Polluting the Atmosphere With the Smoke of Antichrist, part six

So much is happening with lightning speed now that it is truly hard to know where to begin as this series of commentarie continues.

Having spent a good deal of time dissecting the pestilential demon from Argentina’s address to the Congress of the United States on Thursday, September 24, 2015, the Feast of Our Lady of Ransom, time permits me to to focus on a single remark that Jorge Mario Bergoglio made yesterday, Saturday, September 26, 2015, the Feast of Saint Isaac Jogues, John de Brebeuf and Companions and the Commemoration of Saints Cyprian and Justina, in the "homily" he delivered during the staging of the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service in the Cathedrdal of Saints Peter and Paul in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Before doing this, however, it is necessary to state the obvious: Bergoglio’s pilgrimage has been and continues to be a complete propaganda victory for the Castros and for the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro and Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. Obama/Soetoro and Biden could not have imagined the extent to which Jorge would ratify their agenda of unconstitutionality, illegality and immorality. This is all the work of Antichrist, who is not going to give us his calling card to tell us his identity. We must use our sensus Catholicus to recognize that which is of the adversary and to recognize that the Catholic Church is the unspotted, mystical spouse of her Divine Founder, Invisible Head, and Mystical Bridegroom, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Pope Pius XI put things in simple, understandable terms while exhorting Protestants to return to the true Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order:

Furthermore, in this one Church of Christ no man can be or remain who does not accept, recognize and obey the authority and supremacy of Peter and his legitimate successors. Did not the ancestors of those who are now entangled in the errors of Photius and the reformers, obey the Bishop of Rome, the chief shepherd of souls? Alas their children left the home of their fathers, but it did not fall to the ground and perish for ever, for it was supported by God. Let them therefore return to their common Father, who, forgetting the insults previously heaped on the Apostolic See, will receive them in the most loving fashion. For if, as they continually state, they long to be united with Us and ours, why do they not hasten to enter the Church, "the Mother and mistress of all Christ's faithful"? Let them hear Lactantius crying out: "The Catholic Church is alone in keeping the true worship. This is the fount of truth, this the house of Faith, this the temple of God: if any man enter not here, or if any man go forth from it, he is a stranger to the hope of life and salvation. Let none delude himself with obstinate wrangling. For life and salvation are here concerned, which will be lost and entirely destroyed, unless their interests are carefully and assiduously kept in mind."

10. So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, which is visible to all, and which is to remain, according to the will of its Author, exactly the same as He instituted it. During the lapse of centuries, the mystical Spouse of Christ has never been contaminated, nor can she ever in the future be contaminated, as Cyprian bears witness: "The Bride of Christ cannot be made false to her Spouse: she is incorrupt and modest. She knows but one dwelling, she guards the sanctity of the nuptial chamber chastely and modestly."[20] The same holy Martyr with good reason marveled exceedingly that anyone could believe that "this unity in the Church which arises from a divine foundation, and which is knit together by heavenly sacraments, could be rent and torn asunder by the force of contrary wills."[21] For since the mystical body of Christ, in the same manner as His physical body, is one,[22] compacted and fitly joined together,[23] it were foolish and out of place to say that the mystical body is made up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad: whosoever therefore is not united with the body is no member of it, neither is he in communion with Christ its head.

Let, therefore, the separated children draw nigh to the Apostolic See, set up in the City which Peter and Paul, the Princes of the Apostles, consecrated by their blood; to that See, We repeat, which is "the root and womb whence the Church of God springs,"not with the intention and the hope that "the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth"[28] will cast aside the integrity of the faith and tolerate their errors, but, on the contrary, that they themselves submit to its teaching and government. Would that it were Our happy lot to do that which so many of Our predecessors could not, to embrace with fatherly affection those children, whose unhappy separation from Us We now bewail. Would that God our Savior, "Who will have all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth," would hear us when We humbly beg that He would deign to recall all who stray to the unity of the Church! In this most important undertaking We ask and wish that others should ask the prayers of Blessed Mary the Virgin, Mother of divine grace, victorious over all heresies and Help of Christians, that She may implore for Us the speedy coming of the much hoped-for day, when all men shall hear the voice of Her divine Son, and shall be "careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace." (Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.)

Those who think that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not a true and legitimate pope because of the nature of his “election” on March 13, 2013, are simply going down a rabbit hole in search of any excuse imaginable not to accept the obvious: the counterfeit church of conciliarism is not the Catholic Church. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is merely the face of false religious sect that is now “liberated” after years of attacking the sensus Catholicus to present itself in an undisguised manner to the multitudes.

Very significantly, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has enabled the Communist murderers in Cuba and the pro-abort statists here in the United States of America. Bergoglio’s absolute silence about the crimes of the murderous Castros and their Communist thugs, to say nothing of permitting himself to stage the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service in the Plaza de la Revolucion in Havana, Cuba, on Sunday, September 13, 2015, under an image of the wanton murderer Che Guevera, who cowardly pleaded for his own life to be spared after he was captured in the jungles of Bolivia and executed on October 9, 1967, extended to his refusal to meet with those with dissidents, some of whom were rounded up during the “pope’s” visit.

Bergoglio even justified his refusal to meet with the dissidents when asked about it by Rosa Flores of Cable News Network on the flight between Cuba and the United States on Tuesday, September 22, 2015, the Feast of Saint Thomas Villanova:

Rosa Flores, CNN: Good afternoon, Holy Father. I am Rosa Flores of CNN. We understand that more than 50 dissidents were arrested outside the nunciature [in Cuba] as they were trying to have a meeting with you. First, would you like to have a meeting with the dissidents, and if you had that meeting, what would you say?

Pope Francis: Look, I don’t have any news that that has happened. I don’t have any news. Some yes, yes, no, I don’t know. I don’t know, directly. The two questions are about reading the future. Would I like this to happen? … I like to meet with all people. I consider that all people are children of God and the law. And secondly, a relationship with another person always enriches. Even though it was soothsaying, that’s my reply. I would like to meet with everyone. If you want me to speak more about the dissidents, you can ask me something more concrete. For the nunciature, first, it was very clear that I was not going to give audiences because not only the dissidents asked for audiences, but also audiences (were requested) from other sectors, including from the chief of state. And, no, I am on a visit to a nation, and just that. I know that I hadn’t planned any audience with the dissidents or the others. And secondly from the nunciature, some people made some calls to some people who are in these groups of dissidents, where the responsibility was given to the nuncio to call them and tell them that I would greet them with pleasure outside the catedral for the meeting with the consecrated (religious). I would greet them when I was there, no? That did exist. Now, as no one identified themselves in their greetings, I don’t know if they were there. I said hello to the sick who were in wheelchairs. … Oops, I’m speaking Spanish. I greeted those who were in wheelchairs, but no one identified themselves as dissidents; but from the nunciature calls were made by some for a quick greeting.

(Follow up from Flores on what he would tell them if he met with them.)

Pope Francis: Oh, my daughter, I don’t know what I would say. (laughs) I would wish everyone well, but what one says comes in that moment and … You’ve got the Nobel Prize for being a reader of the future, eh? (laughs)

Silvia Poggioli, NPR: I would like to ask you, in the decades of the power of the state of Fidel Castro, the Church in Cuba has suffered much. In your meeting with Fidel, did you get the impression that [he] may be a bit regretful?

Pope Francis: Regret is a very intimate thing, and it’s a thing of conscience. I, in the meeting with Fidel, I spoke of the stories of known Jesuits, because in the meeting I brought a gift of a book, from Fr. Llorente, also a good friend of his, who is also a Jesuit. And also a CD with the conferences of Fr. Llorente and I also gave him two books from Fr. Pronzato [sic] which I’m sure he’ll also appreciate. And we talked about these things. We spoke a lot about the encyclical, Laudato si'. He’s very interested in the issue of ecology. It was a not-so-formal, rather spontaneous meeting. Also his family was present there. Also those who accompanied me, my driver, were present there. But, we were a bit separated from his wife. They couldn’t hear, but they were in the same place. But we spoke a lot on the encyclical because he is very concerned about this. About the past, we didn’t speak.

(inaudible question from Poggioli)

Pope Francis: Yes! About the past, the Jesuit college. And how the Jesuits were and how they made him work. All of that, yes.

“About the past, we did not speak.” (Full Transcript of Bergoglio's Inflight Interview from Cuba to the United States of America.)

The “past” to which Bergoglio referred is very much the present of Cuba in its Communist captivity as the dissidents who wanted to meet with him were rounded up while he remained silent about the Castro regime’s brutality during his visit or to denounce the arrests of the dissidents thereafter.

I believe that there is a reason for this that transcends Bergoglio’s personal support for the way in which Communist regimes have provided “social justice,” including universal health care supposed “income equality,” to the masses: he wants to make it clear to the murderers of Beijing that they can invite him to Red China and be assured of the fact that he will validate the so-called Catholic Chinese Patriotic Association, thus putting the final nail in the coffin of the brave underground Catholics who have suffered so much for the past sixty-five years. Although the Chicom leadership is a wary bunch of murderers and spies, they might just take the chance of inviting the lay Jesuit to do for them with their dissidents what he did for those in Cuba (and what he has done for those who oppose the unconstitutional, immoral, illegal and unjust policies of Obama/Soetoro in the United States of America).

As noted a few days ago in "Respect and Consideration" for Fidel Castro?, Popes Pius XI and XII condemned socialism of all types no uncertain terms. Pope Leo XIII did so in his second encyclical letter, Quod Apostolic Muneris, December 28, 1878, which was issued a little less than thirty-nine years before the Bolshevik takeover of Imperial Russia began just a few weeks after the Miracle of the Sun during Our Lady’s final apparition in the Cova da Iria near Fatima, Portugal, on October 13, 1917:

At the very beginning of Our pontificate, as the nature of Our apostolic office demanded, we hastened to point out in an encyclical letter addressed to you, venerable brethren, the deadly plague that is creeping into the very fibers of human society and leading it on to the verge of destruction; at the same time We pointed out also the most effectual remedies by which society might be restored and might escape from the very serious dangers which threaten it. But the evils which We then deplored have so rapidly increased that We are again compelled to address you, as though we heard the voice of the prophet ringing in Our ears: "Cry, cease not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet."[1] You understand, venerable brethren, that We speak of that sect of men who, under various and almost barbarous names, are called socialists, communists, or nihilists, and who, spread over all the world, and bound together by the closest ties in a wicked confederacy, no longer seek the shelter of secret meetings, but, openly and boldly marching forth in the light of day, strive to bring to a head what they have long been planning -- the overthrow of all civil society whatsoever.

Surely these are they who, as the sacred Scriptures testify, "Defile the flesh, despise dominion and blaspheme majesty."[2] They leave nothing untouched or whole which by both human and divine laws has been wisely decreed for the health and beauty of life. They refuse obedience to the higher powers, to whom, according to the admonition of the Apostle, every soul ought to be subject, and who derive the right of governing from God; and they proclaim the absolute equality of all men in rights and duties. They debase the natural union of man and woman, which is held sacred even among barbarous peoples; and its bond, by which the family is chiefly held together, they weaken, or even deliver up to lust. Lured, in fine, by the greed of present goods, which is "the root of all evils which some coveting have erred from the faith,"[3] they assail the right of property sanctioned by natural law; and by a scheme of horrible wickedness, while they seem desirous of caring for the needs and satisfying the desires of all men, they strive to seize and hold in common whatever has been acquired either by title of lawful inheritance, or by labor of brain and hands, or by thrift in one's mode of life. These are the startling theories they utter in their meetings, set forth in their pamphlets, and scatter abroad in a cloud of journals and tracts. Wherefore, the revered majesty and power of kings has won such fierce hatred from their seditious people that disloyal traitors, impatient of all restraint, have more than once within a short period raised their arms in impious attempt against the lives of their own sovereigns. . . .

11. But you, venerable brethren, who know the origin and the drift of these gathering evils, strive with all your force of soul to implant the Catholic teaching deep in the minds of all. Strive that all may have the habit of clinging to God with filial love and revering His divinity from their tenderest years; that they may respect the majesty of princes and of laws; that they may restrain their passions and stand fast by the order which God has established in civil and domestic society. Moreover, labor hard that the children of the Catholic Church neither join nor favor in any way whatsoever this abominable sect; let them show, on the contrary, by noble deeds and right dealing in all things, how well and happily human society would hold together were each member to shine as an example of right doing and of virtue. In fine, as the recruits of socialism are especially sought among artisans and workmen, who, tired, perhaps, of labor, are more easily allured by the hope of riches and the promise of wealth, it is well to encourage societies of artisans and workmen which, constituted under the guardianship of religion, may tend to make all associates contented with their lot and move them to a quiet and peaceful life. (Pope Leo XIII, Quod Apostolici Muneris, December 28, 1878.)

This is very important because it was only yesterday that “Pope Francis” referred to Pope Leo XIII as a “very wise pope,” a remarkable statement because it represents one of the few times that one will hear something that is true in the objective order of things issue from his mouth.

Here is what Jorge said in his “homily” to the “bishops,” priests and presbyters of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia during the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service at the Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul:

Most of you know the story of Saint Katharine Drexel, one of the great saints raised up by this local Church.  When she spoke to Pope Leo XIII of the needs of the missions, the Pope – he was a very wise Pope! – asked her pointedly: “What about you?  What are you going to do?”.  Those words changed Katharine’s life, because they reminded her that, in the end, every Christian man and woman, by virtue of baptism, has received a mission.  Each one of us has to respond, as best we can, to the Lord’s call to build up his Body, the Church. (Every Christian has a mission to build up the Church.)

Yes, Jorge, Pope Leo XIII was a very wise pope. He was also a true pope, which meant that he believed in a different religion that you do. Pope Leo XIII was a Catholic. You are not.

Bergoglio’s description of Pope Leo XIII as a “very wise pope” provides me with an opportunity to use the words of the second longest reigning Successor of Saint Peter against many of things that Bergoglio has said in the past four days here in the United States of America.

Although, Pope Leo XIII’s Quod Apostolici Muneris was quoted just above, perhaps it is useful as well to demonstrate how Pope Leo XIII condemned socialism and its offshoots in Rerum Novarum, May 15, 1891:

Hence, it is clear that the main tenet of socialism, community of goods, must be utterly rejected, since it only injures those whom it would seem meant to benefit, is directly contrary to the natural rights of mankind, and would introduce confusion and disorder into the commonweal. The first and most fundamental principle, therefore, if one would undertake to alleviate the condition of the masses, must be the inviolability of private property. This being established, we proceed to show where the remedy sought for must be found. (Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum, May 15, 1891.)

Yet it is that Jorge Mario Bergoglio supports socialistic measures to remedy “income inequality” and to foster a “just distribution of wealth" and to "protect nature," something that he made clear before the Congress of the United States of America on Thursday, September 24, 2015:

It goes without saying that part of this great effort is the creation and distribution of wealth.  The right use of natural resources, the proper application of technology and the harnessing of the spirit of enterprise are essential elements of an economy which seeks to be modern, inclusive and sustainable.  “Business is a noble vocation, directed to producing wealth and improving the world.  It can be a fruitful source of prosperity for the area in which it operates, especially if it sees the creation of jobs as an essential part of its service to the common good” (Laudato Si’, 129).  This common good also includes the earth, a central theme of the encyclical which I recently wrote in order to “enter into dialogue with all people about our common home” (ibid., 3).  “We need a conversation which includes everyone, since the environmental challenge we are undergoing, and its human roots, concern and affect us all” (ibid., 14).

In Laudato Si’, I call for a courageous and responsible effort to “redirect our steps” (ibid., 61), and to avert the most serious effects of the environmental deterioration caused by human activity.  I am convinced that we can make a difference, I'm sure and I have no doubt that the United States – and this Congress – have an important role to play.  Now is the time for courageous actions and strategies, aimed at implementing a “culture of care” (ibid., 231) and “an integrated approach to combating poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature” (ibid., 139).  “We have the freedom needed to limit and direct technology” (ibid., 112); “to devise intelligent ways of… developing and limiting our power” (ibid., 78); and to put technology “at the service of another type of progress, one which is healthier, more human, more social, more integral” (ibid., 112).  In this regard, I am confident that America’s outstanding academic and research institutions can make a vital contribution in the years ahead. (Bergoglio's Address to U.S. Congress.)

Jorge Mario Bergoglio came to the United States of America not to save souls. He came to this country to serve as the propaganda arm for Judeo-Masonic socialism, an ideology that has no place for Christ the King and His Sacred Deposit of Faith as any part of political, legal or social life, which is why Bergoglio never once referred to Him when addressing Obama/Soetoro on Wednesday, September 22, 2015, the Feast of Pope Saint Linus and the Commemoration of Saint Thecla, or before the Congress of the United States of America the next day, or at the United Nations. The best that he could do was to refer to “Creator” twice and to the phrases “Almighty God” and the “Most High” once each. He is indeed ashamed of the Holy Name of the Divine Redeemer in “mixed settings,” and makes very few references to Our Lord as Jesus Christ even in Catholic settings. This is all part of an agenda that comes from Judeo-Masonry’s long held goal to great a system of one world governance, if not that of a One World Government, that would serve as the foundation of creating a sort of statist paradise on earth, which is Marxism-Leninism even though it is not labeled as such.

Although Bergoglio did not call Pope Pius XI “a very wise pope” or cite him in any manner, here is what our next-to-last true pope thus far said while condemning the belief that one can be a Catholic and a socialist at the same time: 

We make this pronouncement: Whether considered as a doctrine, or an historical fact, or a movement, Socialism, if it remains truly Socialism, even after it has yielded to truth and justice on the points which we have mentioned, cannot be reconciled with the teachings of the Catholic Church because its concept of society itself is utterly foreign to Christian truth. . . .

120. If Socialism, like all errors, contains some truth (which, moreover, the Supreme Pontiffs have never denied), it is based nevertheless on a theory of human society peculiar to itself and irreconcilable with true Christianity. Religious socialism, Christian socialism, are contradictory terms; no one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist. (Pope Pius XI, Quadragesimo Anno, May 15, 1931.)

Moreover, the pope whom Jorge termed as “very wise” noted that a just economic order must include the good of man’s soul, something that Jorge Mario Bergoglio takes for granted as he enables practicing homosexuals (see Open Sodomite Serves as Lector for “Pope Francis” at Madison Square Garden) and an actor who has played foul-speaking character and once posed indecently for a Calvin Klein advertisement (see Walhberg raises eyebrows as host of “pope” concert).

Pope Leo XIII did not take the care and the eternity destiny of the soul for granted:

40. The working man, too, has interests in which he should be protected by the State; and first of all, there are the interests of his soul. Life on earth, however good and desirable in itself, is not the final purpose for which man is created; it is only the way and the means to that attainment of truth and that love of goodness in which the full life of the soul consists. It is the soul which is made after the image and likeness of God; it is in the soul that the sovereignty resides in virtue whereof man is commanded to rule the creatures below him and to use all the earth and the ocean for his profit and advantage. "Fill the earth and subdue it; and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth."[29] In this respect all men are equal; there is here no difference between rich and poor, master and servant, ruler and ruled, "for the same is Lord over all."[30] No man may with impunity outrage that human dignity which God Himself treats with great reverence, nor stand in the way of that higher life which is the preparation of the eternal life of heaven. Nay, more; no man has in this matter power over himself. To consent to any treatment which is calculated to defeat the end and purpose of his being is beyond his right; he cannot give up his soul to servitude, for it is not man's own rights which are here in question, but the rights of God, the most sacred and inviolable of rights.  

41. From this follows the obligation of the cessation from work and labor on Sundays and certain holy days. The rest from labor is not to be understood as mere giving way to idleness; much less must it be an occasion for spending money and for vicious indulgence, as many would have it to be; but it should be rest from labor, hallowed by religion. Rest (combined with religious observances) disposes man to forget for a while the business of his everyday life, to turn his thoughts to things heavenly, and to the worship which he so strictly owes to the eternal Godhead. It is this, above all, which is the reason and motive of Sunday rest; a rest sanctioned by God's great law of the Ancient Covenant -- "Remember thou keep holy the Sabbath day,''[31] and taught to the world by His own mysterious "rest" after the creation of man: "He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done."[32] (Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum, May 15, 1891.)

Our true popes were both wise and prophetic in denouncing the errors being propagated by a veritable lord of the world, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who is a conscious agent of Judeo-Masonry to condition Catholics to accept a new world order in order to advance a false concept of the common temporal good.

This is why Bergoglio must be silent about the terroristic reign of the murderous Castros and the “democratic” reign of baby-killing statists such as Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Warren Wilhem (aka “Bill deBlasio”), the Mayor of the City of New York, New York, and Michael Nutter, (see Call Me Jorge for The 'Noahide Duo' of Archbishop Chaput & Mayor Nutter seal the deal of Franics' visit to the City of Brotherly Love), the Mayor of the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Bergoglio is a naturalist, and hence it is that the prescriptions of the collective naturalistic errors of Judeo-Masonry suit him very well. It is to advance the “more just world” that the false “pontiff” must not even use the word “abortion” when speaking to the officials of civil governments. The best he can to do is talk about defending “human life” without mentioning the horrors of the surgical execution of the innocent preborn, and he really believes in his apostate heart of hearts that contraceptives, most of which are abortifacients, are a matter of “conscience” for individual families best left to the “internal forum of the “reconciliation room.” After all, Talmudists and Freemasons are in the vanguard of promoting and profiting from the industry of killing babies in the sanctuaries of their mothers’ wombs.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio does not believe that Catholicism is the sole means of human sanctification and salvation and hence of all social order, trusting in the prescriptions of junk science, junk social science and junk theology to “improve” the lot of man on earth at a time when the sins of men have brought the world to the point of almost complete acceptance of the dictatorship of the Antichrist when he comes.

Pope Leo XIII taught us otherwise:

Just as Christianity cannot penetrate into the soul without making it better, so it cannot enter into public life without establishing order. With the idea of a God Who governs all, Who is infinitely Wise, Good, and Just, the idea of duty seizes upon the consciences of men. It assuages sorrow, it calms hatred, it engenders heroes. If it has transformed pagan society--and that transformation was a veritable resurrection--for barbarism disappeared in proportion as Christianity extended its sway, so, after the terrible shocks which unbelief has given to the world in our days, it will be able to put that world again on the true road, and bring back to order the States and peoples of modern times. But the return of Christianity will not be efficacious and complete if it does not restore the world to a sincere love of the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. In the Catholic Church Christianity is Incarnate. It identifies Itself with that perfect, spiritual, and, in its own order, sovereign society, which is the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ and which has for Its visible head the Roman Pontiff, successor of the Prince of the Apostles. It is the continuation of the mission of the Savior, the daughter and the heiress of His Redemption. It has preached the Gospel, and has defended it at the price of Its blood, and strong in the Divine assistance and of that immortality which has been promised it, It makes no terms with error but remains faithful to the commands which it has received, to carry the doctrine of Jesus Christ to the uttermost limits of the world and to the end of time, and to protect it in its inviolable integrity. Legitimate dispenser of the teachings of the Gospel it does not reveal itself only as the consoler and Redeemer of souls, but It is still more the internal source of justice and charity, and the propagator as well as the guardian of true liberty, and of that equality which alone is possible here below. In applying the doctrine of its Divine Founder, It maintains a wise equilibrium and marks the true limits between the rights and privileges of society. The equality which it proclaims does not destroy the distinction between the different social classes. It keeps them intact, as nature itself demands, in order to oppose the anarchy of reason emancipated from Faith, and abandoned to its own devices. The liberty which it gives in no wise conflicts with the rights of truth, because those rights are superior to the demands of liberty. Not does it infringe upon the rights of justice, because those rights are superior to the claims of mere numbers or power. Nor does it assail the rights of God because they are superior to the rights of humanity. (Pope Leo XIII, A Review of His Pontificate, March 19, 1902.)

Those of you who have yet to accept the simple truth that the Catholic Church cannot make any compromises with error ought to reread the following sentence from the passage above as the conciliar “popes” have indeed made terms with error have polluted the integrity of the doctrine of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and all that Jorge Mario Bergoglio at this time to put these errors in easily understandable terms to as to tickle the itching ears of the multitudes:

It makes no terms with error but remains faithful to the commands which it has received, to carry the doctrine of Jesus Christ to the uttermost limits of the world and to the end of time, and to protect it in its inviolable integrity. (Pope Leo XIII, A Review of His Pontificate, March 19, 1902.)

Yes, Pope Leo XIII was a very wise pope.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is no pope at all.

And with that, good readers, I am going to get a few hours of sleep before resuming work on the other articles that are being written more or less simultaneously given the nonstop flood of propaganda being released, although I am grateful that today, Sunday, September 27, 2015, the Eighteenth Sunday after Pentecost and the Commemoration of Saints Cosmas and Damian, is the last day of Bergoglio’s visit to the United States of America. I might be finished commenting on all that is continuing to unfold by the time that the “synod of bishops” opens on Monday, October 5, 2015 just eight days from now, just beginning three weeks of nonstop revolutionary propaganda!

Tomorrow’s segment will focus on his call, made during the “canonization” of Father Junipero Serra in Washington, District of Columbia, on Wednesday, September 23, 2015, the Feast of Pope Saint Linus and the commemoration of Saint Thecla, and in his “homily” during Novus Ordo vespers  at the Cathedral of Saint Patrick in the City of New York, New York, Thursday, September 24, 2015, the Feast of Our Lady of Ransom, and  the Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul yesterday, Saturday, September 26, 2015, the Feast of the North American Martyrs and the Commemoration of Saints Cyprian and Justina  to “go forward,” meaning, of course, to accept the “surprises” he has in store for everyone next month at the “synod of bishops.”

We need the help of Our Lady, especially as we pray her Most Holy Rosary, more than ever now as we bear the difficulties of the present moment as the consecrated slaves of her Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, through her own Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart, seeking at all times to live more penitentially and to give unto her the fruit of whatever merit we might earn for doing so.

Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saints Cosmas and Damian, pray for us.