by
Thomas A. Droleskey
Although we may not know the "details" until eternity, whichever set of forces (can anyone spell M-o-s-s-a-d?) arranged for the Mohammedan stooges in Egypt and Cairo to stage a series of carefully planned and executed attacks on the American Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and on the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that have now spread across the region, including Tunisia, Lebanon, Yemen and Egypt's southern neighbor, The Sudan, certainly knew what they were doing.
As some commentators have noted, many of the Mohammedan Arabs who have taken to the streets in the wake of the well-planned and orchestrated attacks in Egypt and Libya on Tuesday, September 11, 2012, the eleventh anniversary of the tragic events that transpired in this country, are ready to take to the streets at a moment's notice to wreak all kind of violence and mayhem. These poor stooges are like puppets who are given commands that play to their emotions, unsettled as they are as a result of the fact that their immortal souls are captive to the devil by means of Original Sin and by virtue of their actions that are, objectively speaking, Actual Sins that upset the order of their souls even more.
This having been noted, however, there appear to be more sinister forces at work in the Middle East at the present time than the fact that Mohammedans have been killing and pillaging since their blasphemous founder, who, of course, denied the doctrine of the Most Blessed Trinity, decided to unite Arbs around his false beliefs. It is very, very curious that all of this violence has erupted at a time when there is the banging of war drums by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear program that Israel itself has had for years. It couldn't be that that film, which turns out was uploaded by a Coptic Orthodox with a number of aliases and is being promoted by the unfortunate man named Terry Jones (see Combustible Material: Keep Back Five Hundred Feet This Truck Carries Naturalism), mocking the blasphemer named Mohammed has had any back-channel funding from Israeli sources, could it? Nah. Perish the thought (and I am not a conspiracy theorist).
Well, whatever inspired the tragic events that are as yet transpiring in the Mohammedan countries listed above, the reaction of the naturalists herein the United States of America has been completely predictable as the characters who come straight out of central-casting continue to caricature and lampoon themselves every time they open their mouths, proving that the following words of Pope Pius IX, contained in Quanta Cura, December 8, 1864, to be very prophetic:
For you well know, venerable brethren, that at this
time men are found not a few who, applying to civil society the impious
and absurd principle of "naturalism," as they call it, dare to
teach that "the best constitution of public society and (also) civil
progress altogether require that human society be conducted and governed
without regard being had to religion any more than if it did not exist;
or, at least, without any distinction being made between the true
religion and false ones." And, against the doctrine of Scripture, of the Church, and of the Holy Fathers, they do not hesitate to assert that "that
is the best condition of civil society, in which no duty is recognized,
as attached to the civil power, of restraining by enacted penalties,
offenders against the Catholic religion, except so far as public peace
may require." From which totally false idea of social government they do
not fear to foster that erroneous opinion, most fatal in its effects on
the Catholic Church and the salvation of souls, called by Our
Predecessor, Gregory XVI, an "insanity," viz., that "liberty of
conscience and worship is each man's personal right, which ought to be
legally proclaimed and asserted in every rightly constituted society;
and that a right resides in the citizens to an absolute liberty, which
should be restrained by no authority whether ecclesiastical or civil,
whereby they may be able openly and publicly to manifest and declare any
of their ideas whatever, either by word of mouth, by the press, or in
any other way." But, while they rashly affirm this, they do not think
and consider that they are preaching "liberty of perdition;" and that
"if human arguments are always allowed free room for discussion, there
will never be wanting men who will dare to resist truth, and to trust in
the flowing speech of human wisdom; whereas we know, from the very
teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ, how carefully Christian faith and
wisdom should avoid this most injurious babbling." (Pope Pius IX, Quanta Cura, December 8, 1864.)
We live in a country where lots of people make a very handsome living from engaging in injurious babbling, which so many people, including believing Catholics, think is filled with profundity when the only thing that is profound about what is said is the depth of ignorance displayed every time these naturalists open their well-paid mouths.
Thus it is a few points will be made in this commentary so as to provide a bit of perspective that will not be found among the injurious babblers.
First, leaving aside the proximate root causes of how the film that mocked Mohammed, which most of the Mohammedan Arab rioters have not seen, got produced and uploaded to You Tube, we are once again witnessing the simple fact that Mohammedans have more zeal for their false religion than most Catholics do for the true Faith.
Most Catholics are not at all upset when Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ or His Most Blessed Mother or the Holy Faith itself is mocked by the world or by the adherents of false religions. Moreover, most Catholics are not at all upset when their "pope" or his "bishops" offend the honor and majesty and glory of the Most Blessed Trinity by praising false religions, esteeming their symbols with their own hands and engaging in the outrage that is "inter-religious prayer." Such acts are detestable and loathsome in the sight of the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity. Yet it is that most Catholics do not care. Worse yet, some of them who do know that these thing are hideous try to justify them in order to maintain their "good standing" in the counterfeit church of conciliarism and to have access to the modernized version of the Immemorial Mass of Tradition that is in the process of being further modernized (see Next Stop On The Motu Madness Merry-Go-Round: 1969 And Beyond).
No, Catholics do not riot, loot and kill to protest outrages against the Holy Faith. First and foremost, of course, Catholics take to their knees to pray in reparation for such offenses and to pray for the conversion of those who have committed them. Whatever action they take in the world is measured by the circumstances in which they live, although the appropriate public response in such cases would be to organize a Rosary procession to demonstrate the power of the instrument that Our Lady gave to Saint Dominic de Guzman, the founder of the Order of Preachers, to fight the Albigensian heresy an that has been used to turn back Mohammedans (Battle of Lepanto, Battle of the Gates of Vienna), Calvinists (off the coasts of Peru and The Philippines) and Communists (to effect the peaceful withdrawal of Soviet forces there in 1955, ten years after the end of World War II). We get upset. We get outraged. We respond, though, with the supernatural weapons of the Holy Faith and with, where possible to do so, public prayer processions honoring Christ the King and Mary our Immaculate Queen.
Second, there has been much legitimate outrage expressed over the brutality visited upon American Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens before he was killed and had his dead boy dragged through the streets of Benghazi, Libya, on Tuesday, September 11, 2012, and the wanton disregard for the lives of the other American personnel who were killed at the same time.
Taking nothing away from the horror and revulsion that should fill our hearts at such brutality and seeking in no way whatsoever to rationalize attacks upon the lives of innocent human beings, it should also be remembered that the military troops of the government of the United States of America have committed such brutalities as well. Our hands are not very clean in this regard. Indeed, they are very bloodied.
Must we call to mind the atrocities visited upon residents of the states of the Confederate States of America at various points during the War between the States and during the carpetbagger period, euphemistically called the Southern Reconstruction that followed after the end of that war on May 9, 1865, one month to the day after the surrender of Confederate General Robert E. Lee to United States General Ulysses S. Grant at Appamattox Court House, Virginia, on April 9, 1965?
Must we call to mind the atrocities visited upon the residents of The Philippines in the wake of the American "liberation" and occupation of that country following the end of Spanish-American War on August 12, 1868?
Must we call to mind some of the atrocities committed in Italy following the American liberation of Rome, Italy, on June 5, 1944, or that followed in some places of northern France following the invasion of Allied troops there on June 6, 1944?
Must we call to mind the firebombing of Dresden, Germany, that lasted over the course of four terror-filled nights from February 13, 1945, to February 15, 1945?
Must we call to mind the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, on August 6, 1945, and Nagasaki, Japan, on August 9, 1945?
Among other examples, must we call to mind the various crimes committed by our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past decade?
Perhaps more to the point is the simple fact that most Americans, including most Catholics all across and up and down the vast expanse of the ecclesiastical divide, care not to think of the daily slaughter of the preborn under cover of the civil law that is committed with such wretched brutality that some people recoil even at an accurate description of baby-killing methods, no less to actually view the dismembered or burned babies who are the victims of a domestic war and terror that can only be called a genocide.
The United States of America is not as "civilized" as we would like to think it is. Our violence against the innocent preborn and the infirmed and the elderly and at home and the fecundity of marriage and the innocence and purity of the young at home and abroad is vast, cloaked by the veneer of "legality." (See Blood Flows Freely in America and Libya.)
Remember what Hillary Rodham Clinton said early last year as Moammar Quaddafi was attempting to put down the Mohammedan revolt in Libya?
“Now is the time to stop this unacceptable bloodshed,” said Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in a statement. (Chaos Grows in Libya; Defiant Qaddafi Vows to Fight On.)
This is what I wrote at the time by way a response (and just a reminder, it was an article of mine in The Arlington Catholic Herald and The Wanderer in 1994 that got the then First Lady dis-invited to a conference at the University of Dayton, which is run by the Marianist Fathers, whose organizers had sent her an invitation and then listed her as "invited" even though she had not agreed to accept the invitation; "Madame" did not pay any attention to the articles, though the officials at the University of Dayton were forced to do so by angry alumni and alumnae):
Yes, Madam Secretary Clinton, now is indeed the time to stop this unacceptable bloodshed.
Although the Secretary of State of the United States
of America, Hillary Rodham Clinton, was referring to the bloodshed that
has been unleashed by Libya's madman of a dictator, "Colonel" Wilhelm
Klink, I mean, "Colonel" Moammar Qaddafi, who has been engaged in a
scorched earth policy to kill anyone and everyone who is protesting
against his tyrannical regime in the streets of Tripoli, Libya, I am
referring to the innocent blood that is shed right here in the United
States of America on a daily basis, a bloodshed that has been
promoted and enabled by the administration of President Barack Hussein
Obama and Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.
Yes, as pro-abortion officials in the United States
of America and the elsewhere in the world most justifiably decry the
bloodbath that has been engendered by "Colonel" Qaddafi's desperate
attempt to retain power in the fiercely tribalized nation that is Libya,
the daily bloodbath engendered by the chemical and surgical
assassination of the innocent preborn and by the silent slaughter of the
terminally ill in hospices in the name of provide "palliative relief"
as they are given increasingly higher doses of medication that winds up
stopping their hearts and by the starvation and dehydration of
brain-damaged human beings under cover of the civil law continues
unabated in the "civilized" West, including right here in the
United States of America. While the bloodthirsty, amoral tactics of
"Colonel" Daffy Qaddafi are indeed reprehensible and to be condemned in
no uncertain terms, the slaughter of the innocent preborn and the
elderly and the chronically and/or terminally ill in Western countries
is no less reprehensible. Yet the slaughter of the innocent in the West
is accepted with perfect aplomb in the false name of "human rights" and
as various slogans ("choice," "liberty," "dignity," "compassion") are
used to anesthetize the reality of the simple truth that willful, one of
the four crimes that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, has made
supposedly "civilized" nations slaughterhouse where the blood the
innocent is shed with perfect impunity under cover of the civil law and
without a qualm of conscience. (See also Foggy Bottom's Bloody Tradition.)
As you can see, no one forwarded this to United States Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton at the time (my tongue is in my cheek, folks, as I know no one in the civil government other than the assigned monitors pays any never mind this site) as she continues to made some of the most stupid statements imaginable, including one she made immediately after learning of the brutal murders of Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans four days ago now.
“This is not easy,” said Clinton. “Today, many Americans are asking –
indeed, I asked myself – how could this happen? How could this happen
in a country we helped liberate in a city we helped save from
destruction?”
“This question reflects just how complicated, and at times how
confounding, the world can be,” Clinton continued. “But we must be
clear-eyed even in our grief. This was an attack by a small and savage
group — not the people or government of Libya.” (Hillary Clinton Condemns Attacks On Libyan Embassy.)
Will someone get this woman a history book and a mirror?
The history book is necessary to explain to her what happened at the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Tuesday, September 11, 2012, is part of the very fabric of Mohammedanism, something that she, steeped in utter political correctness, seems to be incapable of believing.
The mirror is necessary to help her see the simply reality that her support for the killing of the innocent preborn places her in the same category as the people she condemned in Libya. Too harsh? Just go ask the babies who were killed during the administration of her husband, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, and during the eight years she spent as a carpetbagging United States Senator from the State of New York.
Third, some commentators have remarked on the credulity of the Mohammedan hordes who seemed to be able to be played for fools by those seeking to incite them to violence. While this has always been true in the Arab world and was exploited very skillfully by Mohammed himself in the Seventh Century, we should take a little step back from this assessment as it is relatively easy to whip people into states of agitation.
The entire downward spiral of Modernity that began during certain phases of the Renaissance was given the impetus it needed to spin out of control by the revolutionary named Martin Luther, whose revolution against the Divine Plan that God Himself instituted to effect man's return to Him through the Catholic Church unleashed a wave of bloodshed throughout Christendom. Churches were ransacked. Catholics were killed. Land belonging to the Church was stolen.
Martin Luther is, therefore, the prototypical revolutionary of Modernity, a man who saw his "reform" spiral out of control to such a degree that he decried its consequences even though he could not understand that he was entirely responsible for them. Luther whipped people into a frenzy. So did John Calvin. So did many others. And it was, after al, in "civilized" England that King Henry VIII ushered in a wave of terror against Catholics who remained faithful to the Catholic Church and the papacy after he created the schismatic and heretical Anglican sect. Mobs of angry, newly-minted Protestants and their immediate descendants applauded as Catholics were taken to the Tower of London to be beheaded. Crowds taunted Blessed Edmund Campion, S.J., after he had been arrested and was paraded into London and as he was being executed.
The French, Bolshevik and Maoist revolutionaries were simply following the example of Luther, Calvin and Henry Tudor. And that master propagandist, the paper hanger from Austria named Adolf Hitler, was rather effective in whipping up the passions of people in his own twisted right.
The entire history of the United States of America, starting with the propaganda advanced by the American revolutionaries in support of their cause, is littered with appeals to the passions of the people. Anti-Catholic riots were organized in various places in the Nineteenth Century as a result of the preaching and lectures of Protestants and Freemasons.
In more recent times, of course, we have see professional agitators such as the not-so-Reverend Al Sharpton exploit racially-tinged inicdents to his advantage. (See Intent on Controlling Mind and Body.)
Providing only one more recent example as time is limited, one should call to the mind the agitators who planned and organized the not-so-spontaneous "Occupy Wall Street" protests that included ugly, crude, violent and indecent behavior by mobs of supposedly "concerned citizens" (see Blazing More Paths For Antichrist.)
Ah, but if you think a little more, my few readers, you will realize that those who engage in injurious babbling for a living must agitate their audiences to continue listening to them, convincing even believing Catholics to hang on their every words, no matter whether their names are Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Levin, Savage, O'Reilly or anyone else who comes to mind in this regard. Time to pray more Rosaries? Time to do good spiritual reading? Time to read Catholic commentaries on the state of the world and of Holy Mother Church in this time of apostasy and betrayal? No, no, no. It's far easier to give permission to the devil to make one agitated by listening to the "infallible" gurus of naturalism, whether they be of the false opposites of the "left" or the "right."
What is happening in the Mohammedan world right now only appears to be exceptional to those who do not have mirrors placed of their own faces?
Fourth, much of the "injurious babbling" taking place at this time has centered on what is said to be the necessity of curbing such expressions of "speech" as the film that is being used as the pretext for the mayhem in the Mohammedan world now. This is a subject worth a brief note.
As readers of this site are aware, the modern concepts of unrestricted "freedom of speech" and "freedom of the press" have been condemned by Holy Mother Church as offensive to God and injurious to souls for the very reasons outlined by Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura, quoted herein above, which reiterated the teaching contained in Pope Gregory XVI's Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832. Thus it is that the Catholic Church does believe in censorship, exercised in a moderate and prudent manner to safeguard the integrity of the Faith and thus of the good of the souls for whom Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ shed every single drop of His Most Precious Blood to redeem.
The babblers who belong to the false opposite of the naturalist "left" do, therefore, have a correct principle when asserting that there are limits to "free speech." There are. However, they have arrogated unto themselves what belongs to the Catholic Church, she who is the very object of their relentless assaults, mockery and ridicule in an exercise of "free speech" that they, the "leftists," believe is protected. The professional "leftists" believe that they are the censors of speech and press, thus inverting the truth that the Catholic Church is the true mater, magister and governor of men when it comes everything contained in the Deposit of Faith and that appertains to the good of souls.
As Pope Gregory XVI noted in Mirari Vos:
This shameful font of
indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which
claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It
spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and
over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to
religion from it. "But the death of the soul is worse than freedom of error," as Augustine was wont to say. When
all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of
truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to
ruin. Then truly "the bottomless pit" is open from which John saw smoke
ascending which obscured the sun, and out of which locusts flew forth to
devastate the earth. Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption
of youths, contempt of sacred things and holy laws -- in other words, a
pestilence more deadly to the state than any other. Experience shows,
even from earliest times, that cities renowned for wealth, dominion, and
glory perished as a result of this single evil, namely immoderate
freedom of opinion, license of free speech, and desire for novelty.
Here We must include that harmful and never
sufficiently denounced freedom to publish any writings whatever and
disseminate them to the people, which some dare to demand and promote
with so great a clamor. We are horrified to see what monstrous doctrines
and prodigious errors are disseminated far and wide in countless books,
pamphlets, and other writings which, though small in weight, are very
great in malice. We are in tears at the abuse which proceeds from them
over the face of the earth. Some are so carried away that they
contentiously assert that the flock of errors arising from them is
sufficiently compensated by the publication of some book which defends
religion and truth. Every law condemns deliberately doing evil simply
because there is some hope that good may result. Is there any sane man
who would say poison ought to be distributed, sold publicly, stored, and
even drunk because some antidote is available and those who use it may
be snatched from death again and again? (Pope Leo XIII, Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832.)
The "leftists" have become the true secular "church" from which no one is permitted to dissent while the "rightists" blather on about "restoring" the "founding principles" that brought us to our current situation.
Fifth and finally, the two American presidential candidates represent diametrically different strains of naturalism on matters on foreign policy that are being highlighted as a result of the ongoing "street protests" in much of the Mohammedan world right now.
President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetero supported what has been called the "Arab Spring" in 2011 as he abandoned American support for Arab strongmen such as Hosni Mubarak and, calling to mind how Saddam Hussein, who was sold chemical weaponry by the administration of President Ronald Wilson Reagan (whose intermediary in this agreement was none other than Special Envoy Donald D. Rumsfeld--see Longer Than World War II), was deemed a useful ally to use against Iran in the 1980s before he became part of the Bush family's "axis of evil," Libya's Moammar Qaddafi, who had, despite his past crimes against American citizens, been helpful to the American government after the events of September 11, 2001, and had once referenced Obama as follows:
Referencing Obama as "my son," Qaddafi said: "We are happy that a
young African Kenyan was voted for and made president. Obama is a
glimpse in the dark for the next four years, but I'm afraid we may go
back to square one.
"Can the U.S. guarantee after Obama that they'll be a government? We're happy and content if he can stay forever." (Qaddafi Lauds Obama, Attacks U.S., West; see also Worthy Son of Daffy Gaddafi.)
Barack Hussein Obama's Jimmy Carter-like foreign policy (remember Carter through Iranian Shah Mohammed Pahlavi under the bus and his United Nations Ambassador, Andrew Young, called Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini a "saint") did not "change" the "Muslim" world the way he thought it would. Indeed, this hubristic man who chose to abandon one Mohammedan surname, Soetero, to use his birth name of Saddam Hussein Obama actually believed that the day he was inaugurated "Muslim hostility will ease" (see Obama Flashback: The Day I'm Inaugurated The Muslim World Will Look at us Differently). That didn't work out too well, did it, Mister President? Obama's policies are making the United States of America less safe and endangering the lives of Americans worldwide.
It is said that Obama spoke sternly to the President of Egypt, Mohammed Morsi, the head of the Muslim Brotherhood, to make sure Americans were protected in his country. Might it also be possible that he said something along the lines of, "You idiot, you. What are you trying to do? Get Romney elected? He's not your friend. I am. I understand you. You better crack down now or deal with the likes of Romney later"?
Ah, Obama does not understand the Muslim world anymore than he understands anything about First and Last Things. He is clueless. He is leading this nation into harm's way as the direct consequence of his naive assumptions and egomania that border on being pathological.
As for Obama's hapless opponent, Willard Mitt Romney is a stooge of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose relationship with Obama is one of mutual loathing and contempt), who would lead the United States of America into a global crisis by supporting an Israeli military strike on Iran that the Soviets, excuse me, the Russians, will never tolerate. Romney only has eyes for "Bibi" in the Middle East. Both Obama and Romney do not realize that the Middle East will never know any kind of peace until the following words are realized in end times as they were during the beginning of the first Holy Week:
[36] Amen I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation. [37] Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them
that are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered together thy
children, as the hen doth gather her chickens under her wings, and thou
wouldest not? [38] Behold, your house shall be left to you, desolate. [39] For I say to you, you shall not see me henceforth till you say: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. (Matthew 23: 36-39.)
No Christ the King? No peace. No Christ the King? No Rosary? No Good Cause.
Quite a choice, huh? It's a "choice" given us by the devil himself. It's not looking "good," folks, no matter what happens on Tuesday, November 6, 2012. We are toast. The chastisements we have experienced up to this point are just a preview of worse that is yet to come.
We cannot, therefore, permit ourselves to be agitated by the staged events of Modernity. Father Louis Campbell made this point in a typically superb sermon that he delivered at Saint Jude Shrine in Stafford, Texas, on Sunday, September 9, 2012, the Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost and the Commemoration of Saint Peter Claver, that he has given me his most kind and generous permission to use in this article:
In the Gospel of
today’s Mass (Lk.14:1-11) we find Christ in another confrontation with His
enemies, certain of the Pharisees, who were not interested in the truth but only
in the political power lent to them by the Romans. We can understand this more
clearly by consulting the Book of the Apocalypse, the last book of the Bible:
“And I saw a beast
coming up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon its horns
ten diadems, and upon its heads blasphemous names… And the dragon gave it his
own power and great authority… And all the earth followed the beast in wonder.
And they worshipped the dragon because he gave authority to the beast, and they
worshipped the beast, saying, ‘Who is like to the beast, and who will be able
to fight with it?’ (Apoc.13:1,2b,3b,4).
This Beast, says the
biblical footnote, “is the figure of the kingdoms of the world, kingdoms
founded on passion and selfishness, which in every age are antagonistic to
Christ and seek to oppress the servants of God.”
We are now
confronting the Beast in its modern incarnations. The Beast is now represented
by the modern political machine created by the secret societies, different
heads of the same Beast, such as Zionism and Freemasonry. We were given a
glimpse of the power of the Beast at the recent London Olympics, when “all the
earth followed the beast in wonder”.
The great Pope Leo
XIII warned of the secret societies in his Encyclical, Humanum Genus (April 20, 1884), and spoke of the numerous warnings
issued by his predecessors. With so many of the Supreme Pontiffs, true popes
and vicars of Christ, giving united testimony, the seriousness of their
warnings cannot be doubted:
“The first warning
of the danger was given by Clement XII in the year 1738, and his Constitution
was confirmed and renewed by Benedict XIV. Pius VII followed the same path; and
Leo XII, by his Apostolic Constitution, Quo
graviora, put together the acts and decrees of former Pontiffs on this
subject, and ratified and confirmed them forever. In the same sense spoke Pius
VIII, Gregory XVI, and many times over Pius IX”.
As for the “evil
fruits” of Freemasonry Pope Leo says:
“Now, the Masonic
sect produces fruits that are pernicious and of the bitterest savor. For, from
what We have above most clearly shown, that which is their ultimate purpose
forces itself into view – namely, the utter overthrow of that whole religious
and political order of the world which the Christian teaching has produced, and
the substitution of a new state of things in accordance with their ideas…
“But against the
Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff the contention of these enemies has been
for a long time directed… and now the time has come when the partisans of the
sects openly declare, what in secret among themselves they have for a long time
plotted, that the sacred power of the Pontiffs must be abolished, and the
Pontificate itself, founded by divine right, must be utterly destroyed.”
The Beast is thus
anti-Christ, anti-Church, and anti-pope. It is impossible for us to fathom the
secret counsels of the Beast because secrecy is its shield and lies and
deception its method. Indeed, “Who is like the beast, and who will be able to
fight with it?” The Beast and its heads do not live by their own power but are
given life by the dragon, i.e., the devil.
“And all the earth
followed the beast in wonder.” The vast majority of the world’s people have no
idea of what is happening to them – that they are being robbed of their wealth
and lands, that their rights are fast disappearing, and that their countries
are being prepared by stages for integration into the new world order foretold
by numerous Holy Popes of former times. They are kept in ignorance by keeping
them busy working and watching mind-numbing TV programs and sports events like
the Olympic Games. The Beast’s Revolution has succeeded, and he is now in
control of virtually every country and every organization including the
Catholic Church, although only of her outer structural apparatus, since Our
Lord promised that the gates of hell would never prevail against her.
Can one dialogue
with the Beast? The Beast does not live by the truth, but by lies and
deceptions, like its father, the devil. One cannot dialogue with a liar. Truth
is the Beast’s poison. The servants of the beast are miscreants who try
everything to cover their tracks – gigantic lies, world scale larceny,
manipulation of the sources of information and staged disasters. Political
conventions are no exception.
Then how can we stop
the Beast in its terrible destructive rage? If truth is the Beast’s poison, we
must speak the truth and live by the truth. Pope Leo XIII puts it this way:
“But as it befits
the authority of Our office that We Ourselves should point out some suitable
way of proceeding, We wish it to be your rule first of all to tear away the
mask from Freemasonry, and to let it be seen as it really is; and by sermons
and Pastoral Letters to instruct the people as to the artifices used by societies
of this kind in seducing men and enticing them into their ranks, and as to the
depravity of their opinions and the wickedness of their acts…
“We beseech them
(the good), therefore, with united hearts, to stand together and unmoved
against the advancing force of the sects; and in mourning and supplication to
stretch out their hands to God, praying that the Christian name may flourish
and prosper, that the Church may enjoy its needed liberty, and those who have
gone astray may return to a right mind, that error at length may give place to
truth, and vice to virtue. Let us take as our helper and intercessor the Virgin
Mary, Mother of God, so that she, who from the moment of her conception
overcame Satan, may show her power over these evil sects, in which is revived
the contumacious spirit of the demon, together with his unsubdued perfidy and
deceit.”
We take our secure
refuge in the Two Hearts – the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, and the Sorrowful
and Immaculate Heart of Mary. (Father Louis J. Campbell, "They Follow the Beast in Wonder.")
There is no more to say except to make sure to pray as many Rosaries each day as your state-in-life permits and to fear nothing, absolutely nothing, other than dying in a state of final impenitence
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and the hour of our death. Amen.
Our Lady of Sorrows, pray for us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
Saint Nicomedes, pray for us.
