In the Shoes of The Antichrist, part one

A true pope wears the “Shoes of the Fisherman,” namely, that of the first pope, Saint Peter, who was called by Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to quit his life as a fisherman to follow Him in order to become a fisher of men:

[16] The people that sat in darkness, hath seen great light: and to them that sat in the region of the shadow of death, light is sprung up. [17] From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say: Do penance, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. [18] And Jesus walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea (for they were fishers). [19] And he saith to them: Come ye after me, and I will make you to be fishers of men. [20] And they immediately leaving their nets, followed him. (Matthew 4: 16-20.)

Although He had called Saint Peter and his brother, Saint Andrew, whose feast is transferred this year to Monday, December 1, 2014, together, to abandon their lives of fishermen to be fishers of the souls of men, Our Lord founded His Holy Church, the Catholic Church, upon the Rock of Saint Peter, who became the first pope:

And Jesus came into the quarters of Caesarea Philippi: and he asked his disciples, saying: Whom do men say that the Son of man is? [14] But they said: Some John the Baptist, and other some Elias, and others Jeremias, or one of the prophets. [15] Jesus saith to them: But whom do you say that I am?

[16] Simon Peter answered and said: Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God. [17] And Jesus answering, said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven. [18] And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. [19] And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven. [20] Then he commanded his disciples, that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ. (Matthew 16: 16-20.)

Bishop Richard Challoner commented upon the meaning of this passage from the Gospel according to Saint Matthew that is misrepresented by both the heretical and schismatic Orthodox and by every one of the over thirty-three thousand different Protestant sects extant around the world today:

[18] Thou art Peter: As St. Peter, by divine revelation, here made a solemn profession of his faith of the divinity of Christ; so in recompense of this faith and profession, our Lord here declares to him the dignity to which he is pleased to raise him: viz., that he to whom he had already given the name of Peter, signifying a rock, St. John 1. 42, should be a rock indeed, of invincible strength, for the support of the building of the church; in which building he should be, next to Christ himself, the chief foundation stone, in quality of chief pastor, ruler, and governor; and should have accordingly all fulness of ecclesiastical power, signified by the keys of the kingdom of heaven.

[18] Upon this rock: The words of Christ to Peter, spoken in the vulgar language of the Jews which our Lord made use of, were the same as if he had said in English, Thou art a Rock, and upon this rock I will build my church. So that, by the plain course of the words, Peter is here declared to be the rock, upon which the church was to be built: Christ himself being both the principal foundation and founder of the same. Where also note, that Christ, by building his house, that is, his church, upon a rock, has thereby secured it against all storms and floods, like the wise builder, St. Matt. 7. 24, 25.

[18] The gates of hell: That is, the powers of darkness, and whatever Satan can do, either by himself, or his agents. For as the church is here likened to a house, or fortress, built on a rock; so the adverse powers are likened to a contrary house or fortress, the gates of which, that is, the whole strength, and all the efforts it can make, will never be able to prevail over the city or church of Christ. By this promise we are fully assured, that neither idolatry, heresy, nor any pernicious error whatsoever shall at any time prevail over the church of Christ.

[19] Loose upon earth: The loosing the bands of temporal punishments due to sins, is called an indulgence; the power of which is here granted. (Bishop Richard Challoner Commentary in the Douay-Rheims Bible.)

Bishop Challoner’s commentary on Matthew 16, verses sixteen through twenty is a simple reminder of what Pope Pius XI had noted in Quas Primas, December 11, 1925, namely, that the Catholic Church enjoys a complete and perpetual immunity from error and heresy.

This means, of course, that those who have claimed to wear the “Shoes of the Fisherman” since Angelo Roncalli/John XXIII walked out on the balcony of the Basilica of Saint Peter to lay public claim to that which had been taken from another on October 28, 1958, the Feast of Saints Simon and Jude have been wearing what can be termed the “Shoes of The Antichrist” as they have engaged in idolatry, countenanced, taught and spread heresy while spewing forth a barrage of pernicious errors. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is simply the ultimate end-product of the very revolutionary ideology that formed him as a seminarian and that he has promoted throughout his career as a lay member of the Society of Jesus in conciliar captivity.

Bergoglio’s commitment to heresy and pernicious error was on full display yesterday, Friday, November 28, 2014, a ferial day of the Last Sunday after Pentecost and the feast, although not observed universally, of Saint Catherine Laboure, as he addressed the civil authorities in Ankara, Turkey, upon his arrival in a predominantly Mohammedan land (up to 98.2% of the Turks are Mohammedans of one sort or another) despite the secular nature of the Turkish government:

Mr President
Distinguished Authorities,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am pleased to visit your country so rich in natural beauty and history, and filled with vestiges of ancient civilizations. It is a natural bridge between two continents and diverse cultures. This land is precious to every Christian for being the birthplace of Saint Paul, who founded various Christian communities here, and for hosting the first seven Councils of the Church. It is also renowned for the site near Ephesus which a venerable tradition holds to be the “Home of Mary”, the place where the Mother of Jesus lived for some years. It is now a place of devotion for innumerable pilgrims from all over the world, not only for Christians, but also for Muslims.

Yet, the reasons why Turkey is held with such regard and appreciation are not only linked to its past and ancient monuments, but also have to do with the vitality of its present, the hard work and generosity of its people, and its role in the concert of nations.

It brings me great joy to have this opportunity to pursue with you a dialogue of friendship, esteem and respect, in the footsteps of my predecessors Blessed Paul VI, Saint John Paul II and Benedict XVI. This dialogue was prepared for and supported by the work of the then Apostolic Delegate, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, who went on to become Saint John XXIII, and by the Second Vatican Council. (Meeting with the President, Prime Minister and Civil Authorities.)

Brief Comment Number One:

Although Jorge’s address yesterday was relatively brief, he managed to discuss “dialogue” no less than six times, twice in the preceding passage. The man who currently wears the Shoes of The Antichrist certainly gave credit when credit was due when naming four of his predecessors as responsible for the belief that “dialogue” can end the violence of a false religion that is violent of its nature, filled as it is with adherents whose immortal souls are captive to the devil by means of Original Sin. The Catholic Church has tolerated false religions as the common good may require. She demands such toleration for her own children in countries where they are vastly outnumbered. She does not, however, respect and esteem that which is hideous in the very sight of the Most Blessed Trinity.

Back to the madness of dialogue in Ankara, Turkey, yesterday:

Today what is needed is a dialogue which can deepen the understanding and appreciation of the many things which we hold in common. Such a dialogue will allow us to reflect sensibly and serenely on our differences, and to learn from them.

There is a need to move forward patiently in the task of building a lasting peace, one founded on respect for the fundamental rights and duties rooted in the dignity of each person. In this way, we can overcome prejudices and unwarranted fears, leaving room for respect, encounter, and the release of more positive energies for the good of all.  (Meeting with the President, Prime Minister and Civil Authorities.)

Pretty Long Comment Number Two:

First, the Catholic Church has nothing to learn about any false religion, including Mohammedanism.

Second, the Catholic Church does not build a lasting peace on a false foundation of “fundamental rights and duties rooted in the dignity of each person.

Pope Pius XI made this clear in Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio, December 23, 1922:

There exists an institution able to safeguard the sanctity of the law of nations. This institution is a part of every nation; at the same time it is above all nations. She enjoys, too, the highest authority, the fullness of the teaching power of the Apostles. Such an institution is the Church of Christ. She alone is adapted to do this great work, for she is not only divinely commissioned to lead mankind, but moreover, because of her very make-up and the constitution which she possesses, by reason of her age-old traditions and her great prestige, which has not been lessened but has been greatly increased since the close of the War, cannot but succeed in such a venture where others assuredly will fail.

It is apparent from these considerations that true peace, the peace of Christ, is impossible unless we are willing and ready to accept the fundamental principles of Christianity, unless we are willing to observe the teachings and obey the law of Christ, both in public and private life. If this were done, then society being placed at last on a sound foundation, the Church would be able, in the exercise of its divinely given ministry and by means of the teaching authority which results therefrom, to protect all the rights of God over men and nations.

It is possible to sum up all We have said in one word, "the Kingdom of Christ." For Jesus Christ reigns over the minds of individuals by His teachings, in their hearts by His love, in each one's life by the living according to His law and the imitating of His example. Jesus reigns over the family when it, modeled after the holy ideals of the sacrament of matrimony instituted by Christ, maintains unspotted its true character of sanctuary. In such a sanctuary of love, parental authority is fashioned after the authority of God, the Father, from Whom, as a matter of fact, it originates and after which even it is named. (Ephesians iii, 15) The obedience of the children imitates that of the Divine Child of Nazareth, and the whole family life is inspired by the sacred ideals of the Holy Family. Finally, Jesus Christ reigns over society when men recognize and reverence the sovereignty of Christ, when they accept the divine origin and control over all social forces, a recognition which is the basis of the right to command for those in authority and of the duty to obey for those who are subjects, a duty which cannot but ennoble all who live up to its demands. Christ reigns where the position in society which He Himself has assigned to His Church is recognized, for He bestowed on the Church the status and the constitution of a society which, by reason of the perfect ends which it is called upon to attain, must be held to be supreme in its own sphere; He also made her the depository and interpreter of His divine teachings, and, by consequence, the teacher and guide of every other society whatsoever, not of course in the sense that she should abstract in the least from their authority, each in its own sphere supreme, but that she should really perfect their authority, just as divine grace perfects human nature, and should give to them the assistance necessary for men to attain their true final end, eternal happiness, and by that very fact make them the more deserving and certain promoters of their happiness here below.

It is, therefore, a fact which cannot be questioned that the true peace of Christ can only exist in the Kingdom of Christ -- "the peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ." It is no less unquestionable that, in doing all we can to bring about the re-establishment of Christ's kingdom, we will be working most effectively toward a lasting world peace. (Pope Pius XI, Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio, December 23, 1922.)

One will notice, though, that the currently reigning caesar of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, has made appeals for “dialogue” and “respect” in the Middle East that have been almost identical to the madness that passes for conciliar “orthodoxy” from the conciliar “popes,” including Jorge Mario Bergoglio, and their “bishops.” Here is what Caesar Barackus Obamus Ignoramus said on August 15, 2013, the Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, in the wake of attacks on Christian churches in Egypt, large parts of which had been Catholic prior to the Mohammedan invasions of the early Seventh Century:

Let me say that the Egyptian people deserve better than what we’ve seen over the last several days.  And to the Egyptian people, let me say the cycle of violence and escalation needs to stop.  We call on the Egyptian authorities to respect the universal rights of the people.  We call on those who are protesting to do so peacefully and condemn the attacks that we’ve seen by protesters, including on churches.  We believe that the state of emergency should be lifted, that a process of national reconciliation should begin, that all parties need to have a voice in Egypt’s future, that the rights of women and religious minorities should be respected, and that commitments must be kept to pursue transparent reforms of the constitution and democratic elections of a parliament and a President. (Remarks by the President on the Situation in Egypt.)

One will notice that Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro did not make any specific reference to "Christian" churches. No, no, no. His Marxist-Leninist administration with renegade Catholics such as Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr, John F. Kerry and, among others, Kathleen Sebelius, and outright Catholic haters can never use the word "Christian" in any other context than to disparage the influence of "intolerant," "bigoted" and "narrow-minded" people who condemn the chemical and surgical assassination of innocent preborn children and the sin Sodomy and who protect their children from the brainwashing indoctrination provided in America's concentration camps by exercising their Natural Law right to homeschool their children. No, no, no. There cannot be any specific mention of the horrific nature of the attacks that have been visited upon Egyptian Christians, especially those who belong the heretical and schismatic Coptic Orthodox churches. (The various Catholic rites in Egypt--Latin, Coptic Catholic, Greek Melkite, Maronite, Syrian Catholic, Armenian Catholic and Chaldean Catholic--make up five percent of the ten percent of the Egyptian population that is Christian

Similarly, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, stuck in his own delusional beliefs that "peace and reconciliation" could be realized Egypt, a land where all but ten percent of the population of Mohammedan, issued an equally Judeo-Masonic message in order not to offend the tender sensibilities of Mohammedans whom he believes can be convinced to become participants in "dialogue" in order to make their false religion an instrument in the building up of the mythical fantasy of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II, the "civilization of love."

Here is the statement released by the conciliar Vatican in behalf of Francis the Imam:

(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis on Thursday lamented the "painful news" coming from Egypt following the bloody crackdown there by security forces on protesters and appealed for "peace, dialogue and reconciliation."

The following is a translation into English of his remarks which came at the end of his Angelus address in the papal summer residence of Castel Gandolfo where he had just celebrated an open-air mass to mark the Solemnity of Mary's Assumption into Heaven.

"Unfortunately, painful news has come from Egypt. I wish to ensure my prayers for all the victims and their families, the injured and all those who are suffering. Let us pray together for peace, dialogue and reconciliation in that dear nation and throughout the world. Mary, Queen of Peace, pray for us. Let's all say it, Mary, Queen of Peace, pray for us."  (Pope Francis appeals for peace, dialogue and reconciliation in Egypt.)

The irony here is that Obama/Soetoro's remarks could have been given by Bergoglio/Francis and the latter's remarks could have been given by the former. The lords of Modernity in the world and those of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism are, after all, kindred spirits of the New World Order of Judeo-Masonry. Both sets of delusional adherents of Judeo-Masonry, which is founded upon a rejection of the Social Reign of Christ the King and a belief that men can work together as "brothers" for the "better world," can never quite figure out how it is that all of their pleas for "peace" in the Middle East fall upon deaf ears. This is because they reject the simple fact that Catholicism is the one and only foundation of personal and social order.

Moreover, Bergoglio’s call in Ankara, Turkey, yesterday for  “dialogue” and “mutual understanding” continues to ignore the root cause of the violence being spread by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Mohammedanism, just as Obama/Soetoro ignores the root cause of the violence, which he did not denounce after it had erupted, that was unleashed in Ferguson, Missouri, and surrounding communities after an announcement was made by Saint Louis Country prosecutor Robert McCulloch that a grand jury had decided not to indict police officer Darren Wilson on charges stemming from his shooting Michael Brown, who had been caught on a surveillance camera robbing a cigar store and violently shoving its proprietor, to death on August 9, 2014, the Feast of Saint Romanus:

But what is also true is that there are still problems and communities of color aren't just making these problems up.  Separating that from this particular decision, there are issues in which the law too often feels as if it is being applied in discriminatory fashion.  I don't think that's the norm.  I don't think that's true for the majority of communities or the vast majority of law enforcement officials.  But these are real issues.  And we have to lift them up and not deny them or try to tamp them down.  What we need to do is to understand them and figure out how do we make more progress.  And that can be done. 

That won't be done by throwing bottles.  That won't be done by smashing car windows.  That won't be done by using this as an excuse to vandalize property.  And it certainly won't be done by hurting anybody.  So, to those in Ferguson, there are ways of channeling your concerns constructively and there are ways of channeling your concerns destructively.  Michael Brown’s parents understand what it means to be constructive.  The vast majority of peaceful protesters, they understand it as well.

Those of you who are watching tonight understand that there’s never an excuse for violence, particularly when there are a lot of people in goodwill out there who are willing to work on these issues. 

On the other hand, those who are only interested in focusing on the violence and just want the problem to go away need to recognize that we do have work to do here, and we shouldn’t try to paper it over.  Whenever we do that, the anger may momentarily subside, but over time, it builds up and America isn't everything that it could be. 

And I am confident that if we focus our attention on the problem and we look at what has happened in communities around the country effectively, then we can make progress not just in Ferguson, but in a lot of other cities and communities around the country.  (Remarks by the Caesar.)

Lords of the world always sound alike, don’t they?

Obama/Soetoro, a lawless man who has no regard for the law of God or man, including the Constitution of the United States of America that he holds in complete contempt (probably because it was the product of white men even seventeen of the fifty-four delegates who assembled in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 25, 1787, whom owned slaves), it appears, had his outgoing Attorney General, Eric Holder, put pressure on Missouri Governor Jay Nixon, a Democrat, not to deploy the National Guard on the night of November 24, 2014, the Feast of Saint John of the Cross and the Commemoration of Saint Chrysoganus. This was the moral equivalent of simply letting the rioters get “it out of their system” by looting and rampaging.

A similar situation developed in August of 1991 as it appeared that then Mayor of the City of New York, New York, David N. Dinkins, and Police Commissioner Lee “Out of Town” Brown had ordered the police to stand down during the Crown Heights rioting after the accidental death of a young Guyanese boy, Gavin Cato, caused by a car driven by a Talmudist named Yosef Lifsch on August 19, 1991. A rabbinical student named Yankel Rosenbaum stabbed to death by Lemrick Nelson in the mistaken belief that he had driven the car in the motorcade of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson that struck and killed Gavin Cato. Dinkins denies to this day that he ordered the police stand down. Nevertheless, the police did nothing as the rioters burned and looted. Right in the middle of that scene was a man who was ready entrée to the White House at this time, none other than the race hustler named Alfred Sharpton, who said that young Gavin Cato was a victim of “social apartheid.”

Ah, yes, it is always important to blame alleged “social problems” when violence occurs after it is determined that a police officer acted to defend himself from a legitimate threat against him and when, in the case of Crown Heights, Gavin Cato was killed in a car accident. Those who are lawless themselves can never condemn lawlessness in others. They must blame “social problems.”

Similarly, Jorge Mario Bergoglio cannot blame the violence of ISIS and other Mohammedan groups around the world on Mohammedanism. He must blame a “lack of understanding” as he urges for more “dialogue” (see Silence in the White House and at Casa Santa Marta.)

Yes, the lords of Modernity in the world and the lords of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism are always in search of “understanding through dialogue.”

Bergoglio himself stressed this theme again and again yesterday in Ankara, Turkey:

To this end, it is essential that all citizens – Muslim, Jewish and Christian – both in the provision and practice of the law, enjoy the same rights and respect the same duties. They will then find it easier to see each other as brothers and sisters who are travelling the same path, seeking always to reject misunderstandings while promoting cooperation and concord. Freedom of religion and freedom of expression, when truly guaranteed to each person, will help friendship to flourish and thus become an eloquent sign of peace.

The Middle East, Europe and the world all await this maturing of friendship. The Middle East, in particular, has for too long been a theatre of fratricidal wars, one born of the other, as if the only possible response to war and violence must be new wars and further acts of violence.

How much longer must the Middle East suffer the consequences of this lack of peace? We must not resign ourselves to ongoing conflicts as if the situation can never change for the better! With the help of God, we can and we must renew the courage of peace! Such courage will lead to a just, patient and determined use of all available means of negotiation, and in this way achieve the concrete goals of peace and sustainable development.

Mr President, interreligious and intercultural dialogue can make an important contribution to attaining this lofty and urgent goal, so that there will be an end to all forms of fundamentalism and terrorism which gravely demean the dignity of every man and woman and exploit religion.

Fanaticism and fundamentalism, as well as irrational fears which foster misunderstanding and discrimination, need to be countered by the solidarity of all believers. This solidarity must rest on the following pillars: respect for human life and for religious freedom, that is the freedom to worship and to live according to the moral teachings of one’s religion; commitment to ensuring what each person requires for a dignified life; and care for the natural environment. The peoples and the states of the Middle East stand in urgent need of such solidarity, so that they can “reverse the trend” and successfully advance a peace process, repudiating war and violence and pursuing dialogue, the rule of law, and justice. (Meeting with the President, Prime Minister and Civil Authorities.)

Brief Comment Number Three:

Jorge Mario Bergoglio believes “fanatacism” and “fundamentaltism” exist in all religions, including in what he thinks is the Catholic Church, which is why he is obsessed in his crusade, if I can use this word in the context of a “papal” address given to Mohammedans, against traditionally-minded Catholics who are still attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism.  The way to counter this “fanaticism” is through dialogue and “solidarity of all believers” as the means to respect human life and “religious freedom.”

Yet it is that “religious freedom,” which is different than the Catholic teaching of religious toleration, is premised on the heresy that all religions have a “right” from God to exist and to propagate themselves in the midst of civil society. Our true popes have told us repeatedly that this is heretical:

"Man should use his reason first of all to recognize his Sovereign Maker, honoring Him and admiring Him, and submitting his entire person to Him. For, from his childhood, he should be submissive to those who are superior to him in age; he should be governed and instructed by their lessons, order his life according to their laws of reason, society and religion. This inflated equality and liberty, therefore, are for him, from the moment he is born, no more than imaginary dreams and senseless words." (Pope Pius VI, Brief Quod aliquantum, March 10, 1791; Religious Liberty, a “Monstrous Right").

The Catholic Church: For how can We tolerate with equanimity that the Catholic religion, which France received in the first ages of the Church, which was confirmed in that very kingdom by the blood of so many most valiant martyrs, which by far the greatest part of the French race professes, and indeed bravely and constantly defended even among the most grave adversities and persecutions and dangers of recent years, and which, finally, that very dynasty to which the designated king belongs both professes and has defended with much zeal - that this Catholic, this most holy religion, We say, should not only not be declared to be the only one in the whole of France supported by the bulwark of the laws and by the authority of the Government, but should even, in the very restoration of the monarchy, be entirely passed over? But a much more grave, and indeed very bitter, sorrow increased in Our heart - a sorrow by which We confess that We were crushed, overwhelmed and torn in two - from the twenty-second article of the constitution in which We saw, not only that "liberty of religion and of conscience" (to use the same words found in the article) were permitted by the force of the constitution, but also that assistance and patronage were promised both to this liberty and also to the ministers of these different forms of "religion". There is certainly no need of many words, in addressing you, to make you fully recognize by how lethal a wound the Catholic religion in France is struck by this article. For when the liberty of all "religions" is indiscriminately asserted, by this very fact truth is confounded with error and the holy and immaculate Spouse of Christ, the Church, outside of which there can be no salvation, is set on a par with the sects of heretics and with Judaic perfidy itself. For when favour and patronage is promised even to the sects of heretics and their ministers, not only their persons, but also their very errors, are tolerated and fostered: a system of errors in which is contained that fatal and never sufficiently to be deplored HERESY which, as St. Augustine says (de Haeresibus, no.72), "asserts that all heretics proceed correctly and tell the truth: which is so absurd that it seems incredible to me." (Pope Pius VII, Post Tam Diuturnas, April 29, 1814, POST TAM DIUTURNAS)

"This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it. "But the death of the soul is worse than freedom of error," as Augustine was wont to say. When all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to ruin. Then truly "the bottomless pit" is open from which John saw smoke ascending which obscured the sun, and out of which locusts flew forth to devastate the earth. Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of sacred things and holy laws -- in other words, a pestilence more deadly to the state than any other. Experience shows, even from earliest times, that cities renowned for wealth, dominion, and glory perished as a result of this single evil, namely immoderate freedom of opinion, license of free speech, and desire for novelty.

Here We must include that harmful and never sufficiently denounced freedom to publish any writings whatever and disseminate them to the people, which some dare to demand and promote with so great a clamor. We are horrified to see what monstrous doctrines and prodigious errors are disseminated far and wide in countless books, pamphlets, and other writings which, though small in weight, are very great in malice. We are in tears at the abuse which proceeds from them over the face of the earth. Some are so carried away that they contentiously assert that the flock of errors arising from them is sufficiently compensated by the publication of some book which defends religion and truth. Every law condemns deliberately doing evil simply because there is some hope that good may result. Is there any sane man who would say poison ought to be distributed, sold publicly, stored, and even drunk because some antidote is available and those who use it may be snatched from death again and again? (Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832.)

Everyone should avoid familiarity or friendship with anyone suspected of belonging to masonry or to affiliated groups. Know them by their fruits and avoid them. Every familiarity should be avoided, not only with those impious libertines who openly promote the character of the sect, but also with those who hide under the mask of universal tolerance, respect for all religions, and the craving to reconcile the maxims of the Gospel with those of the revolution. These men seek to reconcile Christ and Belial, the Church of God and the state without God. (Pope Leo XIII, Custodi di Quella Fede, December 8, 1892.)

This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.

No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

Yet it is that Jorge Mario Bergoglio respects each and every false religion as pleasing to God and capable of producing “peace” in the world, showing himself to be a man who is filled with heretical thoughts and erroneous notions that have never issued—and can never issue—from the lips of a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter.

True and legitimate Successors of Saint Peter have preached crusades against the Mohammedans, understanding that the use of duly authorized force, which is not lawless violence, is necessary at times to defend the cause of the children of Holy Mother Church and to defend the integrity of her holy shrines. There is quite a contrast between Pope Saint Pius V and the Conciliarists.

The conciliar revolutionaries, though, save their violence for in the integrity of the Holy Faith and Holy Mother Church’s sacred shrines by having turned them into temples of the abomination of desolation, the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo worship service, that celebrates its forty-fifth anniversary tomorrow, November 30, 2014, the First Sunday of Advent, and by having “ecumenical prayer services” aplenty take place within them and, at least in some instances, using them for purposes of diabolically-inspired “rock” performances that are based on the images and sounds of Hell itself.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio, following the “tradition” of his predecessors, including “Saint John Paul II,” who kissed the blasphemous Koran, and Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who turned in the direction of Mecca and assumed the Mohammedan prayer position when touring the Blue Mosque in Istanbul, Turkey, on November 30, 2006, the Feast of Saint Andrew the Apostle, is afraid to mention the Holy Name of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in “mixed company:”

Sadly, to date, we are still witnessing grave conflicts. In Syria and Iraq, particularly, terrorist violence shows no signs of abating. Prisoners and entire ethnic populations are experiencing the violation of the most basic humanitarian laws. Grave persecutions have taken place in the past and still continue today to the detriment of minorities, especially – though not only – Christians and Yazidis. Hundreds of thousands of persons have been forced to abandon their homes and countries in order to survive and remain faithful to their religious beliefs.

Turkey, which has generously welcomed a great number of refugees, is directly affected by this tragic situation on its borders; the international community has the moral obligation to assist Turkey in taking care of these refugees. In addition to providing much needed assistance and humanitarian aid, we cannot remain indifferent to the causes of these tragedies. In reaffirming that it is licit, while always respecting international law, to stop an unjust aggressor, I wish to reiterate, moreover, that the problem cannot be resolved solely through a military response.

What is required is a concerted commitment on the part of all, based on mutual trust, which can pave the way to lasting peace, and enable resources to be directed, not to weaponry, but to the other noble battles worthy of man: the fight against hunger and sickness, the promotion of sustainable development and the protection of creation, and the relief of the many forms of poverty and marginalization of which there is no shortage in the world today.

Turkey, by virtue of its history, geographical position and regional influence, has a great responsibility: the choices which Turkey makes and its example are especially significant and can be of considerable help in promoting an encounter of civilizations and in identifying viable paths of peace and authentic progress.

May the Most High bless and protect Turkey, and help the nation to be a strong and fervent peacemaker! Thank you! (Meeting with the President, Prime Minister and Civil Authorities.)

Final Brief Comment:

May the “Most High bless and protect Turkey.”

Jorge Mario Bergoglio is an apostate.

Frank M. Rega's book, Saint Francis of Assisi and the Conversion of the Muslims, contains some very poignant episodes in Saint Francis's efforts to convert Sultan al-Kamil. Here is one such passage:

An early font presents the following account of the discourse of the Franciscans: "If you do not wish to believe," said the two friars, "we will commend your soul to God because we declare that if you die while holding to your law, you will be lost; God will not accept your soul. For this reason we have come to you." They added that they would demonstrate to the Sultan's wisest counselors the truth of Christianity, before which Mohammed's law counted for nothing. In answer to this challenge, and in order to confute the teaching of the two missionaries, the Sultan called in the religious advisers, the imams. However, they refused to dispute with the Christians and instead insisted that they be killed, in accordance with Islamic law.

But the Sultan, captivated by the speech of the two Franciscans, and by their sincere concern for his own salvation, ignored the demand of his courtiers. Instead, al-Kamil listened willingly to Francis, permitting him great liberty in his preaching. He told his imams that beheading the friars would be an unjust recompense for their efforts, since they had arrived with the praiseworthy intention of seeking his personal salvation. To Francis he said: "I am going to go counter to what my religious advisers demand and will not cut off your heads . . . you have risked you own lives in order to save my soul." (Frank M. Rega, St. Francis of Assisi and the Conversion of the Muslims, TAN Books and Publishers, 2007, pp. 60-61.)

Saint Francis, a Catholic, spoke in a slightly different manner than the ecumenist, the retired Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who spoke as follows: in Amman, Jordan, on May 8, 2009:

Places of worship, like this splendid Al-Hussein Bin Talal mosque named after the revered late King, stand out like jewels across the earth’s surface. From the ancient to the modern, the magnificent to the humble, they all point to the divine, to the Transcendent One, to the Almighty. And through the centuries these sanctuaries have drawn men and women into their sacred space to pause, to pray, to acknowledge the presence of the Almighty, and to recognize that we are all his creatures. (Muslim religious leaders, members of the Diplomatic Corps and Rectors of universities in Jordan in front of the mosque al-Hussein bin Talal in Amman)

As Mr. Rega noted in his fine book, Saint Francis of Assisi made no compromises whatsoever with the Holy Integrity of the Catholic Faith.

To believe that the leaders of ISIS are going to engage in “dialogue” is madness writ large. It is a madness that Bergoglio believes as insanity is his religion. As if his remarks to the civil authorities were not enough apostasy for one day, Bergoglio reiterated his pleas for "understanding" and "dialogue" when he addressed Turkey's President of Religious Affairs, who is a Turkish equivalent of Kurt "Cardinal" Koch, who, of course, carries on the work of the retired but nontheless busy apostate named Walter "Cardinal" Kasper:

As religious leaders, we are obliged to denounce all violations against human dignity and human rights. Human life, a gift of God the Creator, possesses a sacred character. As such, any violence which seeks religious justification warrants the strongest condemnation because the Omnipotent is the God of life and peace. The world expects those who claim to adore God to be men and women of peace who are capable of living as brothers and sisters, regardless of ethnic, religious, cultural or ideological differences.

As well as denouncing such violations, we must also work together to find adequate solutions. This requires the cooperation of all: governments, political and religious leaders, representatives of civil society, and all men and women of goodwill. In a unique way, religious leaders can offer a vital contribution by expressing the values of their respective traditions. We, Muslims and Christians, are the bearers of spiritual treasures of inestimable worth. Among these we recognize some shared elements, though lived according to the traditions of each, such as the adoration of the All-Merciful God, reference to the Patriarch Abraham, prayer, almsgiving, fasting… elements which, when lived sincerely, can transform life and provide a sure foundation for dignity and fraternity. Recognizing and developing our common spiritual heritage – through interreligious dialogue – helps us to promote and to uphold moral values, peace and freedom in society (cf. John Paul II, Address to the Catholic Community in Ankara, 29 November 1979). The shared recognition of the sanctity of each human life is the basis of joint initiatives of solidarity, compassion, and effective help directed to those who suffer most. In this regard, I wish to express my appreciation for everything that the Turkish people, Muslims and Christians alike, are doing to help the hundreds of thousands of people who are fleeing their countries due to conflicts. There are two million of them. This is a clear example of how we can work together to serve others, an example to be encouraged and maintained.

I wish also to express my satisfaction at the good relations which exist between the Diyanet and the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue. It is my earnest desire that these relations will continue and be strengthened for the good of all, so that every initiative which promotes authentic dialogue will offer a sign of hope to a world which so deeply needs peace, security and prosperity. Following my meeting with the President, I am also hopeful that this interreligious dialogue will take on creative new forms.

Mr President, I renew my gratitude to you and your colleagues for this meeting, which fills my heart with joy. I am grateful also to each one of you, for your presence and for your prayers which, in your kindness, you offer for me and my ministry. For my part, I assure you of my prayers. May the Lord grant us all his blessing. (Visit to the President of Religious Affairs.)

Religious leaders?

Well, including Jorge himself, there were no "religious leaders" present when Jorge spoke yesterday about the madness of "dialogue," only representatives of false religions. Nothing else.

What Catholics need to do is to pray Rosaries for the conversion of all infidels, including those who follow the false religion of the false, lecherous “prophet” named Mohammed, who had twelve “wives.”

Pope Saint Pius V urged Christendom to pray Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary prior to the Battle of Lepanto on October 7, 1571, resulting in a triumph of the outnumbered Christian naval fleet under the command of John of Austria over the Turkish Mohammedans, and it was Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary that helped King John Sobieski of Poland to defeat the Turkish Mohammedans once again in the Battle of the Gates of Vienna on September 12, 1683. Ah, yes, those “peace-building” Turks.

Well, there’s most apostasy ahead in the next two days.

Indeed, although unlikely, I would not be surprised if Jorge Mario Bergoglio receives Holy Communion from Greek Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew I on Sunday, November 30, 2014, at Orthodox Cathedral of Saint George in Istanbul, Turkey, something that would presage similar exercises in “intercommunion” with members of Protestant sects on an ad hoc basis that will receive no disapproval from the conciliar Vatican whatsoever.

Although such an exercise in apostasy may not occur, what we do know is that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is going to attend a Greek Orthodox Divine Liturgy that includes a Credo without the Filioque, which, of course, the Orthodox reject. This represents a tacit, if not overt, rejection of the Catholic teaching that the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, proceeds from God the Father and God the Son, not simply from God the Father as the Orthodox profess heretically. (See Missal for the Anti-Apostolic Journey.)

We must pray extra Rosaries of reparation on this final day of the liturgical year, entrusting all to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary out of which that Most Sacred Heart, which beats for us with such bright, burning love in tabernacles where the true Mass is offered by true priests, was formed,

Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us!

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Sylvester the Abbot, pray for us.

Saint Peter of Alexandria, pray for us.

Saint Andrew the Apostle, pray for us.

Saint Saturninus, pray for us.