extremism. I
cannot let this opportunity pass without calling to mind the pioneering
efforts for peace in the region made by the late King Hussein. How
fitting that my meeting tomorrow with Muslim religious leaders, the
diplomatic corps and University rectors should take place in the mosque
that bears his name. May his commitment to the resolution of the
region’s conflicts continue to bear fruit in efforts to promote lasting
peace and true justice for all who live in the Middle East.
Dear Friends, at the Seminar held in Rome last autumn by the Catholic-Muslim Forum, the
participants examined the central role played in our respective
religious traditions by the commandment of love. I hope very much that
this visit, and indeed all the initiatives designed to foster good
relations between Christians and Muslims, will help us to grow in love
for the Almighty and Merciful God, and in fraternal love for one
another. Thank you for your welcome. Thank you for your attention. May God grant Your
Majesties happiness and long life! May he bless Jordan with prosperity
and peace! (Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, Welcoming ceremony at Queen Alia International Airport of Amman, May 8, 2009.)
Places of worship, like this splendid
Al-Hussein Bin Talal mosque named after the revered late King, stand out
like jewels across the earth’s surface. From the ancient to the modern,
the magnificent to the humble, they all point to the divine, to the
Transcendent One, to the Almighty. And through the centuries these
sanctuaries have drawn men and women into their sacred space to pause,
to pray, to acknowledge the presence of the Almighty, and to recognize
that we are all his creatures.
For this reason we cannot fail to be concerned that
today, with increasing insistency, some maintain that religion fails in
its claim to be, by nature, a builder of unity and harmony, an
expression of communion between persons and with God. Indeed some assert
that religion is necessarily a cause of division in our world; and so
they argue that the less attention given to religion in the public
sphere the better. Certainly, the contradiction of tensions and
divisions between the followers of different religious traditions,
sadly, cannot be denied. However, is it not also the case that often it
is the ideological manipulation of religion, sometimes for political
ends, that is the real catalyst for tension and division, and at times
even violence in society? In the face of this situation, where
the opponents of religion seek not simply to silence its voice but to
replace it with their own, the need for believers to be true to their
principles and beliefs is felt all the more keenly. Muslims and
Christians, precisely because of the burden of our common history so
often marked by misunderstanding, must today strive to be known and
recognized as worshippers of God faithful to prayer, eager to uphold and
live by the Almighty’s decrees, merciful and compassionate, consistent
in bearing witness to all that is true and good, and ever mindful of the
common origin and dignity of all human persons, who remain at the apex
of God’s creative design for the world and for history. (Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, speech to
Muslim religious leaders, members of the Diplomatic Corps and Rectors
of universities in Jordan in front of the mosque al-Hussein bin Talal in
Amman, May 9, 2009.)
In addition, of course, to his
constant attacks on the nature of dogmatic truth by means of his
logically absurd and dogmatically condemned "hermeneutic of continuity
and discontinuity," which, after nearly twenty centuries, it was
"necessary" for the Church to "learn" existed (as Ratzinger/Benedict
contended in his December 22, 2005, address to members of his conciliar
curia), Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI shows his apostate spirit and
provides us with the evidence that he does not believe in the true God
of Revelation by asserting there is a "need for believers to be true to their principles and beliefs is felt all the more keenly." Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetero and Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI are just two figures of Antichrist in search of "moderate" Musselmen with whim to "coexist." They are indeed Kindred Spirits of the New World Order.
This is the precise apostate spirit of The Sillon that was, as noted earlier in this article, condemned by Pope Saint Pius X in Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910
Most of the lords of Modernity and most of the lords of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism are quite adept at ignoring truth in order to appease the tender sensibilities of those who they believe would be "offended" by stating the truth clearly and unequivocally. The current administration of Caesar Barackus Obamus Ignoramus is replete with individuals, starting with caesar himself, who have gone out of their way to avoid using the words "Islamic terrorism," attempting to cover-up and downplay the significance of attacks such as the one that was perpetrated by Major Nidal Hasan at Food Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009. United States Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and United States Attorney General Eric "I Got a Pardon for Marc Rich/Fast and Furious" Holder have refused to recognize, no less admit, that Mohammedanism is violent of its very nature and its spread across Europe and here in the United States of America represents a grave and vital threat to the personal safety of ordinary citizens. Many of the conciliarists understand the threat, believing in all of their utter insanity that "religious liberty" is the answer to these threats (see Unity and Peace Cannot Be Based in Error and Falsehood, part one, Bearing "Fruits" From Hell Itself, part one and Bearing "Fruits" From Hell Itself, part one.)
It is no wonder, therefore, that our own caesars are so "sensitive" to the "feelings" of Mohammedans when the men who claim to represent the true Church make it appear that each religion can contribute to the "building of a better world" as long as "religious liberty" is respected. Statements such as those below made by George Walker Bush and Barack Hussein Obama make perfect sense when you consider the fact that the devil has succeeded in placing spiritual robber barons in the Vatican and diocesan chancery offices, thereby robbing the world of the prophetic voice of Christ the King:
The terrorists practice a fringe form of Islamic extremism that has been rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim clerics -- a fringe movement that perverts the peaceful teachings of Islam. The terrorists' directive commands them to kill Christians and Jews, to kill all Americans, and make no distinction among military and civilians, including women and children. . . .
I also want to speak tonight directly to Muslims throughout the world. We respect your faith. It's practiced freely by many millions of Americans, and by millions more in countries that America counts as friends. Its teachings are good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of Allah blaspheme the name of Allah. (Applause.) The terrorists are traitors to their own faith, trying, in effect, to hijack Islam itself. The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends; it is not our many Arab friends. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them. (Applause.) (George Walker Bush, Address to the Nation, September 20, 2001.)
As we know, these men belonged to al Qaeda – a group of extremists who have distorted and defiled Islam, one of the world's great religions, to justify the slaughter of innocents. Al Qaeda's base of operations was in Afghanistan, where they were harbored by the Taliban – a ruthless, repressive and radical movement that seized control of that country after it was ravaged by years of Soviet occupation and civil war, and after the attention of America and our friends had turned elsewhere.
Just days after 9/11, Congress authorized the use of force against al Qaeda and those who harbored them – an authorization that continues to this day. The vote in the Senate was 98 to 0. The vote in the House was 420 to 1. For the first time in its history, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization invoked Article 5 – the commitment that says an attack on one member nation is an attack on all. And the United Nations Security Council endorsed the use of all necessary steps to respond to the 9/11 attacks. America, our allies and the world were acting as one to destroy al Qaeda's terrorist network, and to protect our common security. (Barack Hussein Obama, Address on the War in Afghanistan, December 2, 2009.)
This kind of insane political correctness, which is practiced also on occasion by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, keeps American policy makers from admitting that Mohammedanism of its demonic nature is an assault against God and seeks to destroy those who will not follow its false "god" and its false teachings, therefore predisposing them to let domestic terror cells form in the United States of America as a result of immigration laws based on political correctness and electoral self-interest. Weak, cowardly American politicians have made this country unsafe by their refusal to keep out those who seek to dominate here as they are now dominating throughout parts of Europe.
There is only one solution to the Mohammedan threat just as there is only one solution to the threat posed by Talmudic Judaism and its related allies in Masonic lodges: Catholicism. Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has sent His Most Blessed Mother to earth to implore us to pray her Most Holy Rosary for world peace and to pray for the conversion of sinners, starting with ourselves as we seek to make reparation to God through her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart for our sins. Catholicism, not any false religion or any form of naturalism, including the falsehood that is "conservatism," is the solution. Nothing else: Who says so? Look once again for yourselves (repetition is the mother of learning, my friends):
Here we have, founded by Catholics, an inter-denominational association that is to work for the reform of civilization, an undertaking which is above all religious in character; for there is no true civilization without a moral civilization, and no true moral civilization without the true religion: it is a proven truth, a historical fact. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)
This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.
No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)
Please, my friends, do not deceive yourself. The babbling voices of naturalism that blather on and on and on about having "faith" to make the country "strong" again are themselves agents of the devil as they promote a renewed sense of religious indifferentism that is at the core of the false principles of the American republic. Each an every Catholic must reject and completely oppose any and all calls for a generic "faith" to combat the evils of the day as such calls come from the devil himself and from no other source, regardless of the "good intentions" of the complete and utter ignoramuses who make those calls. I mean, folks, why should we be opposed to Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's calls for a kind of generic Christianity while embracing those of bombastic talk show hosts?
Yes, my good and very few readers, the Church that Pope Pius XI reminded us in Mit Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937, was founded by the Redeemer is the one, the same for all races and all nations," including the United States of America. We are not going to stop the tide of the threats posed by Mohammedanism and other false religions with any form of naturalism, with any highly emotionally laden appeals to waste one's Catholic time and money on compact discs and books and other materials produced by dopes who have not studied the Social Reign of Christ the King evangelize in behalf of one Americanist myth after another that can do nothing but reaffirm people in a welter of errors just as surely as do Ratzinger/Benedict himself and his "bishops." We must avoid all contact with these agents of error and indifferentism. Who says so? Look again for yourselves:
Everyone should avoid familiarity or friendship with anyone suspected of belonging to masonry or to affiliated groups. Know them by their fruits and avoid them. Every familiarity should be avoided, not only with those impious libertines who openly promote the character of the sect, but also with those who hide under the mask of universal tolerance, respect for all religions, and the craving to reconcile the maxims of the Gospel with those of the revolution. These men seek to reconcile Christ and Belial, the Church of God and the state without God. (Pope Leo XIII, Custodi Di Quella Fede, December 8, 1892.)
We pray for the repose of the souls of those killed in Libya and for the consolation of their families in this time of terrible grief.
We pray for the conversion of Barack Hussein Obama and Willard Mitt Romney and all other naturalists.
We pray for the conversion of Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI and for his fellow conciliarists.
We pray and weep as we make reparation to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary for our own many sins.
We must, however, remember that there is nothing serendipitous about Mohammedanism, which is unleashing a new wave of violence throughout the Mohammedan world. We must oppose this false religion, whose adherents are in the very grip of the devil by means of Original Sin, and we must oppose the false, naturalistic, religiously indifferentist, anti-Incarnational and semi-Pelagian principles of Modernity with which the conciliarists have made their "reconciliation" that teach us that we should not Mohammedan violence by its proper name and identify it as part and parcel of its very founding, history and tenets.
We have been given Our Lady's Rosary to help us in this time of apostasy and betrayal, in this time of chastisement. Let us use this instrument, well as we seek to deny ourselves more and more so that our hearts will yearn only for the things of Heaven and that we will be more and more able to view the world exclusively through the eyes of the true Faith as we, unworthy though we may be, plant a few seeds for the restoration of the Social Reign of Christ the King and of Mary our Immaculate Queen!
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and the hour of our death. Amen.
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.