Plus Ca Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose, partie deux (The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same, part two)

Donald John Trump, who will be sworn in for a second, nonconsecutive term as President of the United States of America tomorrow, Monday, January 20, 2025, the Feast of Saints Fabian and Sebastian, remains a soft touch for globalist depopulators such as William Henry Gates III as the former and very soon-to-be current president is easily impressed by wealth, power, and flattery, and there is little quicker way these days to befriend Donald John Trump than to praise him for how his warped “Operation Warp Speed” “saved” lives during the coronaccam plandemic that started at the Wuhan Institute of Virology sixty-one months ago, that is, in December of 2019.

To believe at this late date and after all that continues to be done by so-called vaccines in general and by the “vaccines” developed during Operation Warp Speed that William Henry Gates III is anything other than a man who desires to depopulate the earth by contraception, sterilization, surgical baby-killing, “vaccines,” and rigid, cookie-cutter “healthcare” protocols that make no allowance for the medical history of individual human beings is completely irresponsible and should be completely unacceptable to anyone who reads these words.

Here is a reminder from May 7, 2021, about how the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was attempting to control the narratives about the coronascam plandemic and the health protocols to be followed by elected officials and the “public health sector” as it was preparing the way for its role in what became Operation Warp Speed:

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is finally facing the heat for his botched and criminally negligent coronavirus response policies, yet no one seems to be asking why Cuomo and select governors made the fateful decisions that led to the excess deaths — and the coverup campaigns — of tens of thousands of senior citizens in New York and elsewhere across the United States.

After being awarded an Emmy and writing a book on his supposedly heroic response to the pandemic, Cuomo is finally receiving the very necessary inquiries into his handling of the crisis. Cuomo is perhaps the most egregious example of abuse and neglect (given his refusal to use the Javits Center or a Navy hospital ship), he is far from the only governor who executed the “nursing home death warrants.” Governor Cuomo was accompanied by the governors of California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and elsewhere.

The common thread seen in the United States is the delegation of state policy to prediction modeling forecasts from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), a Washington State-based institution that is wholly controlled and funded (to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars) by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

In March and early April, politicians were informed by the modeling “experts” at Gates-funded IHME that their hospitals were about to be completely overrun by coronavirus patients. Modelers from IHME claimed this massive surge would cause hospitals to run out of lifesaving equipment in a matter of days, not weeks or months. Time was of the essence, and now was the time for rapid decision making, the modelers claimed.

On two separate April 1 and April 2 press conferences, Cuomo made clear that his policy decisions were based off of the IHME model.

“There is a group that is funded by the Gates Foundation. Thank you very much Bill Gates,” Cuomo said on April 1 in discussing ICU needs and how he was using Gates models to make other healthcare policy decisions.

“There's only one model that we look at that has the number of projected deaths which is the IHME model which is funded by the Gates Foundation,” Cuomo said on April 2, adding, “and we thank the Gates Foundation for the national service that they've done.”

In an April 9 briefing, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer referred to the IHME model in order to project deaths and the PPE resources needed for the supposed surge.

It was the same story with the government of Pennsylvania. The PA Health Department exclusively uses IHME models to forecast coronavirus outcomes.

Governor Phil Murphy, another nursing home death warrant participant, used IHME models to navigate the state’s policy response.

It wasn’t just state governors relying on this data, federal bureaucrats Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, both of whom have substantial ties to the Gates network, used the IHME COVID-19 forecasting models (which Birx endorsed specifically as the best prediction modeling outfit) to make policy recommendations to states. In her White House briefings, Birx, who simultaneously had a seat on the board of a Gates-funded institution, almost exclusively relied on IHME models to project outcomes.

These models, and the policy decisions that were made by relying on them, set off a chain of events that led to indefinite lockdowns, complete business closures, statewide curfews, and most infamously, the nursing home death warrants.

States across the nation went to extremes, resorting to full bunker mode while waiting for bodies to start dropping in the streets, but the IHME modeling never panned out. Hospital capacity was never threatened. Most states that had created “surge capacity” pop-up health care centers never even used these facilities. IHME, for its part, regularly “adjusts” its models, and has never acknowledged their routine failures to forecast outcomes.

Bill Gates has never discussed the catastrophic failures of his prized “health metrics” forecasting organization, and how it has contributed to the suffering of millions of Americans. Instead, he has seamlessly washed his hands of COVID mania, and has moved on to demanding that the western world sacrifice itself in the name of the latest “crisis” that is climate change.

In December, however, Melinda Gates acknowledged that “we hadn’t really thought through the economic impacts “ of demanding that people stay locked in their houses indefinitely, among other policy requests demanded by Gates Inc.

The IHME models that demanded lockdowns and other insane restrictions relied entirely on sketchy COVID-19 data coming from the city of Wuhan, China. The early statistics concerning deaths, hospitalizations, and overall age stratification have not come close to matching the actual data on the virus. For example, IHME used a 3+% death rate when the real number *from* COVID-19 is only around 0.1%. IHME’s risk projections, which they presented as sound science, were all incredibly overinflated.

The buck does indeed stop with the elected leaders who made the fateful decisions to send sick COVID patients into nursing homes, lock down their states, and mask up their citizens in perpetuity, but that’s only half of the story. The bad data they used almost exclusively came from the Gates network, which has trafficked in pseudoscience and has demonstrated complete incompetence and reckless forecasting since the beginning of last year. (How the Gates Foundation Seeded America’s Covid-19 Catastrophe. An article published on Saturday, April 24, 2021, the Feast of Saint Fidelis of Sigmaringen, O.F.M., Cap., within the Octave of the Solemnity of Saint Joseph, discussed the failure of the Imperial College model that was used by various world leaders and referred to at times by the notoriously nefarious Dr. Deborah Birx: Imperial College Modeling Failure is Far Worse Than We Knew.)

Perhaps the major, self-inflicted and ultimately fatal political mistake that Donald John Trump made during his four years in the White House was his decision to listen to Bill Gates about vaccines in 2017 rather than follow through with a truly scientific study of vaccine effects by a commission that was scheduled to be headed by Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr. Trump has always been dazzled and blinded by those who are “successful” as the world measures success, a characteristic that is but a secular vestige of the Calvinist materialism upon which American economic principles were established during colonial days before evolving to its present form of “material success is a sign of worth, importance, and intelligence.”

Yet is that, as noted just yesterday in Bitter Biden the Demonic Demagogue Goes Mumbling and Stumbling Into the Distance, Gates has, according to him, gotten the former and incoming President of the United States of America very “excited” about a campaign to develop a “vaccine” for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) that would operate along the same lines as Operation Warp Speed:

Bill Gates says that during his recent meeting with Donald Trump, the president-elect was “pretty excited” about the idea of fast-tracking a “vaccine” for HIV, akin to the way COVID “vaccine” development was accelerated during Operation Warp Speed.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Bill Gates opened up about his three hour-long discussion with Trump, along with Trump’s Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and Gates’ personal aide Larry Cohen, the CEO of Gates Notes.

Gates said he “spoke a lot about HIV,” which his massively wealthy and influential Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is “working on a cure” for.

“In the COVID days, he accelerated vaccine innovation,” said Gates, referring to Operation Warp Speed, which hastily developed novel, experimental mRNA shots without full testing.

“So I was asking him if maybe the same kind of thing could be done here. And we both got, I think, pretty excited about that,” said Gates.

“I felt like he was energized and looking forward to help driving innovation,” the billionaire concluded about his meeting with Trump, I was frankly impressed with how well he showed a lot of interest in the issues I brought up.”

Infowars founder Alex Jones sounded the alarm about this revelation as a “nightmare development,” given how much death and injury the mRNA COVID shots caused when given to the public. The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which has previously been estimated to account for only 1 percent of vaccine injuries, now has tallied 38,264 deaths due to the COVID shots, and a total of 1,658,330 COVID shot-induced adverse events.

Jones demanded “a clarification from the incoming Trump Administration on whether or not Bill Gates is lying, or admit that Trump has joined the dark side,” and went so far as to call the issue “the ultimate litmus test on whether Trump is on Team Humanity or Team Deathcult.”

Australian journalist Maria Zeee, founder of Zeee media, called Gates’ claim “extremely alarming.”

“We need to know if this is truth, or a lie. Sooner rather than later. Gates belongs in prison for crimes against humanity,” Zeee wrote on X.

Gates has been accused by citizens around the world of causing physical harm through his “health” initiatives. For example, in the Netherlands, he has been sued for allegedly misleading the public about the safety of COVID shots; and he and his foundation have been accused of conducting illegal medical trials on children without parental consent in India, and even of causing illness and death through these vaccine trials.

Despite the documented deaths and injuries caused by the COVID shots, and calls for Trump to admit that their rollout under his administration was a mistake, he has consistently defended Operation Warp Speed. Since leaving office, Trump repeatedly promoted the jab as “one of the greatest achievements of mankind.” In January 2023, he dismissed potential safety issues by suggesting that “problems” were in “relatively small numbers.” (Bill Gates says Trump is 'excited' about another fast-track 'vaccine' operation for HIV.)

We all know what a smashing success Operation Warp Speed was, don’t we?

It is just now coming out that Modern covered-up the death of a child during the trials of its mRNA gene therapy poisoned booster in late-2022 or early-2023:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) likely knew about a child’s death from cardio-respiratory arrest during a clinical trial for Moderna’s COVID-19 booster, but did not publicly disclose it — and neither did the drugmaker, according to documents uncovered by investigative reporter Alex Berenson.

Berenson, a former New York Times reporter who now publishes the Unreported Truths Substack, discussed details of the story in this week’s edition of “The Defender In-Depth.”

Berenson said the death occurred in late 2022 or early 2023, during the Omicron wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was disclosed only to European regulators, who have stricter reporting requirements than some other countries, including the U.S.

Around that time, some European countries stopped recommending COVID-19 shots for kids based on evidence of low efficacy and children’s ability to recover from the virus on their own. However, the U.S. continues to recommend them.

With a new administration about to be sworn in, the FDA may now face an investigation into the child’s death, Berenson said.

Berenson, who previously was censored by social media platforms for posts about injuries related to the COVID-19 vaccines, also addressed Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s recent revelations about White House pressure to censor the content. He also discussed his censorship lawsuit against the Biden administration.

FDA, Moderna ‘sat on’ information about child death during clinical trial

According to Berenson, during 2021 and 2022, the outcomes of clinical trials for the COVID-19 vaccines were “not particularly impressive,” particularly in children. Yet, there was “a lot of pressure on the FDA to move ahead quickly with the trials.”

Despite the shortcomings of the vaccines and their ineffectiveness against new COVID-19 strains, Berenson said it was “pretty clear” by early 2022 that public health agencies would approve the COVID-19 vaccines for children.

“That made zero sense … healthy children and even not particularly healthy children are at very low risk from COVID,” Berenson said. “We don’t know what the long-term impact of the mRNA vaccines is. It’s one thing if you’re 80 years old. It’s another thing if you’re going to be living with the downstream effects of this for a lifetime.”

Berenson said companies and public health agencies “continued to push” for the vaccines, resulting in efforts, in late 2022, to promote Omicron-specific boosters.

According to Berenson, Moderna conducted its KidCOVE clinical trial during this period, with the participation of approximately 12,000 children. It was during this trial that a child, likely between 2 and 5 years of age and from either the U.S. or Canada, died.

Berenson said that the FDA likely learned of the child’s death later, but never publicly shared the information. Moderna only disclosed the death to European regulators — along with the claim that the child’s death was unrelated to the vaccine.

According to Berenson, pertinent information about the child remains undisclosed. “We don’t even know the gender of the child, the race of the child, the age of the child, where this happened, how many days or weeks after the shot it occurred. We just know the child died and [Moderna] sat on it and FDA sat on it,” Berenson said.

Berenson said the child likely was previously in good health because the trial “was designed to enroll healthy children.” He added that while few children today are receiving COVID-19 shots “because parents have finally figured out that mRNA is not something they want to be exposing their kids to,” this was not the case in 2022.

“Two years ago, this was still an active issue and millions of kids got those shots in the fall and winter of 2022. I think they would’ve liked to have known this,” Berenson said.

‘FDA didn’t really want to answer my questions’

Berenson said that when he approached the FDA with questions about the child’s death, the agency was evasive.

“FDA didn’t really want to answer my questions about this initially … and I followed up with them and I hammered them,” Berenson said. “They continued to stonewall me, but they did essentially give me a second statement [where] they don’t deny that there was a death in the trial or that they know about it.”

According to Berenson, the FDA told him it is not allowed to disclose deaths during the pre-approval process for a drug.

“That’s a very interesting way to frame this, considering that the FDA and everybody else have been saying these drugs are safe and effective,” Berenson said. He added that Moderna and Dr. C. Buddy Creech, a Vanderbilt University professor who was a lead investigator on the KidCOVE trial, have not responded to requests for comment.

Berenson said the FDA may soon have to provide public answers about the clinical trial. Berenson said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has disclosed that he will subpoena the FDA for information on the KidCOVE trial and the child’s death.

‘Nobody wants the shots’

In 2021, Berenson was banned by Twitter — now known as X — for his posts on COVID-19 vaccine injuries, under pressure from the Biden administration. He told “The Defender In-Depth” that he welcomed recent developments supporting free speech, including Zuckerberg’s recent statements about Meta’s policies to this effect.

“There’s no question that Facebook, Meta … were pressured by the White House,” Berenson said.

Berenson also referred to his lawsuit, Berenson v. Biden, currently before a federal court in New York. Oral arguments in the case are pending. Berenson said he amended his complaint after previous revelations by Zuckerberg — to Sen. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) — that the White House pressured him to censor content on Meta-owned platforms.

Berenson said Zuckerberg’s admissions are “directly relevant” to his lawsuit.

According to Berenson, Zuckerberg’s recent admissions are part of a broader shift in public opinion on topics ranging from free speech to vaccines.

“There’s 100% a shift in public perception,” Berenson said. “Moderna stock is down almost 95% from its highs. They had to cut their sales estimates … Nobody wants the shots.” (Journalist Alex Berenson on FDA Failure to Report Death of Young Child in Moderna Trials.)

Although Secretary-designate Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr., would certainly be interested in carrying on thorough investigations on the harm being done by the various profit-making poisons being marketed as “vaccines” to fight this or that new virus, most of which are developed from gain-of-function experiments in taxpayer-subsidized laboratories, he may, if confirmed, find his hands tied as the recent meeting between Donald John Trump and William Henry Gates III may wind up with nothing being done by the new administration other than initiating another “Operation Warp Speed,” which will doubtlessly produce results as disastrous as those still being produced by the poisons developed for the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the past five years.

One can also count on the fact that the United States Internal Revenue Service will do nothing to hold the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s activities that have been questioned as violating the regulations governing not-for-profit organizations:

A Florida whistleblower is asking a federal court to force the IRS to investigate alleged vaccine-related for-profit activities conducted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Attorney William S. Scott, executive director of the World Peace Through Education Foundation, made the allegations in a claim filed with the IRS in May 2024. In September 2024, the IRS denied Scott’s claim. On Jan. 8, he filed an appeal against the IRS in federal court.

“Under the pretense of improving World Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation/Trust has been engaged in the promotion, manufacture and sale of Covid-19 vaccines that were not sufficiently tested for safety or for effectiveness for their intended use,” Scott said in his appeal.

Scott is asking that the IRS tax the Gates Foundation’s COVID-19 vaccine-related activities retroactively and in the future “as ordinary income from for-profit transactions.”

“The claim that its efforts are charity are bogus and it has acted in bad faith,” Scott wrote, referring to the Gates Foundation.

Scott’s appeal includes a request for a court order to a lower government official to properly fulfill his/her official duties. Scott alleges the IRS failed to fulfill its obligation to investigate the Gates Foundation.

In a Dec. 20, 2024, motion to dismiss Scott’s original appeal, the IRS claimed that the federal court lacks jurisdiction to hear the case and that the U.S. “has not waived its sovereign immunity” — a legal doctrine under which the state cannot be sued without its consent.

In his Jan. 6 response, Scott alleged the IRS did not engage in a good faith effort to adhere to its own procedures — an assertion he repeated in his amended appeal. In its Jan. 13 response, the IRS repeated its claims of sovereign immunity.

Writing for broken truth.tv, journalist John Davidson said the IRS responded to Scott’s court order in five days, “demonstrating the greatest act of government speed and efficiency in modern history.”

By comparison, Davidson cited an IRS statement that it currently takes the agency approximately seven months to process new applications for tax-exempt status.

Davidson also noted that Matthew L. Paeffgen, one of the U.S. Department of Justice attorneys representing the IRS, was previously employed by McDermott Will & Emery, a wealth management group that advised Smart Immune, a Gates Foundation partner.

Investigation against Gates Foundation ‘long overdue’

Journalist Naomi Wolf, Ph.D., CEO of Daily Clout, called Scott’s efforts to force an investigation of the Gates Foundation “long overdue.”

“The conflict of interest apparent in a situation in which Gates receives tax deductions for money spent to fund entities designed to lobby or pressure governments to purchase vaccines in which Gates himself is a major investor, is obvious,” Wolf told The Defender.

In 2019, the Gates Foundation invested $55 million in German vaccine manufacturer BioNTech, which later partnered with Pfizer to develop a COVID-19 vaccine.

The Gates Foundation made 15 times its initial investment when it sold its BioNTech shares at the height of their value in 2021. In 2019, Gates said his “best investment,” aimed at increasing access to vaccines, had a 20-to-1 return.

The Gates Foundation continues to invest in other mRNA developers.

Journalist Paul D. Thacker, a former U.S. Senate investigator, told The Defender “it’s highly unlikely” the IRS will act against the Gates Foundation.

“The nonprofit section of the IRS has always been loathe to take action against corrupt nonprofits,” Thacker said. “The tax code needs to be rewritten.”

Journalist Tim Hinchliffe, editor of The Sociable, has extensively reported on the activities of the Gates Foundation. He also believes the IRS is unlikely to take action against the foundation.

“If the allegations against Gates are proven to be true, I wouldn’t expect much to come from the case — perhaps a slap on the wrist, like a fine, that would be laughable to the Gates Foundation,” Hinchliffe said.

Gates Foundation ‘a significant financier’ of pro-vaccine organizations

According to Davidson, there would be several implications for the Gates Foundation if it loses its tax-exempt status — including tax liability which, based on 2023 figures, would reach $1.44 billion.

The foundation also would lose income from previously tax-deductible donations, leading to an “immediate” financial impact and loss of public trust.

Davidson described the Gates Foundation as “a significant financier in the pro-vaccine landscape,” citing the organization’s founding of and support for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and funding it has given to other vaccine makers, the World Health Organization, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and PATH — formerly known as the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health.

Such funding can “skew” the priorities of scientific researchers, Davidson wrote.

He noted that there is at least one case that can serve as a precedent for Scott’s case against the IRS and the Gates Foundation. According to NPR, Blue Shield of California lost its state tax-exempt status in 2015 “for operating like a for-profit company.”

The federal court is expected to rule on Scott’s appeal in the coming days. Scott did not respond to a request from The Defender for comment. (Whistleblower Seeks IRS Investigation Into Gates Foundation’s For-profit Vaccine Activities.)

The death-dealing vaccine industry continues to regard such lawsuits as minor nuisances as the mounting evidence of the harm its produces continues to produce, up to and including death, is being documented worldwide, including in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland:

The “Vaccines and Therapeutics” session of the U.K.’s ongoing inquiry into the COVID-19 pandemic kicked off this week with presentations that included videos of people discussing their vaccine injuries.

Interviewees discussed “suicide bereavement, adverse reactions — horrible reactions — to the vaccines, gaslighting and poo-pooing by medics” who dismissed their injuries as coincidences, John Campbell, Ph.D., reported on his YouTube channel. The videos also highlighted official failures in caring for the vaccine-injured.

Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson launched the inquiry in June 2022 to investigate the decision-making during the pandemic by the U.K. government and the administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The first hearings took place in London in June 2023, followed by sessions in Edinburgh, Scotland, Cardiff, Wales, and Belfast, Ireland. The hearings are government-funded and led by an independent chair, the BBC reported.

The inquiry will draw conclusions and make recommendations for the future through a series of reports. The government is not required to follow the recommendations.

Campbell showed video clips in which vaccine-injured people shared their stories through the inquiry’s “Every Story Matters” initiative.

One woman described the severe migraines, convulsions and weakness she suffered following the jab. “There was no support there when anything went wrong,” she said.

Another woman recounted the constant dizziness and passing out she experienced following the booster shot. Eventually, doctors found a blood clot. When she suggested it was linked to the vaccine, they said they had never heard of such a thing, and that she was imagining it.

A third woman developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome, which began like chickenpox before her skin started to fall off. She received no financial support for her treatment and was encouraged to get the booster. Following the booster, she began having seizures, but no doctors connected her conditions to the vaccine. She went on to receive another booster.

“I’m now so ill I can’t see me living long enough to fully recover,” she said.

As part of the “Every Story Matters” project, people shared stories via written online submissions. The project team also traveled to 25 towns across the country to collect first-hand accounts. They collected 34,441 stories from people who wanted to share their experiences with the vaccine campaigns and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Most people wanted to discuss the vaccine, according to the report. Among those, there were “fewer stories and experiences from people who said they had taken the vaccine and were happy” with i

The presentation showed a small sample of the interviews, which Campbell noted tend to emphasize the government’s assessment that vaccine injuries are “rare.”

“I would have thought the purpose of the inquiry was to decide that actually,” Campbell said. “Let’s hope there’s been nothing pre-decided.”

He also hoped the inquiry would release all of the stories to the public so independent researchers could analyze them and adjudicate how objectively the inquiry has selected the sample of stories it released. (‘Every Story Matters’: UK COVID Inquiry Collects Stories From Vaccine-Injured.)

It is truly unfathomable that so many intelligent people in the world can simply ignore these facts and shrug them off as having nothing to do with the “vaccines.”

However, those planned the coronascam plandemic and the death-dealing protocols that discouraged early intervention treatments based on the actual medical history of those who were infected by the Wuhan Virus were meant to pad the figures of those who they claim died from the virus but who were actually victims of the rigid protocols devised by monsters who wanted to augment their own power as they sought to implement Red Chinese-style social control over the masses. Things got so bad in Scotland, for example, that paramedics were told “not to try too hard” to revive elderly patients over the age of seventy so that they could add to the death totals during the height of the coronascam plandemic five years ago:

Scottish health officials in March 2020 told paramedics they would be fully supported if they did not “try too hard” to resuscitate patients over the age of 70, according to a paramedic’s testimony before the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry.

Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., who analyzed the testimony on his YouTube show, said, “We’re talking about people not being resuscitated after a particular age, which of course is patent ageism.”

Robert Pollock, a clinical adviser paramedic who worked as a frontline paramedic during the COVID-19 pandemic, delivered the testimony and a written statement to the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry.

The inquiry heard testimony from government officials and ordinary citizens over a span of more than 50 days. It investigated failures in Scotland’s pandemic response — including how hospitals administered dangerous end-of-life protocols, including pressuring patients to sign DNR (do not resuscitate) orders.

‘Your normal attempts at resuscitation would be minimized’

According to Pollock’s written statement:

“Scottish Ambulance Service employees received a letter by email on Thursday 26 March 2020 from the Health and Care Professions Council which stipulated to every registrant that they realised there would be difficult decisions to be made by healthcare professionals, but they would be given full support to make decisions [without] normal protocols.”

According to Pollock, this practice is known as the “toe tagging” of patients based on their age, which he said is “wording for ‘do not try too hard to resuscitate them’ over a certain age.”

Pollock expanded on these claims in his testimony before the inquiry.

“My recollection is absolutely clear,” he said. “There was discussions around the age grouping for toe-tagging, for want of a better word. People … over a certain age now, your normal attempts at resuscitation would be minimized.”

According to Pollock, these instructions came even though “there is no age limit in Scotland for resuscitation of a patient.”

“This was very frightening for workers who have family members in that age group and it caused a lot of concern and anxiety for people who were used to doing their best to preserve life,” Pollock wrote. “The process of resuscitation has evolved, and we have a high success rate. This did not go down well with members.”

He added:

“Staff morale was severely affected, as they were trained to preserve life, they were paid lifesavers but at the time, they were told to do the complete opposite. This terrified staff that they might have to do this against their normal training and their normal desire to help. This was not a process that anyone welcomed.”

Pollock said there were “rumours” within the Scottish Ambulance Services “that the government had a plan to reduce the age group to those over 50s if Covid levels reached their expected peak and the plan for over 70s did not result in a significant enough drop in medical demand.”

Pollock said such a plan had been “absolutely in discussion.”

Campbell, who holds a Ph.D. in nursing, analyzed Pollock’s statement and testimony.

“This was not a process that anyone welcomed,” Campbell repeated. “The people that sent out these emails, what was their thinking? What was their thinking based on, and what was the rationale for what they were doing?”

In his testimony, Pollock also implied that these instructions came from above the Scottish Ambulance Service.

“They weren’t decision-making on their own,” he said.

“It sounds to me like some decisions were made far too quickly, almost,” Campbell said, adding that Pollock’s testimony raises questions that require further investigation.

‘This is an excellent inquiry’

“We need more information,” Campbell said. “We need to do qualitative research on this and then get quantitative figures out of it because Mr. Pollock said he didn’t know how many people that’s affected. But that information could well be derived.”

Campbell suggested similar policies were likely implemented in other countries, but the lack of a similar public inquiry in most countries means the information might never be revealed publicly.

“This is an excellent inquiry and the counselors on it, the lawyers on it, are asking sensitive questions and getting information from ordinary people,” Campbell said. “People’s ordinary experience, not high-powered politicians, just people that experienced things and often suffered during the pandemic time.”

“It’s a pity other countries aren’t doing the same,” he added.

In an August 2023 interview with The Defender, Scott Schara, the father of Grace Schara, a 19-year-old girl who died after she tested positive for COVID-19 and a Wisconsin hospital administered a series of drugs and treatments without parental permission, said the hospital entered an “illegal” DNR order for his daughter.

And in a July 2023 interview with The Defender, Gail Seiler described 13 days of “cruel and inhuman” treatment at a Texas hospital, including an unauthorized DNR order, which she says were part of the COVID-19 hospital protocols. She left the hospital following a “standoff” in her hospital room.

Campbell’s program came just days before Monday’s launch of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry in the United Kingdom, for which witnesses invited to provide statements in its official UK Covid-19 Inquiry — where testimony is on hold until next year — sought “to give immediate access to their expert testimony.”

“Let’s hope there’s less rapid decision-making,” Campbell said. “Let’s hope there’s no panic in any future threat, and let’s hope that rational cool heads can prevail in any future situation.” (Scottish Paramedics Told Not to ‘Try Too Hard’ to Resuscitate Elderly Patients During Pandemic.)

This callous, utilitarian disregard for human life is a logical consequence of the dehumanization of the preborn child and the subsequent dehumanization of those with healthy vital organs who could be claimed to be “brain dead” so that those organs could be harvested for the purposes of the money-making transplantation racket. I know I sound like a broken record, but many in the so-called “healthcare industry” desire to eliminate the elderly by all means necessary, and the coronascam plandemic gave these monsters the opportunity to do this on a large scale basis.

Moreover, the so-called “scientific belief” that a mass vaccination progam would produce “herd immunity” was “faith-based” and fact-based as the “public health experts” kept denying any linkages between the contaminated DNA in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine had any relationship to a rise in cancers and other serious medical conditions:

A study published on December 29, 2024, has confirmed previous findings by independent researchers that residual DNA from the manufacturing process for Pfizer’s mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine can be found in vials at levels exceeding the World Health Organization’s (WHO) and US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) safety limit.

The study was published in the Journal of High School Science and is titled “A rapid detection method of replication-competent plasmid DNA from COVID‑19 mRNA vaccines for quality control”. It was done by high school students Tyler J. Wang, Alex Kim, and Kevin Kim, who worked under the supervision of FDA scientists at a lab at the FDA White Oak Campus in Silver Spring, Maryland.

The students found contaminant DNA in Pfizer’s COVID‑19 vaccine at levels 6 to 470 times greater than the FDA’s safety limit of 10 nanograms.

The discovery that mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are contaminated with plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process was first made by genomics expert Kevin McKernan, who published his findings in OSF Preprints on April 10, 2023.

The fact that the DNA contamination has now been confirmed in an FDA lab in a study supervised by FDA scientists illuminates the agency’s absolute malfeasance in having to date dismissed the legitimate concerns about the theoretical health risks it poses, including the risk of genomic integration into human DNA and a potentially increased risk of cancer.

McKernan has also observed that the vaccines administered to the public were manufactured using a different process than the products that underwent clinical trials.

Notwithstanding efforts by the mainstream media to gaslight us, the vaccines were incontrovertibly sold to the public on the basis of willful lies, including the scientifically fraudulent claim from so-called “public health” officials that two doses of one of these products would confer durable sterilizing immunity that would stop infection and transmission of SARS‑CoV‑2, infection with which is a necessary but insufficient factor in the pathogenesis of the clinical disease known as COVID‑19 (hence many people becoming infected but never developing the disease).

Government officials who told that willful lie include President Joe Biden; Dr. Deborah Birx, then White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator; Dr. Rochelle Walensky, then director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); and Dr. Anthony Fauci, then director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

In fact, the claim that the vaccines would confer herd immunity was faith-based, not science-based.

In Congressional testimony on July 23, 2022, Birx admitted that the clinical trials were not designed to determine vaccine effectiveness against infection and transmission and that their claim was based not on scientific evidence but on the “hope” that “the vaccines would work in that way”.

In an interview published on March 3, 2022, Walensky similarly admitted that the basis for the claim was that they “wanted to be hopeful” that the vaccines would end the pandemic by conferring herd immunity, without considering the possibility that the protection afforded by the vaccines would wane so rapidly.

The truth that the vaccines were never expected to confer sterilizing immunity because they weren’t designed to was finally admitted by Fauci in an article published in Cell Host & Microbe in January 2023.

Journalists like myself who at the time were trying to warn members of the public how they were being brazenly deceived were censored on social media on the grounds that to provide any information that didn’t align with the proclamations of lying government officials was “misinformation”—the usual euphemism for any information, no matter how factual, that does not serve the adopted political agenda.

For instance, I was banned from LinkedIn for having accurately reported how the CDC’s August 2021 lie that natural immunity to SARS‑CoV‑2 was inferior to that induced by mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines was contradicted at the time by virtually all the non-CDC-originating medical literature and subsequently falsified by the CDC’s own data as reported by its own researchers in its own MMWR journal.

In September 2023, when I tried to share another factually accurate report by Maryanne Demasi, PhD, about the finding of DNA contamination in Pfizer’s COVID‑19 vaccine, my post was censored by LinkedIn on the false grounds that it contained “misinformation”.

Another claim made throughout the government’s mass vaccination campaign was that it was scientifically impossible for genetic material from the mRNA vaccines to integrate into human DNA. The CDC’s argument to support that conclusion was that since the vaccine mRNA never enters the cell nucleus where the DNA resides, it cannot become integrated. However, that was a non sequitur fallacy because it overlooked the phenomenon of reverse transcription of mRNA into DNA, which genetic material can then potentially enter the cell nucleus and integrate into host DNA.

As McKernan and colleagues noted in their April 2023 preprint study, the finding of plasmid DNA in the vaccines at levels exceeding the FDA’s safety limits means that reverse transcription of mRNA into DNA is not even required for the genetic material from the vaccines to become integrated into human DNA.

McKernan’s team discovered that, in addition to DNA, the vaccines are also contaminated with a gene sequence called the “SV40 promoter”, which is used in the manufacturing process to produce the mRNA for the vaccines. This is a fragment of simian virus 40 (SV40), which infamously was found in the 1950s and ‘60s to be contaminating polio vaccines, a residual from rhesus monkey kidney cells used to culture the virus, raising concerns for decades about a potentially increased risk of cancer in polio vaccine recipients.

The SV40 promoter can enable contaminant DNA in COVID‑19 vaccines to be transported into the cell nucleus, where it can theoretically become incorporated into the host genome.

McKernan’s discovery of DNA contamination in COVID‑19 vaccines was subsequently verified by numerous other researchers, including cancer genomics expert Dr. Philip Buckhaults, who explained how this raised legitimate safety concerns to a South Carolina Senate committee.

That testimony was reported by Maryanne Demasi in her article that I shared on LinkedIn only to be removed on the false grounds that it contained “misinformation”. The YouTube video of Dr. Buckhaults’ testimony has also since been removed by Google ostensibly for violating YouTube’s terms of service—another clear example of how inconvenient truths exposing government-approved disinformation have been systematically censored by social media companies in service to the criminal organization in Washington and, by extension, the pharmaceutical industry.

The FDA has been repeatedly notified about the finding of DNA contamination, such as by Kevin McKernan at an open public hearing during a meeting of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on June 15, 2023. (His presentation starts at about 4:58:45 in the following video on the FDA’s YouTube channel.)

https://www.youtube.com/live/gBOyPREXGh8?si=0t515PFSckcyV0EW&t=17926

In an article on January 2, 2025, Demasi also reported the additional verification of the DNA contamination by students working at the FDA lab, noting how their study “challenges years of dismissals by regulatory authorities, who had previously labelled concerns about excessive DNA contamination as baseless.”

McKernan told Demasi that the study’s methods may have underestimated the level of contamination.

The students working at the FDA lab also found fragments of the SV40 promoter, which they said was “practically unlikely” to be functional. However, as McKernan told Demasi, “To assert that the DNA fragments are non-functional, they would need to transfect mammalian cells and perform sequencing, which wasn’t done here.” Additionally, the methods they used “don’t effectively capture the full length of DNA fragments”, and a “more rigorous sequencing analysis could reveal SV40 fragments several thousand base pairs long, which would likely be functional.”

The student authors acknowledge that the risk posed by this DNA contamination remains “currently unknown”, which is true in large part because the FDA to date has refused to conduct a safety assessment despite legitimate concerns about it posing a risk to human health.

As also acknowledged by the study authors, this includes the risk that “DNA fragments can be directly integrated into host genome, increasing the risk of insertional mutagenesis” and the risk that “DNA fragments may contain oncogenes that may induce carcinogenesis if ingressed into host cells.” In other words, the foreign DNA could potentially integrate into human DNA and cause mutations or even cancer.

Apart from those risks, they also acknowledged the risk of even tiny DNA fragments to stimulate the immune system and contributing to adverse events experienced after vaccination.

On January 3, McKernan published his own article constructively critiquing the study, in which he remarks how, “Even in FDA labs, the few lots they survey are over the limit.”

He further notes the study authors’ failure to appreciate the practical irrelevance of the FDA’s safety limit since it was established for naked DNA and hence is inapplicable to the DNA in the COVID‑19 vaccines, which is encapsulated by lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) specifically designed to carry the genetic material into the cells.

In other words, the FDA’s “safe” limit is ipso facto too high in the context of these mRNA products developed using gene therapy technology.

Dr. Brian Hooker, the chief scientific officer for the organization Children’s Health Defense (CHD), remarked,

It is ironic that it takes student researchers at the FDA to do the work of the FDA regulators. It is alarming that the public is made aware of this contamination in an obscure journal that features high school science research. One has to ask, “Where is the FDA now?” and “Why hasn’t the public been alerted of this?”

On January 6, Demasi followed up on her earlier report by noting that the FDA had responded to her inquiry about the new study by disavowing responsibility for it, notwithstanding the involvement of three FDA scientists in supervising the student researchers, and saying that the FDA “does not comment on individual studies”.

The FDA further maintained its untenable position that the DNA contamination poses no health risks, stating that,

Based on a thorough assessment of the entire manufacturing process by the agency’s scientific experts, the FDA is confident in the quality, safety, and effectiveness of the COVID‑19 vaccines that the agency has approved and authorized.

The agency’s benefit-risk assessments and ongoing safety surveillance demonstrate that the benefits of their use clearly outweigh their risks. Additionally, with over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to residual DNA have been identified.

McKernan commented on the FDA’s dismissal by saying, “It’s the same script on auto-repeat at every regulatory agency. They always say, ‘billions of doses given, benefits outweigh the risks, we’ve seen no evidence of harm.’ But billions of cigarettes were smoked, too, and that didn’t make them safe.”

He also rhetorically inquired, “If the FDA supplied the materials for the study and provided the technical advice through staff supervision, then how can they not be responsible for the data?”

Professor Nikolai Petrovsky, Professor of Immunology and Infectious Disease at the Australian Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Institute, similarly expressed disappointment in the FDA’s dismissal. As he pointed out to Demasi,

It completely circumvents whether or not the level of DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines exceeds regulatory limits (as the study performed in their lab would indicate) and what they intend to do about it. . . . Just claiming there’s no safety issue and pointing to the billions of doses administered, without offering any evidence of safety, is far from satisfactory.

In fact, as observed by Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Florida’s Surgeon General, in a letter to the FDA dated December 6, 2023, the FDA itself has previously acknowledged the health risks posed by contaminant DNA—hence its establishment of a “safety limit”.

The FDA responded to Ladapo’s letter by making clear that it had no intention of conducting any safety assessments to address concerns about the DNA contamination.

In a policy document from November 2007, the FDA acknowledged that

Theoretical concerns regarding DNA integration include the risk of tumorigenesis if insertion reduces the activity of a tumor suppressor or increases the activity of an oncogene. In addition, DNA integration may result in chromosomal instability through the induction of chromosomal breaks or rearrangements. [Emphasis added.]

In addition to acknowledging the risk that DNA integration could cause cancer, the FDA document states that if vaccine manufacturers find plasmid DNA in their products at levels exceeding the FDA’s suggested limit, they “should evaluate whether the DNA has integrated into the genome” in animal studies.

The mainstream media establishment, for its part, has served the usual function of deceiving the public in service to the government and its policy goal of maintaining high vaccination rates, which is diametrically opposed to the alternative goal of properly educating people to be able to make their own truly informed choice about whether to get vaccinated.

For example, the finding of DNA contamination was alluded to by the New York Times on January 3, 2024, in an article maligning Dr. Ladapo for calling on the FDA to either demonstrate the safety of the contaminated vaccines or withdraw them from the market. The lazy Times reporter, Apoorva Mandavilli, a so-called “science reporter” with a track record of atrocious so-called “journalism”, mindlessly dismissed Dr. Ladapo’s legitimate concerns on the false grounds that the idea that genetic material from the vaccines could ingtegrate into human DNA has been “widely debunked”. Mandavilli falsely claimed that “scientific evidence has found no basis for his declarations”, thus completely ignoring the repeatedly verified finding of DNA contamination and leaving Times readers with the false impression that this evidence does not exist.

Scientific American likewise mocked that vaccine recipients have a “better chance of becoming Spider-Man” than being harmed by DNA from mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines. The lazy author, Tanya Lewis, similarly lied that Dr. Ladapo’s concerns were “without convincing evidence” and “unfounded”, even though the vaccines had been proven to be contaminated with plasmid DNA and despite the FDA’s own policy document explaining how contaminant DNA poses health risks, including the potential for integration into the host genome and a heightened risk of cancer.

The mainstream media thus have refused to properly inform the public that the mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are contaminated with DNA from the manufacturing process, much less to inform people about the health risks this poses. Those examples illustrate how professional propagandists masquerade as “science reporters” who do policy advocacy instead of journalism.

Fortunately, there are people out there such as Maryanne Demasi who do real journalism, as you can tell by their articles being censored solely on the grounds that their truthful reporting does not align with the official government disinformation. (Study at FDA Lab Confirms DNA Contamination in Covid 19 Vaccines. Also see: Why Does the COVID Vaccine Persist In The Body?, and U.S. Partnered With China on Project Involving 500,000 Viruses That Could Pose Biosecurity Risks.)

Yes, the public health officials lied in 2020. They lied in 2021. They lied in 2022. They lied in 2023. They lied in 2024, and they are continuing to lie in 2025 as they scramble to cover-up their cover-up of the origins of the Wuhan Virus from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in December of 2019:

The Wall Street Journal’s COVID bombshell exposes how federal agencies carried out the biggest scientific con of the century.

From the very start of the COVID pandemic in America, federal bureaucrats and politicians rushed to suppress evidence that the pandemic originated from a Chinese government lab bankrolled by US government agencies.

In 2021, key Biden administration officials effectively exonerated the Chinese government, even though Beijing had completely stonewalled any outside investigation into the origin of the COVID-19 virus.

The FBI’s top expert concluded that the virus leaked from the lab — but he was side-railed by the Biden administration, blocked from presenting evidence at a key White House meeting in August 2021. Three scientists at the National Center for Medical Intelligence, part of the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, also concluded that COVID leaked from a lab, but they were muzzled. The inspector general is conducting an investigation to determine why those experts were silenced.

Bribery testimony

The Department of Energy also concluded that COVID originated in a lab. In September 2023, a senior CIA analyst told a congressional committee that six key CIA analysts had been bribed by the agency to abandon their conclusion that COVID originated in a lab leak.

The COVID coverup was propelled when two dozen scientists announced in February 2020 that any suggestion that the virus originated in a Chinese lab was a “conspiracy theory.”

The US State Department’s Global Engagement Center claimed suggestions of a lab leak were “Russian disinformation” — shades of Hunter Biden’s laptop!

GEC condemned social media companies for failing to totally suppress any suggestions that COVID-19 originated in a lab.

Even references to “research conducted at the Wuhan Institute” supposedly justified banishment from social media. The State Department bizarrely sent Twitter a list of 250,000 accounts it wanted suppressed, including American journalists.

Scorning a prohibition imposed by the Obama administration, the National Institutes of Health had been financing reckless “gain-of-function” research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. That type of research seeks to genetically alter organisms to enable the spread of viruses into new species.

But as MIT professor Kevin Esvelt asked in 2021, “Why is anyone trying to teach the world how to make viruses that could kill millions of people?” The risks were compounded because the Wuhan Institute had a very poor safety rating, according to the State Department.

Anthony Fauci, President Biden’s chief medical advisor, justified COVID mandates because average citizens “don’t have the ability” to determine what is best for them. Congressional investigations revealed that Fauci was at the center of string-pulling to shirk responsibility for the Wuhan debacle.

After Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) suggested prosecuting Fauci for false testimony on bankrolling gain-of-function research, Fauci howled that his critics are “really criticizing science because I represent science. That’s dangerous.”

Misplaced power

But not nearly as dangerous as vesting vast power in secretive federal agencies. “Government knows best” was the storyline sanctifying every heavy-handed decree that politicians imposed during the pandemic. If COVID-19 had been initially recognized as the result of one of the biggest government boondoggles in history, politicians never could have pirouetted as saviors as they seized sway over daily life.

Instead of Tony Fauci bobbleheads, perhaps we would have seen the slogan “Your Government at Work” superimposed atop an image of a million American caskets. (Government COVID con gave us a million American caskets. Other stories about this corruption can be found at: Who decided the US intelligence community would suppress key COVID-origin research?, DOJ secretly investigated EcoHealth Alliance over COVID lab leak questions, House report reveals,  GOP senators slam spy chiefs operating 'in the shadows' for 'politicized' COVID origins probe.)

Those who planned and administered the Wuhan Virus plandemic are sociopaths who were drunk with their own power and deluded by their own infallibility and invincibility as they were given carte blanche to decide what medical treatments could or could not be given as their oversaw the needless deaths of those who died from their death-dealing protocols as well as the destruction of private businesses caused by the lockdowns that were actually a trial run at what life in the West would look like if its leaders adopted the Red Chinese model of social control and repression of dissent.

The mendacity was so extensive that even the Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of the German company BioNTech refused to take his own company’s “vaccine” as he wanted to maintain its “functionality,” meaning that he knew that he could be incapacitated by it:

Imagine if an automobile manufacturer recommended their vehicles for everyone to buy and drive but wouldn’t drive it themselves because they don’t want to risk the vehicle malfunctioning and injuring or killing them. This is basically what the CEO and co-founder of BioNTech, Ugur Sahin, just said about the mRNA Covid “vaccines” that his company, working in tandem with Pfizer, created for the Wuhan Virus plandemic.

Ugur Sahin refuses to take the jab because he says he must ensure he stays "functional," in other words, he knows that the clot shot renders humans functionless, incapacitated, and seriously injured where they cannot do their job, take care of themselves, or function for their children anymore.

Cancer research specialist and immunology scientist refuses to take the vaccine his own company designed and manufactured – does he fear getting turbo cancer from it?

Ugur Sahin is a German oncologist and immunologist who co-founded BioNTech, which developed one of the major clot shots for Covid-19. As a result of his company’s increase in value after merging with Pfizer and creating the deadliest vaccine known to mankind, he became one of Germany’s 100 wealthiest people.

Scientists and coroners around the globe have been identifying strange rubbery vascular clots up to a foot long inside of the humans who have received the Covid-19 jabs, bringing into question whether the mRNA “technology” uses millions of nanoparticles to form these clots and cause horrible health consequences, including myocarditis, pericarditis, vascular clots, strokes, heart attacks, miscarriages, and wait for it… turbo cancer.

Turbo cancer means people who have cancer or were previously diagnosed with cancer that went into remission, after they get the Covid jab(s), suddenly get huge cancer tumors and their cancer catapults into a deadly stage almost overnight.

Why would a cancer research specialist whose company created the Covid vaccines say that he will not take a chance and get inoculated with mRNA because he has to remain functional to run his company?

If Ugur Sahin is terrified to take the vaccine his own company made and distributed to hundreds of millions of people, then what does he know that he’s not telling everyone? What does he mean when he says he has to remain functional, so he can’t take the shot? Does that mean he fears he will have a heart attack or stroke? That’s sure what it sounds like, or why else would he say that? Is he afraid he’ll get a turbo-cancer brain tumor and be incapacitated where he needs chemotherapy and round-the-clock nurses to help him survive the aftermath of the mRNA spike proteins clogging his brain veins? Even Bill Gates is on the record saying he hopes to reduce the world’s population by a few billion people using vaccines to do it. (Co-founder and CEO of BioNTech refuses to take the mRNA Covid vaccine because he says, “we need to ensure functionality of our whole company”.)

The evidence about the origins of the Wuhan Virus is clear, and readers of this website have known about the truth since April 3, 2020, when an interview that Dr. Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois at Urbana Law School to Geopolitics and Empire and republished in Christian Order, whose editor, Rod Pead, gave me permission to use place this in part two of “Sin: More Deadly than the Coronavirus.”

Similarly, the truth about the Wuhan Virus “vaccines” was known as early as the beginnings of “Operation Warped Speed,” and the only thing that has happened since then is the continued evidence of the harm these poisoned jabs has caused.

This all having been noted, however, it must never be forgotten that the entire vaccine industry is poisoned by its use of stem cells derived from butchered preborn babies.

As imprisoned pro-life champion John Hinshaw noted in a recent commentary published on Lifesite News, Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr., has been very courageous in opposing the harm caused by vaccines in general and in opposing the whole coronascam plandemic as it was being carried out, even he, a pro-abort, has failed to provide any information about the linkage that has been proven to exist between the use of fetal stem cells from butchered babies and autism:

Pro-lifers are rightly concerned about a liberal, pro-abortion Democrat from one of the most prominent, pro-abortion, “Catholic” families in our country heading the federal agency most engaged with the poor. Kennedy wealth has always gotten in the way of their helping the poor. Like most of the American monied class, the Kennedys do not see the unborn babies of the poor as the poor. But the unborn are the pre-eminent poor, the most defenseless.  Will an RFK, Jr. – led HHS treat the babies as the victims of poverty they are?  There is nothing in his record to make us think so. The American rich legalized abortion primarily to reduce the number of poor people.  I have not seen any repudiation of this from RFK, Jr.

During his crusade to link modern vaccines to the autism, RFK, Jr. did not seem to notice pro-lifers’ contention that the use of fetal cells from aborted babies in managing vaccines began at the same time as the autism spike : 1989.  A 2010 FDA report, which sought to dismiss RFK, Jr.’s concern about mercury-based preservatives in the vaccines, casually explained that the only change in vaccine management contemporaneous with the autism spike was the introduction of human cells into the matrix.  I find no record of RFK, Jr. responding to this. Was his very public support for abortion the reason he never responded to this fact?  Consequently, should we not expect that his pro-abortion views are going to lead to HHS suppressing the truth like the industry he criticizes?

As one who worked daily with the poor for more than 35 years (before losing my job upon my incarceration), I need to be confident that people who actually know the needs and desires of the poor will be part of HHS. That means pro-lifers need to be hired in an RFK, Jr.-led HHS. I am not looking for a job, but I know many vastly experienced pro-lifers who would benefit the mission at HHS.

There is also the character question.  It can’t be ignored that RFK, Jr. has followed in the Kennedy tradition with a history of confused and confusing dealings with women, most of them not their wives.

With all of this, as much as I would enjoy watching RFK, Jr. take on Big Pharma, I don’t believe he should be supported for the HHS directorate. But understanding that Mr. Trump is feeling very good about himself and his administration and that he doesn’t take criticism well, I also don’t believe he will withdraw RFK, Jr. from consideration. Therefore, we must be forceful in insisting that our pro-life friends in the Senate truly grill him and receive guarantees that truth, which always favors life, will be the guide for all his decisions. (Imprisoned pro-lifer: Why I don't think RFK Jr. is the best person to lead the HHS.)

Those who ignore the plight of the innocent preborn and, indeed, support their destruction in what should be the sanctuaries of their mothers’ wombs will always look the other way at any evidence of how the killing of the preborn and the use of the bodies and cells of butchered babies in pharmaceutical products makes all vaccines immoral just as much as the vaccine industry itself looks the other way at all the harm its products have done and continue to do.

This is all but the sorry consequence of a world unguided by the Social Reign of Christ the King and His Catholic Church, a world where so many men, especially in public life and in positions of corporate power, believe they are automatons who live and work free of any and all “hindrances” to their “enlightened crusades” by any kind of moral standards, no less the infallible teaching of Holy Mother Church in all that pertains to the good of souls upon which rests those souls’ salvation and the entirety of a just social order.

In the midst of this chaos where things stay the same the more they seem to change, we must rely upon Our Lady’s maternal protection and intercession, especially by means of her Most Holy Rosary, as we remember the words she spoke at the wedding feast in Cana after she told her Divine Son that the groom had run out of wine: “Do whatever He tells you.”

Father Francis X. Weninger, S.J., explained the meaning of Our Lady’s humble deference to her Divine Son’s Holy Will and His own willing deference to listen to her pleading:

"And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee."--John 2.

Today's Gospel proposes for our meditation a marriage feast at which Jesus was one of the guests. Let us reflect that Jesus is the bridegroom of our souls, and invites us all to His marriage feast. It depends on us to accept this invitation; and who is there that does not desire to be present at the marriage of the Lamb in heaven of which St. John speaks in the Apocalypse? We prepare ourselves for this feast by fulfilling hereupon earth the will of the Spouse of our souls. It is true, every Christian tries more or less to fulfill his duties, but the essential point is not, to do something after some manner, but to do everything that Jesus demands and in the manner that He demands. And on that does this depend? We shall endeavor to find out.

O Mary! pray for us, that we may be called, in all truth, servants of the Lord! I speak in the most holy name of Jesus, to the greater glory of God!

To do all that Jesus commands means, first, to avoid sin and all that leads to it, and after the example of Christ to fight against temptation. Watch, pray, and encounter the tempter with a firmly spoken: "Leave me!" Should you have the misfortune to commit sin, then go immediately to confession. But how often do we postpone confession!

To do all that Jesus commands signifies, further, to do all the good He demands of us, namely, to fulfill with all zeal and diligence, the duties of our station through love for God, uniting our intention with the intention of His holy Heart.

To do all that Jesus commands means to practise the virtues of His most holy Heart, according to His words: ''Learn of me!" In order to practise these virtues we must seize every opportunity, and endeavor to perfect ourselves in them without relaxation. Therefore, we must above all lay a firm foundation of humility, and see that the three theological virtues inform all our actions. Christian! is this so in your case? Alas, no! You do not do what faith and love for Jesus require of you, but what pride, ambition, vanity, self-love, and egotism demand.

To do all that Jesus commands, means also to keep before our eyes, and exemplify in all our actions, the cardinal virtues, prudence, temperance, justice, and fortitude. These virtues have received their name from the Latin word: Cardo, a hinge, on which the door hangs and turns. No virtue deserves the name which is deficient in either prudence, temperance, justice, or fortitude. How often do your actions exhibit all these qualities? How hasty and imprudent you frequently are even in doing good! How often you show the absence of that moderation which does every thing at the right time and in the right way, and with proper regard for the feelings of others! How often, especially, are you deficient in the virtue of fortitude! You are so inconstant, bent this way and that by circumstances, as a reed by the wind.

To do all that Jesus commands does not mean, to conform to the holy will of God in some things only, but to regulate by it all our doings, every thought and every desire. In order to understand, without mistakes, His wishes and demands we must listen attentively to the inspirations of the Holy Ghost. It is, therefore, necessary to keep God continually in our thoughts, to walk before Him in the spirit of meditation, and to avoid all useless distractions.

Oh, how remiss you are in this regard! It is true you pray daily: "Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven," but, in reality, you have no will for any thing unpleasant to nature. Instead of walking in the presence of God in order to hear the inspirations of the Holy Ghost and to follow them, you hardly ever think of God during the day, and you listen, not to the inspirations of the Holy Ghost, but to the voice of the world. All your wishes, all your longings, are to succeed in business, to become rich, to be honored, to procure for yourself the pleasures of this life, and to enjoy them as long as possible. Hence your continual distraction and your feeling of loneliness when you are separated from the society of men. This is also the cause of your idling away your precious time in the society of persons who are dangerous to you and often lead you into temptation.

To do all that Jesus commands signifies also to make use of all those means through which we may obtain divine graces. These means are prayer, spiritual reading, the listening to the divine Word, the hearing of Mass, visits to the Blessed Sacrament, and its frequent devout reception.

I ask of you: Do you employ these means? Do you do all that Jesus demands of you? Do you say your morning and evening prayers, and in such a manner that you really pray in spirit and in truth, or do you only say them from habit, and with incessant distractions? Is your prayer such that it unites you all day long to God according to the words of Christ: "You must pray always." What do you read? Are you thoroughly instructed as a child of the Church and as these incredulous times demand, or do you read those worldly books, which amuse, rather than those which instruct?

Do you hear Mass daily with piety? Do you assist faithfully at the divine sacrifice? Do you visit regularly the Blessed Sacrament, and receive Jesus frequently into your heart? If not, how can you presume to think that you follow the injunction of the Blessed Virgin: "Whatsoever He shall say to you, do ye."

To do all that Jesus demands means, to fulfill joyfully, and with the utmost confidence in God, all that He asks of us. "The Lord loves a cheerful giver," as the Holy Ghost assures us. If we are not animated by this sentiment, then do we want generosity, zeal, and perseverance in His service. Christian! why are you so faint-hearted and despondent? Shame on you!

To do all that Jesus asks signifies, to fulfill His word notwithstanding the hinderances we may encounter, it means to receive humbly, as from His hands, all the trials we meet in His service, to unite them with His sufferings and bear them for love of Him.

To do all that Jesus demands means lastly, not only to take care of our own salvation, but also to promote that of our neighbor and to assist him spiritually and corporally, for time and eternity, in remembrance of that assurance of Christ: "Whatsoever ye do to the least of mine, ye do to Me."

How cold is your zeal for souls! How little exertion you make for the spiritual welfare of your neighbor, even of those who live with you under the same roof!

Christians! you who have listened to my words, do you now understand the meaning of the admonition of the Blessed Virgin: "Whatsoever He shall say to you, do ye." Do it henceforward, and you will partake of the marriage feast of the Lamb, the Bridegroom of your soul. You will partake of it here upon earth by the joy which the presence of Christ in your heart will bring", and one day you will partake of it in heaven near the throne of God, in the company of your Bridegroom, who will be yours for all eternity! Amen! (As found at: 2nd Sunday After the Epiphany.)

The world is in the mess that it is in because most people do not do whatever Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has taught us exclusively through His true Church and because they do not rely upon Our Lady to help them to do His will with humility and docility.

We, therefore, must not be fazed by the events of the world and it is especially important that we not fall into the trap of the false opposites of naturalism by believing that one set of naturalists will “solve” will provide “relief” from the problems caused by another set of naturalists as naturalism is of the adversary and can only lead to the worsening of men’s lives and contribute to further social decay and disorder.

True change occurs within the souls of men, and it is produced by a sincere desire to reform one’s lives by means of Sanctifying Grace:

20. Every true and lasting reform has ultimately sprung from the sanctity of men who were driven by the love of God and of men. Generous, ready to stand to attention to any call from God, yet confident in themselves because confident in their vocation, they grew to the size of beacons and reformers. On the other hand, any reformatory zeal, which instead of springing from personal purity, flashes out of passion, has produced unrest instead of light, destruction instead of construction, and more than once set up evils worse than those it was out to remedy. No doubt "the Spirit breatheth where he will" (John iii. 8): "of stones He is able to raise men to prepare the way to his designs" (Matt. iii. 9). He chooses the instruments of His will according to His own plans, not those of men. But the Founder of the Church, who breathed her into existence at Pentecost, cannot disown the foundations as He laid them. Whoever is moved by the spirit of God, spontaneously adopts both outwardly and inwardly, the true attitude toward the Church, this sacred fruit from the tree of the cross, this gift from the Spirit of God, bestowed on Pentecost day to an erratic world. (Pope Pius XI, Mit  Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937.)

Yes, we must reform our own lives with every beat of our hearts, consecrated as they must be to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary. In order to do this, of course, we love God as He has revealed Himself to us exclusively through His Catholic Church with our whole mind, our whole soul, our whole body, our whole heart and our whole strength. We must love others for love of Him, Who wills the good of all men, which is the salvation of their immortal souls as members of the Catholic Church.

Then and only then will it be possible for there to be true change so that things will never be the same with us and the world around us.

Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saints Marius, Martha, Audifax and Abucham, pray for us.

Sant Canute, King of Denmark, pray for us.

Saint Wulstan, pray for us.

Appendix
Dr. Francis Boyle Had It Entirely Correct Five Years Ago (as excerpted from an earlier commentary on this site)

What is now obvious to so many was first discussed four years ago by Dr. Francis Boyle, a professor of law the University of Illinois in Urbana, Illinois, who stated the truth about the source of the Wuhan Virus in an interview he gave a website called Geopolitics & Empire that was transcribed and published in Christian Order in early-2020:

HM: Now let’s get to what’s been on the news recently. This coronavirus in Wuhan. There have been some reports recently, there’s a really interesting website called Great Game India that has been reporting on this. They’ve been talking about China, which they say has been complying with biological weapons convention in recent years. But then there are some people in the US and experts that have been saying that in reality, China isn’t complying with the weapons convention. And I think neither, perhaps the US as well. I’m wondering if China is developing its own Biosafety Level 4 [BSL-4] lab in Wuhan and elsewhere, as you know, as a type of deterrence. Is it a type of a biological arms race that we have going on?

You told me in an email that you suspect China was developing the coronavirus as a dual use of biowarfare weapons agent. Also, what do you make of reports that Chinese scientists have been stealing research and viruses, including the coronavirus, from a Canadian bio lab this past December?3 And as well, Chinese nationals have been charged with smuggling vials of biological research to China from the US — with the aid of Charles Lieber who was the chair of Harvard’s chemistry department.4 And he also happens to be, in 2011, a strategic scientist at Wuhan University. So, can you tell us what’s going on with this recent outbreak in Wuhan?

FB: Well, that’s a lot of questions. I guess we can take them one at a time. But if you just do a very simple Google search on “Does China have a BSL-4 laboratory?”, Wuhan comes up right away. It’s at the top of the list. At the moment this type of thing happened I began to do that. So a BSL-4 is the most serious type. And basically, BSL-4 labs, we have many of them here in the United States, are used to develop offensive biological warfare weapons with DNA genetic engineering.

So it does seem to me that the Wuhan BSL-4 is the source of the coronavirus. my guess is that they were researching SARS, and they weaponised it further by giving it gain of function properties, which means it could be more lethal. And indeed, the latest report now is [that] it’s 15% fatality rate, which is more than SARS at 83% infection rate. So, typical gain of function. It travels in the air, so it could reach out maybe six feet or more from someone emitting a sneeze or a cough. Likewise, this is a specially designated WHO research lab. So the WHO is in on it and they knew full well what was going on there.

Yes, it’s also been reported that Chinese scientists stole coronavirus materials from the Canadian lab at Winnipeg. Winnipeg is Canada’s foremost centre for research, developing, testing, biological warfare weapons. It’s along the lines of Fort Detrick here in the United States of America. I have three degrees from Harvard. It would not surprise me if something was being stolen out of Harvard to turn over to China. I read that report. I don’t know what was in those vials one way or the other.

But the bottom line is — and I drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the United States Congress, signed into law by President Bush Sr. — that it appears the coronavirus that we’re dealing with here is an offensive biological warfare weapon that leaked out of that Wuhan BSL-4. I’m not saying it was done deliberately. But there have been previous reports of problems with that lab and things leaking out of it. And I’m afraid, that is what we are dealing with today.

HM: We’ll be talking about the Wuhan and the coronavirus and China, but can you give us kind of like a bigger context. I know you’ve previously in interviews said that since 9/11, you think that the US has spent $100 billion on biological warfare research. We know the Soviet Union, if I’m not mistaken, developed anthrax as a bioweapon. And you’ve also mentioned that UK, France, Israel and China are all involved in biological warfare weapons research. And something interesting, I believe one or two years ago a Bulgarian journalist and the Russian government shared their concern of the discovery of a US bioweapons lab in the country of Georgia. You’ve commented how in Africa, [the]US has set up bioweapons labs to work on Ebola, which I think is illegal under international law. But they were allowed somehow to put those in Africa. Can you give us like a bigger picture? What’s going on with these different countries and what’s the purpose of this research?

FB: All these BSL-4 labs — by United States, Europe, Russia, China, Israel — are all there to research, develop, test biological warfare agents. There’s really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4 labs. That figure I gave, $100 billion, that was about 2015 I believe. I had crunched the numbers and came up with that figure [for] the United States since 9/11. To give you an idea: that’s as much in constant dollars as the US spent to develop the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb. So it’s clearly all weapons related. We have well over 13,000 alleged life science scientists involved in research development testing biological weapons here in the United States. Actually this goes back, it even precedes 9/11, 2001. I have another book, The Future of International Law and American Foreign Policy, tracing that all the way back to the Reagan administration under the influence of the neocons. And they got very heavily involved in research development testing of biological weapons with DNA genetic engineering. It was because of that I issued my plea in 1985 in a Congressional briefing sponsored by the Council for Responsible Genetics — I’m a lawyer for them; they’re headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. All the MIT [Massachusetts Institute of Technology], Harvard people are involved in that, the principal ones, and then they asked me to draft the implementing legislation.

The implementing legislation that I drafted was originally designed to stop this type of work. Death science work, I call it, by the United States government. After 9/11, 2001, it just completely accelerated. My current figure [is] that last figure, a 100 billion [dollars]. I haven’t had a chance to re-crunch the numbers because I just started classes. But you have to add in about another 5 billion per year. Basically, this is an offensive biological weapons race by the United States government, and with its assistance in Canada and Britain. And so other States of the world have responded accordingly, including Russia and China. They were going to set up a whole series of BSL-4 facilities as well. And you know Wuhan was the first. It backfired on them.

HM: So would you boil down what happened [in] Wuhan to ineptitude or incompetence on the Chinese part?

FB: Well, it’s criminality. It does appear they stole something there from Winnipeg. This activity that they engaged in clearly violates the Biological Weapons Convention. Research development of biological weapons these days is an international crime. I mean the use of it would be. That was criminal. I’m not saying they deliberately inflicted this on their own people, but it leaked out of there. And all these BSL-4 facilities leak. Everyone knows that who studies this. So, this was a catastrophe waiting to happen. Unfortunately, it happened. The Chinese government under Xi and his comrades there have been covering this up from the get-go. The first reported case was December 1, so they’ve been sitting on this until they couldn’t anymore. And everything they’re telling you is a lie. It’s propaganda. The WHO still refuses to declare a global health emergency. It said Tedros [Adhanom], Director-General of the WHO] was over there shaking hands with Xi and smiling and yucking it up. The WHO was in on it. They’ve approved many of these BSL-4 labs, they know exactly what’s going on. And that is a WHO research approved laboratory. So they know what’s going on too. You can’t really believe anything the WHO is telling you about this either, they’re up to their eyeballs in it, in my opinion.

HM: I’d probably agree with you that this outbreak in Wuhan was an accidental leak from the laboratory. But just your thoughts: it’s happening at quite an opportune time because we’re smack in the middle of a US-China new Cold War, which is currently characterised by economic warfare such as the trade war among other forms of hybrid and technological warfare. And it seems the Wuhan outbreak will likely hit the Chinese economy hard. The Chinese are flat out dismissing any idea that the US is involved. Like I said, it’s probably they made the mistakes in the Wuhan lab. But what are your thoughts. Seemingly, this would benefit the US.

FB: When the outbreak occurred, of course I considered that alternative too. When you have an outbreak you’re never quite sure who or what is behind it. It certainly isn’t bats, that’s ridiculous. They made the same argument on Ebola in West Africa. I demolished that online, you can check it out. So I kept competing theories about this. But right now, when you originally contacted me, I said I wasn’t prepared to comment because I was weighing the evidence. I’m a law professor and a lawyer, I try to do the best I can to weigh the evidence. But right now, that Wuhan BSL-4 in my opinion is the most likely source. Apply Occam’s razor, the simplest explanation. I’m not ruling out some type of sabotage. But right now, I believe that is the source here. HM: You mentioned WHO. I’d like to just get your thoughts on the WHO and the Big Pharma [pharmaceutical companies]. There’s also some analysts who are downplaying this news media hype of the coronavirus. You’ve just said that it seems to be lethal, but if we go back a decade to the 2009 swine flu, which I believe didn’t have too many casualties, but I think profited greatly the pharmaceutical companies. And if I recall, back in 2009, many countries purchased great stocks of the vaccines and they ended up not using anywhere from 50 to 80% of the vaccines that they purchased. You’ve previously stated in an interview that the World Health Organisation is a front for Big Pharma, if I’m not mistaken. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also agrees and he says, you know, 50% of WHO funding comes from pharmaceutical companies, and that the CDC itself is also severely compromised. What are your thoughts on the WHO, the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]?

FB: You can’t trust anything the WHO says because they’re all bought and paid for by Big Pharma. And they work in cahoots with the CDC, which is the United States government, they work in cahoots with Fort Detrick, so you can’t trust any of it. However, the swine flu — and yes, I agree pharma made a lot of money — but that swine flu which I looked at it, it did seem to me to be a genetically modified biological warfare weapon. It was a chimera of three different types of genetic strains that someone put together in a cocktail. Fortunately, it was not as lethal as all of us fear. So fine. But as I said, this figure I just gave to you was Saturday from Lancet, which is a medical publication, saying it’s a 15% fatality rate and an 83% infection rate. So it’s quite serious, I think, far more serious than swine flu.

As for Big Pharma, sure they’re all trying to profit off this today as we speak. There was a big article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, all Big Pharma trying to peddle whatever they can over there in China even if it’s worthless and won’t help. We do know you know if you read the mainstream news media they say that there isn’t a vaccine. Well, there is. It’s by the Pirbright Institute in Britain that’s tied into their biological warfare program over there. They were behind the hoof-and-mouth [aka foot-and-mouth] disease outbreak over there that wiped out their cattle herd and it leaked out of there. So it’s clear they’re working on a hoof and mouth biological warfare weapon. But the vaccine is there. I have the patent for it here — I haven’t had a chance to read the patent, it’s about 25 pages long and my classes [have] just resume[d]. So eventually, I'll get some free time and I’ll read the patent.

You can’t patent a vaccine with the United States patent office unless the science is there. So there is a vaccine. Everyone’s lying about that, no one’s pointing this out. There’s a vaccine but instead Big Pharma wants to make money and the researchers say, well, it’ll take three months and we’re racing forward, you know. Everyone’s gonna make a buck off of this, that’s for sure. But there is a vaccine, I have the patent here. It’s been patented by the United States government. So, obviously, I don’t know exactly how workable it is, but it’s a vaccine. I don’t know why it isn’t out there now? Why isn’t someone saying there is a vaccine? Perhaps political leaders have already been vaccinated for all I know. I really don’t know. But there is a vaccine. Pirbright is well known there in Britain, and it’s tied into Fort Detrick, and CDC is tied into Fort Detrick too. So they all know there’s a patented vaccine.

HM: Just to get your comment on something related to this... I think, I’m not sure, if it’s that same Institute that you just mentioned that has the patent. I read somewhere that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation maybe funds or has some connection to that Institute that has the patent.

FB: I think they do. Yeah. The Bill & Melinda Gates [Foundation], they fund this type of DNA genetically-engineered biological warfare work. That’s correct. So you can’t trust anything they’re telling you, that somehow they’re out there trying to make the world a better place. I mean, we have Bill Gates publicly admitting that the world be a better place if there were a lot less people. So, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, they are wolves in sheep’s clothing, and they are funding this type of stuff. Sure. [Now allied with the Vatican, arch population controller Gates has been touted as a potential funding partner of the Pope's sulphurous Global Education Pact, due to kick off in Rome this May, with a view to creating a "new humanism."]

HM: And just your comment: there was also the report that — I guess it was a consortium of companies which included the Gates Foundation — that just two or three months ago in October of 2019 they held a pandemic exercise simulating an outbreak. I mean, what are the chances specifically of a coronavirus. It was called Event 201. People can find this online online and they gave a list of seven recommendations for governments and international organisations to take. I also find that kind of interesting, how they had this simulation.

FB: That’s correct. It raises that question: the origins of what happened here. But right now, I’m just looking at the evidence I have, and applying Occam’s razor. And we know that Wuhan BSL-4 was researching, developing, testing, SARS as a biological warfare agent. So it could have been they gave it this DNA genetic engineering enhanced properties, gain of function, which we do here in the West, in the United States all the time. We have all sorts of research that is clearly bio-warfare research that has been approved by the National Institutes of Health. It’s a joke. They know full well they are approving all kinds of biological warfare research. And it gets funded by the United States government.

HM: And you’ve also mentioned in an email to me that what happened in the Biosafety Lab level 4 in Wuhan calls into question the safety of all of these level 3 and 4 four labs around the world.

FB: They’re completely unsafe. BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs are only designed for research, development, testing of offensive biological warfare agents. In my opinion they serve no legitimate purpose at all. They should all be shut down. Every one of them. Simply, they’re too dangerous. If you want, there’s an excellent documentary called Anthrax Wars, by Nadler and Coen, and I’m in there repeatedly, and at the end I say, with respect to these labs, 3 and 4, this is a catastrophe waiting to happen.

HM: We’ll be talking about the Wuhan and the coronavirus and China, but can you give us kind of like a bigger context. I know you’ve previously in interviews said that since 9/11, you think that the US has spent $100 billion on biological warfare research. We know the Soviet Union, if I’m not mistaken, developed anthrax as a bioweapon. And you’ve also mentioned that UK, France, Israel and China are all involved in biological warfare weapons research. And something interesting, I believe one or two years ago a Bulgarian journalist and the Russian government shared their concern of the discovery of a US bioweapons lab in the country of Georgia. You’ve commented how in Africa, [the]US has set up bioweapons labs to work on Ebola, which I think is illegal under international law. But they were allowed somehow to put those in Africa. Can you give us like a bigger picture? What’s going on with these different countries and what’s the purpose of this research?

FB: All these BSL-4 labs — by United States, Europe, Russia, China, Israel — are all there to research, develop, test biological warfare agents. There’s really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4 labs. That figure I gave, $100 billion, that was about 2015 I believe. I had crunched the numbers and came up with that figure [for] the United States since 9/11. To give you an idea: that’s as much in constant dollars as the US spent to develop the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb. So it’s clearly all weapons related. We have well over 13,000 alleged life science scientists involved in research development testing biological weapons here in the United States. Actually this goes back, it even precedes 9/11, 2001. I have another book, The Future of International Law and American Foreign Policy, tracing that all the way back to the Reagan administration under the influence of the neocons. And they got very heavily involved in research development testing of biological weapons with DNA genetic engineering. It was because of that I issued my plea in 1985 in a Congressional briefing sponsored by the Council for Responsible Genetics — I’m a lawyer for them; they’re headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. All the MIT [Massachusetts Institute of Technology], Harvard people are involved in that, the principal ones, and then they asked me to draft the implementing legislation. The implementing legislation that I drafted was originally designed to stop this type of work. Death science work, I call it, by the United States government. After 9/11, 2001, it just completely accelerated. My current figure [is] that last figure, a 100 billion [dollars]. I haven’t had a chance to re-crunch the numbers because I just started classes. But you have to add in about another 5 billion per year. Basically, this is an offensive biological weapons race by the United States government, and with its assistance in Canada and Britain. And so other States of the world have responded accordingly, including Russia and China. They were going to set up a whole series of BSL-4 facilities as well. And you know Wuhan was the first. It backfired on them.

Well, I’m afraid the catastrophe is now happened. So, there it is.

HM: I was just watching that documentary before we connected and I recommend the listeners go check that out. Do you see, in the future, any countries, if we come to a conflict between US, EU, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Russia, I mean you name it, do you see any of these countries actually utilising these biological weapons? I mean, it’s illegal under international law but we know like in the past that international law isn’t followed. Do you think that there’s a real danger of this escalating?

FB: For sure. That’s the only reason they develop these biological weapons, is, eventually, to be used, sure. I mean, it’s like the Manhattan project. We put all that money into developing an atom bomb, and even though it was not needed to end World War II, they still nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So, yes, I think that’s correct. And also these can be used covertly. Anytime you see an unexplained, sudden outbreak of a disease like this anywhere in the world, both for human beings and/or animals, I always suspect the bio-warfare agent is at work. And I monitor the situation, like I did at Wuhan, until I can reach a conclusion. So, yes, they can be used.

As for the United States government, today they are fully prepared, armed, equipped, supplied to wage biological warfare with anthrax. These other more exotic things I don’t know. But they have the weapons, they're stockpiled. We have to understand ... if you read Seymour Myron Hersh’s book, published about 1968, he won the Pulitzer prize for My Lai, he had the whole offensive US biological warfare industry in there — back before it was illegal and criminal. Basically, after 9/11 2001, that entire industry — offensive biological warfare industry — has been reconstituted here in the United States, with all these BSL-4 BSL-3 labs, well over 13,000, alleged scientists, sort of like Dr. Mengele, working on these things. And so other countries have responded in kind, like Russia, like China. France is involved. Britain’s involved. Sure.

HM: You mentioned covert use. In the last few years there was the Russian double-agent spy, Sergei Skripal, who had been allegedly poisoned with Novichok out in Britain. And I thought it was funny [that] it just so happened where he was allegedly poisoned, he was right in Porton Down, the British bio weapons lab [near Salisbury], I guess the world’s first bio weapons lab created in 1916. I don’t know if you have thoughts on that whole incident.

FB: Yeah, well, it was right down the street from Porton Down, so apply Occam’s razor, who do you think might’ve been behind this? And, it was not a nerve agent, a nerve agent would have killed him immediately, this Novichok. It was something else, like VX or something like that. I would just say that I don’t think that [proximity to Porton Down] was a coincidence. But, you know, there you go. Obviously there’s a lot of speculation on that.

HM: Something else that’s kind of interesting. You’ve written in Biowarfare and Terrorism, your book, and there’s also Graeme MacQueen, I think your colleague, who wrote The 2001 Anthrax Deception : The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy...

FB: Right. I agree with everything he said in there. That’s correct.

HM: ... and I’m wondering, if this new war for biotechnological dominance, whatever you want to call it, if it can also be used kind of as a pretext for the centralisation of political power and the initiation of wars, like I guess it did in the 2003 Iraq war. Is this another danger that we get these events, like now this coronavirus, and then governments will call for centralisation of greater power, and taking away some of our civil liberties?

FB: Sure. If you look at the October, 2001 anthrax attacks here in the United States, that was clearly by elements of the United States government that was behind that. That was super weapons-grade anthrax, with a trillion spores per gram, and it floated in the air. Solely a very sophisticated biological weapons lab, like Fort Detrick, could produce that. And they used that anthrax attack, including on Congress, to ram through the USA Patriot act, which basically turned the United States into a police state, which is what we have now. So, you have to understand, the Pentagon, Fort Detrick, maybe Dugway Proving Ground [bio and chem weapons testing area in Utah], still has a stockpile of that super weapons-grade anthrax that we saw in October of 2001, that they can use the next time they want to do something like that, to further develop the American police state.

HM: Is there anything else you feel important to mention regarding this Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak or biological warfare, or any other thoughts you’d like to leave us with?

FB: Well, you just can’t believe anything the Chinese government, the WHO, the CDC are telling you. They’re all lying because they know what was going on there. And so, you’re going to have to figure it out as fast as you can. But in my opinion, as of this time, and I’m fully prepared to consider further evidence on this, it does seem to me that this was a DNA, genetically-engineered biological warfare agent leaking out of Wuhan, that has gain of function properties, which can make it more lethal. I think they're probably doing something with SARS to make it a lot more lethal and more infectious. And so for that reason, you have to take extreme precautions. And they’ve now finally admitted, well yeah, anyone within six feet can be infected, whereas with SARS it was about two feet. Well, that’s gain of function right there. And that should be a tip off.

So, I guess you’re gonna have to protect yourself. Laurie Garrett had a pretty good essay in Foreign Policy yesterday, and she was over there covering SARS, and she has very good advice in there, except that she took the SARS figure out two to three feet and said well, you gotta stay to two to three. I think you’ve got to stay at least six feet away, because this is gain of function. It can flow through the air and infect you. It can get you in the eyes. Any orifice, the mouth, maybe the ears. We’re not sure, at this point.

HM: I’m here on the border of China, in Kazakhstan, and I was just reading yesterday... they’re no longer allowing Chinese citizens into Kazakhstan without a medical, like a paper medical check, to get their visas to enter Kazakhstan.

FB: Those medical checks are worthless. This is just public relations by all the governments involved. Because there is a fourteen day incubation period where people can still be infected. So someone could walk right through a medical inspection and pass it, get into your country, and then they come down with the coronavirus. So that’s all public relations in my opinion by governments, and they know it. They’re just sending people out there, with temperatures and things like that. It’s not like SARS. This is more dangerous than SARS. As I said, I think that Wuhan lab, we know they had SARS in there that they were dealing with, and I think they enhanced it, and, I’m afraid, that’s what we’re dealing with. But you know I’m keeping an open mind as to what other sources it might have. And I wasn’t prepared to say anything until [I found] that Wuhan lab is right there and it’s dealing with coronavirus. So, again, apply Occam’s razor. It seems to me that’s the simplest explanation here.

HM: One of my final questions would be, in the months ahead, apart of what you say, staying six feet away from people, I’ve read taking high doses of vitamin C and other things like this can help you. But, if they come out as the situation develops, if it gets worse, and they come out with a coronavirus vaccine, should people take it or not? What are your thoughts?

FB: Well, what I would say is this. Right now, if you look at the article in the Wall Street Journal, Big Pharma is trying to sell all sorts of — they’re taking all their drugs off the shelf, and say, well, let’s see if it works. Which is preposterous. Okay. The scientists are saying, well, we can get you a vaccine, maybe two to three months, but they’re not testing. So, what we do know, however, is that Pirbright vaccine has been patented. So all I can assume is that that might work. But I don’t think I’d be taking any of these other vaccines. No, you have no idea what’s in there. You’ll be the guinea pig, for Big Pharma. And, you know, everyone figures they’re gonna make a lot of money here. So I’ll keep my eye open on this, and how it develops, but I wouldn’t trust anything they’re trying to sell right now. They’re just pulling these things off the shelf.

If they do come up with something in two to three months, even that’s not going to be tested, in accordance with normal scientific protocols. So it’s going to be a crap shoot. If it’s going to help you, indeed it might not help you because they’ll be using for these vaccines, these DNA genetic-engineered vaccines, they’ll be using live coronavirus, probably, and sticking it in there and giving you, some live coronavirus, on the theory you’ll develop an immunity. That’s the way a lot of these vaccines work out. That’s what happened with the Ebola vaccine that created the Ebola pandemic there in West Africa. They were testing out a vaccine on poor black Africans, as usual, and this vaccine had live Ebola in it, so it gave them live Ebola. So again, I’d be very careful, even if they do come up with these vaccines two to three months from now. Very careful. Why would you want to inject the live coronavirus in you?

HM: All right. I don’t believe you have a strong online presence. How can people best follow your work? I suppose to search for interviews as well as get your books.

FB: Well, basically I’m blackballed and blacklisted off all the mainstream news media here, on purpose. As far as I can figure out, the US government gave an order that I should not be interviewed by anyone, so I’m not. I guess you could just put my name in there under Google, a Google alert, and some interviews might come up.

But what happened was, right after the anthrax attacks of 9/11, 2001, I was giving a lecture out at Harvard, my Alma Mater. I was running a panel on biological warfare for the Council for Responsible Genetics, I'm their lawyer. It was at Harvard Divinity School, and as I was going in there was a Fox camera crew there from Boston, and I said it looks to me like this has come out of the US government's lab, and we know they do research and testing on anthrax. Then I said the same thing there at Harvard. Then I gave an interview to a radio station in Washington DC. Then I gave an interview on that to the BBC. So the whole world saw it. And at that point I was completely cut off. And I’ve been cut off ever since.

So, you're probably not going to hear too many interviews from me here. As for my book, Biowarfare and Terrorism, you can just get it at amazon.com. That picks up the story pretty much from 9/11, 2001, until it went to press. And then there are interviews I’ve given to an investigative reporter, Sherwood Ross. And a big one I just sent you, and you might want to put that on your web page. That was pretty comprehensive.

HM: I read that as well. I’ll include the link in the description of this interview, so people can go check that out. You’re not the only academic I know, I've heard of others that similar things have happened [to]. And that’s just, I guess, the price you, we, pay for telling the truth. Again, for listeners, if people want to have a broader context and deeper understanding of what’s happening today, especially with biological warfare, as well as US foreign policy and international affairs, I urge you to get Dr. Francis Boyle’s books and listen to his interviews, as well as his colleague's book, Graeme MacQueen, The 2001 Anthrax Deception, The Case For Domestic Conspiracy. Thank you for being with us, Dr. Boyle.

FB: Well, thank you. And again, please understand these are my current opinions. I could change my opinion here, based on more evidence. So I’m just looking at the evidence out there as I see it. And you have to understand, there is so much disinformation, lies and propaganda, that it’s kind of very difficult to distinguish truth from fact. I’m doing the best job I can here.

[Christian Order] Editor's Comment China's Genocidal Biowarfare Plan After reading Dr Boyle's expert, plain-speaking assessment, those still reliant, whether solely or mostly, on corporate media for their news may finally reconsider their self-harming habit and seek out alternative sources. He lays bare the disinformation put about (once again) on the origins and true nature of a virus: in this case not the random product of nature and "bats" as depicted, but of sinister experiments in a lab. His considered view, aggressively attacked by the media and big tech giants and labelled "misinformaton" and "fake news" by the WHO, was subsequently vindicated. A study by scientists at the prestigious South China University of Technology in Guangzhou confirmed that "the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan." [Daily Mail, 16/2/20]

There is every reason to suspect the darkest reasons for shutting down truth-tellers. In this regard, readers who recall the murder of English bio-warfare expert Dr David Kelly in 2003, and the flagrant Establishment cover-up, will appreciate the courage of Dr Boyle in speaking out. Indeed, he mentions being deemed persona non grata ever since he depicted the anthrax-letters attacks just after 9/11 as the Deep State (CIA/Fort Derek biodefence centre) conspiracy it turned out to be. Later, in 2008, following the entirely predictable and convenient pre-indictment "suicide" of the (equally convenient) alleged sole perpetrator of those anthrax letters (microbiologist Bruce Ivins of Ft Derek), Dr Boyle said: “Ivins is only the latest dead microbiologist.” He had previously stated:

“You also have to tie into this the large numbers of dead microbiologists that have appeared since around the summer before these events, when the New York Times revealed the existence of the covert anthrax weapons programmes run by the CIA, and that too is in the public record.”

Fast forward to 2020. On cue, a renowned infectious disease specialist, Canadian Frank Plummer, who was the key to the entire investigation on the origins of the coronavirus bio-weapon, collapsed and died, suddenly and conveniently on 4 February, during an annual meeting at the University of Nairobi, Kenya, where he was a keynote speaker. Omitted from mainstream reports were some salient facts:

1. Plummer was working on a coronavirus (HIV) vaccine at his National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, thanks to a SARS coronavirus sample he had received from the Saudis;

2. The Winnipeg lab had been targeted by Chinese bio-warfare agents. The chief Chinese scientist, Dr. Qiu, was allegedly making trips between Winnipeg and Wuhan. By July 2019 she and her Chinese compatriots had been kicked out of the facility, but not before they reportedly stole the SARS Coronavirus from the lab and smuggled it to none other than China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology — where, in the estimation of Dr Boyle and others, it is believed to have been weaponised and leaked.

Thankfully, independent outlets like Infowars, Natural News, Daily Caller, Breitbart, and in this case Geopolitics & Empire, along with many other sources, allow us to discern the deeper truths behind daily headlines long before the controlled corporate press is compelled to abandon its spurious narratives. In other words, despite both the unavoidable abundance of fake news to be found among millions of websites, and the official disinformation spewed forth by intelligence agencies (East and West) to distract, divide, confuse and demoralise us, the demonisation of alternative media as baseless "conspiracy" fare is itself fake news.

As truth-seekers know through years of weighing up reliability, the reporting, analysis and conclusions of countless credible sites and 'citizen journalist' bloggers are invariably based on brave investigative reporting (like the devastating undercover exposé of Planned Parenthood by David Daleiden); little publicised articles and reports already in the public domain (oftentimes irrefutable declassified documents); and the input of acknowledged experts and courageous whistleblowers sidelined by the press. Meanwhile, massive cyber-attacks were duly launched against Natural News, Zero Hedge, Great Game India and other sites reporting on the coronavirus. Natural News provided this sobering summation:

“Dr. Boyle’s position is in stark contrast to the mainstream media’s narrative of the virus being originated from the seafood market, which is increasingly being questioned by many experts,” reports GreatGameIndia.com [3/2/20], an independent news website that has also been subjected to aggressive cyber-attacks after it began publishing information about the coronavirus pandemic. (Natural News was also subjected to an extremely well-funded cyber takedown attack that disrupted our publishing operations for 2-3 days.) As Great Game India now reports:

[T]he mainstream media’s narrative still maintains that the origin of the 2019 Coronavirus is the Wuhan Seafood Market. After GreatGameIndia published the story on Coronavirus Bioweapon – not only were our database tinkered with and our reports blocked by Facebook on the flimsy reason that they could not find GreatGameIndia Facebook page, but the report itself was viciously attacked by Foreign Policy magazine, PolitiFact (known widely as Facebook’s propaganda arm) and BuzzFeedNews. (Facebook's laughable claim is no surprise given Mark Zuckerberg’s history of forgetting crucial information when grilled by authorities worldwide. So, we would just like to remind everyone "How Facebook’s Secret Unit created India’s Troll Armies for Digital Propaganda to Influence Elections."5 )

It is not GreatGameIndia alone which is being viciously attacked. Zero Hedge, a popular alternate media blog was suspended by Twitter for publishing a story related to a study by Indian scientists finding 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus to be not naturally evolved, raising the possibility of it being created in a lab. Shockingly, the study itself came under intense online criticism by Social Media experts resulting in the scientists withdrawing the paper. The coronavirus biological weapon development program was part of China’s long-admitted effort to weaponise viruses and wipe out the USA by deploying them on U.S. soil. “In a secret speech given to high-level Communist Party cadres nearly two decades ago, Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Chi Haotian explained a long-range plan for ensuring a Chinese national renaissance,” reports Great Game India: “We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons,” said the general. “Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves.” The answer is found in biological weapons. “Of course,” he added, “we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind.” “In the long run,” said Gen. Chi, “the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.” This tragic situation must be accepted. According to Gen. Chi, “We must not forget that the history of our civilisation repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to live together.” According to Gen. Chi, China’s overpopulation problem and environmental degradation will eventually result in social collapse and civil war. General Chi estimated that “more than 800 million” Chinese would die in such a collapse. Therefore, the Chinese Communist Party has no policy alternative. Either the United States is “cleaned up” by biological attacks, or China suffers national catastrophe.6 In other words, China has been building a biological weapon to destroy the United States, and that weapon got loose in their own back yard. Now, it looks like China may have just nuked itself with that very same bioweapon, and the fate of China’s population, industrial output and political leadership looks very much in doubt. Perhaps it’s fitting that the coronavirus may be the vector by which China destroys itself before its treacherous philosophy of communism, tyranny and mass death infects the entire world. (The Coronavirus Cover-up, published in Christian Order, March 2020, issue. For ordering information, please see Christian Order)

A Few Pertinent Observations About the Boyle Interview (As found in Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part two, revised.)

There are several important points that I want to highlight for the readers of Christ or Chaos.

First, the information provided by Dr. Francis Boyle is very important for all those who read this article to consider and digest.

Second, Catholics have got to understand and accept the fact that Dr. Francis Boyle is entirely correct when he states that one must believe nothing—as in absolutely nothing—that is said by officials of the United States Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization about how to “stop” the China Virus. It is thus nothing less than tragic that many fully traditional Catholic clergy believe anything these purveyors of evil say as their agenda is ideological and thus has nothing to do with legitimate public health. Once again, the China Virus crisis is all about social control, not public health. Does the fact that Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has cover-up cholera cases in his native Ethiopia and that he is a lifelong member of a terrorist organization mean anything? See World Health Organization President Tedro Adhaanom Ghebreyeus Covered Up Cholera Outbreaks in His Native Ethiopia.

This is in no way to denigrate the fact that there is the coronavirus can be deadly for a percentage of those who contract it. However, we must recognize that this is a manufactured crisis that is being exploited for nefarious ends by our statist minders to see just how far they can push the unwashed masses.

The highest numbers of deaths from the China Virus have occurred here in the United States of America and in Red China, Iran and Italy, where the China Virus has hit especially hard because of the country’s reliance upon Chinese-based businesses and immigrant workers to compensate for the declining birth rate that the country has visited upon itself by means of contraception and abortion. For a detailed analysis of how Iran and Italy have relied upon the assistance of the Chicoms and Chinese nationals to sustain their economies, please see Iran and Italy are paying a hefty price for close times with Communist China. For a balanced view of the hysteria caused by the China Virus publicity, see Evidence Over Hysteria.

Why are not the World Health Organization, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and/or the United States Centers for Disease Control calling for state-imposed “social distancing” measures to fight the seasonal influenza outbreaks?