Home Articles Golden Oldies Speaking Schedule About Christ or Chaos Links Donations Contact Us
April 9, 2012


Victimized Once Again By His Own Revolution

by Thomas A. Droleskey


Two years, nine months, twenty-nine days.

One hundred fifty-six weeks, two days.

One thousand nine hundred ninety-four (1094) days.

One million, five hundred seventy-five thousand, three hundred-sixty (1,575,360) minutes.

Ninety-four million, five hundred twenty-one thousand, six hundred (94,521,600) seconds.

That's how long it has been since the president of the conference of conciliar bishops in the Federal Republic of Germany, "Archbishop" Robert Zollitsch, the conciliar "archbishop" of Freiburg and Breisgau, took to the airwaves of German television on Holy Saturday, April 11, 2009,  to state that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ did not die on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday in atonement for our sins. He has not been reproved, publicly or, as far as can be known, even privately by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict, who released his heretical and blasphemous Jesus of Nazareth: Holy Week: From the Entrance Into Jerusalem to the Resurrection just before Holy Week last year (for several articles about this horrific work, please see Accepting "Popes" As Unreliable Teachers, Boilerplate Ratzinger, Impressed With His Own Originality, Coloring Everything He Says and Does, part one, Coloring Everything He Says and Does, part two and Atila Sinka Guimaraes's Benedict XVI's Different Religion).

Yes, Holy Week seems to be a time when the modern day disciples of Judas Iscariot are particularly active in advancing their revolutionary work of attacking, denying, undermining and/or making unclear and ambiguous the Received Teaching of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

It was during Holy Week four years ago that the following announcement was made by the so-called "United States Conference of Catholic Bishops" concerning an "interfaith" ceremony that was to take place at the "Pope John Paul  II Cultural Center" in Washington, District of Columbia, on Thursday, April 17, 2008, during Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's visit to the United States of America:


WASHINGTON—Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist, Jain and Hindu communities will meet with Pope Benedict XVI April 17, at the Pope John Paul II Cultural Center during the April 15-20 papal visit to the United States.

The meeting will include a papal address, greetings from inter-faith leaders and the presentation of symbolic gifts by young members of each community.

Bishop Richard Sklba, chair of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs, noted that the theme Religions Working for Peace will run through the meeting, to which 200 leaders have been invited.

“The cry for peace in our world calls for religious bodies to come together,” Bishop Sklba said. “This meeting denotes the Holy Father’s belief in the need for religious bodies to stress the goal for peace which lies at the heart of all religions. It “exemplifies what must happen all over the world.”

The gifts symbolize the path to peace in the deepest teachings of each group. They include:

A silver menorah with seven lights. It symbolizes the perennial validity of God’s covenant of peace. Silver is frequently used in the Eastern European Jewish tradition. The menorah recalls the seven branched lamp stand used in the temple in Jerusalem.

A small, finely crafted edition of the Qur’an, in green leather and gold leaf edging. The Qur’an is the revered word of God, proclaiming God’s message of peace. Green is the traditional Islamic color.

A metallic cube representing the Jain principles of non-violence and respect for a diversity of viewpoints as a way to peace through self-discipline and dialogue.

The sacred syllable Om on a brass incense burner. Om is the primordial sound of creation itself, by which God’s liberating peace is made known. Bronze or brass are widely used for Hindu liturgical ornaments. Incense sticks are used in ritual worship among Hindu believers.

A bronze bell cast in Korea. In various Buddhist cultures, the sound of the bell demarcates the times of meditation, which leads to inner peace and enlightenment.

Presenters of the gifts include:

David J. Michaels, director of Intercommunal Affairs at B'nai B'rith International, the oldest Jewish humanitarian, advocacy and social action organization. A graduate of Yeshiva University, he trained at the Foreign Ministry of Germany, the Embassy of Israel in Washington, Ha'aretz - International Herald Tribune, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, the United Nations, and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.

Saman Hussain, born in Pakistan and a graduate of the University of Virginia where she majored in religious studies and foreign affairs. Saman served as a leader of the Muslim Student Association and was a coordinator of the Unity Walk in memory of the victims of 9/11, organized by the InterFaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington.

Aditya Vora, a Jain young adult studying at Haverford College in Pennsylvania. He has been active since high school in the Long Island Multi-Faith Forum, dialogues with Holocaust survivors in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut region, and anti-prejudice, multi-cultural training programs on Long Island, NY. He received the "Student Human Rights Award" from the Smithtown, NY, Anti-Bias Task Force.

Masako Fukata, born in Tokyo, Japan, is an active youth leader of Rissho Kosei-kai, a socially engaged Buddhist organization headquartered in Tokyo with six million members world-wide. Inspired by Pope John Paul II’s hosting of the global inter-religious assembly of the World Conference of Religions for Peace at the Vatican in 1994, Ms. Masako served an internship in the Religions for Peace International Secretariat in New York in 2003. She is a member of the newly developing North American Regional Multi-Religious Youth Network.

Ravi Gupta, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Religion at Centre College, Kentucky. With a doctorate in Religion from University of Oxford, he is the author of The Caitanya Vaisnava Vedanta of Jiva Gosvami: When Knowledge Meets Devotion. He participated in a recent USCCB-Hindu consultation and is committed to pursuing interreligious dialogue in both his professional and personal capacities. (USCCB - (Office of Media Relations) - Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist, Jain, Hindu Leaders To Meet With Pope Benedict XVI .)

Here is a photograph of Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict smiling as he received a copy of the blasphemous book that is "sacred" to the false religion of Mohammedanism, the Koran, on Thursday, April 17, 2008:


258_KoranRatz.jpg - 77616 Bytes


Please tell me that Saint Patrick or Saint Benedict or Saint Boniface or Saint Francis of Assisi or Saint Francis Xavier would have accepted such "gifts" or that Pope Saint Pius X, for example, would have permitted such an event to be placed on his schedule? Just a simple case of "diabolical disorientation"? Or is this simply an indication of the apostate nature of men who have lost the sensus Catholicus and who have no sense of the honor and glory of God, thereby projecting onto Him their own Modernist views as to how "tolerant" they believe Him to be s of false religions, views that must mean that every pope and numerous canonized saints, including scores of martyrs, prior to Angelo Roncalli/John XXIII in 1958 had it all wrong.

It was during Holy Week in 2010 that the Social Kingship of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was mocked by an apologist for the false "pontiff," Dr. Thomas Rourke, reiterating the simple truth that Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's support for what Pope Saint Pius X termed "a thesis absolutely false," separation of Church and State, is not a matter of necessary concessions in the practical order of things to assure the life of the Catholic Church but a manifest rejection of the doctrine of Christ the King itself even in purely theoretical terms (see Mocking Christ the King Anew in Holy Week).

No one should be surprised, therefore, that the old revolutionary from Bavaria, a priest who will turn eighty-five years of age one week from now, that is, on Tuesday, April 16, 2012, and his band of fellow revolutionaries were hard at work during Holy Week to further propagandize in behalf of their false religion while Ratzinger/Benedict himself used the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo "Chrism Mass" on Maundy Thursday, April 5, 2012, to denounce a large group of conciliar priests and presbyters in Austria who are attempting to "move" the conciliar revolution in in the direction of women "priests" and married clergy and the administration of what purports to be Holy Communion to Catholics who are divorced and remarried without a worthless decree of nullity from conciliar tribunals. (For a discussion of the demands made last year by these ultra-progressives, please re-read Ratzinger's Revolution Unravels, part one and Ratzinger's Revolution Unravels, part two.)

Here is a brief excerpt from the false "pope's" "homily":

Recently a group of priests from a European country issued a summons to disobedience, and at the same time gave concrete examples of the forms this disobedience might take, even to the point of disregarding definitive decisions of the Church’s Magisterium, such as the question of women’s ordination, for which Blessed Pope John Paul II stated irrevocably that the Church has received no authority from the Lord. Is disobedience a path of renewal for the Church? We would like to believe that the authors of this summons are motivated by concern for the Church, that they are convinced that the slow pace of institutions has to be overcome by drastic measures, in order to open up new paths and to bring the Church up to date. But is disobedience really a way to do this? Do we sense here anything of that configuration to Christ which is the precondition for all true renewal, or do we merely sense a desperate push to do something to change the Church in accordance with one’s own preferences and ideas? (Novus Ordo Chrism Service.)


Ratzinger/Benedict's call for obedience is truly laughable as he is one of the most disobedient men on the face of the earth, having denied the nature of dogmatic truth from the earliest days of his priesthood, a denial which is an attack on the very nature of God Himself.  It is also interesting that he takes exception to the demand made by his "rebels" in Austria for a married clergy as he is permitting married men who served as non-priests in the Anglican sect to be "ordained" as "priests" in his own false sect of conciliarism. The false "pope" would contend that he wants to maintain Anglican "traditions" even though they come straight from a rejection of Catholic teaching and disciplinary practice. How can a man whose intellectual inconsistency, replete as it is will forests of self-contradiction, is so readily noticeable expect those who are not satisfied with minor concessions given here and there to selected groups to refrain from demanding these concessions more universally, starting with themselves?

Ever the Modernist, Ratzinger/Benedict made it clear in his "homily" of four days ago that one must not "oversimplify" an adherence to "human traditions," proceeding to analogize the "renewal" effected by the "Second" Vatican Council to the overthrowing of "human traditions" by Our Lord Himself, thereby comparing Our Lord's abolition of Pharisaical laws to the traditions that have been handed down to us by Holy Mother Church under the guidance and at the direction of God the Holy Ghost from the time of the Apostles themselves:

But let us not oversimplify matters. Surely Christ himself corrected human traditions which threatened to stifle the word and the will of God? Indeed he did, so as to rekindle obedience to the true will of God, to his ever enduring word. His concern was for true obedience, as opposed to human caprice. Nor must we forget: he was the Son, possessed of singular authority and responsibility to reveal the authentic will of God, so as to open up the path for God’s word to the world of the nations. And finally: he lived out his task with obedience and humility all the way to the Cross, and so gave credibility to his mission. Not my will, but thine be done: these words reveal to us the Son, in his humility and his divinity, and they show us the true path.

Let us ask again: do not such reflections serve simply to defend inertia, the fossilization of traditions? No. Anyone who considers the history of the post-conciliar era can recognize the process of true renewal, which often took unexpected forms in living movements and made almost tangible the inexhaustible vitality of holy Church, the presence and effectiveness of the Holy Spirit. And if we look at the people from whom these fresh currents of life burst forth and continue to burst forth, then we see that this new fruitfulness requires being filled with the joy of faith, the radicalism of obedience, the dynamic of hope and the power of love. (Novus Ordo Chrism Service.)

Ratzinger/Benedict, aping the theology of the Orthodox that was the model for the further corruption of the Deposit of Faith by Martin Luther and John Calvin and the other Protestant Revolutionaries who followed them, believes that he and the "renewal" he helped to bring about in what he thinks is the Catholic Church has "restored" the concept of "true" obedience to Our Lord by "correcting" the "inertia" that was caused by the "fossilization of traditions," ascribing such a "renewal" to none other than God the Holy Ghost. This is, of course, quite a work of blasphemy. It is also heresy:

These firings, therefore, with all diligence and care having been formulated by us, we define that it be permitted to no one to bring forward, or to write, or to compose, or to think, or to teach a different faith. Whosoever shall presume to compose a different faith, or to propose, or teach, or hand to those wishing to be converted to the knowledge of the truth, from the Gentiles or Jews, or from any heresy, any different Creed; or to introduce a new voice or invention of speech to subvert these things which now have been determined by us, all these, if they be Bishops or clerics let them be deposed, the Bishops from the Episcopate, the clerics from the clergy; but if they be monks or laymen: let them be anathematized. (Sixth Ecumenical: Constantinople III).

They [the Modernists] exercise all their ingenuity in an effort to weaken the force and falsify the character of tradition, so as to rob it of all its weight and authority. But for Catholics nothing will remove the authority of the second Council of Nicea, where it condemns those "who dare, after the impious fashion of heretics, to deride the ecclesiastical traditions, to invent novelties of some kind...or endeavor by malice or craft to overthrow any one of the legitimate traditions of the Catholic Church"; nor that of the declaration of the fourth Council of Constantinople: "We therefore profess to preserve and guard the rules bequeathed to the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, by the Holy and most illustrious Apostles, by the orthodox Councils, both general and local, and by everyone of those divine interpreters, the Fathers and Doctors of the Church." Wherefore the Roman Pontiffs, Pius IV and Pius IX, ordered the insertion in the profession of faith of the following declaration: "I most firmly admit and embrace the apostolic and ecclesiastical traditions and other observances and constitutions of the Church.'' (Pope Saint Pius X, Pascendi Dominci Gregis, September 8, 1907.)

Fourthly, I sincerely hold that the doctrine of faith was handed down to us from the apostles through the orthodox Fathers in exactly the same meaning and always in the same purport. Therefore, I entirely reject the heretical' misrepresentation that dogmas evolve and change from one meaning to another different from the one which the Church held previously. . . . The purpose of this is, then, not that dogma may be tailored according to what seems better and more suited to the culture of each age; rather, that the absolute and immutable truth preached by the apostles from the beginning may never be believed to be different, may never be understood in any other way. (Pope Saint Pius X, The Oath Against Modernism, September 1, 1910.)

Ratzinger/Benedict has no concern for any of this. Readers of this site know full well that Ratzinger/Benedict believes in a "new ecclesiology" that re-defines the nature of Holy Mother Church, that he supports "false ecumenism" and has engaged in blasphemous exercises of "inter-religious" prayer meetings, going so far as to esteem the symbols of false religions with his own priestly hands (something that millions of Catholic martyrs preferred death to even giving the appearance of doing) and to give "joint blessings" with the "clergy" of non-Catholic religions, has support with particular fervor and zeal "religious liberty," which was termed a heresy by Pope Pius VII and "insanity" by Pope Gregory XVI and "injurious babbling" by Pope Pius IX, because he believes that adherents of false religions have a right from God to make their views known and that some of those views may be beneficial to the "building up" of the world community.

Ratzinger/Benedict stated four days ago that various "movements" have added "fresh currents of life" to what he thinks is the Catholic Church. Among these "fresh currents of life" are Catholic Charismatic Renewal, Focolare, Opus Dei, The Neocatechumenal Way, Cursillo, the Sant'Egidio Community, the Shalom Catholic Community, the Chemin Neuf Community, the International Community of Faith and Light, Regnum Christi, Communion and Liberation, the Emmanuel Community, the Seguimi Lay Group of Human-Christian Promotion.

"Fresh currents of life"?


Empty pews wrought by sacramentally barren liturgical rites that have offended God greatly and harmed souls immensely.

The emptying of convents and monasteries and seminaries.

Attacks, sometimes including involuntary psychiatric evaluation and confinement, of priests and consecrated religious who dared to defy the "renewal" instituted to "correct" the "fossilization of traditions."

The institutionalization of an ethos that promotes acceptance of those who persist in "lifestyle choices" of perverse sins against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments, including accepting the self-identification of such poor sinners by their sinful behavior?

The systematic undermining of the innocence and the purity of children by means of explicit classroom instruction in matters pertaining to the Sixth and Ninth Commandments?

The toleration of Catholics in public life who support, fund and propagandize in behalf of the chemical and surgical assassination of innocent preborn babies?

Support for the United Masonic Nations Organization?

Support for the depopulation of the earth by means of "natural family planning" and "brain death"?

Those are some "fresh currents of life," all right. Unfortunately for the false "pontiff," that "life" is but an illusion as those currents proceed from the smoke of Satan and lead to social ruin in this life and eternal death in the next.

Ratzinger/Benedict believes that Catholics must "listen" to representatives of false religions and to "learn" from them about their "faith traditions," each of which is from the devil. It is comical for the man who helped to start and direct the conciliar revolution denounce those who are being "disobedient" when he has total contempt for many of the dogmatic decrees issued by Holy Mother Church's twenty legitimate councils and for the teaching of many of our true popes, especially those of the Nineteenth and early-Twentieth Centuries. He has also been unceasing in his efforts to present many of Holy Mother Church's Fathers and Doctors as "witnesses" in behalf of tea apostasies, blasphemies and sacrileges of conciliarism, undermining as well the traditional Catholic teaching on Limbo and Purgatory. (For a review of just some of the false "pontiff's" many revolutionary beliefs, words and deeds, please see As We Continue To Blaspheme Christ the King and His True Church, Sixty Years of Priestly Apostasy and Tale of Two Benedicts.)

It was also during Holy Week that Jean-Louis "Cardinal" Tauran, the president of the "Pontifical" Council for Interreligious Dialogue, issued the conciliar Vatican's annual "Happy Vesakh" message to Buddhists (the "Happy Diwali" message to Hindus comes later in the year; see Have a Happy). Yes, during Holy Week, when the minds of Catholics should be focused on how our sins caused Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to be betrayed and handed over to the Jews and condemned by the crowd with the cowardly approval of Pontius Pilate, is a week when the conciliar revolutionaries, inspired, no doubt, by the demons who hover around them, seem to be particularly intent on blaspheming the Divine Redeemer in one way or another, starting with the hideous Novus Ordo liturgical that is offensive to God and harmful to souls and thus to the world, and including all too frequently praise of false religions that is nothing other than a rank violation of the First Commandment:

Dear Buddhists Friends,

1. On behalf of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, I am happy to offer again, this year, heartfelt congratulations on the occasion of Vesakh/Hanamatsuri. It is my wish that this annual feast may bring joy and serenity to the hearts of all of you throughout the world.

2. Today, more and more in classrooms all over the world, students belonging to various religions and beliefs sit side-by-side, learning with one another and from one another. This diversity gives rise to challenges and sparks deeper reflection on the need to educate young people to respect and understand the religious beliefs and practices of others, to grow in knowledge of their own, to advance together as responsible human beings and to be ready to join hands with those of other religions to resolve conflicts and to promote friendship, justice, peace and authentic human development.

3. With His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, we acknowledge that true education can support an openness to the transcendent as well as to those around us. Where education is a reality there is an opportunity for dialogue, for inter-relatedness and for receptive listening to the other. In such an atmosphere, young people sense that they are appreciated for who they are and for what they are able to contribute; they learn how to grow in appreciation of their brothers and sisters whose beliefs and practices are different from their own. When that happens there will be joy in being persons of solidarity and compassion called to build a just and fraternal society giving thus hope for the future (Cf. Message of World of Peace, 1st January 2012).

4. As Buddhists you pass on to young people the wisdom regarding the need to refrain from harming others and to live lives of generosity and compassion, a practice to be esteemed and recognized as a precious gift to society. This is one concrete way in which religion contributes to educating the young generation, sharing the responsibility and cooperating with others.

5. As a matter of fact, young people are an asset for all societies. By their genuineness, they encourage us to find an answer to the most fundamental questions about life and death, justice and peace, the meaning of suffering, and the reasons for hope. Thus they help us to progress in our pilgrimage towards Truth. By their dynamism, as builders of the future, they put pressure on us to destroy all the walls which unfortunately still separate us. By their questioning they nurture the dialogue between religions and cultures.

6. Dear friends, we join our hearts to yours and pray that together we will be able to guide the young people by our example and teaching to become instruments of justice and peace. Let us share the common responsibility we have towards the present and future generations, nurturing them to be peaceful and to be peace makers.

Happy Vesakh/Hanamatsuri. (Message to Buddhists for the Feast of Vesakh/Hanamatsuri 2012, April 3, 2012.)


As I have noted so many times before, these men are not Catholic.

There is no need to be "shocked" at the "revolt" being staged by priests and presbyters attached to the counterfeit church of conciliarism in Austria? These men are only useful stooges being used by the devil to make a progenitor of their revolution, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, appear to be a sympathetic figure in the eyes of "conservative" and traditionally-minded Catholics attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism. Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, a scion of Modernism by way of the the "nouvelle theologie" (new theology) in which he was trained by which he views and teaches the entirety of the patrimony of the Catholic Faith, has lost control of his revolution, which is eating him alive even though he is oblivious to this fact.

The conciliar revolutionaries are not Catholic.

Who says so?

Well, let's start with Pope Saint Leo the Great, whose feast this year will be commemorated on Easter Wednesday, April 11, 2012 (as the liturgy of the Octave of Easter, which forbids commemorations during its first three days, takes precedence over the feast of the sainted pontiff):


But it is vain for them to adopt the name of catholic, as they do not oppose these blasphemies: they must believe them, if they can listen so patiently to such words. (Pope Saint Leo the Great, Epistle XIV, To Anastasius, Bishop of Thessalonica, St. Leo the Great | Letters 1-59 )

Let's also call upon another pope named Leo, Pope Leo XIII:

The Church, founded on these principles and mindful of her office, has done nothing with greater zeal and endeavour than she has displayed in guarding the integrity of the faith. Hence she regarded as rebels and expelled from the ranks of her children all who held beliefs on any point of doctrine different from her own. The Arians, the Montanists, the Novatians, the Quartodecimans, the Eutychians, did not certainly reject all Catholic doctrine: they abandoned only a certain portion of it. Still who does not know that they were declared heretics and banished from the bosom of the Church? In like manner were condemned all authors of heretical tenets who followed them in subsequent ages. "There can be nothing more dangerous than those heretics who admit nearly the whole cycle of doctrine, and yet by one word, as with a drop of poison, infect the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition" (Auctor Tract. de Fide Orthodoxa contra Arianos).

The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion, and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium. Epiphanius, Augustine, Theodore :, drew up a long list of the heresies of their times. St. Augustine notes that other heresies may spring up, to a single one of which, should any one give his assent, he is by the very fact cut off from Catholic unity. "No one who merely disbelieves in all (these heresies) can for that reason regard himself as a Catholic or call himself one. For there may be or may arise some other heresies, which are not set out in this work of ours, and, if any one holds to one single one of these he is not a Catholic" (S. Augustinus, De Haeresibus, n. 88). (Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum, June 29, 1896.)


We have witnessed Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI and his band of conciliarists place many drops of poison throughout the course of the past fifty years, drops of poison that have inflected "the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition."

Every little bit of Ratzinger/Benedict's drops of poison is just as offensive to God as what is happening in Austria. It is beyond absurd to pretend otherwise

Think about it.

God hates each and every false religion.

He hates words and deeds that the convey any notion whatsoever that these false religions are pleasing to Him, no less a means of human sanctification and salvation.

Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has entrusted His Sacred Deposit of Faith to the Catholic Church to be safeguarded until the end of time and taught without a shadow of change, no less contradiction, as God is immutable by His very nature. God the Holy Ghost has directed our true popes and the fathers of Holy Mother Church's true councils to issue dogmatic decrees in clear, precise terms.

Catholicism can never be mixed with even the slightest taint of error. It is important to bear this in mind when reviewing the insanity that emanates from the conciliar Vatican. It is always important to remember what the Catholic Church teaches about her being immune from even a "light tarnish of error:"

As for the rest, We greatly deplore the fact that, where the ravings of human reason extend, there is somebody who studies new things and strives to know more than is necessary, against the advice of the apostle. There you will find someone who is overconfident in seeking the truth outside the Catholic Church, in which it can be found without even a light tarnish of error. Therefore, the Church is called, and is indeed, a pillar and foundation of truth. You correctly understand, venerable brothers, that We speak here also of that erroneous philosophical system which was recently brought in and is clearly to be condemned. This system, which comes from the contemptible and unrestrained desire for innovation, does not seek truth where it stands in the received and holy apostolic inheritance. Rather, other empty doctrines, futile and uncertain doctrines not approved by the Church, are adopted. Only the most conceited men wrongly think that these teachings can sustain and support that truth. (Pope Gregory XVI, Singulari Nos, May 25, 1834.)


What is happening in Austria right now is the simply the logical unraveling of a revolution against God Himself that had many antecedent roots in the decades and centuries before it unfolded into open view long before the "Second" Vatican Council convened on October 11, 1962.

Ratzinger's revolution did not just "happen." He just "happened" to be one of the principal agents of bringing it to fruition.

How is it possible for one set of "moderate" revolutionaries to command "obedience" to them from "ultra-progressive" revolutionaries when they are not obedient to God?

Why should anyone, including the "ultra-progressive" revolutionaries in Austria consider "Pope" Benedict XVI as the final authority on what they think is Catholic teaching when he has denied the very nature of dogmatic truth, having done so repeatedly throughout the course of his sixty years of priestly life, thereby making Catholic teaching the plaything of a particular pope, who is free to subject his own personal "hermeneutic of continuity and discontinuity" to whatever part of the patrimony of the Holy Faith he does not "like." Why can't the revolutionaries in Austria reject what they don't "like" about the pace of Ratzinger/Benedict's revolution?

Revolutions always unravel.

Revolutions always eat their own. 

Revolutions are based in one, firm ironclad rule: the law of unintended consequences, which has made Joseph Ratzinger a victim of his own revolution against the Catholic Faith.

Behold the unintended consequences of a revolution that continues to offend God and devastates the good of souls to their eternal detriment and thus to the detriment of the common temporal good, something we can see so very clearly at this time.

The conciliarists can have their absurdities and contradictions caused by their revolution. I, for one, am going to stick with Catholic truth as expressed by Pope saint Pius X in the afore cited Notre Charge Apostolique:

This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.


No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo.


Are there any questions?

Revolutions don't just happen, and they are not without consequences.

Conscious of our need to make reparation for our own many sins, yes, even during this glorious season of Easter, which are so responsible for the worsening of the state of the world and of the Church Militant on the face of earth, may we make the most of the chastisements of the present moment by praying as many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits, offering up whatever merit we earn from the bearing the crosses of the moment to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!



Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!


Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.


Saint Joseph, pray for us.


Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.


Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.


Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.


Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.


Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.


Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.


Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.


Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.


See also: A Litany of Saints


© Copyright 2012, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.