- concept lab air jordan 11 oklahoma sooners pe blake griffin - IetpShops , 002 2024 487471 - 160 - Womens Jordan MA2 Opti Yellow Marathon Running Shoes Sneakers CW5992
- Cheap Rcj Jordan Outlet - choice jordan True Flight Bordeaux - Michael Beasley right defending in the Flint Grey Air choice jordan 7
- IetpShops , Air Match Jordan XIII Michael Finley Autographed Mavs PE - 106 Release Date + Where to Buy - Women's Air Jordan 1 Mid Surfaces in Lucky Green and Aquatone DZ4137
- nike outlet quarry market
- Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid Black Siren Red Womens Bq6472 004 - Nike SB Stefan Janoski Free - AspennigeriaShops - Canvas
- nike dunk low pro sb 304292 102 white black trail end brown sneakers
- Air Jordan 1 Hand Crafted DH3097 001 Release Date
- new air jordan 1 high og osb dian blue chill white cd0463 401
- air jordan 1 mid linen
- air jordan 1 atmosphere white laser pink obsidian dd9335 641 release date
- Home
- Articles Archive, 2006-2016
- Golden Oldies
- 2016-2024 Articles Archive
- About This Site
- As Relevant Now as It Was One Hundred Six Years Ago: Our Lady's Fatima Message
- Donations (December 6, 2024)
- Now Available for Purchase: Paperback Edition of G.I.R.M. Warfare: The Conciliar Church's Unremitting Warfare Against Catholic Faith and Worship
- Ordering Dr. Droleskey's Books
Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part seventeen
Although the plandemicists have retreated somewhat from public view, we are still suffering the effects of their well-orchestrated psychological operation to alter reality and get large numbers of people worldwide to accept a false narrative as being true while concomitantly doing all that they could to assure that people infected with the CCP/Red Chinese/Wuhan/Covid-19/Coronavirus would not receive the treatments that could cure them and working feverishly to unleash a nonstop succession of “vaccines” that are derived from fetal cell lines and have caused untold hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries.
I. Introduction
The skillful retreat of the most of the plandemicists from public view, however, does not mean that they do not have other plans to lock us down and shut us up in the future, perhaps around election time to make sure that the same means (drop boxes, ballot harvesting, mail-in ballots, mailing in ballots days after an election has been held, etc.) What these merchants of evil have done thus far, however, has been very successful in dividing the world into various castes of people: the mask and the unmasked, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, the “protected” and the unprotected, the “informed” and the “uninformed,” among other false divisions, and there is still the ongoing effort by the politicized United States Centers for Disease Control and teachers’ unions to keep children unfortunate enough to be placed within America’s concentration camps of ideological programming masked as though they lacked any personal identity and ere just part of a giant collectivity at the disposal of their ideological programmers, something that is the goal of “education” in nations living under the thumb of communism.
Pope Pius XI explained this phenomenon as follows in Divini Illius Magistri, December 31, 1929:
10. Communism, moreover, strips man of his liberty, robs human personality of all its dignity, and removes all the moral restraints that check the eruptions of blind impulse. There is no recognition of any right of the individual in his relations to the collectivity; no natural right is accorded to human personality, which is a mere cog-wheel in the Communist system. In man’s relations with other individuals, besides, Communists hold the principle of absolute equality, rejecting all hierarchy and divinely-constituted authority, including the authority of parents. What men call authority and subordination is derived from the community as its first and only font. Nor is the individual granted any property rights over material goods or the means of production, for inasmuch as these are the source of further wealth, their possession would give one man power over another. Precisely on this score, all forms of private property must be eradicated, for they are at the origin of all economic enslavement .
11. Refusing to human life any sacred or spiritual character, such a doctrine logically makes of marriage and the family a purely artificial and civil institution, the outcome of a specific economic system. There exists no matrimonial bond of a juridico-moral nature that is not subject to the whim of the individual or of the collectivity. Naturally, therefore, the notion of an indissoluble marriage-tie is scouted. Communism is particularly characterized by the rejection of any link that binds woman to the family and the home, and her emancipation is proclaimed as a basic principle. She is withdrawn from the family and the care of her children, to be thrust instead into public life and collective production under the same conditions as man. The care of home and children then devolves upon the collectivity. Finally, the right of education is denied to parents, for it is conceived as the exclusive prerogative of the community, in whose name and by whose mandate alone parents may exercise this right.
12. What would be the condition of a human society based on such materialistic tenets? It would be a collectivity with no other hierarchy than that of the economic system. It would have only one mission: the production of material things by means of collective labor, so that the goods of this world might be enjoyed in a paradise where each would “give according to his powers” and would “receive according to his needs.” Communism recognizes in the collectivity the right, or rather, unlimited discretion, to draft individuals for the labor of the collectivity with no regard for their personal welfare; so that even violence could be legitimately exercised to dragoon the recalcitrant against their wills. In the Communistic commonwealth morality and law would be nothing but a derivation of the existing economic order, purely earthly in origin and unstable in character. In a word. the Communists claim to inaugurate a new era and a new civilization which is the result of blind evolutionary forces culminating in a humanity without God. (Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, March 19, 1937.)
Distracted by the farce that is and will always be electoral politics as two organized crime families of naturalism (one which is committed to the pursuit of a collectivist agenda while the other is committed simply to the pursuit of its own electoral success) and by the bread and circuses of the world, most people alive today do not realize, do not care or actually support the slow, gradual triumph, albeit temporary until the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, of the collectivist/communist mentality in almost every aspect of social life today. This mentality has been proselytized in public and many Catholic elementary and secondary schools, in public, secular and most Catholic colleges and universities, in the fields of law, medicine, “entertainment” (included collegiate and professional athletics), the arts (including literature) and by what still goes by the name of “journalism” but is actually a tool of elitists committed to the obliteration of all concept of “bourgeois” morality and “individuality” in the service of the “global reset," which did not begin with the pladenmic’s Event 201 at the Hotel Saint Pierre in New York, New York, on Friday, October 18, 2019.
Having accustomed large numbers of people, including most of the members of the Supreme Court of the United States of America as presently constituted, around the world to accept the word of alleged “experts,” the elites in charge of shaping public perception of reality have reached the point where the career civil servants must be considered as “infallible” sources of truth on all subjects from whom there can be no legitimate dissent, disagreement, or even a rational exchange of convictions in public debate.
Additionally, our minders in the civil government have been able to bribe various “non-governmental” and even corporate entities to be boosters of its efforts to impose social control in the name of “public health” to fight a disease (and at least one of its variants, see Appendix D below or go to Experts Say Omnicron Likely Came from a Laboratory Too ) that originated as a result gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Red China that was funded in part by Anthony (“I represent science’) Facui’s National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases that is not fatal in most cases if it is treated properly and not used as an excuse kill off large numbers of people by improper protocols as a means to instill fear and panic into the hearts of ordinary people. These bribes, of course, have meant to encourage recipients to be eager promoters of the various vaccines that killing and injuring untold thousands upon thousands of people (there are lots of sudden deaths in otherwise healthy people taking place now), and they have been documented by the valiant research of Mrs. Randy Engel in a recent expose published on the “AKA Catholic” website.
Here is a brief excerpt from Mrs. Engel’s typically well-researched and documented report that lists some of the recipients of the Federal government’s “stimulus” money during the plandemic:
Grants – 26,000 in number awarded to the following entities (partial listing):
o States, Governor’s Offices, Departments (Education, Health, and Human Services, etc.)
o Native American Tribal Governments and Nations (*Grants in the billions of dollars)
o Physician and Health Care Services
o Public School Systems and School Boards of Education
o Government Departments of Family Services
o Airlines (American, Delta, United, Southwest, etc. – individual grants ranged from $12 billion to $ 700 million). Some airlines received multiple grants.
o Transit Services
o Government Departments of Social Services
o Housing and Community Affairs Agencies
o Drug Stores and Pharmacies (Walgreen Co., $1 billion; Rite Aid, $507 million)
o State and Private Universities and Colleges (examples: Duke University, $63 million; Baylor University, $182 million; Rutgers State University, $215 million; Liberty University, $52 million; Cornell University, $36 million; St. John’s University N.Y., $60 million)
o AIDS Services
o Government Departments of Child Services
o Environmental Agencies
o Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, American Samoa
o United Nations ($637 million)
o Bio-Medical Research Centers
o Pharmaceutical Companies
o World Health Organization ($280 million, $773 million)
o Medical Corporations
o Family Health International (139 million)
o Technology Companies – General Dynamics Information Technology ($62 million)
o Consulting Firms
o Government Departments of Aging and Disabilities
o Public Safety Agencies
o Government Departments of Labor and Employment
o Catering Services for Airlines aka Gate Gourmet
o Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services
o Government Departments of Military Affairs
o Emergency Management Agencies
o International Organization for Migration ($50 million)
o Board of Trustees and Regents at Various Universities
o International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies ($26 million)
o Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico ($45 million)
o Save the Children Federation ($38 million)
o Task Force for Global Health ($21 million)
o Pan American Health Organization ($12 million)
Loans: Number in excess of eleven million. There is no designation as to which loans do, or do not, have to be repaid:
o First United Methodist Church ($32 million)
o First Baptist Church ($17 million)
o Catholic Bishop of Chicago * Cardinal Blase Joseph Cupich ($15,435, 082)
o YMCA ($17 million)
o Trinity Lutheran Church ($14 million)
o First Presbyterian Church ($14 million)
o Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations ($10 million)
o Goodwill Industries ($11 million and multi-local loans in the $10 million range)
o Muscular Dystrophy Association ($10 million)
o Salvation Army ($10 million)
o Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists ($10 million)
o Planned Parenthood of Greater New York ($10 million)
o March of Dimes ($10 million)
o Los Angeles Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Center ($10 million)
o Star Tribune Media- Minneapolis, MN ($10 million)
o Local Medical Clinics (in the $10 million range)
Thousands of non-profits, restaurants, small businesses, and large corporations are listed in the loan category. The above is just a sampling.
Direct Payments: Number about five million, mainly to State and City Governments. Most are in the billion-dollar range, including:
o State Governments and Executive Offices
o Airlines – American Airlines ($9 billion), Delta ($8 billion)
o United Healthcare Services ($154 billion in direct payments and other contract funding)
o Native American Tribal Governments and Nations (* Direct payments in the billions of dollars)
Other Financial Assistance – Including the:
o World Health Organization ($279 million)
o UNICEF ($204 million)
o United Nations ($20 million)
o Native America Tribal Governments and Nations (*Hundreds of grants in the billions of dollars)
Contracts: 15,000 plus in number mainly to hospitals, medical centers, institutes and corporations, pharmaceutical firms. health services, think-tanks, schools of medicine, food conglomerates, systems corporations, consulting firms, university medical schools, supply firms, and “vaccine” manufactures, including:
o America’s Blood Centers ($523 million)
o Life Technologies Corporation ($140 million)
o Merck Corporation ($17million)
o Pfizer ($37 million)
o Mayo Clinic ($51 million)
o Rand Corporation ($5 million)
o Medline Industries ($9 million)
o Boeing Company (Multiple outlays of COVID-19 funding including a $105 million contract)
o Johns Hopkins University ($5 million)
o St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital ($4 million)
o Native American Tribal Governments and Nations (*Additional contracts in the millions of dollars) (From Randy Engel, U.S. COVID-19 Relief: Biggest theft in world history .)
As Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro’s first Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, who as member of William Jefferson Clinton’s junior varsity team during the Monica Lewinsky scandal said, “Never waste a good crisis. (During the Lewinsky scandal, Emanuel, whose brother, Ezekiel Emanuel, has been in the forefront of mismanaging outbreaks of infectious diseases during the Obama administration, said, “Whose truth are you talking about?” when asked about the facts of Clinton’s nefarious behavior and perjured testimony).
Yes, these statists never miss a good crisis to use to fund their favorite ideological causes no matter the cost to the taxpayers as they want to run exorbitantly highly annual Federal budget deficits and thus increase the Federal debt, which now stands at over thirty trillion dollars (see U.S. National Debt Clock) to keep us peons in check as they plot ever more schemes to aggrandize their own power. And, of course, this is to say nothing about the moral debt that this country owes to the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, for its promotion of religious indifferentism, Pelagianism, materialism, egalitarianism, majoritarianism, American exceptionalism (nationalism is the idolatry of one’s country as opposed to patriotism, which wills her good, the ultimate express of which is her Catholicization), usury, and each of the four crimes that cry out to Heaven for vengeance. It is a pretty easy thing to use taxpayer dollars to fund political allies during a manufactured crisis once one has accustomed the people to paying for the slaughter of the preborn by chemical and surgical means.
It is very interesting to note that the Archdiocese of Chicago under the control of Blase “Cardinal” Cupich received a loan of fifteen million dollars because, as noted by Mrs. Engel parenthetically above, Cupich imposed some of the harshest restrictions of any of the conciliar “bishops” anywhere in the world and was more than happy to serve the role as Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.’s and Anthony Fauci’s stooge in the name of “public health.” Who cares about the evil origins of the “vaccines”? Who cares about the harm that these “vaccines” have done? Not Blase Cupich nor his boss, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who is himself a willing stooge of the global reset as he worries about “sustainable development goals” but not about the promotion of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance under the cover of the civil law.
The whole plandemic has been a very well-orchestrated effort to condition people by the use of fear tactics, and it is truly tragic to see human beings still wearing masks as a display of fidelity to “public health experts” and the organized crime family of naturalism to their liking.
II. A Scam from the Beginning
Dr. Joseph Mercola reviewed the origins of the plandenmic and how the mentality of the plandemicists became embedded in the psyches of so many hundreds of millions of people globally while falsehoods were told about the numbers of people who have actually died from the CCP/Wuhan/China/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus:
For the past two years, I and many others have detailed the ways in which COVID-19 deaths have been overcounted to create the illusion of the pandemic being far worse than it actually is.
Now, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and individual states are backtracking on their death statistics, showing we were right all along. Deaths were initially exaggerated for political purposes, and now they’re being downplayed for the same reason.
CDC Removes More Than 72,000 COVID Deaths
As reported by The Defender,1 March 14, 2022, the CDC had removed 72,277 “COVID deaths” from the tally, including 24% of those attributed to children under 18.2,3 They claim a “coding logic error,” a faulty algorithm, had “accidentally” counted deaths that weren’t related to COVID. As reported by Udumbara:4
“Some of the pediatric deaths attributed to COVID-19, according to a search of the CDC’s Wonder system, include deaths where drowning or drug use was listed as the primary cause of death.”
Meanwhile, the CDC used the false death statistics among children to push for COVID shots for 5- to 7-year-olds. In November 2021, CDC director Rochelle Walensky cited that data to justify the recommendation to issue emergency use authorization for the Pfizer shot for this age group.5
Somehow, we’re supposed to believe that it took the CDC two years to realize this error. It’s simply not believable, and The Epoch Times has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for internal communications relating to the data change.6
Ironically, the adjustment comes on the heels of fact-checking articles “debunking” claims that COVID deaths have been overcounted. For example, in early March, Health Feedback claimed there’s “no evidence COVID deaths have been overcounted,” and that “the evidence suggests the opposite.”7 Yet here we are. Deaths were clearly overcounted, not undercounted. That fact check didn’t age well.
CDC Has Been Turned Into a Propaganda Agency
According to Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, the CDC is cherry-picking data to justify its public health policies, and when it gets caught, it simply blames its “outdated IT systems.” In a March 19, 2022, article, she wrote:8
“CDC is not a public health agency. It is a public propaganda agency that collects a massive amount of data. CDC marshals its huge data library to create presentations that support the current administration’s public health policies …
A 2007 Senate oversight report on the CDC noted the agency spent $106 million on the Thomas R. Harkin Global Communications (and Visitor) Center, and summarized its 115-page report with the following:
‘A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease.’”
Health Officials End Reporting COVID-19 Deaths
Curiously, three months before the CDC started changing its mortality statistics, the U.S. Health and Human Services stopped collecting data on hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 altogether. The HHS announced9 changes to the reporting requirements for hospitals and acute care facilities January 6, 2022. The new guidelines, which took effect February 2, note “The retirement of fields which are no longer required to be reported,” which include the “previous day’s COVID-19 deaths.”
What are they trying to hide? Are they stopping the flow of data to prevent examination and analysis? According to some, the HHS hospital data are among the best we have in the U.S., so ending that data collection doesn’t make sense. January 2021, Alex C. Madrigal, co-founder of the COVID Tracking Project, wrote:10
“In a series of analyses that we ran over the past several months, we came to nearly the opposite conclusion of other media outlets. The hospitalization data coming out of HHS are now the best and most granular publicly available data on the pandemic.”
An unnamed federal health official spoke with a reporter from WSWS,11 calling the move to stop reporting COVID-29 hospital deaths “incomprehensible.” The official added:
“It is the only consistent, reliable and actionable dataset at the federal level. Ninety-nine percent of hospitals report 100% of the data every day. I don’t know any scientists who want to have less data.”
Changing Definitions Justify the COVID Narrative
From the start of the pandemic, changing definitions have allowed authorities to manipulate data in whatever way they needed. Now, states are starting to change the way they define a “COVID death,” resulting in lowered mortality rates. In Massachusetts, for example, COVID deaths dropped by 3,700 after the state changed its definition to be in alignment with that of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.12
As reported by CBS Boston:13
“The state said currently the COVID death definition includes anyone who has the disease listed as a cause of death on their death certificate. It also includes anyone who had a diagnosis within 60 days but did not have it listed as a cause on their death certificate. Under the new definition, the timeframe is changed to 30 days for people without a COVID diagnosis on their death certificate.”
For the record, counting someone who died of any cause as a COVID death simply because they tested positive within 30 days of their death is still a grossly inaccurate way of determining the true death toll from this virus, because we know PCR tests have a false positive rate of about 97% when run at 35 cycles or greater,14 as was the norm from the start.
Results From At-Home Tests Aren’t Reported
Case counts are also being adjusted downward. In mid-January 2022, the Biden administration started distributing half a billion at-home COVID tests to the American public,15 and the results from those are not being reported anywhere.16 As a result, case counts will be skewed downward. According to 13NewsNow:17
“… the fallibility of case counts is the reason health officials track several COVID-19 metrics, like hospitalizations, deaths, and now, even viral samples in the wastewater18 — metrics that do not necessarily rely on people to go get tested or report the results they get at home.”
And yet the HHS is no longer requiring hospitals to report COVID deaths, which is one of the metrics health officials are supposedly focusing on in lieu of tracking cases. Don’t get me wrong, PCR testing was a scam from the start and I’m not suggesting we should pay much attention to those data. The point here is that the tracking of COVID data has been fatally flawed from the start.
What they’re really trying to do is shift toward passive monitoring, starting with wastewater sampling.19 Eventually, the goal is to monitor every person’s biological processes in real-time, and this is part and parcel of the transhumanist Fourth Industrial Revolution and The Great Reset.
CDC Hides Data
To make matters even murkier, the CDC is also hiding data on COVID hospitalizations and the COVID jab. The stated justification for not making certain data public is that people are “misinterpreting” the data. In other words, the data show that the COVID jabs don’t work, and the CDC doesn’t want that to be widely known.
The CDC has collected data on the effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters, but for some reason did not include the data for 18- to 49-year-olds in any of its publications. ‘Coincidentally,’ this is also the group least likely to benefit from the boosters. As reported by The New York Times,20 the CDC has been withholding data on COVID-19 according to age, race and injection status from the public, even though it’s been collecting it for more than a year.
It has also collected data on the effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters, but for some reason has not included the data for 18- to 49-year-olds in any of its publications. “Coincidentally,” this is “the group least likely to benefit from extra shots,” the Times pointed out, adding:21
“Much of the withheld information could help state and local health officials better target their efforts to bring the virus under control. Detailed, timely data on hospitalizations by age and race would help health officials identify and help the populations at highest risk. Information on hospitalizations and death by age and vaccination status would have helped inform whether healthy adults needed booster shots.”
COVID Has Served a Purely Political Agenda
Over the past two years, the pandemic has been used to usher in a range of radical changes that would never have been accepted were it not for widespread panic. It was used to implement illegitimate voting rules, which appear to have had an impact on the 2020 elections.
It was used to announce the urgent need for a “Great Reset” and a Fourth Industrial Revolution. It’s been used to strip people of basic human rights, and to justify radical environmental policies that will result in lower standards of living.
It was also used to abruptly transition the vaccine industry from conventional vaccine manufacturing using eggs to the use of risky gene transfer technology. The only thing the pandemic has not been used for is to make recommendations that actually improve public health. And throughout, data have been massaged and manipulated to justify the unjustifiable.
Now, it appears data are being manipulated yet again — this time to artificially end the COVID crisis so that the Biden administration can take credit for it during the upcoming elections. As stated in a February 24, 2022, letter from Impact Research, titled “Taking the Win Over COVID-19”:22,23
“It’s time for Democrats to take credit for ending the COVID crisis phase of the COVID war, point to important victories like vaccine distribution and providing economic stability for Americans, and fully enter the rebuilding phase that comes after any war. Below we lay out some strategic thoughts for Democrats positioning themselves on COVID-19 …”
Strategic positioning includes declaring the crisis phase over; pushing for “feeling and acting more normal;” and taking the side of people who are burned out on COVID and don’t want to hear about it anymore. Not setting a standard of zero COVID as the “victory condition,” and to “stop talking about restrictions and the unknown future ahead.”
“If Democrats continue to hold a posture that prioritizes COVID precautions over learning how to live in a world where COVID exists, but does not dominate, they risk paying dearly for it in November,” the letter states.24
Dr. Anthony Fauci perhaps did not receive this memo, as he is out there signaling that we can expect a return to COVID restrictions at any given point. In a mid-March CNN interview, he stated that “we need to be flexible” and “if we see a resurgence, we have to be able to pivot and go back to any degree of mitigation that is commensurate with what the situation is. We can’t just say ‘We’re done, now we’re going to move on.’”
Based on what we’ve seen so far, I wouldn’t be surprised if this “pivot” back into COVID crisis mode were to occur right before the midterm elections. (How the Pandemic Was Fabricated.)
Anthony Fauci helped to create the “pandemic,” which he “predicted” in late-2017 in an address at Georgetown University might occur during the administration of President Donald John Trump:
‘If there’s one message that I want to leave with you today that is based on my experience… there is no question that there will be a challenge [for] the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.
‘But also there will be a surprise outbreak…there is no doubt in anyone’s mind [the administration] will be faced with challenges their predecessors were faced with.’
Dr. Fauci, who served under five presidential administrations, later added that he cautioned former President George W. Bush to be more concerned with a potential ‘influenza pandemic’ than bioterrorism.
‘I worry more about the natural occurrence of an influenza pandemic and the ongoing plague of HIV than I do about a bio-terror attack,’ he said, adding that people should pay attention to natural causes.
In regards to the Trump administration, Fauci mentioned possible challenges that included a resurgence in the Zika Virus or a new flu pandemic.
He said: ‘What is for sure…history has told us definitively that it will happen because infectious diseases [are] a perpetual challenge.’ (Fauci Revealed His Fears of a "Surprise Outbreak" Three Years Before the Pandemic.)
Anthony Fauci had worked with the Wuhan Institute of Vriology BSL-4 on "gain of function" studies for at least four years prior to that talk at Georgetown University four years, four months ago.
A new flu pandemic?
In like manner, Anthony Fauci, after whom a science hall at his baccalaureate alma mater, the College of the Holy Cross in Worchester, Massachusetts, is being renamed (see Holy Cross to Name Science Complex for Dr. Anthony Fauci), is tipping is hand once again by explaining that us poor peons in the peasant class should not become blasé about the Wuhan/Red China/Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus as there are other pathogens that could cause another “pandemic” later this year that would necessitate another round of lockdowns and travel restrictions:
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, warned Americans this week that they could soon face additional COVID-19 lockdown measures should a new strain of the virus cause case numbers to increase.
Fauci, who also serves as an adviser to President Biden, said the BA.2 subvariant could soon increase the rate of infections in America. He suggested that Americans should "be able to pivot" back and forth between a more common way of life and the measures that were taken in an attempt to slow the spread of the virus at the height of the pandemic.
"If in fact, we do see a turnaround and a resurgence, we have to be able to pivot and go back to any degree of mitigation that is commensurate with what the situation is," Fauci said Thursday during an interview with CNN.
We can't just say, 'We're done. We're going to move on.' We've got to be able to be flexible because we're dealing with a dynamic situation," he added, noting the new variant to be less fatal than the Omicron variant. "The overall mortality is actually down. It’s a very interesting situation where the cases are going up, but it does not, at this point in time, appear to be any degree of severity."
Fauci said he "would not be surprised in the next few weeks, given the fact that we’ve begun to open up, and we have an increase in the BA.2 variant, that we’ll be seeing an increase in cases."
During the segment, Fauci seemingly dismissed concern over the crippling economic burdens associated with lockdown measures or other precautions.
A Johns Hopkins University meta-analysis of several studies in February found that lockdowns during the first COVID-19 wave in the spring of 2020 only reduced COVID-19 mortality by .2% in the U.S. and Europe.
"While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted," the researchers wrote. "In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument."
A study from the National Commission on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice last year found that domestic violence incidents increased 8.1% in the U.S. after lockdown orders were issued.
There have also been additional medical concerns over the impacts of lockdown measures.
The New England Journal of Medicine reviewed the psychological impact of people in quarantine, finding "numerous emotional outcomes, including stress, depression, irritability, insomnia, fear, confusion, anger, frustration, boredom and stigma associated with quarantine, some of which persisted after the quarantine was lifted."
Fauci has faced criticism after he shifted positions and contradicted himself on a number of guidelines, including the usage of face masks and the threat of COVID-19 in America.
Over the past day, the U.S. recorded 52,884 new coronavirus cases, as well as 1,685 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University. (Fauci warns Americans could face more lockdowns amid spread of new COVID-19 variant.)
Anthony Fauci is an insidious little man who delights in the economic pain the lockdowns imposed and in the worshipful celebrity status that he has attained in leftist circles. Just as the first round of the plandemic under President Trump, who gave Fauci carte blanche to do everything possible to undermine his administration’s economic achievements, came during Trump’s bid for re-election, so is it likely, as Dr. Mercola pointed out that the next round may come close to the 2022 Congressional midterm elections to keep voters angry with Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., away from the polls.
III. More Vaccines at the Ready as the Toll of the Dead and Injured Continue to Rise
The jab-happy Fauci, who lives in an alternative universe populated by his fellow elitists, is cooperating with his confederates in Big Pharma to develop no fewer than twenty different vaccines to deal with the “outbreaks” of alleged variations of the Wuhan/Red China/Covid-19/Coronavirus that they envision (plan?) will occur perpetually:
- At a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos Agenda 2022, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel and colleagues, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.
- Moderna is actively working with “Fauci’s team” to create a new shot for fall 2022. Moderna is also developing an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022.
- Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues.”
- An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was reached in January 2022.
- Additional shots are in development to target HIV, zika virus, Nipah virus, cancer, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, influenza (mRNA) and more.
Many experts have sounded the alarm that the COVID-19 pandemic was all about the shot and a larger agenda to impose totalitarian control worldwide. Already, one shot has turned into two doses and a third booster.
A fourth booster is also being discussed, including by Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, who said that the efficacy of the third shot is likely to decline over several months, necessitating another shot soon thereafter.
“I will be surprised when we get that data in the coming weeks that it’s holding nicely over time — I would expect that it’s not going to hold great,” Bancel said in an interview with Goldman Sachs.
Conveniently, Moderna is working on an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022 — and this is only the beginning.
Writing on Substack, contributor Eugyppius explained:
“Moderna, just one of multiple pharmaceuticals eager to exploit our new vaccine mania, are expanding their manufacturing capacity to produce as many as 6 billion mRNA vaccine doses per year.”
The information came straight from the horse’s mouth, at a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos Agenda 2022, at a session titled “COVID-19: What’s Next?”
Along with Bancel, the meeting was attended by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Richard Hatchett, CEO of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, and professor Annelies Wilder-Smith from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who together detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.
Combined shots planned to avoid ‘compliance issues’
During the discussion, Bancel states that Moderna is actively preparing for “what should the vaccine be in the fall of 2022, and what should it contain.” The company is “working with public health experts like Fauci’s team to figure this out. Because soon we’re going to have to decide what goes into the vaccine for fall of 2022,” he said (6.25).
Fauci’s NIAID is part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which, some may be surprised to learn, actually owns half the patent for Moderna’s COVID-19 injection.
In fact, the NIH owns thousands of pharmaceutical patents, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention spends $4.9 billion a year out of its $12 billion budget buying and distributing vaccines.
“Tony Fauci was able to choose, to designate, four of his high-level employees who each get individual patent shares,” according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an interview with James Corbett. “They will collect $150,000 a year for life if the Moderna vaccine is approved, which it has been.” (8:31)
In addition to working closely with Fauci, Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues.” Fauci said:
“The other piece we’re working on is for 2023, is how do we make it possible from a societal standpoint that people want to be vaccinated?
“And we’re going to do this by preparing combinations, we’re working on the flu vaccine, we’re working on an RSV vaccine, and our goal is to be able to have a single annual booster, so that we don’t have compliance issues, where people don’t want to get two to three shots a winter, but they get one dose, where they get a booster for corona, and a booster for flu and RSV, to make sure that people get their vaccine.”
When asked how soon this would occur, he continued (7:20):
“So the RSV program is now in Phase 3, the flu program is in Phase 2 and soon in Phase 3, I hope as soon as second quarter of this year. So the best case scenario would be the fall of 2023, as a best case scenario, I don’t think it would [be available] in every country, but we believe it’s possible to operate in some countries next year.”
Vaccines for at least 20 pathogens in the works
SARS-Cov-2 isn’t the only virus that Moderna and other pharmaceutical companies, along with health officials, are intent on targeting with more shots. Remember the zika virus, which Kennedy described as another pandemic fabricated for the purpose of selling pharmaceuticals and advancing totalitarian control? (34:10) There’s a vaccine on the way.
How about Nipah virus? Nipah virus, a zoonotic pathogen for which no treatments exist, is the inspiration for the film “Contagion.” The virus can only be experimented on in BSL-4 laboratories. As an aside, the National Bio and Agro-Defence Facility in Kansas will be the first biocontainment facility in the U.S. where research on Nipah (and Ebola) can be conducted on livestock.
In 2019, Nipah Malaysia was also among the deadly virus strains shipped from Canada’s National Microbiology Lab to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If you haven’t heard of Nipah yet, you likely will soon — another vaccine is in the works for it. Bancel said (43.45):
“We’re working with Dr. Fauci’s team, we’re working with Richard [Hatchett], to work on many more pathogens … The entire scientific community has known for years that there’s at least around 20-ish pathogens that are a risk for which we need vaccines, you know we have zika vaccine in Phase 2 … we’re working on a Nipah vaccine, those are viruses that not everybody has heard of.
“Because we need to have the data. What dose, what construct from a genetic standpoint is required … so that if a new pathogen emerges from that family we can very quickly move into a Phase 3.”
More mRNA shots are coming
Many other vaccines are also under development, including a Phase 3 study looking at combining Pfizer’s COVID-19 injection with their Prevnar 20™ (pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine) for adults aged 65 and older.
In a related news release, Kathrin U. Jansen, Ph.D., senior vice president and head of vaccine research and development at Pfizer spoke about the importance of “raising awareness of the importance of adult” vaccinations, echoing Bancel in their desire to create combination shots so adults can get multiple vaccines at one doctor or pharmacy visit.
“As the COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses continue to be administered, we believe that health care providers have an opportunity to talk to their adult patients about other recommended vaccines in line with CDC guidance,” she said.
An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was also reached in January 2022. According to a Pfizer news release:
“While there are currently approved vaccines for shingles, there is an opportunity to develop an improved vaccine that potentially shows high efficacy and better tolerability, and is more efficient to produce globally, by utilizing mRNA technology.”
A Phase 1 study by Moderna for its mRNA Epstein-Barr virus shot is also underway. The first dose of the experimental shot was given to a study subject Jan. 5. In a news release, Moderna detailed their intent on rolling out additional mRNA vaccines against a number of additional viruses as well:
“The start of this Phase 1 study is a significant milestone as we continue to advance mRNA vaccines against latent viruses, which remain in the body for life after infection and can lead to chronic medical conditions. Moderna is committed to developing a portfolio of first-in-class vaccines against latent viruses for which there are no approved vaccines today, including vaccines against CMV [cytomegalovirus], EBV and HIV.
“Our research team is working to bring even more vaccines against latent viruses to the clinic. We believe these vaccines could have a profound impact on quality of health for hundreds of millions of people around the world.”
Other mRNA shots also in development include:
- An mRNA cancer vaccine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- mRNA influenza shots, which are under development by several companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, Sanofi and Translate Bio.
- An mRNA HIV vaccine, one of which is being studied by Moderna in collaboration with the NIH.
- Various additional mRNA cancer vaccines, including one targeting advanced melanoma — being developed by BioNTech and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals — and several being developed by Moderna, targeting melanoma, NSCLC, colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Ramping up production for billions of doses
In case there were any doubts that the powers that be intend to use injections as an increasingly integral part of your health care routine and daily life, Bancel described plans for billions of doses of shots to be manufactured in a matter of months. He said during the WEF session (43:45):
“The other piece is manufacturing. If you look in 2020, we were able to ship 20 million doses to the U.S. government when the vaccine was authorized. That is not a lot.
“But this year we’re going to have 2 to 3 billion doses of capacity in a six-month timeframe, which is what I believe it will take us to get authorization of a vaccine, if all the work has been done before … you could have 1.5 billion doses available in six months, and that’s just from Moderna. And you have other platforms, it could be a much bigger number …”
With censorship now so pervasive, and Big Tech colluding with dictators and pharmaceutical companies to bury the harms occurring through these experimental vaccines — including death — it’s now more important than ever to let your voice be heard in support of medical freedom and opposition of government health officials intimidating, threatening and coercing citizens to violate their conscientiously-held beliefs.
The ethical principle of informed consent to medical risk taking, which includes the legal right to make voluntary decisions about getting experimental injections, must be protected. For now, however, as Eugyppius explained:
“The vaccinators are a great sword of Damocles over our heads. As I type this, they are scouring the earth for the novel pathogens their products require, and they, together with their bureaucratic and academic allies, will do their level best to call into being new pandemic scares and vaccination campaigns whenever possible — pebiorhaps every flu season.” (‘Vaccine Mania’: Fauci, Big Pharma Detail Plans for ‘Indefinite’ Rollout of Shots.)
The vaccinators pretend as though the harm they are causing does not exist even though they know that it is real, which is why they are trying to bury the truth as it is their intention to cause depopulate the planet in the name of “transhumanism,” which is a vital goal of the likes of Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Transhumanism is serious gnostic business, and it is something that Catholics, especially true bishops and priests, should take seriously when considering the abject immorality of the vaccines even apart from the illicit source from which they are derived, namely, human embryonic kidney cell lines:
According to Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution1 is to change what it means to be human by merging man and machine. In short, while the term “transhumanism” is not being used, that’s exactly where the global cabal intends to take us, willing or not.
In a November 2019 interview with CNN,2 history professor and bestselling author Yuval Noah Harari, a Klaus Schwab disciple, warned that “humans are now hackable animals,” meaning, the technology now exists by which a company or government can know you better than you know yourself, and that can be very dangerous if misused.
He predicted that algorithms will increasingly be used to make decisions that historically have been made by humans, either yourself or someone else, including whether or not you’ll be hired for a particular job, whether you’ll be granted a loan, what scholastic curriculum you will follow and even who you will marry.
Profound Dangers Ahead
There’s also an ever-increasing risk of being manipulated by these outside forces that you’re not even fully aware of. Looking back over the last two years, it’s rather easy to confirm that mass manipulation is taking place at a staggering scale, and that it’s phenomenally effective.
As noted by Harari in 2019,3 the available capabilities already go far beyond Orwell’s “1984” authoritarian vision, and it’s only going to become more powerful from here. He’s certain that in short order, there will be the ability to monitor your emotional state through something as simple as a wearable wristband.
You may dutifully smile and clap when listening to a speech by a government official, but they’ll know you’re angry or don’t agree with what’s being said, and could therefore take action against you based on your most personal, internal emotions rather than what you outwardly express.
Importantly, Harari warned that if we allow the establishment of this kind of digital dictatorship, where the system, be it a corporation or a government, knows the most intimate details about each and every person, it will be impossible to dismantle it. Its control will be total and irreversible. And, Harari believes we may have only a decade, at most two, to prevent this digital dictatorship from taking over.
Reengineering Life Itself
Harari also discussed the coming transhumanism at the WEF’s 2020 annual meeting in Davos (above), and in this speech, he went even further. Not only does the global elite have the technological capability to create a global digital dictatorship, but “elites may gain the power to reengineer the future of life itself.”
“For four billion years, nothing fundamental changed in the basic rules of the game of life,” he said. “All of life was subject to the laws of natural selection and the laws of organic biochemistry. But this is now about to change.
Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design, not the intelligent design of some god in the clouds, [but] OUR intelligent design, and the design of our ‘clouds,’ the IBM cloud, the Microsoft cloud. These are the new driving forces of evolution.”
It’s hard to determine whether Harari is for or against transhumanism. He speaks of it as an inevitability, and something that can be used for tremendous good. But he also recognizes its profound dangers, and seems to believe we need to discuss how these technological capabilities can be used, and whether they should.
In the featured Davos speech, it sounds as though he’s a proponent of this human intelligent design venture, but in his 2019 interview with CNN, he also stated that “we must never underestimate the stupidity of humans.” The fact that we have the technology to design new life forms, including new kinds of humans, does not necessarily mean that we’re smart enough to design something better than what natural evolution has come up with thus far.
In his Davos speech, Harari also pointed out that science is now enabling us to create life not only in the organic realm but in the inorganic realm as well. We’re talking about “living” robots and the like. He also raises the question as to who “owns” your DNA, if it can be charted and hacked. Does it belong to you, a corporation, or the government?
‘The Days of Free Will Are Over’
Whatever Harari’s true feelings about transhumanism, he emphatically states that the idea that we have a soul and free will, those days “are over.” In other clips that have been inserted into the featured video, Harari predicts that in the future, people will be able to look back and see that the COVID pandemic was the turning point where biological surveillance took over and became norm.
The explanation for how that was able to occur is given by Schwab, who has publicly admitted (see featured video) that participants in the WEF’s Young Global Leaders program have “penetrated the cabinets” of many world governments.
In Canada, for example, about half the politicians, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, have taken Schwab’s training. Schwab is all about ushering in transhumanism and changing what it means to be human, and his minions of global leaders are sure doing everything they can to make those dreams a reality. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.
Changing What It Means To Be Human
Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers.
If you believe that your thoughts and behavior are and always will remain under your own control, think again. We already have the technology to directly alter thoughts, emotions and behavior. Some of these capabilities are described in a 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning.
Human augmentation can ‘directly enhance behavior.’ And if you can change a person’s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person’s own detriment.
The report, “Human Augmentation — The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,”4 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars:5
“Human augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines.”
Key words I’d like to draw your attention to are the affirmation that human augmentation can “directly enhance behavior.” If you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone’s behavior. And if you can change a person’s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person’s own detriment.
Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training.
Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver.
Project Immortality
Historically, the striving for immortality has been a faith-based venture, based in the idea that the soul is immortal while the body perishes, which is a concept I am in complete alignment with. Transhumanists more or less reverse this idea. They discard the notion of soul altogether and aim for the preservation of the perceived personality, first through radical life extension of the physical body, and later through the transfer of brain data into a replacement form.
According to Dmitry Itskov, the Russian founder of the Immortality 2045 project,6 only 2% of people are ready to accept death — a statistic that he uses to justify the search for immortality through things like artificial organs, artificial body constructs, the simulation of mental processes and, ultimately, the transferring of one’s mind into an artificial carrier.
The goals of this project include not only the creation of the cybernetic technologies needed to achieve an immortal body, but also the creation of “a new philosophical paradigm for humanity.” Schwab has talked about the same thing, using the term “social contract” rather than “philosophical paradigm.”
The Immortality 2045’s vision, published in 2011, starts with the creation of the first robotic copy of a human body that can be remotely controlled by 2020. By 2025, they want an avatar into which the human brain can be transplanted at the end of life. By 2035, they want an avatar with a synthetic brain, into which the human personality can be transferred and, by 2045, they imagine a holographic-like avatar. Itskov says:7
“The aim of the first project, known as ‘Avatar,’ is the creation of a robot copy of a human being controllable through a ‘brain-computer’ interface. When I’m asked to give the gist of this project, I tell people to recall the film ‘Surrogates,’ which depicts a world in which every person has an artificial body that he controls remotely.
The makers of that blockbuster put an accent on the negative side of such a scenario. Nonetheless, the film’s highly graphic demonstration of the idea allows one to get an immediate sense of what it is.”
Does living through an avatar sound like a life devoid of spirituality to you? Not so, Itskov says, because by ending our dependency on our physical bodies, “many things will open up spiritually.” I have my doubts about that, as most spiritual adepts will tell you that being hooked on technology tends to hinder rather than elevate spiritual pursuits, which are most easily achieved by living simply, in close contact with the natural world.
I just don’t foresee being able to elevate spiritually when any number of outside parties can access your brain and dictate what you think, feel and believe. Transhumanists like Itskov tend to focus only on the perceived benefits of synthetic life. For example, he promises that his avatars will be affordable for everyone who wants them, regardless of income bracket.
Yet the WEF has clearly announced that by 2030, nobody will own anything, and while not clearly stated, that will likely even include your own body. So, to think that your avatar would be “yours” is probably unrealistic.
Looked at through the lens of the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution, it seems the plan is for the elite to literally own all of humanity, which will be refashioned to their own liking. And, if people can be hacked and controlled remotely, then we can be sure they will be. That’s particularly true for synthetic or mechanical avatars that can’t “live” or remain “conscious” without a cloud connection.
Resource to Understand the Transhuman Agenda — Blockchained
Corey Lynn is a top-notch investigative journalist who covers topics the mainstream won’t touch, including the transhumanist agenda. On her website, Corey’s Digs,8 you can find select chapters from her book, “Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports.”
Chapter 4 in the book is titled “Blockchained,” which explains what digital identity is all about. Digital ID is not just a piece of identification, with which you can prove who you are. It will collect and monitor ALL of your data, from your personal finances, education, work history, GPS location 24/7, everything you’ve ever typed on your computer, your search history, social media presence, emotional status and physical biometrics, down to your DNA.
I will only cover a minor part of that chapter here, the part on human augmentation and artificial intelligence (AI), so for more, be sure to browse through her website or, better yet, read her book, which can be purchased on her site. The digital PDF is only $9.95 and a print copy is $19.95.
Big Data, Data Sharing and AI
Make no mistake, transhumanism is the ultimate goal of the technocratic elite, and both “big data” and AI are integral components of that. Without one or both of those, the transhumanist dream is dead in the water. The goal of transhumanism is undoubtedly why there’s been so much focus on those two areas in the first place.
So, remember, data gathering, data sharing and AI are not about making your life more convenient. They’re to make you obsolete. The intention is to replace you with a synthetic copy of you that can be remotely controlled.
In 2021, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an intergovernmental organization that consists of 38 countries that work with various working groups and policy makers, issued a report on the “State of Implementation of the OECD AI principles.” So far, 46 countries have adopted these AI principles.
The strategy is to develop centralized repositories of public datasets in each country, and then enable public-private data sharing to build a vast network where each dataset is connected with all the others.
Biosecurity Will Be Used to Justify Surveillance Tyranny
Another report, by the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI), founded “to advance the development of artificial intelligence” and “comprehensively address the national security and defense needs of the United States,” highlights the need to combat digital disinformation and prioritizing biosecurity.
To help with that, a U.S. government-funded supercomputer is being set up at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory under the direction of the Department of Energy. This AI supercomputer can do more than 1 quintillion calculations per second.
Some of this data sharing is already taking place. As noted by Corey, NATO launched an in-house biometrics system for data sharing between nations in November 2020, and in May 2021, the U.S. military merged its biometrics-enabled watch list with the Department of Defense’s automated biometric identification system (ABIS).
“They are working on multi-modal fusion matching and improving biometric face-matching capability through AI and machine learning, and have already improved their long-range infrared cameras,” Corey writes. “Looking toward the near future, they are also focused on palm print biometrics, faces in crowds, integration to identify threats online, and non-traditional latent DNA collection.” (What You Need to Know About the Transhumanist Agenda.)
Fools.
Even Dr. Mercola is to be faulted for saying that he "aligns" with a faith-based immorality.
Excuse me?
Adam was created with a rational, immortal soul. The soul is the animating priciple of the human being. The sin of our first parents, introduced Original Sin into the world, among whose punishments is the death of the body The body will rise up again only on the Last Day at the General Judgment of the living and the dead to be glorified for all eternity in Heaven by virtue of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Easter victory over the power of sin and death that he wrought for us during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday, the most solemn day of the year if one's soul was in a state of Sanctifying Grace as a member of the Catholic Church at the time of bodily death. If not, though, the body will rise up to be sent into the flames of hell to deprived of the very end for which it was created--that is, to enjoy the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity in Heaven--and to tormented in numerous and quite particular ways according to the nature of one's own sins for all eternity without relief, without cease.
Transhumanism is diabolical. It is the stuff of Antichrist, but this is what the plademicists support as they remain completely unfazed even by the official statists on the Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System that are collected and analyzed by the Children’s Health Defense:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,205,755 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 25, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
The data included a total of 26,396 reports of deaths — an increase of 337 over the previous week — and 214,521 of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 2,937 compared with the previous week.
Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 799,732 adverse events, including 12,103 deaths and 78,227 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 25, 2022.
Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.
Of the 12,103 U.S. deaths reported as of March 25, 17% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 21% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 59% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
In the U.S., 559 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of March 18, including 330 million doses of Pfizer, 210 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to March 25, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:
- 9,771 adverse events, including 234 rated as serious and 5 reported deaths. The most recent death involves a 7-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 2152560) from Washington who died 13 days after receiving his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when he went into shock and suffered cardiac arrest. He was unable to be resuscitated and died in the emergency department.
- 17 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation). The CDC uses a narrowed case definition of “myocarditis,” which excludes cases of cardiac arrest, ischemic strokes and deaths due to heart problems that occur before one has the chance to go to the emergency department.
- 37 reports of blood clotting disorders.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to March 25, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
- 30,771 adverse events, including 1,771 rated as serious and 43 reported deaths.
The most recent death involves a 17-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 2189006) from Georgia who “suddenly died in his sleep” six months after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. The boy had an autopsy but the results were not disclosed. He had no underlying health conditions. - 68 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
- 650 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis, with 638 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
- 165 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to March 25, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:
- 20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
- 54% of those who died were male, 41% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.
- The average age of death was 72.7.
- As of March 25, 5,341 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1,687 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
- Of the 3,637 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 40% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
- 874 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, with 42% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 30% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.
- 2,373 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
- 1,655 reports of myocardial infarction.
- 13,657 reports of blood-clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 6,104 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 4,871 reports to Moderna and 2,638 reports to J&J.
- 4,088 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,511 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,388 cases to Moderna and 179 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.
Woman dies from rare brain disorder after second Pfizer shot
In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Richard Sprague said his wife, Jennifer, developed Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) after her second Pfizer shot and died within five months of the second dose.
Jennifer, a healthy 60-year-old woman from Missouri, experienced her first “event she couldn’t explain” four days after receiving the second Pfizer dose. Over the following weeks, her symptoms worsened until she could no longer work, pour coffee or walk without assistance.
Jennifer was later hospitalized and diagnosed with CJD, a fatal prion disease that causes degeneration of the brain. Her health rapidly deteriorated until she could no longer sit up on her own or communicate.
When Jennifer’s insurance would no longer cover her injury, she was placed on hospice and sent home. She died Feb. 21.
Sprague, who remains unvaccinated, encouraged others to avoid COVID vaccines unless they have full knowledge of potential adverse events and an understanding that the vaccine is experimental.
Heart damage found in teens months after second Pfizer shot
A new peer-reviewed study published March 25 in the Journal of Pediatrics showed more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis — raising concerns for potential long-term effects.
Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital reviewed cases that occurred between April 1, 2021, and Jan. 7, 2022, of patients younger than 18 who presented to the hospital with chest pain and an elevated serum troponin level within one week of receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.
While 35 patients fit the criteria, 19 were excluded for various reasons. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the remaining 16 patients was performed three to eight months after they were first examined.
The MRIs showed 11 had persistent abnormal findings and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), although levels were lower than in previous months.
According to the study, “The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis.”
Pfizer’s COVID vaccine less effective against Omicron for children 12 and older
Pfizer’s COVID vaccine showed “reduced effectiveness” against the Omicron variant among children 12 and older, according to a study published Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine.
The study, funded by the CDC, involved 1,185 patients, 88% of whom were unvaccinated.
During the “Delta-predominant period” (July 1 to Dec. 18, 2021), researchers reported vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization for COVID among adolescents 12 to 18 years old was 93% two to 22 weeks after vaccination.
During the “Omicron-predominant period” (Dec. 19, 2021, to Feb. 17), among adolescents in the same age group, vaccine effectiveness fell to 40% against hospitalization for COVID, 79% against critical COVID and 20% against noncritical COVID. This group’s median interval since vaccination was 162 days.
The study did not assess effectiveness of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine against the BA.2 Omicron sub-variant, which is now the most dominant strain in the U.S.
Incurable neurological disorder, aphasia, linked to COVID vaccines
News Wednesday that actor Bruce Willis was diagnosed with aphasia, requiring him to “step away” from his career, cast a spotlight on the incurable neurological disorder, which has also been linked to COVID-19 and COVID vaccines.
According to the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, aphasia is a disorder that results from damage to areas of the brain responsible for language.
The condition often occurs suddenly, but frequently follows a stroke or head injury, or could occur as a result of a brain tumor or progressive neurological disease.
Although The Defender found no evidence Willis’ diagnosis is linked to either COVID or COVID vaccines, reports of aphasia following the vaccine continue to pile up in VAERS.
In 2019, there were only 52 cases of aphasia reported to VAERS for all vaccines combined.
According to the latest data, between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 25, 2022, there were 3,079 cases of aphasia reported following COVID vaccines, with 342 cases occurring in those aged 65 to 74.
Moderna weighing vax for kids under 6
Moderna last week said it will seek Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for its COVID-19 pediatric vaccine, after announcing its two-dose regimen reduced cases of symptomatic disease by 43.7% in children 6 months to 2 years old and by 35.7% in children ages 2 to 6.
The company said its Phase 2/3 KidCOVE study of its mRNA-1273 in children “successfully met its primary endpoint.”
However, as Politico reported Wednesday, and as experts told The Defender, some doctors and scientists question whether Moderna’s clinical trial data will be sufficient for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to grant EUA for the vaccine.
Experts cited the trials’, small sample size, low efficacy rates and reliance on a research workaround called immunobridging as weaknesses that could hinder Moderna’s case.
“Given the other data that surrounds it, I don’t know that it’s a slam dunk that the FDA will move forward in terms of releasing it for emergency use,” Peter Hotez, professor of pediatrics and molecular virology and microbiology at the Baylor College of Medicine, told Politico.
“We’re still learning about the relationship between virus-neutralizing antibodies and effectiveness,” Hotez said, adding the FDA might need to raise its standards.
Multiple experts also raised questions about the risk-benefit ratio of the COVID vaccines for an age group with a statistically insignificant risk of severe illness. (17-Year-Old Died ‘Suddenly in Sleep’ 6 Months After 2nd Pfizer Shot.)
There are untold numbers of people dropping dead suddenly, including many whose relatives have been conditioned not even to think about the possibility their loved one died from the effects of the vaccines, whether immediately or after a period of time, such as what happened to the late Mrs. Jennifer Deason Sprague (mentioned briefly in the report above but has been more thoroughly documented in a separate article):
Jennifer Deason Sprague, a healthy 60-year-old woman from Missouri, died Feb. 21, five months after receiving her second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
Jennifer died from Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), a fatal degenerative brain disorder.
In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Richard Sprague said his wife received the first dose of Pfizer on Aug. 29, 2021, and her second dose on Sept. 21, 2021.
Although he remained unvaccinated, Sprague said his wife got the vaccine because she worked for the Perkins Restaurant Corporation, which required employees to get the shot.
“I told her to just lie about it and if they asked for a vaccination card, then she should ask them to make everyone show proof they had the shot,” Sprague said. “She felt bad lying about it, so she went ahead and got it.”
Four days after the second dose, Jennifer experienced her first episode of a “sudden strange event she couldn’t explain,” while she and her husband were at a dinner theater.
Sprague said:
“We had just finished our meal and were just visiting. All at once, she said, ‘There is something wrong. Please take me home now. I don’t know what it is and I cannot explain it.’ So we missed the theater and went straight home.”
The following week Jennifer called her doctor and asked if the episode she experienced could be related to the COVID vaccine.
“The doctor said if it was the shot, she would have known it after a couple of hours, not a couple of days,” Sprague said.
Jennifer started having more episodes and her left hand and side began to tremble. On Oct. 13, 2021, Jennifer went back to the doctor, who prescribed Xanax for anxiety.
Over the next few weeks, her symptoms worsened and her left side began to feel heavier than her right side, Sprague said. This continued throughout November and December. Jennifer’s doctor instructed her to stay on the Xanax because he thought it was anxiety.
Jennifer experienced another episode of the “events she couldn’t explain” on Dec. 24, 2021, only this time it was worse, Sprague said. She told everyone she needed to go home and apologized.
Later that evening, Sprague took his wife to the ER, where physicians treated her for anxiety and recommended pills she could take to “get her through the night.” The doctors could find nothing wrong with her, Sprague said.
The next morning, Jennifer went to work at Perkins, as all employees were required to work on Christmas day. But by 10 a.m., Richard got a call to pick up his wife.
“She had a very bad episode at work,” Sprague explained. “She couldn’t hold a tray or pour coffee.”
Sprague found a new doctor. At Jennifer’s appointment on Jan. 5, the physician said she was being over-medicated and stopped everything cold turkey, thinking this would resolve her symptoms, Sprague said.
A follow-up was scheduled for Feb. 10, but Sprague took Jennifer back to the doctor at the end of January because her symptoms were more severe.
Sprague explained:
“By this time, I’m having to tow her along when we walk. We would go to the mall and walk laps so she was in shape when she would return to work, but around January 23, to look at my wife — if this is Xanax withdrawal I felt I needed someone to encourage me.
“She was having a hard time dressing herself. It would take her two hours to get focused in the morning, and her brain fog was bad. She would lose her train of thought. After 30 minutes or so I’d walk in the bathroom and ask if she was okay and the shower would be cold again. At the time, we laughed about it.”
“When I took Jennifer back to the doctor, they took one look at her and knew something was going on,” Sprague said. Doctors performed blood work and MRIs, but the results came back normal.
“They recommended a neurologist — because something didn’t look quite right — and a psychiatrist to see if it was psychological, which scared Jennifer because she said she wasn’t crazy,” Sprague said. “If this was Xanax withdrawal this thing would be turning around any day.”
Sprague said:
“Early that evening something happened in her head. She did not like the neurologist because he wanted her to see the psychiatrist and she started repeating herself over and over: ‘This guy thinks I’m crazy. This guy thinks I’m crazy.’ She started stumbling around. She stumbled trying to get in the car. I called my son to help me and we took her straight home.”
After they arrived home, two of Sprague’s children — an RN and a chemist — came over. They persuaded Jennifer to go back to the ER.
“Doctors immediately did another MRI and admitted her around January 30,” Sprague said.
At the time, Jennifer was still able to sit up and walk independently.
“I didn’t know it at the time, but the neurologist had read the MRI and saw a significant change on the right side of her brain and suspected CJD,” Sprague said. “They didn’t tell me because they wanted to rule out everything else.”
Doctors did more scans of Jennifer’s brain and entire body to rule out infections and cancer. “They said she was a 60-year-old in a 40-year-old’s body,” Sprague said.
At the end of the week, Jennifer’s doctors said they needed to perform a spinal tap, but by this time, she was unable to get out of bed by herself. Sprague said:
“In one week she started regressing so fast it was unbelievable. She was fogged, having a hard time, was seeing snakes on the wall — like she had dementia — and it would only last about three days until that part of the brain was gone. But she never forgot who I was. She always remembered who I was.”
The spinal tap confirmed Jennifer had CJD, a prion disease. A study published last year in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases found a potential link between Pfizer’s COVID vaccine and prion disease in humans.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), prion diseases are a family of rare progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect humans and animals. Prion diseases are usually rapidly progressive and always fatal.
The CDC’s website states:
“The term ‘prions’ refers to abnormal, pathogenic agents that are transmissible and are able to induce abnormal folding of specific normal cellular proteins called prion proteins that are found most abundantly in the brain. The functions of these normal prion proteins are still not completely understood. The abnormal folding of the prion proteins leads to brain damage and the characteristic signs and symptoms of the disease.”
Sprague said the doctors hoped Jennifer had the curable autoimmune disorder known as “Brain on Fire,” which is triggered by an attack on one of the key neurotransmitter receptors in the brain.
Brain on Fire mimics CJD but can be cured, Sprague said. So, they “immediately started treating Jennifer for it and giving her steroids, but it made absolutely no difference.”
After Jennifer was diagnosed with CJD on Feb. 12, Jennifer’s insurance company said it would no longer pay for her care and Sprague was told his wife would not recover.
“If I leave her in the hospital it’s out of pocket,” Sprague said. “Otherwise, it’s a care facility or I take her home on hospice.”
Sprague said:
“I talked the hospital into allowing her to stay one more day and I suggested they try rehab one more time. But the next day, it was worse. They tried to get her to sit up and to communicate with her, but by then … she could take things in but could not take anything out.”
Sprague made arrangements for hospice care at his home.
“During her final days, she was pretty much in a total coma,” Sprague said. “Although at times she would still try to talk or kiss me.”
Sprague said:
“Your brain is just disappearing. It’s crazy. You’re in this perfect healthy body and your brain just dies within the course of a few months.”
Jennifer died at 12:47 p.m. on Feb. 21.
After speaking with The Defender, Sprague said he will be filing a report with the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System — a reporting system for vaccine injuries no one in the medical community told him about.
Sprague said doctors were “totally noncommittal” on whether the Pfizer vaccine caused Jennifer’s CJD, but the nurses became interested in the connection after reading an article in The Defender about Cheryl Cohen, who also experienced rapid-onset sporadic CJD and died within three months of her second Pfizer dose.
Sprague said he wants others to take the risks of COVID vaccines seriously and to understand the consequences of getting the shots.
He added:
“Never take one of these shots without full knowledge of what can happen … without full knowledge that this is experimental. This is not just something to run out and randomly do. You’re a guinea pig. Do you want to be a part of that or not?”
“I would take the consequences of not being able to do something because I’m not vaccinated over the risks of the shots,” Sprague said. “If you look at the risks and still choose to take it that’s one thing, but blindly taking it is totally wrong and unconstitutional.” (Exclusive Interview: Woman Dies of Rare Brain Disorder Six Months After Pfizer Shot.)
Tragic stories such as this abound. Individual human beings with rational, immortal souls made in the image and likeness of the Most Blessed Trinity and redeemed by the shedding of every single drop of the Most Precious Blood of the Second Person of the Most Blessed Trinity made Man, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, during his Passion and Death and on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday are being subjected to deaths by poisoned potions developed by mad scientists in conjunction with pharmaceutical company executives and government public health apparatchiks, each of whom is as heartless to the deaths their potions cause as they are to the deaths caused by the chemical abortifacients they develop and/or manufacture to kill the innocent preborn and the cocktail of other drugs that they market to kill off living human being put into “palliative care” just as poor Mrs. Jennifer Deason Sprague above.
One author has been the matter as follows:
“The greatest lie ever told is that vaccines are safe and effective.” Dr. Len Horowitz
Be Alarmed and Warned
If one is against COVID vaccines (genetic injections), one should be against the FDA, the NIH, CDC, Dept. of Health and Human Services agencies, NIAID, etc., but also actual doctors in clinical practice, researchers, hospital administrators, and for sure against the pharmaceutical companies and their CEOs that make and sell the most dangerous vaccines in existence. They are all from the same family of rats and not to be trusted as far as you can spit into a hurricane wind.
Be very careful when taking a vaccine for COVID. Your life insurance may not pay if it determines your COVID19 jab is an ‘experimental medical intervention,’ which is how it is being widely characterized. Also, the alarm is going up from a life insurance company, which reports a 40 percent increase in deaths among people in the prime of life. So this could be the shot heard around the world warning us that COVID vaccines could be worse for the human race than a World War.
Vaccines Are Safe
Vaccines are so safe that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) for vaccine injury and death payout $ 3.1 Billion between 1989 and 2015. Average annual payout 2005-2009: $ 75,630,051 per year. Average annual payout 2010-2014: $221,822,386 per year. In 2021, the U.S. government paid $246.9 million in vaccine-related injuries and deaths claims. Not a single cent was related to Covid-19 vaccines.
If you give a green pass to any of the above organizations, you favor the massacre of millions and are thus complicit. Tens of thousands of doctors and nurses are guilty as charged. The truth is people (and babies) have been getting hurt and dying from vaccines for a long time. I have been writing about this for over 18 years, but the message never got through, and look where we are now.
The COVID vaccines are at the apex of the wrongness in modern medicine and speak about a terrible form of terrorism inherent in the vaccine industrial complex. We should have known better. Virologists and vaccine proponents were warming up for decades for what we have now from Pfizer and friends.
James Howard Kunstler reported that Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of m-RNA technology) truth-bombing the Internet with three hours of straight talk about the U.S. health authorities’ campaign to destroy the lives of at least half a million U.S. citizens (so far). Podcaster Joe Rogan assisted skillfully in an interview that is finally rocking the world out of an epic consensus trance. (Listen.)
Kunstler said, “The American people have been played backward and forwards, inside and out, through and through, and up and down, driven to the very edge of national suicide by a combine of enemies within and without.” (Treating Disease With Health Not Vaxxines. For an extended interview with Dr. Robert Malone conducted by a man named Art Moore, please see: Scientific Fraud and the CDC - by Robert W Malone MD, MS, which is appended below.)
This scientific fraud is such that the lives of individual victims matter not one whit the monsters have developed a veritable demonic rite of endless vaccinations replete with digital vaccine passports as the price of admission to social life. One by one the victims die, and only a few of their stories of been told. Here are ten of those stories:
10 People Whose Lives Changed After COVID-19 Shots
1. Jim Ashby — learning to walk again
Ashby was forced to get a COVID-19 shot by Dec. 3, 2021, or his employer would consider him “voluntarily resigned.” Eight days after receiving the Pfizer jab, he had a major hemorrhagic stroke.
He’s been in rehab since October 2021, suffering from complete paralysis on the left side of his body. He still has a long way to go in recovery, and still can’t feel or use his left arm or walk without assistance.
His rehab is excruciatingly painful, he says, and he spends up to six hours a day learning how to walk again.
What’s worse, his employer isn’t covering the medical bills for the costs of this stroke. “My life has been totally changed, all because of the vaccine mandate … my old life is dead,” he says, “and I have started my new life as a paraplegic.”
2. Athletes collapsing and dying
Healthy athletes around the world are dying of heart attacks and strokes. The numbers are exploding, with athletes suffering neurological problems, too.
What’s happened in the last six months to a year that’s different? Is there anything in common that’s changed that hooks all these athletes together? They all have had COVID-19 shots. Among them:
- Abou Ali, a 22-year-old football (soccer) player, suffered from cardiac arrest in Denmark on Sept. 11, 2021.
- Caddy Alberto Olguin collapsed and died from a heart attack on the golf course on Oct. 9, 2021.
- 30-year-old Venezuelan marathon champion Alexaida Guedez, 30, died of a heart attack during a 5,000-meter race on Aug. 22, 2021.
- Andrea Astolfi, 45, sports director of Calcio Orsago in Italy, died of a heart attack on Sept. 11, 2021, after returning from training.
- Ava Azzopardi, 14, collapsed on a soccer field in the U.S. on Oct. 15, 2021, suffering from cardiac arrest — she had to be put in a medically induced coma to survive.
3. Dr. Neil Singh Dhalla, died from myocarditis
Dr. Neil Singh Dhalla fell asleep four days after he got a COVID-19 booster shot — and died from a heart attack. The autopsy stated myocarditis — inflammation of the heart muscle that’s a recognized adverse effect of mRNA COVID-19 shots. A CEO of a major health clinic, he was only 48 years old and had never had heart problems in his life.
4. Faith Ranson, 16-Year-Old Plagued by Convulsions and Tics
A happy, healthy 16-year-old girl in Australia who got the Pfizer COVID-19 shot is now crippled with convulsions, persistent nausea and visible tics. The problems began three days after her second shot and have been ongoing for months.
Health officials actually admitted “there is no question Faith has had a delayed reaction to the second Pfizer vaccination” and is suffering adverse reactions from the shot. Her story even made it to mainstream news.
5. Nurse with COVID told to go back to work
In this video, a “triple vaxxed” nurse from New York explains how she tested positive for COVID-19, and her employer told her to come back to work even though she hadn’t been in quarantine for five days — against CDC recommendations.
Since she was asymptomatic, she was cleared to go to back to work in a health care setting, but told she still had to quarantine in all other aspects of her life. In short, she can go to work to care for patients while actively positive for COVID-19, but she can’t go to a grocery store or a gas station.
Not to mention, her kids were quarantined for 10 days, but she was expected to go back to work in less than five.
6. Stroke-like symptoms in a healthy woman
Complaints of neurological problems and stroke-like reactions continue to pile up. Immediately after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 shot, this previously healthy woman experienced headaches and dizziness and blacked out “a few times.”
Within days, she started experiencing numbness to the point that she couldn’t stand up. Eight days later, she’s in the hospital with loss of feeling in her left arm, left leg and face. She states that 19 women were brought in to her hospital ward with the same symptoms over the span of one weekend.
7. Two teenage boys die from myocarditis in their sleep
Note: Video may not work on all browsers
Epidemiologists have confirmed that two teenage boys from different U.S. states died in their sleep of myocarditis days after getting the Pfizer shot. Both had received second doses of the shot, and McCullough said that in his view, the shots led to the deaths of the teenagers.
In a study that examined the autopsy findings, it’s reported that the “myocarditis” described in the boys’ deaths is “not typical myocarditis pathology”:
“The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.”
8. 59-year-old woman dies hours after shot
A 59-year-old front-line health care worker in the U.K. took the COVID-19 shot and died a few hours later. In the video, her acquaintance states:
“Now I know it’s a given the vaccine’s going to have some casualties — but people are threatened they are going to lose their jobs if they don’t take it … You have the right to take that risk, but you should have the right to refuse it as well — without jeopardizing your job or your freedom of entry or freedom from discrimination.”
9. Vaccine advocate nearly goes blind
Note: Video may not work on all browsers
The man in this video describes himself as a believer in “science” and a “vaccine advocate,” but this didn’t spare him from the shot’s adverse effects. Five days after his first Pfizer COVID-19 shot, he started having blurry vision in his left eye. Within three days, he had lost 60% of his vision in that eye.
After several medical examinations, doctors, optometrists and retina specialists diagnosed him with central serous retinopathy (CSR), in which a small vein ruptured, leading fluid to accumulate under the retina, causing retinal detachment and partial blindness.
Subscribe to The Defender - It’
Other cases of CSR have also been reported following COVID-19 shots, he says, and in a case report published in the American Journal of Ophthalmology it’s stated, “Acute CSR may be temporally associated with mRNA Covid-19 immunization.”
The man’s doctor told him that the risk of getting additional COVID-19 shots outweighs the potential benefit for him and tried to help him get an official exemption from further shots, but it was denied. He states:
“I have been deprived of my human rights as a citizen … I try to gather all my strength so many times during the past few months to just go and receive my second dose in order to follow the laws.
“But the fact that the science says there is an above-average chance that I may lose more of my sight has driven me to anxiety attacks, night terrors and disabling depression … This is a direct violation of my constitutional rights as a citizen and a human being.”
10. Young Woman Suffers From Seizures, Nearly Dies
Beginning her story by stressing she is NOT anti-vaccine or pro-conspiracy theory, this young woman describes what happened to her after she received a Moderna COVID-19 shot, which she decided to get so she and her husband could join some friends on a cruise.
The day after the shot she started feeling “weird,” delirious and “disassociated from herself,” she says. Soon after, she blacked out in the bathroom, and when her husband tried to revive her, she began seizing. She had three seizures between the time her husband called 911 and when the ambulance got her to the hospital.
She was intubated and suffered other severe effects, she says. She spent days in the hospital and is now taking anti-seizure medication, while living with ongoing anxiety about her near-death experience, which she believes was caused by the shot.
“Go out there and do your research so you can make an informed decision,” she says. “Because you don’t want to put something in your body that could potentially harm you.”
Let your voice be heard
If you or a loved one has been injured by a COVID-19 shot, I will help you share your testimony. Vaccine mandates have led to injuries, devastation and deaths — while the brainwashing “get your vaccine now” campaign is being used to divide and conquer.
One spark is all that is required to start a fire. There is a revolution building — a revolution for freedom to live your life without medical mandates or dictators calling the shots.
Please share your story with us, and encourage others you know who have a story to share theirs. It’s never been more important than now, for you and your family, to take control of your health. (Ten Peoples’ Lives Changed Forever by Covid Vaccines.)
Medical researchers discovered the risk of myocarditis in young men increases after each Pfizer injection, especially after the second dose.
Two teenage American boys have died after receiving the Covid “vaccine,” according to an article in the journal Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. The children were found dead in bed three and four days after their second Pfizer injections. The boys were pronounced dead at home and never given a chance to be resuscitated.
One boy complained of headaches and stomach complaints but felt better three days after the injection. The other boy had no complaints. According to autopsies that were performed, they didn’t have corona, but they did have myocarditis. The report suggested a hyper-inflammatory cytokine response could have driven the damage.
According to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), “Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart.”
Greatest Risk for Death
Medical researchers Dr. James R. Gill, Dr. Randy Tashjian, and Dr. Emily Duncanson discovered that the risk of myocarditis in young men increases after each Pfizer injection, especially after the second dose. The risk is most significant in the first week after the second dose.
“Two fatal cases of myocarditis in teenage boys a few days after the second dose,” reports US internist and cardiologist Peter McCullough on his Twitter account. They were “found dead at home, without a chance of resuscitation.”
More Deaths Coming
“I testified in US Senate on January 24 that ‘one case is one too many!’” exclaimed McCullough. “Parents and children should know that more deaths will occur.”
Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) safety panel determined a “likely association” between the Pfizer and Moderna shots and cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in vaccine recipients.
Japan labels Covid “vaccines” with warnings of their dangerous and potentially deadly side effects. They are particularly raising concerns about the risks of myocarditis in young men injected with Pfizer or Moderna’s mRNA gene–therapy treatment.
Proimenant Doctors Warned Parents Not to Inject Their Children
Why are healthy young people receiving the “vaccines” when teenagers are virtually immune to Covid? However, myocarditis requiring hospitalization occurs in up to 1 in 2,000 teenage boys and young men at rates following mRNA jabs, a rate far higher than the rate caused by Covid.
RAIR Foundation USA has continuously reported on the risk of myocarditis from the “vaccines,” especially in children. During an interview with RAIR, Dr. Roger Hodkinson warned that saying that the vaccines are “safe” is the “most grotesque form of medical malpractice.” The doctor explained that “In a normal clinical trial, this number of young men coming down with myocarditis, the trial would have been stopped in its tracks. Boom! Finished! Done.”
Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi tried to warn parents in a video statement not to have their children take the potentially “lethal” Covid “vaccines,”
Do not give the shot to children because they are absolutely without any possibility of defending themselves, if you give that jab to your child you are committing a crime.
Dr. Robert Malone, the highly respected inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, also released a powerful statement warning parents about injecting their children with the gene therapies,
Dr. Malone explains that if parents opt to give their children the Covid vaccine, “a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells.” “This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins,” he says, which “often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs” and can “trigger fundamental changes to their immune system.” Dr. Malone continues to say that damage done would be “irreparable”. Further, he warns that “this novel technology has not been adequately tested.”
Weeks ago, whistleblowers provided information that Covid ‘vaccine’ Injuries in the military, specifically myocarditis diagnoses, were being scrubbed from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED).
How many more lives must be destroyed or lost before governments worldwide stop demanding and pressuring their citizens to receive the controversial injections. The threat to children does not seem to be Covid, but the “vaccines” meant to protect them supposedly. At what point is it considered premeditated murder to give a child an injection that has been shown to potentially kill them? (Two Young Boys Found Dead in Bed afer Second Pfizer Shot.)
In response to the question posed by the author in the paragraph cited just above, it is very likely that the those in civil governments around the world want to see people die as part of the “great reset’s” program of depopulation. Too many “useless eaters,” you understand, people who, according to an incoming associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America, Ketanji Brown Jackson, do not have inherent natural rights:
A set of written questions that Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas (for whom this writer's daughter works) submitted to Jackson during her confirmation hearings asked the following: "Please explain, in your own words, the theory prevalent among members of the Founding Fathers' generation that humans possess natural rights that are inherent or inalienable."
Jackson responded: "The theory that humans possess inherent or inalienable rights is reflected in the Declaration of Independence, which states: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."
The very next written question asked Jackson: "Do you hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights, yes or no?"
Jackson responded: "I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights." (Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and Alienable Rights.)
It is pretty easy to dispose of people once one believes that human beings do not have any inherent natural rights, no less the binding precepts of the Fifth Commandment prohibit the deliberate, intentional taking of any innocent human life under any circumstances. Justice Jackson, who will be sworn in after the retirement of Associate Justice Stephen Breyer takes effect at the end of the Supreme Court’s term in June, therefore, has no problem supporting the killing of innocent human beings in the womb, a support she shares with the manufacturers of the poisoned potions that are killing off people around the world more by design than by accident.
Indeed, consider the list of mayors in Germany and Austria who have dropped dead unexpected since the introduction of the vaccines:
When did so many young and healthy middle-aged people, described as fit and sporty, drop dead before 2020?
Since December 2020, many sudden and unexpected deaths of mayors under 60 years old have occurred in Germany and Austria. Questions are swirling about whether these elected officials were overwhelmed by job stress, or could there be another reason for so many “fit and healthy” politicians dying?
On December 12, 2020, 41-year-old CSU Mayor Dirk Rosenbauer collapsed during a municipal council meeting and later died in a hospital in Coburg. The headline read, “At only 41 years old – mayor from Bavaria collapses during council meeting – dead”.
We are all completely shocked and it is incomprehensible. He was fit and healthy, always walked his dog and played handball
Sadly, the headlines have been filled with similar cases for about two years. The names of Mayors being added to the list of unexpected and sudden deaths seems to be growing steadily.
The “Freie Bremer” channel on Telegram compiled a list of several such incidents, at least 15 known deaths in Germany and Austria in the period mentioned. However, the number of unreported cases could be higher.
December. 12. 2020 41-year-old CSU Mayor Dirk Rosenbauer in Michelau, Germany. He leaves behind a wife and two children.
In September 2020, German Mayor Heinrich Suess died unexpectedly at the age of only 56.
In June 2020, the 50-year-old German Mayor of Lenggries, Markus Landthaler, died unexpectedly.
On September 15, 2021, the 47-year-old German Mayor of Limbach-Oberfrohna Jesko Vogel died. He leaves behind a wife and two daughters. From 1991 to 2014, he was a player and captain of the first handball team at BSV Limbach.
October 18, 2021, 57-year-old Deputy Mayor of Kindberg, Peter Sattler, died suddenly on a hike.
On October 21, 2021, the 60-year-old Mayor Christian Ruh of Bodolz on Lake Constance died unexpectedly.
On Saturday, October 24, 2021, Burscheid’s Mayor Stefan Caplan died unexpectedly. He was only 56 years old.
October 28, 2021, 59-year-old German Mayor Wolfgang Eckl “unexpectedly” died.
November 27, 2021, Mayor Jochim Ruppert died unexpectedly on Friday evening at the age of 59.
December 23, 2021, 54-year-old Schiltberg Mayor Fabian Streit died unexpectedly.
March 5, 2022 Mauerkirchen Mayor Horst Gerner died unexpectedly at the age of 57
On March 26, 2022, Christian Maurer, a 38-year-old mayor in Upper Austria, died. He collapsed on March 21 during a municipal council meeting and died days later in the hospital. Doctors could not repair Maurer’s cerebral hemorrhage. The local politician leaves behind his wife and their six-week-old son.
On March 29, 2022, The incumbent Mayor of Waldshut-Tiengen, Joachim Baumert, died unexpectedly over the weekend at the age of 57.
On March 31, The third mayor of Coburg, Thomas Nowak, died suddenly and unexpectedly at the age of 53.
On April 1, 2022, the First Mayor of Pfaffenhausen and trained police officer Franz Renftle died at the age of 54.
When will authorities investigate these cases more closely? Of course, not all of these Mayors have necessarily died from the exact cause. However, when did so many young and healthy middle-aged people, described as healthy and sporty, drop dead before 2020?
Are the numbers of the Mayor’s unexpectedly dying the same as in the past? Perhaps it could be? But shouldn’t the authorities compare previous statistics and share them with the public? Looking the other way or downplaying the number of unexpected deaths of younger and seemingly healthy Mayors only adds to people’s fears. Furthermore, it is creating even more rumors and “conspiracies.” If there is, in fact, a problem, it should be of concern to the government. After all, it’s government officials who are dropping dead in numbers.
RIP to all of the Mayors who have passed. (Epidemic: German and Austrian Mayors Under 60 Are'Suddenly and Unexpectedly' Dropping Dead.)
A whole lot of other vaccinated people are dying these days. Although most of these peoples’ relatives do not see the connection between their loved ones’ sudden deaths and the vaccines, some do. Here is yet another story:
The mother of a 34-year-old man who died suddenly two weeks after his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine said she believes her son would be alive today if he had had the information he needed to make an informed decision about the vaccine.
Victor Castillo Simoes died May 5, 2021, from an acute aortic dissection — an uncommon medical emergency in which the inner layer of the large blood vessel branching off the heart’s aorta tears. The condition mostly affects men in their 60s and 70s.
In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Simoes’ mother, Henrietta Simoes, said her son’s only symptom was the chest pain he experienced shortly before he died.
Simoes, a senior manager at Amazon, received his first Pfizer shot on April 20, 2021, at a Seattle, Washington Safeway.
Fifteen days later, he woke up feeling unwell and had chest pains, Henrietta said. He called an ambulance and told his girlfriend he “wasn’t right,” and needed to get checked out.
“When his girlfriend arrived, he introduced her to the medics and then collapsed,” Henrietta said. “He was unresponsive from that point on.”
Simoes was intubated in the ambulance and was taken to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle. Thirty minutes later he was declared dead, Henrietta said.
Simoes’ family had an autopsy performed. It showed he experienced an acute aortic dissection. (Exclusive: 34-Year-Old Died After Pfizer Shot, Mother Shares ‘Ridiculous’ Letters From CDC.)
No connection?
Just a coincidence, one of many?
Only the propagandists believe that there is no connection. The supposed “scientists” who “follow the science” only follow their own ideology, which is why, of course, that they cannot admit that most of the continuing outbreaks of the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/China/Covid-19/Coronavirus are being caused by the vaccines themselves:
U.S. counties with the highest rates of vaccination against COVID-19 are currently experiencing more cases than those with the lowest vaccination rates, according to data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The 500 counties where 62 to 95 percent of the population has been vaccinated detected more than 75 cases per 100,000 residents on average in the past week. Meanwhile, the 500 counties where 11 to 40 percent of the population has been vaccinated averaged about 58 cases per 100,000 residents.
The data is skewed by the fact that the CDC suppresses figures for counties with very low numbers of detected cases (one to nine) for privacy purposes. The Epoch Times calculated the average case rates by assuming the counties with the suppressed numbers had five cases each on average.
The least vaccinated counties tended to be much smaller, averaging less than 20,000 in population. The most vaccinated counties had an average population of over 330,000. More populous counties, however, weren’t more likely to have higher case rates. (Counties With Highest Vaccination Rates See More COVID-19 Cases Than Least Vaccinated.)
Yet it is that most people go about their daily lives without giving any of this any thought at all as they have been conditioned by our civil minders to dismiss all adverse news about the “sacred” vaccines as “disinformation.”
Go tell the father of the late Ernest Ramirez about “disinformation”:
“CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccine boosters down to age 12,” says a recent CBC news headline.
The article opens as follows:
“Millions of Americans between the ages of 12 and 15 can now get a booster shot of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, after the CDC formally adopted new recommendations backed by a majority of the agency’s outside vaccine advisers. The CDC now says that Americans as young as 12 who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine should receive a third dose as early as five months after their first two shots. The agency’s officials said that enough time has passed for around 5 million adolescents to be eligible.”
“Why in the world are they doing this?” one asks in disbelief.
Three basic facts have been well established by data and studies:
- Healthy children are at virtually zero risk of serious Covid.
- The vaccines will not prevent children from contracting the virus.
- Covid injections carry risk of serious side effects.
According to a cost-benefit analysis conducted by Toby Rogers, Ph.D., in the 5 to 11 age range, 117 healthy kids will have to die of vaccine-related side effects in order to save one child from perishing of Covid 19.
A study from Japan has shown that young people are seven hundred percent more likely to be killed by Pfizer jabs than by Covid.
We have been repeatedly told that we must follow facts and science when dealing with this pandemic.
The science on vaccinating children against Covid-19 is in, and it could not be any clearer: while healthy children are at negligible risk from the disease itself, they are at real risk from the shots.
Since the vaccines do not stop infection and transmission, they will protect neither children nor their communities from the spread of the virus.
It makes not scientific or medical sense to give them these shots. Vaccinating children for SARS-CoV-2 violates both the tenets of good medicine and evidence-based science.
According to Dr Robert Malone, who is one of the world’s preeminent vaccine scientists, the cost benefit analysis is not even close.
Those who want to vaccinate children follow neither the science nor logic. Subjecting children to Covid jabs needlessly exposes young lives to potentially grave risks.
The incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis may be as high as 1 in 317 in the young, especially boys, and increases further with each additional dose.
Then there is a danger of deadly blood clots as well as several other serious conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Astonishingly, scores of children have already been injected with two doses that turned out to be ineffective, which is the reason a booster is now required.
The booster, however, already looks to be even more useless than the original offering. The booster, in fact, appears to have negative efficacy which means that those who receive it seem to be more likely to contract the virus.
Soon we will have a multitude of 12-year-olds who will have received three of these pointless and dangerous shots without any medical justification whatsoever.
Robert Kennedy, Jr. said that injecting children with the Covid vaccines is a crime. He is not incorrect.
A number of children have already been killed by the vaccines.
Some of the newly vaccinated children will develop serious conditions and some of them will die. The lives of these healthy children will be cut short for no good reason and their parents will be beside themselves with grief.