Revised and Expanded: Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part sixteen

Although I realize that some of the very few readers of this website may have tired of reading articles about the Wuhan/CCP/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus, I believe that it is important to pass along new information as well as to provide additional documentation in support of facts established in previous commentaries.

To Recognize the Prophetic Moment in Which We are Living

Many people, including many Catholics all across the vast expanse of the ecclesiastical divide in this time of apostasy and betrayal, have been so focused on one or more of the details of all that has transpired in the past two years that they have failed to recognize the prophetic moment in which we are living.

First, it is essential to recognize that, as was stated in part one of this series on March 3, 2020, this whole so-called “pandemic” has been about social control, not public. Needless lockdowns, mask mandates, and “vaccine mandates” have been imposed by governors and mayors in various parts of the United States of America and elsewhere in the world to create a Red Chinese-style totalitarian rule that has been replete with tracking and the suppression of so-called “disinformation” in the name of “public health.

Consider the fate of Dr. Mary O’Connor, a Canadian physician who has had her license to practice medicine suspended for granting medical exemptions to the gene-therapy treatments that are being marketed as “vaccines”:

OTTAWA (LifeSiteNews) – A Catholic doctor of nearly 50 years from Ontario was stripped of her medical license because she refused to cooperate with a medical college investigation into why she allegedly gave out medical exemptions to patients for the experimental COVID shots.

Dr. Mary O’Connor confirmed with LifeSiteNews in an email that at midnight on December 23 the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) took away her medical license, which was first granted in 1973.

“The College did take away my license on Dec 23, midnight.  They consider me a high-risk person that must be urgently dealt with,” O’Connor said via email.

“I just keep praying for strength, and I have had so much prayer support from so many people.”

A search on the CPSO website shows O’Connor’s status as suspended as of December 23. Restrictions on her license were first imposed by the college on November 5.

O’Connor, along with three other doctors, became the recent target of legal action by (CPSO) after refusing to cooperate with an investigation into why she allegedly gave medical exemptions for the experimental COVID shots.

In November, O’Connor along with Dr. Mark Trozzi, Dr. Rochangé Kilian, and Dr. Celeste Jean Thirlwell had a legal filing against them by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario because they did not comply with a request to hand over confidential patient information pursuant to an “investigation” by the college as to why they were granting COVID-19 vaccine medical exemptions to patients.

The college in its court filing is demanding that the Ontario Superior Court mandate its compliance.

The court filing, set to be heard on January 7, seeks to also allow investigators entry into the offices of the doctors to copy or remove “necessary documents.”

According to a report in the Ottawa Citizen, the CPSO has also taken issue with O’Connor calling the COVID injections “gene-therapy experiments” as opposed to calling them “vaccinations.”

In her email to LifeSiteNews, O’Connor said that her lawyers along with the other doctors “are committed to fight very hard.”

O’Connor said that Dr. Thirlwell is no longer part of her group fighting the CPSO’s demands, but that Ontario Dr. Patrick Phillips has been added.

“What an honour to be associated with them,” O’Connor told LifeSiteNews.

The CPSO’s investigation against O’Connor concerns “her conduct in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic and her completion of medical exemptions for COVID-19 vaccinations and diagnostic testing.”

Instead of releasing the records, the college maintains that O’Connor insisted they must first “define COVID-19″ and that she “will not be able to move forward without the College’s precise definition of COVID-19.”

The CPSO also claimed that O’Connor requested for them to “advise if [the college] knows the ingredients of the gene therapy experiments, the so-called vaccinations, being administered to humanity without informed consent.”

O’Connor’s lawyer, Michael Swinwood, said she will fight the case in court and that he does not “see the need for an investigation.”

“There is no malpractice or incompetence involved,” Swinwood said.

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, has said calling COVID jabs “gene therapy,” is an accurate term.

This is despite governments, media, and most in academia along with the medical community insisting that the COVID jabs not be called “gene therapy” or “experimental,” even though the jabs are in the clinical trial phase until 2023.

Malone has also said that it is the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated, who are the “super-spreaders” of the disease.

The COVID-19 injections approved for emergency use in Canada, including the Pfizer jab for children ages 5 and up, all have connections to cell lines derived from aborted babies. For this reason, many Catholics and other Christians refuse to take them.

Also, the COVID jabs have been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects.

In Ontario, official reports released by its Public Health unit state that more than 100 young people from ages 12 to 24 were diagnosed with myocarditis, or heart inflammation, after getting the shots.

In reality, the effects from the jabs on the young are feared to be much higher, according to Trozzi and others.

Despite reports of injuries and even deaths from those who have had the COVID jabs, the CPSO itself says that medical exemptions are only to be given out if one had a first dose of the jab and was injured.

LifeSiteNews set up a LifeFunder campaign for O’Connor in November, which to date has raised nearly $18,000 to help her cause. (Canadian doctor in practice for almost 50 years loses medical license over COVID exemptions.)

Another physician, Dr. Meryl Nass, who practices medicine in the State of Maine, had her license suspended temporarily for disseminating “misinformation” about the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus and was ordered to under “psychological evaluation” of the sort that was used in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics to punish and “reprogram” anti-Communist dissidents:

A doctor with decades of experience can’t practice medicine after her license was temporarily suspended over complaints that she shared coronavirus misinformation, according to a Maine licensing board. The board has ordered her to undergo a neuropsychological evaluation, it said. Dr. Meryl J. Nass, who got a license to practice medicine in Maine in 1997, had her license “immediately” suspended for 30 days after a board investigation and review of complaints against her on Jan. 12, according to a suspension order from the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine.

Nass, who’s an internist in Ellsworth, must “submit” to an evaluation by a “Board-selected psychologist” on Feb. 1, the board’s evaluation order issued Jan. 11 said. “I have no comment about submitting to a neuropsych exam, except that the board ordered me to do so on shaky grounds,” Nass told McClatchy News, adding that she’s had her license for a total of 41 years.

“The information received by the Board demonstrates that Dr. Nass is or may be unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to her patients by reason of mental illness, alcohol intemperance, excessive use of drugs, narcotics, or as a result of a mental or physical condition interfering with the competent practice of medicine,” the evaluation order states. The complaints against Nass include how the board was told she engaged in “public dissemination of ‘misinformation’” about COVID-19 and vaccinations “via a video interview and on her website,” the board said about the October 26, 2021 complaint. It lists several comments Nass made that were subject to the board’s investigation. Roughly 10 days later, the board got another complaint about Nass “spreading COVID and COVID vaccination misinformation on Twitter,” it said. Nass called “disinformation and misinformation” a “fuzzy concept” that the board hasn’t defined for her, she said. “There’s no law that says doctors can’t express their educated opinion on any subject.” Other grounds for her suspension include how Nass treated COVID-19 patients with Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, according to the board.

The board noted that Ivermectin isn’t Food and Drug Administration “authorized or approved” as a treatment for COVID-19 in the suspension order. Ivermectin is used as a parasitic treatment for animals, according to the FDA. “For humans, ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses to treat some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea,” the agency explains online. Additionally, it noted the FDA “revoked’ emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine since it “may not be effective” against COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine is FDA approved for malaria and certain autoimmune conditions. On Dec. 19, a physician notified the board that Nass diagnosed a sick, unvaccinated patient “‘over the phone’” with COVID and prescribed 5 days of Ivermectin,” the board said. This patient had to be hospitalized for COVID-19. With another patient, Nass is accused of emailing the board about another COVID-19 patient saying she was “forced” to “provide misinformation” in order to obtain hydroxychloroquine. The board said Nass told them during a Zoom meeting that she “lied and said the patient had Lyme disease and so the pharmacist dispensed the medication only because I lied.” On Dec. 31, a Certified Nurse Midwife reported that Nass prescribed one of her pregnant patients who tested COVID-19 positive with hydroxychloroquine earlier in 2021, according to the board. Nass said she believes vaccines are “preventive, but they don’t work anymore against the omicron variant.” Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s leading infectious disease expert, says otherwise. Omicron “will ultimately find just about everybody” Fauci said on Jan. 11, CNN reported. But those who are vaccinated and boosted “will very likely, with some exceptions, do reasonably well in the sense of not having hospitalization and death.” Unvaccinated individuals are “going to get the brunt of the severe aspect of this,” Fauci said On her blog, Nass called her license suspension a “witch hunt.” Nass’ license is suspended until Feb. 11 “pending further Board action at an adjudicatory hearing,” the suspension order said. She said that this hearing can be “extended by either party.” Because of her suspension, her practice in Ellsworth was shut down where she said she takes care of chronically ill patients as well as COVID-19 patients. Ellsworth is located about 100 miles east of Augusta. The board said that her continuing to practice as a physician “constitutes an immediate jeopardy to the health and physical safety of the public who might receive her medical services, and that it is necessary to immediately suspend her ability to practice medicine in order to adequately respond to this risk.” (Doctor loses license for COVID falsehoods, board says.)

There are more such examples of medical fascism at work in the world today:

Italian researcher Domenico Biscardi, known for his criticism of the government’s Covid policies and investigation into the “vaccines” content, has died suddenly and suspiciously. The 53-year-old is believed to have died of a heart attack at home on the morning of January 12, 2022. However, many people, including an Italian Senator, feel that he is just the latest of a growing list of whistleblower medical professionals and researchers ‘waking up dead’, in a mental hospital, or otherwise destroyed.

In the days leading up to Biscardi’s death, he was visited by the Italian Carabinieri Command for Health Protection (NAS). Italian newspaper Il Giornale d’Italia reports that Police were investigating Biscardi because of research he was conducting into the effectiveness of the “vaccines.”

The researcher from Campania was very critical of both the mRNA shots and the more traditional Novavax injections. Biscardi had recently slammed Novavax for its supposed harmful contents,  which included ‘mercury and aluminum salts.’

Just before Biscardi’s death, he had announced that he would be going to Europe’s highest court, The European Court of Justice, to protect the population’s rights. He declared, “It will be a new Nuremberg. There will be war; war breaks out, pharmaceutical companies will have to pay billions of euros.”

Watch the following news report about Domenico Biscardi suspicious death,

Many people worldwide feel Biscardi is a hero for his brave research into the experimental injections. Recently, the Italian researcher released a video detailing studies on some of the adjuvants in the vaccine, which he says are illegal and unsuitable for human use.

Biscardi’s death, which occurred at a relatively young age, leads to understandable questions from his followers. Why do you drop dead at the age of 53 without any warning – especially when you haven’t opted for the experimental gene therapy vaccinations? 

Many have reported that Biscardi was “murdered” because he was about to release shocking information about the injections. Just a few days before his death, Biscardi said he has indisputable proof that there are tiny nano-devices in the Covid “vaccines.”  Biscardi had previously published videos in which he reported on “graphene, nanoparticles, and micro transmitters” in vaccines. 

Others claim his sudden death might have been “caused by the excessive stress due to the accusations and questioning he endured during the NAS inspection.”. 

In a video posted to Facebook, Senator Laura Granato publicly expressed her doubts about his death being from natural causes: “Coincidences? I do not think so.” The Senator was suspended in October from the Senate for ten days for refusing the vaccine stated,

I am shocked to learn of Doctor Biscardi’s death. So all those who are against these drugs and who are speaking with a modicum of factual knowledge… That means he had said publicly that he had found evidence and was ready to lodge a complaint with the European Court of Justice. (…) They find him dead in the house. Does anyone still believe in these coincidences? Not me”.

Growing List of Famous Dissenters Dying or Targetted

Andreas Noack

At the end of last year, German chemist and engineer Andreas Noack died under mysterious circumstances after making a video about graphene in the corona shot. Like Biscardi, police had raided Noack’s home a few months before his death. The raid occurred at the end of November 2021, during a live stream he was filming. First, Noack’s door was smashed in, after which officers stormed in screaming. An agent with a weapon ordered him to lie on the floor. Then two more officers appeared. One of them ended the live stream.

Noack, who has been regularly critical of the Covid vaccines and lockdowns, published a video about graphene oxide in the vaccine on November 23, 2021. The video, in which the whistleblower explains that graphene oxide forms tiny blades, went viral. His pregnant wife made it on November 27, in which she says that Noack was attacked and killed.

Dr. Giuseppe De Donno

In July 2021, 54-year-old Dr. Giuseppe De Donno, who devised a groundbreaking treatment for Covid patients, was found dead. The doctor’s treatment used the plasma from people who had recovered from Covid to treat patients who had contracted the infection. Unfortunately, the doctor who pioneered hyperimmune plasma allegedly hung himself. Dr. De Donno had developed an essentially free method of creating immunity to Covid using the plasma out of the blood of those who had recovered.

Many claim that powerful globalists and the pharmaceutical industry were hostile to Dr. De Donno because plasma is cheap. They want to continue to render massive profits from Covid, much as they did from AIDS, by selling azidothymidine (AZT) and other patent medicines.

The case is even more intriguing because Dr. De Donno was not against the Covid experimental ‘vaccines”. Instead, he recommended that people get the “vaccine” to protect themselves from Covid but also wanted to focus on treating those who were ill with it.

At the end of last year, prominent vaccination critic 44-year-old Brandy Vaughan, who worked for pharmaceutical giant Merck, was discovered dead in her house by her young son.

She saw it as her mission to educate people about the dangers of drugs and vaccines. She said the pharmaceutical industry makes people sick to make money. She also researched vaccines and discovered that they contain dangerous substances that damage the body.

“If I am ever found dead, then there was malicious intent,” Vaughan repeatedly wrote on her social media. In her last post on Instagram, Vaughan warned about the dangers of the flu shot. She posted the message two days before her death.

Dr. Mel Bruche

Well-respected Canadian doctor Mel Bruche was recently locked in a psych ward after exposing the stillbirth explosion in ‘vaccinated’ moms. Reminiscent of the Soviet Union’s treatment of dissidents, the Canadian government targeted the doctor and unlawfully placed him in detention against his will. Furthermore, the doctor was force-medicated with a psychiatric drug known to be dangerous to his age group and forbidden to use his phone.

Dr. Meryl J. Nass

Dr. Meryl J. Nass, a 25-year Maine doctor, has had her license temporarily suspended and was ordered to submit to a psychological evaluation for the alleged offenses of treating her patients with Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, in addition to sharing so-called “misinformation” about covid and its associated “vaccines.”

It should be noted that Maine is a state with a death with dignity law. Therefore, people sick with Covid can ask to be put to death but not get Ivermectin.

John O’ Looney

Covid whistleblower John O’ Looney was abused at a UK Hospital and had to be rescued by friends. “I feel very fortunate to have escaped hospital (I never dreamt I would have lived to say that) with the help of family in friends,” stated O’ Looney.

The independent coroner and funeral home director are well known for exposing hospital practices in the UK where nurses are ordered to administer a lethal dose of a medication called midazolam to Covid patients, leading to even more deaths.

O’ Looney had been openly against the vaccine mandates because of the shocking death toll apparently caused by the “vaccines.” Recently, he exposed the pressure being applied to medical officials to falsify death certificates to inflate the number of Covid deaths artificially.

Last January, RAIR warned about the war launched by Globalists against doctors who question the state’s vaccination and Covid narratives. Covid offers a convenient pretext for left-wing leaders to silence critics and consolidate power. Any doctor or researcher who gets in their way and refuses to fall in line will be canceled, some, perhaps even permanently.

See selected coverage on coronavirus tyranny:

Dr. Mary Bowden, who practices medicine in the somewhat freer State of Texas that has been our home for eight years, seven months, is suing Houston Methodist Hospital after she was denied privileges there because of the Orwellian rouse called “Covid Misinformation”:

Houston doctor previously in the spotlight after being suspended by Houston Methodist Hospital after they accused her of spreading COVID-19 "misinformation" is now suing the institution.
Ear, nose and throat specialist Dr. Mary Bowden, who runs a private practice, announced the suit on Monday, FOX 26 Houston reported.

Bowden's lawsuit asks for data from Methodist hospital detailing the effects of the vaccines and financial reports.
She held provisional privileges at Houston Methodist prior to her resignation in mid-November 2021 after a public dispute with the hospital.

Houston Method Hospital wrote in a series of tweets in November that Bowden had been using her social media to express political opinions about the COVID-19 vaccine and treatments, the TV station reports. Houston Methodist accused the doctor of "spreading dangerous misinformation which is not based in science."

Bowden said, "Vaccine mandates are wrong" and highlighted her battle to prescribe patients Ivermectin, a controversial drug hailed as a coronavirus treatment option by some

Methodist hospital said Bowden had never admitted a patient at the hospital.

Bowden held a press conference in November and said the way Methodist hospital handled the situation led to her name being "vilified" and people calling her "the sister of the devil." She said her focus was on treating the unvaccinated and she wanted to "eliminate the mandates" and let "people have a choice." (Texas doctor accused of spreading COVID-19 'misinformation' slaps hospital with lawsuit.)


Oh, that’s been “cancelled” by the plandemicists in favor of a narrative that is controlled by Big Pharma, to which the United States Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control, and the National Institutes of Health (including Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases). The plandemic continues to be about social control and profit, which is why the Centers for Disease Control has sought to suppress actual medical information that can treat those infected with the virus rather than subject everyone to a “one-size-fits-all” set of protocols that winds up killing people in the end. The global health care fascists have incentivized the killing of patients by the use of these useless protocols that exclude the use of treatments that work but for which physicians have been suspended and/or are continuing to live under the threat of suspension:

If you’re ever debating anyone about how many people have died FROM Covid in the United States and you don’t have time to read everything here, the figure arrived at here is ~93,420. All the justifications are in this piece with the final conservative estimates in the final section. The number of people killed by the government, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies is far, far greater than those who died FROM Covid.

It was recently revealed through a freedom of information request to the UK Department of Health that the real Covid death toll in England and Wales is substantially less than what the corporate-state media report. The “official” number meant to scare and manipulate the population into obedience and compliance is 174,233 deaths where Covid is mentioned as the cause of death on the death certificate. The actual number of deaths in England and Wales from Covid with no other underlying cause is…17,371. The average age was roughly 81.5 years with 85% of deaths in the over 65 category.1

This figure of 17,371 has been publicly available for a month now but not one single report of it has been filed by any western “journalists”. To quote the great comic and truth teller Jimmy Dore, “I wonder why they wouldn’t want people to know the real death count? I wonder why? Maybe it’s because people would [stop panicking] and putting up with all their authoritarianism. Maybe that’s why they also suppressed early treatments? Who knows?

What about the United States and its very different healthcare system, one we’re constantly told is superior in quality to the rest of the world? In the case of Covid it certainly appears to be the number one system in the world, at enriching hospital executives, administrators and pharmaceutical companies by being one highly efficient deceptive incentivized centrally controlled killing machine.

U.S. Deaths With Covid

The current “official” fear number for Covid deaths in the United States is 865,000. This figure shouldn’t grow much with the Omicron sniffles and headache variant, but it will for a number of reasons related to incentivizing death. By now you’ve seen the reports of people being included in that overall figure who died of motorcycle accidents, car crashes, cancer, gun shots and so forth. The absurdities of those counted as Covid deaths are endless but there’s a reason for this. The government pays a lot of money to hospitals that have “covid deaths”, even if those people didn’t die FROM covid. We know that those who had multiple co-morbidities and died with Covid were roughly 73% of the total. But what about those who died because they were never given early treatments and then were given deadly treatments once they got to a hospital? There will be no way to effectively calculate this figure since there’s just no data to work with, and that’s by design. But let’s go off what doctors who have been treating covid patients effectively and early have been saying.

Early Treatment (40%)

We knew in the early days of the original variant that Vitamin D deficiency was found in 78% of hospitalized Covid patients and later that a mortality rate of near zero could be achieved at certain levels of Vitamin D.2 Hydroxychloriquine and Ivermectin also emerged as early options for treatment that showed promise even with a lack of a wide range of studies at the time. Zinc, melatonin, aspirin, fluvoxamine and others proved effective over the months. The corporate-state decision to intentionally suppress effective treatments was rooted in having vaccines in waiting that were going to be approved no matter what and their emergency use approval required there being no effective treatments available.

Thousands of doctors ignored the CDC and FDA and began studying what drugs were working around the world. Doctors shared intel with others in forums and through collaboration and by the summer of 2020 the truth was out there, effective treatments were available and working well.

On a recent podcast with Joe Rogan, Dr. Peter McCullough stated that he believes around 85% of Covid deaths in the United States could have been prevented with early treatment. The fact it wasn’t being recommended constituted ‘crimes against humanity’. In his words, it was the first time in the history of medical treatment that he was aware of that patients were told to “go home and wait until your condition worsens and need to be put on oxygen.”

In combination numerous treatments proved effective and thousands of doctors like Dr. McCullough began treating patients and perfecting their methods and protocols. Before the deadly winter wave of 2020 came, there was a very effective plan in place that could have been deployed nationally at a fraction of the cost of vaccines and Dr. Fauci’s preferred high cost weapon of death - Remdesivir.

One nation that deployed this strategy of early treatment was India in the spring of 2020. Vaccines were not in high supply for India and they were in the midst of a massive spike in Delta cases. Numerous provinces deployed early treatment packages to every citizen which included Vitamin D3, Zinc, Aspirin, Ivermectin, and Doxycycline.

They also avoided use of the odious remdesivir. "All trials are saying that this drug is not effective in the treatment of COVID-19, rather it is complicating and resulting in mortality of patients," said Dr. Tripathi. "At so many centers, remdesivir trials were stopped. Also, remdesivir is costing minimum of Rs 5,000 per vial."3

Meanwhile when word reached the United States that Ivermectin had effectively ended the pandemic in India, Americans began seeking out the treatment for themselves. Doctors refused to prescribe it and many pharmacies refused to fill prescriptions for the drug.

The FDA was behind this push to suppress Ivermectin and mocked Americans for wanting to treat themselves. The agency is clearly controlled, like all U.S. government agencies, by corporations. This above tweet simultaneously shows why they didn’t want Americans getting early treatment to push the only treatment as the vaccines, and how much contempt they have for rural and red state Americans by mocking them with the “y’all”. This tweet should be revisited by historians who want to fully understand just how intentional the for-profit death management system worked on behalf of vaccine manufactures, while allowing hundreds of thousands of Americans to die by pushing them away from early treatments in The Great American Hospicide.

While Dr. McCullough puts the figure at 85% of the 865,000 deaths being preventable with early treatment this presupposes that those who didn’t respond to early treatment wouldn’t have ended up in the hospital under the Remdesivir-Ventilator death protocols. For a very conservative estimate let’s use a figure less than half of Dr. McCullough’s estimate - 40%.

Vaccine Deaths
Back in September attorney Thomas Renz claimed to have found the smoking gun for “vaccine” deaths with the government’s own CMS statistics.4

The official VAERS figure is ~22,000 deaths from Covid vaccines, but this system is archaic and under reported. There are zero incentives to report deaths. Many deaths will never receive a proper autopsy to show cause of death related to the vaccines either from heart attacks, strokes, or killer lymphocytes attacking other organs. The CMS figures show 48,465 deaths within 14 days of a Covid vaccine. Once again, there will intentionally never be a way to accurately count vaccine related deaths. Steve Kirsch has put the total estimate at 150,000 which he calls conservative.5 If VAERS under reports by a factor of 10-40x then the figure could be between 222,000 and 800,000. Let’s use that 150,000 figure for purposes of arriving at a conservative estimate in all areas.

Government Death Incentives (20%)
Remdesivir is a scam drug that was funded with $99 million in taxpayer dollars, plus billions more by Fauci’s NIH to conduct numerous studies. It failed as a treatment for other diseases including Ebola where 50% of the patients in the study died from it. For use against Covid it showed only 56% efficacy by the manufacturer’s own study, but later that number was revealed to truly be 19% efficacy when third party studies were done.

Remdesivir has such a horrible track record that nurses refer to it as “Run death is near.” The FDA just approved it for outpatient early treatment over the weekend, so in case anyone wants to go blow out their kidneys for the sniffles and headache variant the government has given them that option and since hospitals will be nicely rewarded for continuing to destroy people’s kidneys they’ll continue to offer it. Look for Gilead, the developer of Remdesivir, to be working on dialysis machines and other kidney treatments.

In the original study from April, 2020 which Fauci called a success, Remdesivir destroyed the kidneys of 23% of patients and had to be stopped in another 8% because it was killing them. One of the side effects of kidney failure is the lungs fill up with liquid and breathing becomes difficult. Patients are then put on a ventilator where very few come off it.6 If patients have pneumonia and already have difficulty breathing Remdesivir will accelerate their move to the ventilator, grave, and government cash bonus lottery for hospitals. Here’s what that lottery system looks like.

The hospital payments include:7

  • A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
  • Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
  • Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
  • A 20 percent “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
  • Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
  • More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
  • A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners

Attorney Thomas Renz has estimated that each Covid patient will net the hospital a minimum of $100,000 through this death-incentive structure. To stay with conservative estimates let’s put the average figure at just $115,000 per ‘with covid’ death.

U.S. Deaths From Covid
The current figure of deaths with Covid is 865,000.
If early treatments could have conservatively saved 40% of Covid related deaths, and late treatments killed roughly 20% of those in that category, another conservative estimate, AND we know roughly ~73% of those that died had one or more co-morbidities then we end up with ~93,420 deaths in the U.S. from Covid. When I arrived at this estimate I did not expect it to be almost the exact same percentage of the total population as the government figure for England and Wales (17,371 out of 59,130,000 = 0.03), but it did end up being roughly the same (93,420 out of 320,000,000 = 0.03).

The Great American Hospicide By The Numbers
These are rough figures of The Great American Hospicide based on avoiding early treatments, avoiding effective treatments and using deadly treatments like Remdesivir and ventilators to maximize death profits.

Estimate of total deaths from the vaccines versus lives saved:

  • ~150,000 (per Steve Kirsch’s conservative estimate)
  • Lives saved = 0 (since early treatment and natural immunity was always more effective than vaccines and the vaccines were never needed)

Estimate of total killed by the corporate-state for-profit death program:

  • 865,000: 40% (could have been saved by early treatment) = 346,000
  • 865,000: 20% (otherwise killed by deadly treatment) = 173,000
  • 519,000: Killed by The Great American Hospicide
  • 865,000 - 519,000 = 346,000 Total Deaths with Covid

Estimate of total deaths from Covid:

  • 346,000: Total Deaths with Covid minus 73% comorbidities = ~93,420
  • 93,420 as a % of US Population (320 mil) = 0.03
  • 17,371 as a % of England and Wales Population (59.13 mil) = 0.03

Estimate of Covid versus Covid Vaccines:

  • 93,420 have died from Covid, ~150,000 from “vaccines”
  • 56,680 more have died from “vaccines” or 60% more than from Covid alone

Final Estimates:

  • ~93,420 Deaths From Covid
  • ~519,000 Americans killed by The Great American Hospicide
  • ~150,000 Americans killed by Vaccines
  • ~669,000 Americans killed by Hospicide + Vaccines
  • ~$115,000 Hospital Profit per CMS hospicide death (+test, Remdesivir, ventilator, death)

United States Covid-19 Final Score

SARS-CoV-2: 865,000 93,420 dead

Government + Corporations: 669,000 killed

Cost: $5-7 Trillion + Trust in Government .gov agencies and entire HC industry

U.S. Deaths By Comparison
World War I: 116,516
World War II: 291,557
Vietnam War: 58,220
Spanish Flu: ~675,000
Millions of Americans will be turning to FLCCC doctors to treat them in the future and will be avoiding hospitals and opting for self care and self treatment wherever possible. Those doctors who go rogue or have a private practice will then have their licenses to practice medicine revoked for disobeying government directives. Patients will then be forced to buy drugs off-prescription in Mexico or Canada or online from pharmacies in India, something millions of them already do for the fair prices. These parcels will be intercepted at the border, as the USPS has been doing with Ivermectin by order of the FDA in the past months and most Americans will be forced to participate in whatever deadly “medicine” and “science” the federal government dictates. The nation already has a centralized government controlled health care system where losses are socialized (taxpayers) and profits are privatized. It will be just another industry that continues to extract vast amounts of wealth from U.S. taxpayers at the expense of their health, well being, and value of their national currency (inflation). (The Great American Hospicide.)

The Centers for Disease Control’s strait-jacketed “protocols” have killed most people who are said to have died from the virus, noting that scores upon scores of thousands of others have been killed by what the notoriously nefarious Anthony Fauci called “comfort care” (hospice, palliative care), meaning that their deaths were expedited by the use of the same sort of “cocktails” that are provided to family members to be administered at home once they “call in hospice” to provide “comfort” to a relative. One must recognize the prophetic situation in which we find ourselves and quit believing the propaganda of the so-called “healthcare” industry.

Mrs. Randy Engel’s five-part series on the cover-up of the deaths caused by the Salk polio vaccine should leave no doubt in anyone’s mind about the ability of government apparatchiks to remain utterly indifferent about the deaths of innocent human beings caused by medical treatments they have authorized. Mrs. Engel quoted the late Dr. Herbert Ratner’s study on this scandal as follows::

It would be less consequential if the employment of skullduggery to give failure the appearance of success, were a transitory event in the history of science and medicine. Unfortunately, it was a turning point that gave birth to rationalization, cynicism and even dishonesty in subsequent generations of physicians associated with voluntary and governmental health agencies and programs (emphasis added). To mention a few instances, such behavior was evident in government vaccination programs against the Asiatic (1957) and Swine (1976) influenza and the rubella (1969) vaccine programs. … The number of persons who view the medical scene with sophistication and skepticism, who do not servilely accept health programs generated by voluntary and governmental agencies, and who do not permit ends to justify means are rare. (The Salk Vaccine and Covid-19 -- Lessons never learned, Part V.)

Government public health apparatchiks are in the business of enabling Big Pharma, which is in the business of making money, lots of which is being made at the present time from the government “approved” and, in many cases, “mandated” “vaccines” that do not prevent one from contracting any virus and that, in all truth, are causing the outbreaks that are occurring throughout the world at this time.

Second, in this regard, therefore, the so-called “public health” authorities have been lying from the very beginning. These lies have included the origins of the Wuhan/CCP/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus, as discussed just above, the devising and implementation of “treatment guidelines” that have actually caused most of the deaths blamed on the virus and the refusal to authorize treatments (Vitamins C, D, Zinc, Ivermectin) that actually work to treat those infected on the virus, the inflation of the numbers of those who were said to have died from the virus in 2020 (people who died from falls, in automobile accidents or from long-term diseases were said to have died from the virus even though they did not have it at all), the granting of “emergency use” permission for the administration of “vaccines” that are not vaccines at all but experimental gene therapy treatments that have caused the deaths of thousands more people than the United States Centers for Disease Control are reporting in their Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS), the constant use of fear mongering with the emergence of the virus’s variants, most of which are the result of the spike proteins engineered into the gene therapy treatments, and the surrender of major public health decisions to the pharmaceutical companies which are reaping record profits off of the so-called “vaccines.”

Origins of the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus:

As was made clear by international law expert Dr. Francis Boyle in an interview with Geopolitics magazine almost precisely two years ago, the evidence pointing to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its connections to “gain of function” research funded by the nefarious Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases at a time when a moratorium on such funding had been put in place by the administration of Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro was very clear. Well, very clear to those who had the intellectual honesty to admit the truth that Fauci and his cohorts have to this day refused to admit because it would show them be feckless, reckless traffickers of unnecessary scientific experiments and apologists for the totalitarian murderers of the so-called “People’s Republic of China.”

A recent report examined the evidence of Fauci’s efforts to suppress the truth about the virus’s origins at the Wuhan Institute of Virology:

On Tuesday night’s episode of Special Report with Bret Baier, Fox News dove into the early days of the coronavirus pandemic and explored documents obtained showing that Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was warned early on that the virus may have originated in a Wuhan, China lab.

According to the timeline of events laid out by Baier, Fauci was told on January 27, 2020 that his NIAID had been indirectly funding the Wuhan lab through EcoHealth-- a US-based scientific non-profit that had been working with novel coronaviruses.

On January 31, Dr. Kristian Andersen, a noted virologist at the Scripps Lab, privately told Fauci that after discussion with his colleagues some of COVID-19’s features look possibly engineered and the "genome is inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."

Andersen added that the situation needed to be looked at more closely, at which point Fauci organized an all hands on deck conference call with colleagues where he was told that risky experiments with the novel coronavirus may not have gone through proper biosafety review and oversight. 

Hours later, Fauci hastily organized a call with dozens of worldwide virologists, and notes from the meeting obtained by Special Report reveal that suspicions of the lab leak theory were suppressed over concerns of how the public would react to news of possible Chinese government involvement. 

In the meeting, fears were raised by then-National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins that "science and international harmony" could be harmed and accusations of China’s involvement could distract top researchers. (Fox News Special Report outlines fresh questions on what Fauci, government knew about COVID origin.)

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House top medical adviser, shouldn’t be on TV; he should be under federal investigation answering serious questions about his knowledge of the National Institutes of Health’s reckless funding of dangerous gain-of-function research of bat coronaviruses at China’s Wuhan lab via EcoHealth Alliance while overseeing the government agency.

And the so-called infectious disease expert leading the US COVID-19 pandemic response should be explaining shocking new information and emails obtained by Fox News’ “Special Report” program exposing Fauci’s reported role in withholding vital information about the true origins of the suspected bioengineered coronavirus and subsequent alleged cover-up at the outset of the pandemic beginning in January 2020.

The fact that America’s highest medical officer reportedly failed to disclose this critical information to the public is beyond frightening; it’s a dereliction of duty warranting his immediate dismissal and full investigation by authorities.

“On January 31, Dr. Kristian Andersen, a noted virologist at the Scripps Lab, privately told Fauci that after discussion with his colleagues some of COVID-19’s features look possibly engineered and the ‘genome is inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory,’ ” reports Fox News.

“Hours later, Fauci hastily organized a call with dozens of worldwide virologists, and notes from the meeting obtained by Special Report reveal that suspicions of the lab leak theory were suppressed over concerns of how the public would react to news of possible Chinese government involvement.”

So instead of being upfront with the American people and world at large about where and how the deadly pandemic began, it appears that Fauci & Co. were more concerned with protecting Communist China’s image and shielding the oppressive regime from accountability. In the meeting, now retired former National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins expressed fears that “science and international harmony” could be harmed and “accusations of China’s involvement could distract top researchers.”

Huh? Did Team Fauci do Communist China’s bidding by acting as its de facto public relations firm covering up its possible role in unleashing mass genocide? And have Fauci, Collins or other staffers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ever communicated with Chinese authorities or colluded with others within the domestic or international scientific community to deliberately deceive the public on the virus’s origins?

These are just some of the questions the FBI and members of Congress should be demanding answers to as a matter of national security and public health, given the pandemic has killed millions worldwide and is still causing an average of over 2,000 American deaths per day, according to statistics by Johns Hopkins University.

So instead of being upfront with the American people and world at large about where and how the deadly pandemic began, it appears that Fauci & Co. were more concerned with protecting Communist China’s image and shielding the oppressive regime from accountability. In the meeting, now retired former National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins expressed fears that “science and international harmony” could be harmed and “accusations of China’s involvement could distract top researchers.”

Huh? Did Team Fauci do Communist China’s bidding by acting as its de facto public relations firm covering up its possible role in unleashing mass genocide? And have Fauci, Collins or other staffers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ever communicated with Chinese authorities or colluded with others within the domestic or international scientific community to deliberately deceive the public on the virus’s origins?

These are just some of the questions the FBI and members of Congress should be demanding answers to as a matter of national security and public health, given the pandemic has killed millions worldwide and is still causing an average of over 2,000 American deaths per day, according to statistics by Johns Hopkins University.

But that’s not all. “Just four days later, five researchers who were on the call authored preliminary findings abandoning their early private beliefs that the virus was likely the result of a lab leak,” reported Fox News. What caused these scientists to do an immediate about-face and reverse their initial findings?

What we do know is that various drafts of their “new” talking points and vacillating “scientific” positions on the origins of the coronavirus were suspiciously sent to Fauci and Collins for their approval. And Fauci and Collins continued to work behind the scenes to squash the lab leak theory for the months that followed.

So, here’s where we’re at in America today: Over the course of the pandemic, Fauci has been instrumental in getting social media networks and Big Tech to censor anyone spreading “misinformation” about vaccines or lab leak “conspiracy theories” while spreading misinformation himself to America and the world who relied on his trusted medical and “scientific” opinions.

Talk about a hypocrite! Has Fauci, Collins and/or the scientific research community benefitted financially or otherwise protecting China throughout the pandemic? And did Fauci commit perjury before Congress when claiming earlier this month his financial disclosures were public information?

This is where the FBI should be directing its attention — at real domestic threats such as those responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, which has killed nearly 900,000 Americans to date, and the subsequent alleged cover-up — not targeting innocent parents at local school board meetings who haven’t killed a fly. (Why hasn't Fauci been fired and put under FBI investigation yet?)

Leaving aside the author's facile acceptance of the official death toll of those said to have died from the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus as opposed to those either died with it or have been killed by the Centers for Disease Control "protocols," Anthony Fauci’s and Francis Collins’s touching concern for the reputation of a murderous Communist dictatorship is of no interest to the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, which will never investigate them as they have done and continue to do the bidding for the Chicom monsters whose state-approved financiers own Biden family:

For those wondering why Joe Biden is soft on China, consider this never-before-reported revelation: The Biden family has done five deals in China totaling some $31 million arranged by individuals with direct ties to Chinese intelligence — some reaching the very top of China’s spy agency.

Indeed, every known deal that the Biden family enjoyed with Beijing was reached courtesy of individuals with spy ties. And Joe Biden personally benefited from his family’s foreign deals.

What are these deals? And who are the individuals who made them happen for the Bidens?

Here, then, are a few key facts about the Biden family’s $5 million-plus deals with individuals in bed with Chinese intelligence.

Payout: estimated $20 million

In 2018, I was the first to report on Hunter Biden’s involvement with a Chinese investment fund called Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). Hunter even introduced his dad to a company executive in December 2013 when father and son flew to Beijing on Air Force Two.

In October 2019, Hunter Biden’s lawyer George Mesires said Hunter would be resigning from the BHR board, without receiving any return on his investment or shareholder distributions.

What Team Biden failed to address was the fact that Hunter Biden still owned a stake in the investment fund, said to be 10%.

When I first reported on Hunter Biden’s China ties in 2018, Team Biden denied that they existed. Then they absurdly claimed that his stake in the BHR investment fund was only $420,000.

Steven Kaplan, who conducts research on issues in private equity, venture capital, entrepreneurial finance, corporate governance and corporate finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, said a private equity fund with $2 billion under management will typically generate fees over its life of hundreds of millions of dollars.

“It is difficult to imagine, if not incomprehensible, that a 10% stake in those economics is worth only $420K,” Kaplan said via email. “The distinction they appear to be making is they capitalized the management company with $4.2M even if the fund manages $2B. The value of that management company is likely far in excess of $4.2M if they are managing $2B.”

Kaplan pointed to two large publicly traded private equity firms for reference, both of which have a market value of about 10% of the assets under their management. Using that as a rough guide, that would put the value of Hunter Biden’s share closer to $20 million, he said.

Two months ago, Hunter Biden’s lawyer said he sold his equity stake. They have not disclosed how much he made.

But courtesy of the Hunter Biden emails on his abandoned laptop, we now know two of the key individuals who made that deal happen. And at the time, they had close ties to the very top of the Chinese intelligence apparatus.

A Chinese tycoon named Che Feng, a k a “The Super Chairman,” played a key role in getting the deal going by introducing Hunter and his partners to large Chinese state-backed investment funds. Hunter saw a big payday. As he wrote in one email to business partner Devon Archer, “I don’t believe in lottery tickets anymore, but I do believe in the super chairman … I think the sky’s the limit.”

Who exactly is Che Feng?

At one time, he was business partners with the then-vice minister for state security in China, which is China’s KGB.

This man was reportedly the director of the ministry’s No. 8 Bureau, which targeted foreigners with its intelligence apparatus — including reporters, diplomats and businessmen. It was also reported that he oversaw intelligence operations for North America.

Another key figure in putting this investment deal together was Zhao Xuejun (a k a Henry Zhao) of Harvest Fund Management. Zhao is a Communist Party official. (“The mission of our Party is to bring happiness to people, and to revive the nation for people,” he has said.)

But more troubling — Zhao was at that time business partners with Jia Liqing, the daughter of the former minister of state security, Jia Chunwang.

In short, he was in charge of espionage, domestic and overseas intelligence work for China. Jia was famous during his tenure for developing China’s “deep water fish” (Chendi yü) strategy of developing thousands of special agents on foreign soil.

Zhao was also a key figure for Biden prospects in China. His fund participated in BHR, where Hunter Biden received a board seat. The business that he co-founded with Jia Liqing, Harvest Global Investments, also figures in Deal #2.

Payout: $5 million

Hunter Biden had another company called Burnham Asset Management. According to court documents filed by disgruntled investors, Harvest Global wired Burnham $5 million.

The purpose of this payment is unclear, but it may have been intended as an investment in Hunter’s business.

According to emails obtained from Hunter Biden’s laptop, Zhao may have sent other money, too.

“Henry remains committed to also making something work with myself and Hunter outside of this Burnham matter as mentioned before,” business partner James Bulger wrote. “He has a few interesting ideas.”

Zhao had suggested to Hunter and his business partners that he would structure a deal they estimated would be “putting money directly into our pockets.”

Payout: $188,000+

Hunter Biden had co-founded a firm called Rosemont Realty, and as early as 2011, he was looking for a Chinese buyer.

Rosemont Realty owns commercial buildings around the United States.

He had little luck initially, but then he and his partners received an “unsolicited offer” from a Hong Kong-based firm called Gemini Investments to buy his firm.

What is Gemini? The company is controlled by something then called Sino-Ocean Land, which was also chaired by the head of China Ocean Shipping Corporation (COSCO).

Japanese government agencies report that “Chinese intelligence services are closely linked” to COSCO. Some scholars in the West refer to COSCO as the “fifth arm of the Chinese Navy.”

For his part, President Xi Jinping has called the company “the dragon’s head for China” because of its strategic activities in Europe.

Hunter worked even more closely with COSCO in an attempt to buy the Greek national railway.

How much has Hunter Biden made from the Chinese deal that took over Rosemont Realty? It is impossible to know. But emails reveal at least one payment of approximately $188,000 from Rosemont Realty to Hunter Biden.

He also retained his stake in the company after the Chinese leadership took over.

Payout: $6 million

Ye Jianming, a wealthy Chinese businessman and the head of CEFC China Energy, provided $6 million to the Biden family, according to a Senate investigation into Hunter’s activities.

In early 2017, one month after his father left office as vice president, Hunter Biden worked for Ye as a counselor and adviser, and Joe Biden’s brother James received some of the funds that Ye transferred to Hunter.

Five million came in the form of a forgivable, interest-free loan. Ethically, a loan is worse than a cash gift for a politician’s family, because the loan giver can always demand their money back if the recipient of the funds is not doing as they like.

Who exactly is Ye?

Ye Jianming once served in a leadership position within the China Association for International Friendly Contact (CAIFC), which is funded directly by Chinese military intelligence.

CEFC’s corporate documents confirm its self-perceived role in advancing China’s national energy strategy. Ye Jianming’s close relationship with both the Chinese military intelligence apparatus and the government cannot be overstated.

Payout: $1 million

Hunter Biden received even more money in his relationship with CEFC and Ye Jianming.

In 2017, one of Ye Jianming’s “top lieutenants,” Patrick Ho, was arrested on bribery charges by the FBI for offering money to African officials in exchange for energy deals.

He immediately called James Biden, Joe Biden’s brother, looking for Hunter Biden.

Hunter was soon hired by CEFC to be Patrick Ho’s defense attorney despite his little experience in criminal defense. CEFC paid Hunter a $1 million fee. Hunter referred to Patrick Ho as “the f–ing spy chief of China,” according to leaked audio obtained by RealClearPolitics.

These deals are disturbing enough, and are exacerbated by the fact that every one of them was made possible by an individual with ties that sometimes went to the highest levels of Chinese intelligence.

But there is also the curious fact that in 2014, Hunter Biden took the unusual step of telling the Secret Service that he did not want protection when he traveled overseas. The request happened shortly after he began securing deals in Beijing.

Money that Hunter Biden received from his overseas deals flowed to other members of the Biden family.

Joe Biden’s brother James received over $1 million originating from the spy-connected Ye, according to a US Senate investigation.

And Joe Biden benefited, too. 

In a text to his daughter, Hunter Biden insinuated that he was giving half his salary to “pop.” This is more than hyperbole. 

Email records back him up to the extent that they show Hunter’s businesses paying some of his father’s bills while he was vice president of the United States. This means that Joe Biden benefited from these financial deals that happened courtesy of executives linked to Chinese spies.

Americans deserve answers as to why the Bidens received some $31 million and what promises or influence it bought. If Washington is to restore what’s left of its credibility, Congress must launch wide-ranging and serious investigations into the Biden family’s China cash haul and the resultant national security implications. (Chinese elite have paid some $31M to Hunter and the Bidens. Also see Schweizer: McConnell Linked to CCP through Wife’s Family about Senate Minority Leader Addison Mitchell McConnell's family ties to the Chinese Communist Party. For an article about the Red Chinese try to enforce their laws upon its own nationals—and even ethnically Chinese citizens—in foreign nations, please see Beijing's Tentacles Around The World - Fox Hunt.)

No, no one in the administration of China Joe Biden nor in the Federal Bureau of Investigation is going to investigate Anthony Fauci or any of his cohorts in the American “public health” sector. Then again, it is very reasonable to sell out one’s country to Communist mass murderers when one has already sold his soul to the devil by supporting the chemical and surgical execution of the innocent preborn and thus defies the Fifth Commandment in a thorough rebellion against the Sovereignty of Christ the King.

Fauci and his compatriot, Francis Collins, were concerned about protecting the Red Chinese government, not about exposing the truth of the novel coronavirus’s origins, something that gave them the pretext to support the sort of draconian, Red Chinese-style statist measures of social control, suppression of truth and the repression of treatment plans that actually work to cure patients in favor of strait-jacketed “protocols” that elevated the “body count” and thus gave statists more excuses for lockdowns to keep the masses in place until the “salvific” gene-therapy treatments could be created and then mandated to create a scheme of medical apartheid that will become a permanent feature of life in many states and cities across the United States and the rest of the world.

Fauci and his fellow fiends based most of their policies in 2020 on the computer models developed by "experts" at the Imperial College in England that proved to be completely wrong, and it those same "experts" at the Imperial College who recommended that wide use of "lockdowns" that researchers at Johns Hopkins University, of all places, have now concluded did nothing stop deaths said to have been caused by the coronavirus (most of them were the result of the "protocols" put  in place by the United States Centers for Disease Control, which worked actively to prevent the use of treatments that did work to cure those infected with the virus) and wound up worsening the economy and the world:

Lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19, according to a new analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins University.

The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by about 0.2%, said the broad review of multiple scientific studies.

“We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,” the researchers wrote.

But the research paper said lockdowns did have “devastating effects” on the economy and contributed to numerous social ills.

“They have contributed to reducing economic activity, raising unemployment, reducing schooling, causing political unrest, contributing to domestic violence, and undermining liberal democracy,” the report said.

“Such a standard benefit-cost calculation leads to a strong conclusion: lockdowns should be rejected out of hand as a pandemic policy instrument,” the paper concluded.

Early on, many states and 186 countries imposed bans on work, socialization, in-person schooling, travel and other restrictions to limit the spread of the disease, citing recommendations by top health care experts.

Researchers at the Imperial College London, for example, predicted that such steps could reduce death rates by up to 98%.

That never happened, according to the new study by researchers Steve Hanke, Jonas Herby, and Lars Jonung at Johns Hopkins.

“Overall, we conclude that lockdowns are not an effective way of reducing mortality rates during a pandemic, at least not during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic,” they wrote.

They examined deaths early during the pandemic and determined that, by end of the lockdown period studied, on May 20, 2020, a total of 97,081 people had died of COVID-19 in the U.S.

A prominent study at the time had estimated there would be 99,050 deaths without lockdowns.

Mr. Hanke is the founder and co-director of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise. Mr. Herby is special adviser at Center for Political Studies in Copenhagen, Denmark. Mr. Jonung is professor emeritus in economics at Lund University, Sweden.

They conducted a “meta-analysis” of dozens of studies that examined COVID-19 mortality rates.

Despite the overall findings, they did note some evidence that closing bars helped to reduce deaths.

“Closing nonessential businesses seems to have had some effect (reducing COVID-19 mortality by 10.6%), which is likely to be related to the closure of bars,” they said.

The researchers said the timing of lockdowns, and unintended consequences, may play a larger role than expected in affecting mortality.

“Lockdowns have limited peoples’ access to safe (outdoor) places such as beaches, parks, and zoos, or included outdoor mask mandates or strict outdoor gathering restrictions, pushing people to meet at less safe (indoor) places,” they wrote. “Indeed, we do find some evidence that limiting gatherings was counterproductive and increased COVID-19 mortality.” (Lockdowns Had Little or No Imapct on Covid-19 Deaths.)

This is a very rare piece of scholarly honesty in our world of abject intellectual dishonesty. However, the fact that researchers had to study this with empirical data is a reminder that there is often not a lot of common sense to be found in the halls of academe where I had walked from 1974 to 2007 (with a brief reprise in the Fall of 2014), reminding me of a commission appointed by Mayor Robert Francis Wagner, Jr., of the City of New York, New York in 1957 to study traffic patterns on the Brooklyn Bridge. The study took six months to complete and cost several thousand dollars to undertake before coming to the conclusion that traffic was heaviest on the Brooklyn Bridge from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and then again from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays. Anyone with a bit of common sense would have recognized there was no need for such a study to come to the conclusion that traffic was heaviest on the Brooklyn Bridge during the morning and evening rush hours!

Well, Anthony Fauci used the fake, phony, fraud computer models and policy recommendations of the Imperial College and wrecked the lives of many ordinary Americans by denying them gainful employment and causing epic disruptions in national life that were entirely unnecessary. Then again,  the extent of Fauci’s mendacity in suppressing the truth of the virus, including its origins, is staggering:

CNN was right, the mail dump was revealing. But what it revealed was not frank honesty. 

Quite the contrary. The emails showed that, within weeks after it first emerged, Fauci had been warned that Sars-CoV-2 might have been genetically modified and leaked from a lab. On Friday, January 31, 2020, Kristian Andersen, a California virologist, had emailed Fauci to warn him that the genome of the virus had “unusual features . . . some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”

Within hours, Fauci had set up a conference call for the next day, which was a Saturday, with Andersen and other prominent virologists to discuss the email. Early Saturday morning, he also emailed Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, his deputy, a copy of the 2015 paper in which Ralph Baric had reported his coronavirus gain-of-function research he had conducted with the Wuhan lab’s Shi Zhengli. 

“Read this paper as well as the email that I will forward to you now,” Fauci wrote. “You will have tasks today that must be done.” (In one of my favorite Fauci moments, he then ended the email with a breezy “Thanks, Tony.”)

Fauci has never disclosed what the “tasks” he gave to Auchincloss were or what he discussed with Andersen and the other virologists on the conference call—which has never been released. But we do know that the coordinated campaign to discredit the lab leak theory began days later. 

And the lead author of the March 17 letter published in Nature Medicine that became the ur-text used against the leak theory was . . . Kristian Andersen. Yes, the same virologist who had told Fauci on January 31 that the virus appeared “engineered.” 

And the emails contained still more damning evidence, showing the central role that a man named Peter Daszak had played in trying to steer inquiries away from the lab leak. To say Daszak had a conflict of interest was an understatement. His non-profit, EcoHealth Alliance, had helped funnel money from the NIH to fund coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab. 

At best, the emails suggested that behind the scenes Fauci and top virologists and infectious disease researchers had had serious concerns about a lab leak—concerns based on a top virologist’s observation that parts of the Sars-CoV-2 genome might have been artificially engineered—and acted in bad faith when they publicly dismissed it. 

China might never have cooperated with an investigation no matter how much pressure the United States put on it, but our own public health officials had ensured that the scientific and medical community never even came together to demand that the Chinese open their doors. They had ensured China would have plenty of time to destroy whatever evidence it had. 

This scandal was genuine, worthy of the world’s best investigative reporters. 

Who ignored it. 

The primary contribution of the New York Times to the story came on June 14, when it published a “conversation” with Kristian Andersen (calling it an interview would have been too confrontational, I suppose). Over email, Andersen explained that the concerns he had expressed privately to Fauci in January hadn’t matched the public letter six weeks later because—well, because science.

But you can trust Andersen. After all, he said so! “My comments and conclusions are strictly driven by scientific inquiry, and I strongly believe that careful, well-supported public messaging around complex topics is paramount,” he claimed. 

Best of all, the subhead of the hard-hitting “conversation” was this groundless assertion: “In early 2020, Kristian Andersen wrote to Anthony Fauci about the possibility of an engineered coronavirus. His research has since dispelled those suspicions.”

What research? Andersen was no closer to identifying a natural host for Sars-CoV-2 in June 2021 than he had been in January 2020. And any “research” he had done before supposedly changing his mind would have had to take place in a matter of weeks in the winter of 2020. This was not journalism but stenography, the equivalent of the Vogue Arabia interview in 2019 when Kayne West interviewed Kim Kardashian, his (then) wife. 

But even with outlets such as the Times refusing to step forward, I thought the public discussion of the lab leak was a hopeful sign, as was the fact that Facebook had backed off on its censorship. Media outlets were once again acknowledging realities that I and other skeptics had hammered since the start of the epidemic. 

With the fight over COVID vaccines heating up, I hoped I was seeing a new commitment to the truth from both social and legacy media outlets.

I was about to learn how wrong I was. (Truth Leaks Out.)

It should be clear by now that truth of any kind, natural or supernatural, matters not to amoral monsters intent on conducting dangerous research that they consider worth the “risk” of a pandemic so that they can then peddle supposed vaccines filled with poisons that just happens to make them millions of dollars personally.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has actively suppressed treatments that work to help patients recover from the virus’s debilitating effects in its more virulent forms, has indemnified the Red Chinese repeatedly in the past two years. It is clear that the Chicom model of repression and social control suits him, a pro-abort to the core, just fine.

Underreporting the Number of Deaths Caused by the Gene Therapy Treatments:

The very people who inflated the numbers of deaths truly attributable to the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus in 2020 have worked assiduously to make sure that the true numbers of those who have been killed by the vaccines that do nothing to prevent a disease that, though very debilitating for some, is not life-threatening in most instances if it is caught early and treated properly with high levels of Vitamins C and D, Zinc, Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and antibiotics such as Azithromycin, never get reported to the Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System. One way this is being done is by not informing physicians and nurses that the Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System even exists:

Brittany Galvin of Tampa posted a heartbreaking video on social media proving that the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is slow-waking cases of people who have been harmed by the coronavirus vaccine.

Galvin states that her significant vaccine injuries include Guillain-Barré syndrome, Pericarditis, Gastroparesis, and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS). She describes the bureaucratic nightmare she has endured to ensure her case is counted, and Brittany Galvin is determined to be counted. The video was posted at the Twitter account for The account surmises that “deliberate foot dragging” is behind the lack of interest in Brittany’s case.

As previously reported at RAIR Foundation USA, whistleblower nurse Collette Martin states that adverse reactions are not being reported to VAERS, and continued to say that many of her colleagues did not even know what VAERS is:

The majority of nurses, nurse managers and some doctors do not even know what VAERS is. I’ve spoken to our chief medicine, managers, other nurses on why we’re not reporting to VAERS and the most common response is, ‘What is VAERS?’”

In September, Project Veritas featured a video recording of Emergency Room Dr. Maria Gonzales as saying that while a patient “probably [has] myocarditis due to the [COVID] vaccine…” the government will not “blame the vaccine.” Further, whistleblower Jodi O’Malley, also a registered nurse stated “I’ve seen dozens of people come in with adverse reactions [from the Covid vaccine].”

Documenting adverse reactions from the coronavirus vaccine is clearly not on the federal government’s list of priorities. The question becomes whether the slow waking of cases reported to VAERS is deliberate.

How many adverse reactions from the vaccine are unknown because of government incompetence? How many adverse events from the vaccine are deliberately lost in government bureaucracy? (SHOCK: Woman Injured by Covid Vaccine Exposes Incompetent VAERS System (Video) - RAIR.

The video above features Collette Martin, a practicing nurse who testified before a Louisiana Health and Welfare Committee hearing December 6, 2021.1,Martin claims she and her colleagues have witnessed “terrifying” reactions to the COVID shots among children — including blood clots, heart attacks, encephalopathy and arrhythmias — yet their concerns are simply dismissed.

Among elderly patients, she’s noticed an uptick in falls and acute onset of confusion “without any known etiology.” Coworkers are also experiencing side effects, such as vision and cardiovascular problems.

Martin points out that few doctors or nurses are aware the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) even exists, so injury reports are not being filed. Hospitals also are not gathering data on COVID jab injuries in any other ways, so there’s no data to investigate even if you wanted to. According to Martin:

“We are not just seeing severe acute [short term] reactions with this vaccine, but we have zero idea what any long-term reactions are. Cancers, autoimmune [disorders], infertility. We just don’t know.

We are potentially sacrificing our children for fear of MAYBE dying, getting sick of a virus — a virus with a 99% survival rate. As of now, we have more children that died from the COVID vaccine than COVID itself.

And then, for the Health Department to come out and say the new variant [Omicron] has all the side effects of the vaccine reactions we’re currently seeing — it’s maddening, and I don’t understand why more people don’t see it. I think they do, but they fear speaking out and, even worse, being fired … Which side of history will you be on? I have to know that this madness will stop.”

Martin also states she believes the hospital treatment protocol is killing COVID patients. Doctors agree that it’s “not working,” but that “it’s all we have.” But “that’s simply not true,” she says. “It’s just what the CDC will allow us to give.”

What the VAERS Data Tell Us About COVID Jab Risks

I recently interviewed Jessica Rose, Ph.D., a research fellow at the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge in Israel, about what the VAERS data tell us about the COVID jabs’ risks. As noted by Rose, the average number of adverse event reports following vaccination for the past 10 years has been about 39,000 annually, with an average of 155 deaths. That’s for all available vaccines combined.

The COVID jabs alone now account for 983,756 adverse event reports as of December 17, 2021, including 20,622 deaths3 — and this doesn’t include the underreporting factor, which we know is significant and likely ranges from five to 40 times higher than reported. Most doctors and nurses don’t even know what VAERS is and even if they do, they chose not to report the incidents.

You can’t even compare the COVID shots to other vaccines. They’re by far the most dangerous injections ever created, yet there doesn’t appear to be a cutoff for acceptable harm. No one within the CDC or Food and Drug Administration, which jointly run VAERS, has addressed these shocking numbers. Both agencies outrageously deny that a single death can be attributed to the COVID jabs, which is simply impossible. It’s not statistically plausible.

The FDA and CDC are also ignoring standard data analyses that can shed light on causation. It’s known as the Bradford Hill criteria — a set of 10 criteria that need to be satisfied in order to show strong evidence of causal relationship. One of the most important of these criteria is temporality, because one thing has to come before the other, and the shorter the duration between two events, the higher the likelihood of a causative effect.

Well, in the case of the COVID jabs, 50% of the deaths occur within 48 hours of injection. It’s simply not conceivable that 10,000 people died two days after their shot from something other than the shot. It cannot all be coincidence. Especially since so many of them are younger, with no underlying lethal conditions that threaten to take them out on any given day. A full 80% have died within one week of their jab, which is still incredibly close in terms of temporality.4

Children Risk Permanent Heart Damage

Aside from the immediate risk of death, children are also at risk for potentially lifelong health problems from the jab. Myocarditis (heart inflammation) has emerged as one of the most common problems, especially among boys and young men.

In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an analysis5 of VAERS data on the preprint server medRxiv, showing that more than 86% of the children aged 12 to 17 who report symptoms of myocarditis were severe enough to require hospitalization.

Cases of myocarditis explode after the second shot, Hoeg found, and disproportionally affect boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis reports are males, and 85% of reports occurred after the second dose. According to Hoeg et. al.:6

“The estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] among boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence among boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs among girls was 13 per million in both age groups.”

No doubt, doctors are seeing an increase in myocarditis, but few are willing to talk about it. In a recent Substack post, Steve Kirsch writes:7

“I just read a comment on my private ‘healthcare providers only’ substack. An estimated100X elevation in rate of myocarditis, but nobody will learn of it since cardiologists aren’t going to speak out for fear of retribution.

His comment was a private conversation he had with a pediatric cardiologist. The cardiologist is never going to say this in public, to the press, or have his name revealed since his first duty is to his family (keeping his job).

If a ‘fact checker’ called the cardiologist, he might either refuse to comment or say ‘I’m seeing somewhat more cases after the vaccine rolled out.’ Here’s the exact comment that was posted to the private substack:

‘Pre-jab, one or two cases per year of myocarditis. Now, half his waiting room. Tells parents they are ‘studying’ the causality. Refers them to infectious disease specialist for discussions on their other children.

Admits he and about 50% of his colleagues know what’s going on but are too terrified to speak out for fear of retaliation from hospitals and state licensing boards.

Other 50% don’t want to know, don’t care and/or are reveling in the cognitive dissonance (like Dr. Harvey [Cohen] at Stanford) and/or letting loose their authoritarian demon. Good luck with these former colleagues of mine. The stench is overpowering.’

… From 1 or 2 cases per year to ‘half his waiting room.’ I don’t know the size of his waiting room, but it’s at least two people since he said ‘half.’ So, the rate has increased by: 250 day per year open/1.5 avg cases per year=166X.”

Myocarditis Is Not a Mild, Inconsequential Side Effect

Together with Dr. Peter McCullough, in October 2021 Rose also submitted a paper on myocarditis cases in VAERS following the COVID jabs to the journal Current Problems in Cardiology. Everything was set for publication when, suddenly, the journal changed its mind and took it down.

You can still find the pre-proof on Rose’s website, though. The data clearly show that myocarditis is inversely correlated to age, so the risk gets higher the younger you are. The risk is also dose-dependent, with boys having a sixfold greater risk of myocarditis following the second dose.

While our health authorities are shrugging off this risk saying cases are “mild,” that’s a frightening lie. The damage to the heart is typically permanent, and the three- to five-year survival rate for myocarditis has historically ranged from 56% to 83%.9

Patients with acute fulminant myocarditis (characterized by severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction requiring drug therapy or mechanical circulatory support10) who survive the acute stage have a survival rate of 93% at 11 years, whereas those with acute nonfulminant myocarditis (left ventricular systolic dysfunction, but otherwise hemodynamically stable11) have a survival rate of just 45% at 11 years.12

This could mean that anywhere from 7% to 55% of the teens injured by these shots today might not survive into their late 20s or early 30s. Some might not even make it into their early 20s! How is this possibly an acceptable tradeoff for a virus you have practically zero risk of dying from as a child or adolescent?

Excess Deaths Are Exploding, Including Among Teens

Throughout the pandemic, the COVID jab was held out as the way back to normalcy. Yet, despite mass injections and boosters, excess deaths keep rising. For example, in the week ending November 12, 2021, the U.K. reported 2,047 more deaths13 than occurred during the same period between 2015 and 2019.

COVID-19 cannot be entirely to blame, as it was listed on the death certificates for only 1,197 people. Even more telling is the fact that, since July 2021, non-COVID deaths in the U.K. have been higher than the weekly average in the five years prior to the pandemic. Heart disease and strokes appear to be behind many of the excess deaths, and both are known side effects of the COVID jab.

In a November 28, 2021, Twitter post,14 Silicon Valley software engineer Ben M. revealed that in the preceding 13 weeks, about 107,700 seniors died above the normal rate, despite a 98.7% vaccination rate. In another example, he used data from the CDC and to show excess deaths rising in Vermont even as the majority of adults have been injected.15

“Vermont had 71% of their entire population vaccinated by June 1, 2021,” he tweeted. “That’s 83% of their adult population, yet they are seeing the most excess deaths now since the pandemic!”

Even more disturbing, British data show deaths among teenagers have spiked since that age group became eligible for the COVID shots.16 Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, 148 deaths were reported among 15- to 19-year-olds. Between the week ending June 25, 2021, and the week ending September 17, 2021, 217 deaths occurred in that age group. That’s an increase of 47%!

Correlation does not equal causation, but it is extremely concerning to see that deaths have increased by 47% among teens over the age of 15, and COVID-19 deaths have also increased among this age group since they started receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and it is perhaps one coincidence too far. ~ The Exposé

Deaths from COVID-19 also went up among 15- to 19-year-olds after the shots were rolled out for this age group. Significant concerns have been raised about the possibility that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).17 Is that what’s going on here? As reported by The Exposé, which conducted the investigation:

“Correlation does not equal causation, but it is extremely concerning to see that deaths have increased by 47% among teens over the age of 15, and COVID-19 deaths have also increased among this age group since they started receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and it is perhaps one coincidence too far.”

Omicron Poses No Risk to Young People

As noted in a recent analysis by Dr. Robert Malone,19 (who recently got banned from Twitter but can be found on Substack), the risk-benefit ratio of the COVID shot is becoming even more inverted with the emergence of Omicron, as this variant produces far milder illness than previous variants, putting children at even lower risk of hospitalization or death from infection than they were before, and their risk was already negligible.

Malone is currently spearheading the second Physicians Declaration20 by the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists, which has been signed by more than 16,000 doctors and scientists, stating that “healthy children shall not be subjected to forced vaccination” as their clinical risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection is negligible and long term safety of the shots cannot be determined prior to such policies being enacted.

Not only are children at high risk for severe adverse events from the shots, but having healthy, unvaccinated children in the population is crucial to achieving herd immunity.

Shots Double Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Researchers have also found Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 shots dramatically increase biomarkers associated with thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following injection.21

People who had received two doses of the mRNA jab more than doubled their five-year risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the researchers found, driving it from an average of 11% to 25%. ACS is an umbrella term that includes not only heart attacks, but also a range of other conditions involving abruptly reduced blood flow to your heart. In a November 21, 2021, tweet, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra wrote:22

Extraordinary, disturbing, upsetting. We now have evidence of a plausible biological mechanism of how mRNA vaccine may be contributing to increased cardiac events. The abstract is published in the highest impact cardiology journal so we must take these findings very seriously.”

AMA Is A-OK With Sacrificing Children

Tragically, it’s not only the CDC and FDA that have been captured by the drug industry and who are sacrificing public health, including the health of our children, in order to further the technocratic Great Reset agenda.

Even the American Medical Association, which is supposed to lobby for physicians and medical students in the U.S. and promote medicine for the betterment of public health, has abandoned all semblance of ethics, transparency and honesty.

In a mid-November 2021 article on the AMA’s website, “COVID-19 Vaccine for Kids: How We Know It’s Safe,”23 contributing news writer Tanya Albert Henry cites data straight from Pfizer’s press release, and then goes on to claim we “know it’s safe” because “younger children see the same side effects as has been seen in adults and teens.” Based on the VAERS data, that should send shivers down parents’ backs.

“The American Academy of Pediatrics is on board with vaccinating this age group, along with the American Academy of Family Physicians and the Pediatrics Infectious Diseases Society, said Dr. Fryhofer, chair-elect the AMA Board of Trustees,” Henry writes.

“Dr. Fryhofer … noted that myocarditis has been a rare occurrence after the second dose of the mRNA vaccines. ‘The observed risk is highest in young males age 12 to 29, but COVID infection can also cause myocarditis,’ she pointed out. ‘For adolescents and young adults, the risk of myocarditis caused by COVID infection is much higher than after mRNA vaccination.’”

Really? Where did Fryhofer get that idea? I’ve not seen any data to back that up, and Henry doesn’t provide any.

What Do the VAERS Data Show?

Research published in 201724 calculated the background rate of myocarditis in children and youth, showing it occurs at a rate of four cases per million per year. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, as of 2020 there were 73.1 million people under the age of 18 in the U.S.25 That means the background rate for myocarditis in adolescents (18 and younger) would be about 292 cases per year.

In total, that’s 1,475 cases of myocarditis in teens aged 18 and younger — five times the background rate. And again, this does not take into account the underreporting rate, which has been calculated to be anywhere from five to 40.

Meanwhile, the CDC27 claims that, between March 2020 and January 2021, “the risk for myocarditis was 0.146% among patients diagnosed with COVID-19,” compared to a background rate of 0.009% among patients who did not have a diagnosis of COVID-19.

After adjusting for “patient and hospital characteristics,” COVID-19 patients between the ages of 16 and 39 were on average seven times more likely to develop myocarditis than those without COVID.

That said, the CDC stressed that “Overall, myocarditis was uncommon” among all patients, COVID or not. What’s more, only 23.7% of myocarditis patients between the ages of 16 and 24 had a history of COVID-19, so a majority of the cases in that age group were not due to COVID.

We’re also not talking about big numbers in terms of actual COVID infections. The weekly adolescent hospitalization rate peaked at 2.1 per 100,000 in early January 2021, declined to 0.6 per 100,000 in mid-March, and rose to 1.3 per 100,000 in April.28

Using that peak hospitalization rate of 2.1 per 100,000 (or 21 per million) in this age group, and assuming the risk for myocarditis is 0.146% among COVID-positive patients, we get a myocarditis-from-COVID rate among adolescents of 0.03 per million. That’s a far cry from the normal background rate of four cases per million, so the risk of getting myocarditis from SARS-CoV-2 infection is probably quite small.

Now, assuming the COVID hospitalization rate for adolescents is 21 per million, and we have 73.1 million adolescents, we could expect there to be 1,535 hospitalizations for COVID in this age group in a year. If 0.146% of those 1,535 teens develop myocarditis, we could expect 2.2 cases of myocarditis to occur in this age group each year, among those who come down with COVID.

In summary, based on CDC statistics, we could expect just over two teens to contract myocarditis from COVID-19 infection. Meanwhile, we have 1,475 cases reported following the COVID jab in just six months (shots for 12- to 17-year-olds were authorized July 30, 202129).

Taking into account underreporting, the real number could be anywhere between 7,375 and 59,000 — again, in just six months! To estimate an annual rate, we’d have to double it, giving us anywhere from 14,750 to 118,000 cases of myocarditis. So, is it actually true that “For adolescents and young adults, the risk of myocarditis caused by COVID infection is much higher than after mRNA vaccination”? I doubt it.

Can You Lessen the Damaging Effects?

There is absolutely no medical rationale or justification for children and teens to get a COVID shot. It’s all risk and no gain. If for whatever reason your son or daughter has already received one or more jabs, and you hope to lessen their risk of cardiac and cardiovascular complications, there are a few basic strategies I would suggest implementing.

Keep in mind these suggestions DO NOT supersede or cancel out any medical advice they may receive from their pediatrician. These are really only recommendations for when there are no adverse symptoms. If your child experiences any symptoms of a cardiac or cardiovascular problem, seek immediate medical attention.

1.First and foremost, do not give them another shot or booster.

2.Measure their vitamin D level and make sure they take enough vitamin D orally and/or get sensible sun exposure to make sure their level is between 60 ng/mL and 80 ng/ml (150 to 200 nmol/l).

3.Eliminate all vegetable (seed) oils in their diet. This involves eliminating nearly all processed foods and most meals in restaurants unless you convince the chef to only cook with butter. Avoid any sauces or salad dressings as they are loaded with seed oils.

Also avoid conventionally raised chicken and pork as they are very high in linoleic acid, the omega-6 fat that is far too high in nearly everyone and contributes to oxidative stress that causes heart disease.

4.Consider giving them around 500 milligrams per day of NAC, as it helps prevent blood clots and is a precursor for the important antioxidant glutathione.

5.Consider fibrinolytic enzymes that digest the fibrin that leads to blood clots, strokes and pulmonary embolisms. The dose is typically two to six capsules, twice a day, but must be taken on an empty stomach, either an hour before or two hours after a meal. Otherwise, the enzymes will merely act as a digestive enzyme rather than digesting fibrin. (More Children Die From the Covid Shot Than From Covid.)

Despite all this evidence, however, Anthony Fauci wants to inject the gene therapy poisons into children as young as four months ago who are at absolutely zero risk of during from any variant of the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus:

The official U.S. shot goblin, Anthony Fauci, announced earlier today, kids 6 months to 4 years-old will receive a three-dose vaccine schedule as soon as the political operatives in the FDA come to an agreement with the multinational pharmaceutical companies.

However, other than the most entrenched Branch Covidians, who are willing to subject all of their children to the experimental drugs and gas station sushi, a wider effort might run into a much more skeptical American population.

The increased skepticism, some would say ‘awakening’ over the vaccine intent and efficacy, is highlighted by the reluctance of the previously vaccinated population to take a booster shot.  First, to the kids:

(New York Post) – […] Two clinical trials of the Pfizer vaccine on children ages 6 months to 2 years old, and ages 2 to 4 are underway, but the older group hasn’t yet met standards, White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said at a press conference.

“Dose and regimen for children 6 months to 24 months worked well, but it turned out the other group from 24 months to 4 years did not yet reach the level of non-inferiority, so the studies are continued,” Fauci said, referencing effectiveness standard comparison to adults.

“It looks like it will be a three-dose regimen. I don’t think we can predict when we will see it [approved],” he said — adding he can’t speak for the Food and Drug Administration. (read more)

The shot goblin really, really, really wants those kids jabbed.  It is very important to him.  However, the vaccination effort overall is now starting to raise eyebrows.

NEW YORK (AP) — The COVID-19 booster drive in the U.S. is losing steam, worrying health experts who have pleaded with Americans to get an extra shot to shore up their protection against the highly contagious omicron variant.

Just 40% of fully vaccinated Americans have received a booster dose, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (link)

The International Business Times puts the data into context:

[…] New Hampshire has the lowest percentage of people who have received booster shots at 18.7%. States like North Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Texas and Mississippi join New Hampshire as the states in the U.S. with the lowest rates of booster shots.

Vermont has the highest rate of booster vaccination at 56.3%. California has 41.1% of its population boosted while New York is at 39.7%, Florida is at 36.6% and Washington, D.C. is at 32%.

A vaccination campaign has been ongoing in the U.S. since the Food and Drug Administration first authorized the Pfizer vaccine doses in December 2020 and a mass vaccination campaign began in early 2021.

According to data from Johns Hopkins University, the U.S. sits at No. 58 in the world in terms of the percentage of the total population fully vaccinated, which is still above the world average. (link)

“COVID vaccines lose power,” may not be exactly the greatest of campaign messages right before the multinational corporations who run government start to push their effort toward babies.