Home Articles Golden Oldies Speaking Schedule About Christ or Chaos Links Donations Contact Us
June 28, 2012

Springing Back Into Power

by Thomas A. Droleskey

Events certainly do seem to be building rather significantly. The consequences of the sins of men and their nations are cascading.

Figures of Antichrist govern nations and global governance organizations.

Figures of Antichrist pose as officials of the Catholic Church.

As has been explained in numerous articles on this site over the years, the figures of Antichrist of Modernity in the world and the figures of Antichrist of Modernity in the counterfeit church of conciliarism both are possessed of the same anti-Incarnational spirit of Judeo-Masonry that is at the very heart and center of modern thought, civil law, education, science and cultural praxis.

It is enough for men, these figures of Antichrist believe, to join together in common purpose for the "betterment of the world" and the advancement of "peace" without acknowledging the Word Who was made Flesh in Our Lady's Virginal and Immaculate Womb by the power of God the Holy Ghost and dwelt amongst us or the fact that He has founded a perfect, visible, hierarchical community, the Catholic Church, to teach and sanctify men, a perfect community that has the Divine right to command rulers of men and nations in all things that pertain to the good of souls.

In order words, the lords of Modernity and Modernism reject the simple truth that the temporal fate and men and their nations and the eternal fate of all souls on the face of this earth depend upon the right ordering of souls according to the Sacred Deposit of Faith that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ entrusted exclusively to His true Church for their eternal safekeeping and infallible explication as they cooperate with the graces He, the Christ the King, won for us by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross that flow into human hearts and souls through the loving hands of His Most Blessed Mother, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces.

Our popes have warned us about Modernity and Modernism's "respect for all religions" as they have reminded us that Catholicism is the one and only foundation of personal and social order:


Everyone should avoid familiarity or friendship with anyone suspected of belonging to masonry or to affiliated groups. Know them by their fruits and avoid them. Every familiarity should be avoided, not only with those impious libertines who openly promote the character of the sect, but also with those who hide under the mask of universal tolerance, respect for all religions, and the craving to reconcile the maxims of the Gospel with those of the revolution. These men seek to reconcile Christ and Belial, the Church of God and the state without God. (Pope Leo XIII, Custodi Di Quella Fede, December 8, 1892.)

The same applies to the notion of Fraternity which they found on the love of common interest or, beyond all philosophies and religions, on the mere notion of humanity, thus embracing with an equal love and tolerance all human beings and their miseries, whether these are intellectual, moral, or physical and temporal. But Catholic doctrine tells us that the primary duty of charity does not lie in the toleration of false ideas, however sincere they may be, nor in the theoretical or practical indifference towards the errors and vices in which we see our brethren plunged, but in the zeal for their intellectual and moral improvement as well as for their material well-being. Catholic doctrine further tells us that love for our neighbor flows from our love for God, Who is Father to all, and goal of the whole human family; and in Jesus Christ whose members we are, to the point that in doing good to others we are doing good to Jesus Christ Himself. Any other kind of love is sheer illusion, sterile and fleeting.

Indeed, we have the human experience of pagan and secular societies of ages past to show that concern for common interests or affinities of nature weigh very little against the passions and wild desires of the heart. No, Venerable Brethren, there is no genuine fraternity outside Christian charity. Through the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ Our Saviour, Christian charity embraces all men, comforts all, and leads all to the same faith and same heavenly happiness. . . .

Here we have, founded by Catholics, an inter-denominational association that is to work for the reform of civilization, an undertaking which is above all religious in character; for there is no true civilization without a moral civilization, and no true moral civilization without the true religion: it is a proven truth, a historical fact. The new Sillonists cannot pretend that they are merely working on “the ground of practical realities” where differences of belief do not matter. Their leader is so conscious of the influence which the convictions of the mind have upon the result of the action, that he invites them, whatever religion they may belong to, “to provide on the ground of practical realities, the proof of the excellence of their personal convictions.” And with good reason: indeed, all practical results reflect the nature of one’s religious convictions, just as the limbs of a man down to his finger-tips, owe their very shape to the principle of life that dwells in his body. 

This being said, what must be thought of the promiscuity in which young Catholics will be caught up with heterodox and unbelieving folk in a work of this nature? Is it not a thousand-fold more dangerous for them than a neutral association? What are we to think of this appeal to all the heterodox, and to all the unbelievers, to prove the excellence of their convictions in the social sphere in a sort of apologetic contest? Has not this contest lasted for nineteen centuries in conditions less dangerous for the faith of Catholics? And was it not all to the credit of the Catholic Church? What are we to think of this respect for all errors, and of this strange invitation made by a Catholic to all the dissidents to strengthen their convictions through study so that they may have more and more abundant sources of fresh forces? What are we to think of an association in which all religions and even Free-Thought may express themselves openly and in complete freedom. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

The lords of Modernity in the world and the lords of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism are absolutely united in their refusal to accept the simple truth that men whose souls are held captive to the devil, either by means of Original Sin (as is the case with all non-Christians and invalidly baptized Protestants) or by means of Actual Sins, are more prone to conflict with others violently than are men who are trying, despite their own sins and failings, to please the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, noting that being a Catholic in a state of Sanctifying Grace is not, quite obviously, an infallible guarantor of rectitude of intentions and the probity of judgment necessary to consider all decisions in light of First and Last Things.

The history of Egypt, for example, between the the time of the Mohammedan conquest there in 640 A.D. and the time that Mohammedans of the Ottoman Empire of Turkey took over control of the country in 1517 was marked by great instability and violence. Around one hundred twenty of the approximately two hundred five known rulers of Egypt in that period left office by means of being dethroned, jailed, assassinated, executed or exile. Several just decided to leave the country. The Ottomans subjected Egypt to nearly four centuries of rule by governors who received their commissions from Istanbul. Egypt was a difficult province for the Ottomans to control as a result of all the country's internal factions.

Thus it is that the man who rose to the Egyptian presidency in 1954, two years after the Egyptian Revolution of 1952 overthrow King Farouk and ended the country's occupation by forces of the United Kingdom, which had been there for the better part of ninety years, Gamal Abdel Nasser, ruled with an iron hand until his death on September, 28, 1970. Nasser's successor, Anwar El-Sadat, who was assassinated on October 6, 1981, did so as well, including imprisoning the Coptic "pope," Shenouda III in 1981 just months before his assassination. Sadat's successor, Hosni Mubarak, who is now in jail and in failing health, ruled in a similar manner for nearly forty years. Now, however, the leader of the so-called Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammad Morski, has promised to work with "all Egyptians" upon bearing sworn into a vastly reduced (by the military generals) Egyptian presidency on Sunday, July 1, 2012, the Feast of the Most Precious Blood of Jesus.

Sure. Right.

Here is a report on his election as found on the website of Vatican Radio:

The Muslim Brotherhood's Mohammed Morsi who was declared the winner of Egypt's first free presidential election, Sunday has proclaimed himself a leader ``for all Egyptians,'' although he faces a struggle for power with the country's still-dominant military rulers. (Sean Patrick Lovett reports:

The announcement that the Muslim Brotherhood's Mohammad Morsi had won the Presidential run off came after a delay in declaring in the result of the June 16-17 poll. It also saw tens of thousands of celebrating people cram in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, the birthplace of the uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak 16 months ago.

World leaders have been quick to offer their congratulations to Mr Morsi. US President Barack Obama telephoned the new President elect to congratulate him on his victory and offer continued support for Egypt's transition to democracy.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon also offered his congratulations and commended the Egyptian people for the peaceful atmosphere of their first free presidential election in history.

Speaking on Egyptian television Sunday evening, Morsi declared he wanted an Egypt where there was social justice, freedom and human dignity. He also said he would be President for all Egyptians.

The election commission said Morsi won 51.7 percent in the runoff--a margin of only 8000, votes--over Ahmed Shafiq, the last prime minister under deposed leader Hosni Mubarak. Just a week ago the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces issued constitutional amendments that stripped the president's office of most of its major powers.

A court earlier dissolved Egypt’s freely elected parliament, which was dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, leaving the military also in charge of legislating.

According to the constitutional declaration, the new president won't appoint the defence minister and will lose the title of ``Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces.'' Now that the country has a President elect, Mohammad Morsi’s work is only just beginning.

Egypt faces major economic challenges as well as and maintaining law and order--both of which deteriorated in the post-Mubarak period. (Egypt: Morsi a president for all Egyptians.)


Ah, yes, the "Arab springtime" continues, at least in the warped minds of the usurpers who control the Vatican these days, a place where dancing to the tune of the "Arab springtime," with must be a corollary, I supposed, to the "springtime of the church" that is said to have "sprung" after the "Second" Vatican Council, has been quite joyous, although not without some caveats now and again following various bouts of violence against Christians by committed Mohammedans, in the past year.

Consider this report from 2011:

ZENIT: Is it the beginning of a path toward democratization or, instead, to give power to the radicals?

Father Samir [Khalil, S.J.]: I am inclined to say that we are moving toward a greater democracy. Seeing the photos and videos it is clear that they are not young men manipulated by radical movements, by extremists. It was quite clear in Egypt, for example, that Muslims and Christians were going hand in hand, and the extremists have not succeeded in pitting them against each other. The politicians have been unable to do this; they have disappeared. They tried to a degree to foment a counter-revolution, and then they left. They're not at all radical extremists.

There was almost an atmosphere of celebration, a celebration of the people. I think they want more democracy. There is a fact that is not noticed in Europe, in the West, and it is that the people in the Arab world are aware, and they write about it every day, that the Arab world is not well at all. That we are among the worst in the world. This feeling is very widespread among intellectuals: What have we done for the good of humanity? And there is an aspiration to be able to live as the other countries do.(://www.zenit.org/article-31848?l=english.)


To paraphrase Snagglepuss (if you know the reference, fine; if you don't, just remember I wasted a good deal of time in my childhood watching television), "An Arab springtime even!" An Arab "springtime"? Here's what they call on the streets a "reality check":

At least 13 people died and 140 were injured in clashes between Muslims and Coptic Christians in Cairo on Tuesday.

Both Coptic Christians and Muslims were killed in the violence, which began during a protest by Copts against last week's burning of a church.

Egypt's Sunni authority has urged Muslims to help rebuild the church, calling its destruction un-Islamic.

The clashes come two months after a suicide bomber killed 23 people at a Coptic church in Alexandria.

In January, an Egyptian man was sentenced to death for shooting dead six Copts and a Muslim policeman in Naga Hamady, southern Egypt.

The violence erupted when Coptic protesters blocked a highway in the Egyptian capital, protesting against the burning of the church in the province of Helwan.

The rally angered Muslims who wanted to pass through. Witnesses said both sides threw stones, and the army fired into the air to disperse the crowds.

The Grand Imam of al-Azhar issued a statement on Tuesday condemning the attack on the church in Atfih, Helwan governorate, as "a distortion of Islam".

Sheikh Ahmad al-Tayyib called on Muslim residents of the town to help start rebuilding the church and to refrain from sectarian violence, Egypt's official news agency, Mena, reported.

Meanwhile, thousands of Coptic protesters continued their sit-in outside the state television building. They are calling for the rebuilding of the church, better protection for Christians, and a full investigation into last week's attack.

Copts - who make up about 10% of Egypt's population - have often complained of harassment and discrimination, and argue that attacks on them go unpunished or result in light sentences.

The government in the predominantly Muslim country denies discriminating against Copts. (Ten dead after Copt-Muslim clash in Cairo.)


A distortion of "Islam"? Hardly. The false religion of Mohammedanism was born of violence. It has been spread by violence. It has been maintained by violence. There has been, quite to the contrary of assertion made by United States Representative Peter King (R-New York), no "radicalization of Islam." (for a rather comprehensive report on the hearing being held by Representative King, please go to Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch and King Hearing Witnesses Say U.S. 'Failing' to Confront Radical Islam.) To assert this is to ignore the whole of this false religion's history of bloodletting, of constant efforts to batter Christendom, of the demands being made now in more and more Western countries for the recognition of the Mohammedan "law" of "Sharia" as those formerly Catholic lands have been depopulated of their indigenous people as a result of the widespread acceptance of use of contraception and the decriminalization of surgical baby-killing. God is indeed using the Mohammedans to chastise the so-called "civilized" West just as He used the barbarians of old to bring down the Roman Empire in the West. No land is civilized when its laws permit the frustration of the natural end of marriage and when they allow for the slicing and dicing of innocent preborn children by various surgical means.

A number of articles on this little-read, much castigated site in the past few years have focused on the violent, bloodthirsty reality of Mohammedanism (see, among others, Killing In The Name of The Religion of Peace. Hawaii Sleep-O, Pope Saint Pius V and the Conversion of the Muslims, Just Following Their "Pope's" Call for Cohesion, Mainstreaming Mosques, Still Trying to Make Everyone Happy Except God Himself, Combustible Material: Keep Back Five Hundred Feet This Truck Carries Naturalism, Bag Man in a Karakul Hat, Not Interested in Assisi III, American Pots Lecturing Egyptian Kettles and Blood Flows Freely in America and Libya). There is no need to repeat ad nauseam, ad infinitum each of the points that have been made in these articles. However, it is useful to note that the false distinctions being made by many conciliar revolutionaries and Western politicians between "radical Islam" and "the religion of peace" are delusions from the devil himself to keep people from recognizing that Catholicism and Catholicism alone is the one and only foundation of personal and social order. Nothing else.

Yes, Jean-Louis "Cardinal" Tauran said in 2010 that "dialogue" between his own false church of conciliarism and the Mohammedans was going "nowhere." Yet it is that he stated as recently as January of 2011 that the Vatican remained "open" to "dialogue" with the followers of the false "prophet" named Mohammed, who rejected the doctrine of the Most Blessed Trinity (see (see Hillaire Belloc, The Great and Enduring Heresy of Mohammed.) And, of course, the false "pontiff" himself, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI remains committed to holding his "World Day of Prayer for Peace" in Assisi, Italy, seven months from now even though the Mohammedans have demonstrated time and again that they are truly not interested in Assisi III. They are interested in world domination, unaware of the fact that the forces of Antichrist will crush each false religion, including Talmudic Judaism and Mohammedanism and concilairism itself, in preparation for the apocalyptic battle with the true religion founded by Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ upon the Rock of Peter, the Pope, Catholicism. In other words, the Mohammedans lose. So does every other false religion no matter how much blood they shed in its promotion.

Moreover, it should be remembered that Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict has twice esteemed the blasphemous Koran with his own priestly hands, calling it "that dear book" as he did so in the Vatican, smiling greatly on the other occasion as he received a copy from a Mohammedan woman on Thursday, April 17, 2008, at the John Paul II Cultural Center in Washington, District of Columbia.

Ratzinger/Benedict also said the following during his visit to Jordan in 2009:

Just take a look at a few excerpts of the speeches given by Ratzinger/Benedict during his pilgrimage to Jordan and Israel between May 8, 2009, and May 15,  2009, and the speech given by Barack Hussein Obama today, Thursday, June 4, 2009, at Cairo University to see that there is indeed much "common ground" shared by these kindred spirits of the new world order:


My visit to Jordan gives me a welcome opportunity to speak of my deep respect for the Muslim community, and to pay tribute to the leadership shown by His Majesty the King in promoting a better understanding of the virtues proclaimed by Islam. Now that some years have passed since the publication of the Amman Message and the Amman Interfaith Message, we can say that these worthy initiatives have achieved much good in furthering an alliance of civilizations between the West and the Muslim world, confounding the predictions of those who consider violence and conflict inevitable. Indeed the Kingdom of Jordan has long been at the forefront of initiatives to promote peace in the Middle East and throughout the world, encouraging inter-religious dialogue, supporting efforts to find a just solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, welcoming refugees from neighboring Iraq, and seeking to curb extremism. I cannot let this opportunity pass without calling to mind the pioneering efforts for peace in the region made by the late King Hussein. How fitting that my meeting tomorrow with Muslim religious leaders, the diplomatic corps and University rectors should take place in the mosque that bears his name. May his commitment to the resolution of the region’s conflicts continue to bear fruit in efforts to promote lasting peace and true justice for all who live in the Middle East.

Dear Friends, at the Seminar held in Rome last autumn by the Catholic-Muslim Forum, the participants examined the central role played in our respective religious traditions by the commandment of love. I hope very much that this visit, and indeed all the initiatives designed to foster good relations between Christians and Muslims, will help us to grow in love for the Almighty and Merciful God, and in fraternal love for one another. Thank you for your welcome. Thank you for your attention. May God grant Your Majesties happiness and long life! May he bless Jordan with prosperity and peace! (Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, Welcoming ceremony at Queen Alia International Airport of Amman, May 8, 2009.)

Places of worship, like this splendid Al-Hussein Bin Talal mosque named after the revered late King, stand out like jewels across the earth’s surface. From the ancient to the modern, the magnificent to the humble, they all point to the divine, to the Transcendent One, to the Almighty. And through the centuries these sanctuaries have drawn men and women into their sacred space to pause, to pray, to acknowledge the presence of the Almighty, and to recognize that we are all his creatures.

For this reason we cannot fail to be concerned that today, with increasing insistency, some maintain that religion fails in its claim to be, by nature, a builder of unity and harmony, an expression of communion between persons and with God. Indeed some assert that religion is necessarily a cause of division in our world; and so they argue that the less attention given to religion in the public sphere the better. Certainly, the contradiction of tensions and divisions between the followers of different religious traditions, sadly, cannot be denied. However, is it not also the case that often it is the ideological manipulation of religion, sometimes for political ends, that is the real catalyst for tension and division, and at times even violence in society? In the face of this situation, where the opponents of religion seek not simply to silence its voice but to replace it with their own, the need for believers to be true to their principles and beliefs is felt all the more keenly. Muslims and Christians, precisely because of the burden of our common history so often marked by misunderstanding, must today strive to be known and recognized as worshippers of God faithful to prayer, eager to uphold and live by the Almighty’s decrees, merciful and compassionate, consistent in bearing witness to all that is true and good, and ever mindful of the common origin and dignity of all human persons, who remain at the apex of God’s creative design for the world and for history. (Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, speech to Muslim religious leaders, members of the Diplomatic Corps and Rectors of universities in Jordan in front of the mosque al-Hussein bin Talal in Amman, May 9, 2009.)

In addition, of course, to his constant attacks on the nature of dogmatic truth by means of his logically absurd and dogmatically condemned "hermeneutic of continuity and discontinuity," which, after nearly twenty centuries, it was "necessary" for the Church to "learn" existed (as Ratzinger/Benedict contended in his December 22, 2005, address to members of his conciliar curia), Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI shows his apostate spirit and provides us with the evidence that he does not believe in the true God of Revelation by asserting there is a "need for believers to be true to their principles and beliefs is felt all the more keenly."

This is the precise apostate spirit of The Sillon that was, as noted earlier in this article, condemned by Pope Saint Pius X in Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910

Most of the lords of Modernity and most of the lords of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism are quite adept at ignoring truth in order to appease the tender sensibilities of those who they believe would be "offended" by stating the truth clearly and unequivocally. The current administration of Caesar Barackus Obamus Ignoramus is replete with individuals, starting with caesar himself, who have gone out of their way to avoid using the words "Islamic terrorism," attempting to cover-up and downplay the significance of attacks such as the one that was perpetrated by Major Nidal Hasan at Food Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009. United States Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and United States Attorney General Eric "I Got a Pardon for Marc Rich/Fast and Furious" Holder have refused to recognize, no less admit, that Mohammedanism is violent of its very nature and its spread across Europe and here in the United States of America represents a grave and vital threat to the personal safety of ordinary citizens. Many of the conciliarists understand the threat, believing in all of their utter insanity that "religious liberty" is the answer to these threats (see Unity and Peace Cannot Be Based in Error and Falsehood, part one Bearing "Fruits" From Hell Itself, part one and Bearing "Fruits" From Hell Itself, part one.) 

It is no wonder, therefore, that our own caesars are so "sensitive" to the "feelings" of Mohammedans when the men who claim to represent the true Church make it appear that each religion can contribute to the "building of a better world" as long as "religious liberty" is respected. Statements such as those below made by George Walker Bush and Barack Hussein Obama make perfect sense when you consider the fact that the devil has succeeded in placing spiritual robber barons in the Vatican and diocesan chancery offices, thereby robbing the world of the prophetic voice of Christ the King:

The terrorists practice a fringe form of Islamic extremism that has been rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim clerics -- a fringe movement that perverts the peaceful teachings of Islam. The terrorists' directive commands them to kill Christians and Jews, to kill all Americans, and make no distinction among military and civilians, including women and children. . .  .

I also want to speak tonight directly to Muslims throughout the world. We respect your faith. It's practiced freely by many millions of Americans, and by millions more in countries that America counts as friends. Its teachings are good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of Allah blaspheme the name of Allah. (Applause.) The terrorists are traitors to their own faith, trying, in effect, to hijack Islam itself. The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends; it is not our many Arab friends. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them. (Applause.)  (George Walker Bush, Address to the Nation, September 20, 2001.)

As we know, these men belonged to al Qaeda – a group of extremists who have distorted and defiled Islam, one of the world's great religions, to justify the slaughter of innocents. Al Qaeda's base of operations was in Afghanistan, where they were harbored by the Taliban – a ruthless, repressive and radical movement that seized control of that country after it was ravaged by years of Soviet occupation and civil war, and after the attention of America and our friends had turned elsewhere.

Just days after 9/11, Congress authorized the use of force against al Qaeda and those who harbored them – an authorization that continues to this day. The vote in the Senate was 98 to 0. The vote in the House was 420 to 1. For the first time in its history, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization invoked Article 5 – the commitment that says an attack on one member nation is an attack on all. And the United Nations Security Council endorsed the use of all necessary steps to respond to the 9/11 attacks. America, our allies and the world were acting as one to destroy al Qaeda's terrorist network, and to protect our common security. (Barack Hussein Obama,  Address on the War in Afghanistan, December 2, 2009.)


This kind of insane political correctness, which is practiced also on occasion by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, keeps American policy makers from admitting that Mohammedanism of its demonic nature is an assault against God and seeks to destroy those who will not follow its false "god" and its false teachings, therefore predisposing them to let domestic terror cells form in the United States of America as a result of immigration laws based on political correctness and electoral self-interest. Weak, cowardly American politicians have made this country unsafe by their refusal to keep out those who seek to dominate here as they are now dominating throughout parts of Europe.

There is only one solution to the Mohammedan threat just as there is only one solution to the threat posed by Talmudic Judaism and its related allies in Masonic lodges: Catholicism. Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has sent His Most Blessed Mother to earth to implore us to pray her Most Holy Rosary for world peace and to pray for the conversion of sinners, starting with ourselves as we seek to make reparation to God through her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart for our sins. Catholicism, not any false religion or any form of naturalism, including the falsehood that is "conservatism," is the solution. Nothing else: Who says so? Look once again for yourselves (repetition is the mother of learning, my friends):


Here we have, founded by Catholics, an inter-denominational association that is to work for the reform of civilization, an undertaking which is above all religious in character; for there is no true civilization without a moral civilization, and no true moral civilization without the true religion: it is a proven truth, a historical fact. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.

No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

Please, my friends, do not deceive yourself. The babbling voices of naturalism that blather on and on and on about having "faith" to make the country "strong" again are themselves agents of the devil as they promote a renewed sense of religious indifferentism that is at the core of the false principles of the American republic. Each an every Catholic must reject and completely oppose any and all calls for a generic "faith" to combat the evils of the day as such calls come from the devil himself and from no other source, regardless of the "good intentions" of the complete and utter ignoramuses who make those calls. I mean, folks, why should we be opposed to Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's calls for a kind of generic Christianity while embracing those of bombastic talk show hosts?

We should, obviously, recognize the truth of these words written by Pope Pius XI in Mit Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937, that apply to the American sense of religious indifferentism just as much as they did at the time to the employment of the word "faith" by partisans of Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany:

Beware, Venerable Brethren, of that growing abuse, in speech as in writing, of the name of God as though it were a meaningless label, to be affixed to any creation, more or less arbitrary, of human speculation. Use your influence on the Faithful, that they refuse to yield to this aberration. Our God is the Personal God, supernatural, omnipotent, infinitely perfect, one in the Trinity of Persons, tri-personal in the unity of divine essence, the Creator of all existence. Lord, King and ultimate Consummator of the history of the world, who will not, and cannot, tolerate a rival God by His side.

No faith in God can for long survive pure and unalloyed without the support of faith in Christ. "No one knoweth who the Son is, but the Father: and who the Father is, but the Son and to whom the Son will reveal Him" (Luke x. 22). "Now this is eternal life: That they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent" (John xvii. 3). Nobody, therefore, can say: "I believe in God, and that is enough religion for me," for the Savior's words brook no evasion: "Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that confesseth the Son hath the Father also"(1 John ii. 23). . . .

Faith in Christ cannot maintain itself pure and unalloyed without the support of faith in the Church, "the pillar and ground of the truth" (1 Tim. iii. 15); for Christ Himself, God eternally blessed, raised this pillar of the Faith. His command to hear the Church (Matt. xviii. 15), to welcome in the words and commands of the Church His own words and His own commands (Luke x. 16), is addressed to all men, of all times and of all countries. The Church founded by the Redeemer is one, the same for all races and all nations. Beneath her dome, as beneath the vault of heaven, there is but one country for all nations and tongues; there is room for the development of every quality, advantage, task and vocation which God the Creator and Savior has allotted to individuals as well as to ethnical communities. The Church's maternal heart is big enough to see in the God-appointed development of individual characteristics and gifts, more than a mere danger of divergency. She rejoices at the spiritual superiorities among individuals and nations. In their successes she sees with maternal joy and pride fruits of education and progress, which she can only bless and encourage, whenever she can conscientiously do so. But she also knows that to this freedom limits have been set by the majesty of the divine command, which founded that Church one and indivisible. Whoever tampers with that unity and that indivisibility wrenches from the Spouse of Christ one of the diadems with which God Himself crowned her; he subjects a divine structure, which stands on eternal foundations, to criticism and transformation by architects whom the Father of Heaven never authorized to interfere.  (Pope Pius XI, Mit Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937.)


Yes, my good and very few readers, the "Church founded by the Redeemer is the one, the same for all races and all nations," including the United States of America. We are not going to stop the tide of the threats posed by Mohammedanism and other false religions with any form of naturalism, with any highly emotionally laden appeals to waste one's Catholic time and money on compact discs and books and other materials produced by dopes who have not studied the Social Reign of Christ the King evangelize in behalf of one Americanist myth after another that can do nothing but reaffirm people in a welter of errors just as surely as do Ratzinger/Benedict himself and his "bishops." We must avoid all contact with these agents of error and indifferentism. Who says so? Look again for yourselves:


Everyone should avoid familiarity or friendship with anyone suspected of belonging to masonry or to affiliated groups. Know them by their fruits and avoid them. Every familiarity should be avoided, not only with those impious libertines who openly promote the character of the sect, but also with those who hide under the mask of universal tolerance, respect for all religions, and the craving to reconcile the maxims of the Gospel with those of the revolution. These men seek to reconcile Christ and Belial, the Church of God and the state without God. (Pope Leo XIII, Custodi Di Quella Fede, December 8, 1892.)

The belief held and stated so very frequently by Ratzinger/Benedict that "religions" can be a "force for peace" and the sappy sentimentality of inter-cultural cooperation spread by one American president after another (see Kindred Spirits of the New World Order and Not A Mention of Christ the King, which is perhaps my most comprehensive historical review of the Americanist ethos on our presidents) have no foundation in truth. Indeed, Pope Saint Pius X, condemning The Sillon whose false principles serve as the very foundation conciliarism's perverse "social teaching," eviscerated the apostasy of the conciliarists and the naturalism of the lords of Modernity in Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910:


Indeed, we have the human experience of pagan and secular societies of ages past to show that concern for common interests or affinities of nature weigh very little against the passions and wild desires of the heart. No, Venerable Brethren, there is no genuine fraternity outside Christian charity. Through the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ Our Saviour, Christian charity embraces all men, comforts all, and leads all to the same faith and same heavenly happiness.

By separating fraternity from Christian charity thus understood, Democracy, far from being a progress, would mean a disastrous step backwards for civilization. If, as We desire with all Our heart, the highest possible peak of well being for society and its members is to be attained through fraternity or, as it is also called, universal solidarity, all minds must be united in the knowledge of Truth, all wills united in morality, and all hearts in the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ. But this union is attainable only by Catholic charity, and that is why Catholic charity alone can lead the people in the march of progress towards the ideal civilization. (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)

There is nothing serendipitous about Mohammedanism, which is springing back to life in Egypt as committed, as opposed to secular, Mohammedans once rule region a north Africa from Tunisia to the west to Egypt in the east. Events are certainly escalating very rapidly. Very rapidly.

There is nothing "redemptive" about the false, naturalistic, religiously indifferentist, anti-Incarnational and semi-Pelagian principles of Modernity with which the conciliarists have made their "reconciliation."

We have been given Our Lady's Rosary to help us in this time of apostasy and betrayal, in this time of chastisement. Let us use this instrument, well as we seek to deny ourselves more and more so that our hearts will yearn only for the things of Heaven and that we will be more and more able to view the world exclusively through the eyes of the true Faith as we, unworthy though we may be, plant a few seeds for the restoration of the Social Reign of Christ the King and of Mary our Immaculate Queen!

Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?


Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!

Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us now and the hour of our death. Amen.


Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saint Irenaeus, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

© Copyright 2012, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.