Home Articles Golden Oldies Speaking Schedule About Christ or Chaos Links Donations Contact Us

              November 4, 2010

See Caesar Pout

by Thomas A. Droleskey

Pity poor Caesar Barackus Obamus Ignoramus. See Caesar pout. See Caesar run away from the truth.

Although the election results on Tuesday, November 2, 2010, the Commemoration of All Souls, are indeed written in sand, the President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, is unwilling to read what was written on the sand by the "people" two days ago. It is the "people" who must be faulted again and again for failing to perceive and to accept his own utter brilliance and the infallibility of his policies. The "people" are angry. The "people" are scared.

Sure, the "people" are angry and scared. A substantial number of the "people" are angry at Barack Hussein Obama's overweening pride and hubris. The "people" are scared by a typically sanctimonious naturalist of the "leftist" bent who believes himself to have been endowed with near-mystic powers to "save" the nation. Although the "people are easily diverted by bread and circuses and other side shows, they are not going to let the current caesar off the hook unless the "money" starts flowing again. Absent a return of the "money," the current caesar's only real hope of remaining in power once the election returns have been counted after the presidential election on Tuesday, November 6, 2012, is the prospect of his opponents in the naturalist "right" engaging in the sort of fratricidal warfare that made possible the election of another statist, the then Governor of the State of New Jersey, Thomas Woodrow Wilson, on Tuesday, 5, 1912, when the incumbent President, the Freemason named William Howard Taft, and his predecessor, the Freemason named Theodore Roosevelt, split the Republican vote. This not an impossible scenario in 2012, something that I will explain in an article to be published on Saturday, November 6, 2010.

Barack Hussein Obama has been told throughout his life how "wonderful" and how "special" he is. This, of course, has gone to his head. He cannot accept the fact that he is seen by large numbers of Americans as a posturing, preening leftist elitist, a man who really, really thinks that those who oppose him and his policies are simply misinformed goofs and hayseeds who have yet to recognize his own alleged brilliant omniscience. The fact that he is perceived as a bogeyman disturbs him more than anything else. Such a perception has got to be the work of shadowy forces, such as Crossroads America, the group run by the former caesar's longtime assistant, Karl Rove, and the United States Chamber of Commerce. It simply cannot be, at least not in the current caesar's narcissistic little mind, that he is the one responsible for how he is perceived, and that the perception is indeed quite accurate.

Moreover, our pouting caesar, who is soon to depart for an extensive foreign trip that is sure to soothe his wounded ego as he receives adulation in his former home country, Indonesia, and receives plaudits from his adoring multitudes in Europe, has had the temerity once again to call for "civility" in political discourse. He did so yesterday, November 3, 2010, during a nationally televised press conference from the White House in Washington, District of Columbia:

You know, a little over a month ago, we held a town hall meeting in Richmond, Virginia.  And one of the most telling questions came from a small business owner who runs a tree care firm.  He told me how hard he works and how busy he was; how he doesn’t have time to pay attention to all the back-and-forth in Washington.  And he asked, is there hope for us returning to civility in our discourse, to a healthy legislative process, so as I strap on the boots again tomorrow, I know that you guys got it under control?  It’s hard to have a faith in that right now, he said.

I do believe there is hope for civility.  I do believe there’s hope for progress.  And that’s because I believe in the resiliency of a nation that’s bounced back from much worse than what we’re going through right now -- a nation that's overcome war and depression, that has been made more perfect in our struggle for individual rights and individual freedoms. (Caesar's Press Conference.)


 Civility? Civility? Is this man mad? Is this man insane? Is he such a sanctimonious fraud that he cannot recall demonizing his naturalist counterparts in the Republican Party as follows?

“If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, ‘We’re going to punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’ if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s going to be harder and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2.”

Referring specifically to Republicans such as Senator John McCain, who formerly supported an overhaul but now are stressing border security and supporting strict immigration laws like Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration measure, Mr. Obama said, “Those aren’t the kinds of folks who represent our core American values.” (In Appeal to Hispanics, Obama Promises to Push Immigration Reform.)


It took caesar seven whole days to "walk back" his reference to Republicans as being the "enemies" of Latinos:

Reuters) - President Barack Obama said on Monday he should not have used the word "enemies" to describe his political opponents as Republicans sought to make an issue of the comment a day before congressional elections.

Obama, in an interview with talk radio host Michael Baisden, said, "I probably should have used the word 'opponents' instead of enemies."

He was backtracking from a comment he made a week ago in an interview with Univision radio in which he sought to persuade Hispanics to vote for Democratic candidates instead of Republicans.

"If Latinos sit out the election instead of, 'we're going to punish our enemies and we're going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us' -- if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it's going to be harder," Obama had said.

Republicans in hot pursuit of control of the House of Representatives in Tuesday voting were drawing attention to Obama's "enemies" comment in hopes of encouraging more turnout by Republican voters.

Hammering home the issue was John Boehner, the Republican who would oust Democrat Nancy Pelosi as House speaker if Republicans win control of the House on Tuesday as most pollsters believe will happen.

"Today, sadly, we have president who uses the word 'enemy' for fellow Americans ... fellow citizens. He uses it for people who disagree with his agenda of bigger government ... people speaking out for a smaller, more accountable government that respects freedom and allows small businesses to create jobs," Boehner planned to say in Cincinnati.

"Mr. President, there's a word for people who have the audacity to speak up in defense of freedom, the Constitution, and the values of limited government that made our country great. We don't call them 'enemies.' We call them 'patriots,'" he planned to say.

Obama told Baisden that he was talking about opponents of a comprehensive overhaul of the U.S. immigration system. Hispanics have been disappointed that Obama has not pushed ahead on immigration legislation, which Republicans oppose. (Obama seeks to blunt Republican attack over comment.)


Civility? Civility?

Back Hussein Obama and Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi and Harry Reid told one lie after another during the debate on ObamaCare earlier this year. Each of them misled Americans concerning the coverage for surgical baby-killing that was to be included in ObamaCare.

Civility? Civility?

"Civility" is a code word for fascists of the naturalist "left" so that they can tar anyone who disagrees with them by any pejorative that comes into their hollow little heads, mindful that they can always find a friendly interview who will "understand" them when they disingenuously say "Oops!" when they receive heat for saying what they actually believe about those who are so "insensitive" and so bold as to actually disagree with them, worse yet to oppose their policy proposals.

Oh, by the way, President Obama, what do you have to say about the Americans being killed by members of Mexican drug cartels along the United States border in the State of Texas with Mexico? Are those who call for the increased border protection that you continue to refuse to provide despite your words of assurance to the contrary "enemies" of those who have emigrated, whether legally or illegally, from Mexico?

Although the careerists in the organized crime family of the naturalist "right," the Republican Party, are also capable of use invective to cannibalize those within their ranks whom they despise (Christine O'Donnell, Carl Paladino, Sharron Angle, Sarah Palin, and even United Senates Senator Jim De Mint of South Carolina) for daring to assert themselves as party leaders), they have nothing on the professional leftists when it comes to savaging and demonizing others for electoral gain. As has been noted before, the man who denounced what he called "the politics of personal destruction," former caesar William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, sat back and enjoyed the ride as his associates engaged in a scorched policy against the late United States Representative Henry Hyde (R-Illinois) and former United States Representatives Bob Barr (R-Georgia) and Bob Livingston (R-Louisiana) and United States Representative Dan Burton (R-Indiana) during Monicagate in 1998 and 1999. The naturalist "left" plays by Saul Alinsky's "rules for radicals," which, it must be remembered gives an elegy of praise to the devil himself:

Opening page - Dedication

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

"An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent... He must create a mechanism that can drain off the underlying guilt for having accepted the previous situation for so long a time. Out of this mechanism, a new community organization arises.... (A System Based on Lies Still Produces Liars.)


Ah, who cut his political eye-teeth in Alinsky organizations. Yup, Barack Hussein Obama? Who considered herself to be a disciple of Saul Alinsky? Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Having no basis to claim that the "money" was coming back anytime soon, many desperate Democratic Party candidates, including Jack Conway in the State of Kentucky, launched personal attacks against their naturalist counterparts in the Republican Party, a strategy that failed in many instances two days ago but succeeded in some instances, especially in some races for the United States House of Representatives, thereby keeping the Republican victory of two days ago from being even bigger than it was.

Ah, such must be the situation that obtains when most of those in the halls of civil power are governed by the amorality of Niccolo Machiavelli in a world where almost no one, especially those in civil power, has any understanding, no less allegiance to, the Social Reign of Christ the King as It must be exercised by the Catholic Church. And our currently pouting caesar, who will go through the motions of "seeking" bi-partisanship on certain issues, believes that that he still retains his mandate, at least from half of the voters, to defend his programs, including Obama Care:

Q    According to some exit polls, sir, about one out of two voters apparently said that they would like to either see it overturned or repealed.  Are you concerned that that may embolden voters who are from the other party perhaps?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, it also means one out of two voters think it was the right thing to do.  And obviously this is an issue that has been contentious.  But as I said, I think what's going to be useful is for us to go through the issues that Republicans have issues on -- not sort of talking generally, but let’s talk specifics.  Does this particular provision -- when it comes to preexisting conditions, is this something you’re for or you’re against?  Helping seniors get their prescription drugs -- does that make sense or not?

And if we take that approach -- which is different from campaigning -- I mean, this is now governing -- then I think that we can continue to make some progress and find some common ground. (Caesar's Press Conference.)


Permit me to extrapolate what the pouting caesar meant to communicate with this answer:

All right. My advisers told me to beat up on myself out here, to admit that I've taken a shellacking. It's one that I don't deserve, however. The Republicans were able to close the deal in various House and state legislative races. They couldn't close the deal on some Senate races that were close. This means that I still have a base of support among the people, especially on the coasts, to begin my re-election campaign, and I am not going to anger my liberal base by revisiting ObamaCare. My liberal base is already upset enough with me for not giving them a full-throated, avowedly nationalized system of health care by means of the "public option." I cannot and I will not alienate my liberal base any more by caving to Republicans on an issue that is settled.

Indeed, do you really know what I am going to do: I am going to spend the next two years oozing niceness, inviting Republicans to dinners and luncheons and retreats at Camp David, a place I abhor as I am not a rustic kind of guy. I will give them all kinds of photo ops. And then I will blame them for being absolutely intransigent, for being ideologues who stand in the way of progress whenever I propose compromises that I know for a fact are dead-on-arrival.

I will accuse these right-wing fanatics, these lunatics from the fringe, of slowing down progress every time they issue a subpoena to harass and intimidate me. I will posture and preen before the cameras as I am doing now. And I believe that I have enough core support at this time to win the States of New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Minnesota, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, Massachusetts, Maryland, Delaware, Illinois, California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and West Virginia without any questions at all. I start my re-election campaign now with a guarantee of at least 197 electoral votes. I can probably get Pennsylvania, but I have to turn out my base in Philadelphia to do that. If so, then I will have 217 electoral votes in my pocket. I will only need fifty-three more electoral votes to get re-elected. Colorado has nine electoral votes. I think I will win there. Michigan and Wisconsin are winnable in a presidential election. That's forty-three more votes. I'm almost home. I don't need no stinkin' compromise with my enemies, er, I mean my opponents, the Republicans.

Independent voters may have abandoned the Democratic Party this year. They will come back to me, especially if Republicans nominate another Bob Dole figure or if they wind up nominating Sarah Palin, who I don't think could carry her home State of Alaska at this point.

Any more questions?


The pouting caesar knows his math. That's why he's going to play to his base for the next two years as he demonizes Republicans. It's all a game, my good and few readers (actually, the Alexa website says that the current ranking of this site in the United States of America, is 79,188, after having fallen to around 180,000 in recent weeks; I don't know the reason for the increase), and it's a game that excludes any possibility of a victory for Christ the King and the cause of the pursuit of the common temporal good in light of man's Last End, the possession of the glory of the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity.

Men, whether acting individually or collectively, deceive themselves if they think that they can make the world a "better" place absent a profound devotion to Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary. Our Lady told us in the Cova da Iria near Fatima, Portugal, ninety-three years ago that we must pray the Rosary to console the good God and to make reparation for our sins as we pray for the conversion of poor sinners and for the faithful fulfillment of her Fatima Message. This is a work of the Mercy of the Divine Redeemer, Who is giving us every chance to repent and convert. Why do men still persist in their obstinate refusal to take Our Lady's Fatima Message seriously and to organize Rosary processions and rallies to counter the naturalism of the day and to serve as valiant champions of Christ the King?

We must not be distracted by the side shows of naturalism or conciliarism. We must serve as champions of Christ the King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, especially by praying as many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits.

What are we waiting for?

Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us!


Saint Joseph, Patron of Departing Souls, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

See also: A Litany of Saints


© Copyright 2010, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.