Saints and Idols: No Room for "Coexistence"
by Thomas A. Droleskey
Such is the state of confusion engendered by the apostasies of the counterfeit church of conciliarism that the lion's share of Catholics across the ecclesiastical divide have no ability to reason as Catholics, responding naturalistically, and emotionally and illogically to simply reassertions of Catholic dogmatic truths.
For example, various specious arguments are offered by a lot of ordinary Catholics when they are confronted by such outrages as Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's reception of "gifts" from representatives of false religions in Washington, District of Columbia, and his entering into a Talmudic synagogue and his participation in an "inter-religious" prayer ceremony and the refusal to mention the Holy Name of the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, at the site of the former twin towers of the World Trade Center in the Borough of Manhattan of the City of New York, New York. "Oh, he's got to to these things, you know. He's got to 'reach out' to people?" "What's wrong with any of this. Doesn't God 'love" all people?" "Things change. God 'moves' with the times." "He's the 'pope,' you know. He knows best. I'm not going to question Peter. He can do what he wants. God is inspiring him."
Mind you, these are only some of the ridiculous, specious arguments that are made by people who are so bereft of the sensus Catholicus that they accept everything but the perennial teaching of the Catholic Church as being true. Such has been the triumph of the illogic and sentimentality of the Protestant Revolt and of the naturalism of Judeo-Masonry that the average Catholic, having been immersed in a cultural soup of pluralism, has been more than receptive to conciliarism's assault upon the very nature of dogmatic truth, which is nothing other than an assault upon the very nature of God Himself. "God loves all people. He would never permit anyone to go to Hell." "God loves all religions equally. How do we know which one is the true one?" "Why shouldn't we show respect to the Koran or to Buddhism or to Judaism?" These ridiculous questions, which are asked repeatedly by baptized Catholics who are absolutely ignorant of the truths of the Faith, having therefore no understanding of Who God is as He has revealed Himself to be through His true Church, when they are confronted by refutations of conciliarism's accommodations to the spirit of the world and its embrace of false ecumenism as articulated by true popes and decreed by true councils and practiced by truly canonized saints.
What follows is a simple reminder of Catholic truths to serve as antidote to the emotionalism and illogic and sentimentality that many of you will encounter from friends and co-workers in the next eight days or so. Many of the quotations below were cited in
A Pope and a Zionist nearly seven months ago. As much verbiage has been posted on this site since that time--and as it is unreasonable to expect that each reader will retain all of the details of each article, it is useful, I believe, to serve up a dose of reality about how Catholic saints despised idols and sought to destroy them, not to receive them with respect and equanimity as will occur in three days from now when Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI receives with esteem various items that are "sacred" to the adherents of an assortment of false religions at the "Pope" John Paul II Cultural Center in Washington, District of Columbia. (See Many Acts of Evil Demand Many Acts of Reparation.)
Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI does not believe that God hates false religions, thus showing once again that he does not understand the very nature of God. Ratzinger/Benedict does not believe that God wants the destruction of their places of false worship, stating in God and the World, which was published in the year 2000, that there were "in fact Christian hotheads and fanatics who destroyed temples, who were unable to see paganism as anything more than idolatry that had to be radically eliminated.” (My thanks to Father Francisco Radecki, CMRI, for providing me his "library" of books by Joseph Ratzinger when we visited him at Saint Joseph's Church in Wayne, Michigan, just about a year ago now.)
The great Saint Benedict of Nursia, who lived on Mount Subiaco before he established his monastery at Monte Cassino, after whom Ratzinger has taken his "papal" name, mind you, must have been one of those "hotheads" who did not consider pagan idols to be sacred. Pope Pius XII, writing in Fulgens Radiatur, March 21, 1947, explained in the most admiring of terms how Saint Benedict himself burned a tample of Apollo to the ground!
But while things started very favorably, as We said, and yielded rich and salutary results, promising still greater in the future, Our saint with the greatest grief of soul, saw a storm breaking over the growing harvest, which an envious spirit had provoked and desires of earthly gain had stirred up. Since Benedict was prompted by divine and not human counsel, and feared lest the envy which had been aroused mainly against himself should wrongfully recoil on his followers, "he let envy take its course, and after he had disposed of the oratories and other buildings -- leaving in them a competent number of brethren with superiors -- he took with him a few monks and went to another place". Trusting in God and relying on His ever present help, he went south and arrived at a fort "called Cassino situated on the side of a high mountain . . .; on this stood an old temple where Apollo was worshipped by the foolish country people, according to the custom of the ancient heathens. Around it likewise grew groves, in which even till that time the mad multitude of infidels used to offer their idolatrous sacrifices. The man of God coming to that place broke the idol, overthrew the altar, burned the groves, and of the temple of Apollo made a chapel of St. Martin. Where the profane altar had stood he built a chapel of St. John; and by continual preaching he converted many of the people thereabout".
Saint Boniface, the great apostle to the German people, showed the same kind of "respect" for a pagan symbol about two centuries after Saint Benedict:
A bold deed which he [Saint Benedict] performed at this time greatly increased his prestige and led to numerous conversions. At Geismar, near Fritzlar, there was a gigantic oak, called the "Tree of Thor," which the pagans of the whole country regarded with the deepest veneration. Mighty as the God of the Christians was, over the oak of Geismar, so they boasted, He had no power, and none of His followers would are destroy it. This tree the Christians advised Boniface to cut down, assuring him that its fall would shake the faith of the pagans in the power of their gods. Boniface consented, and on the appointed day undertook to lay the ax to the tree with his own hands. A vast crowd of pagans stood around, intently watching to see some dire misfortune overwhelm the desecrator of their shrine. But when the mighty tree fell to the ground under the strokes of the Bishop's ax, they with one accord praised the God of the Christians and asked to be received among the number of His followers. Boniface baptized them, and out of the wood of the tree built a little oratory, which he dedicated to St. Peter. (Father John Laux, Church History, published originally by Benziger Brothers, in 1930, republished by TAN Books and Publishers, 1980, p. 149.)
Not very ecumenical of Saint Boniface, now was it?
Saint Francis Xavier must have been another one of those "hotheads," a missionary who believed that it was necessary to spend himself tirelessly in the baptizing of the heathens and in the utter destruction of everything to do with the false religions from which they were converted. Although a little over one thousand years separated Saint Benedict and Saint Francis Xavier, both were driven by the same, immutable sensus Catholicus that understands God's own revulsion of false religions and His desire to rescue people from them by means of their unconditional conversion to the Catholic Church, His own true Church:
As to the numbers who become Christians, you may understand them from this, that it often happens to me to be hardly able to use my hands from the fatigue of baptizing: often in a single day I have baptized whole villages. Sometimes I have lost my voice and strength altogether with repeating again and again the Credo and the other forms. The fruit that is reaped by the baptism of infants, as well as by the instruction of children and others, is quite incredible. These children, I trust heartily, by the grace of God, will be much better than their fathers. They show an ardent love for the Divine law, and an extraordinary zeal for learning our holy religion and imparting it to others. Their hatred for idolatry is marvellous. They get into feuds with the heathen about it, and whenever their own parents practise it, they reproach them and come off to tell me at once. Whenever I hear of any act of idolatrous worship, I go to the place with a large band of these children, who very soon load the devil with a greater amount of insult and abuse than he has lately received of honor and worship from their parents, relations, and acquaintances. The children run at the idols, upset them, dash them down, break them to pieces, spit on them, trample on them, kick them about, and in short heap on them every possible outrage. (St. Francis Xavier: Letter from India, to the Society of Jesus at Rome, 1543.)
Saint Francis Xavier went on to explain that the Brahmins in India were people of malice and cunning, not people to be admired:
We have in these parts a class of men among the pagans who are called Brahmins. They keep up the worship of the gods, the superstitious rites of religion, frequenting the temples and taking care of the idols. They are as perverse and wicked a set as can anywhere be found, and I always apply to them the words of holy David, "from an unholy race and a wicked and crafty man deliver me, O Lord." They are liars and cheats to the very backbone. Their whole study is, how to deceive most cunningly the simplicity and ignorance of the people. They give out publicly that the gods command certain offerings to be made to their temples, which offerings are simply the things that the Brahmins themselves wish for, for their own maintenance and that of their wives, children, and servants. Thus they make the poor folk believe that the images of their gods eat and drink, dine and sup like men, and some devout persons are found who really offer to the idol twice a day, before dinner and supper, a certain sum of money. The Brahmins eat sumptuous meals to the sound of drums, and make the ignorant believe that the gods are banqueting. When they are in need of any supplies, and even before, they give out to the people that the gods are angry because the things they have asked for have not been sent, and that if the people do not take care, the gods will punish them by slaughter, disease, and the assaults of the devils. And the poor ignorant creatures, with the fear of the gods before them, obey them implicitly. These Brahmins have barely a tincture of literature, but they make up for their poverty in learning by cunning and malice. Those who belong to these parts are very indignant with me for exposing their tricks. Whenever they talk to me with no one by to hear them they acknowledge that they have no other patrimony but the idols, by their lies about which they procure their support from the people. They say that I, poor creature as I am, know more than all of them put together.
They often send me a civil message and presents, and make a great complaint when I send them all back again. Their object is to bribe me to connive at their evil deeds. So they declare that they are convinced that there is only one God, and that they will pray to Him for me. And I, to return the favor, answer whatever occurs to me, and then lay bare, as far as I can, to the ignorant people whose blind superstitions have made them their slaves, their imposture and tricks, and this has induced many to leave the worship of the false gods, and eagerly become Christians. If it were not for the opposition of the Brahmins, we should have them all embracing the religion of Jesus Christ. (St. Francis Xavier: Letter from India, to the Society of Jesus at Rome, 1543.)
Saint Francis Xavier wrote a letter to Saint Ignatius of Loyola in 1549 about the effects of paganism on the character of the Indian people:
My own and only Father in the Heart of Christ, I think that the many letters from this place which have lately been sent to Rome will inform you how prosperously the affairs of religion go on in these parts, through your prayers and the good bounty of God. But there seem to be certain things which I ought myself to speak about to you; so I will just touch on a few points relating to these parts of the world which are so distant from Rome. In the first place, the whole race of the Indians, as far as I have been able to see, is very barbarous; and it does not like to listen to anything that is not agreeable to its own manners and customs, which, as I say, are barbarous. It troubles itself very little to learn anything about divine things and things which concern salvation. Most of the Indians are of vicious disposition, and are adverse to virtue. Their instability, levity, and inconstancy of mind are incredible; they have hardly any honesty, so inveterate are their habits of sin and cheating. We have hard work here, both in keeping the Christians up to the mark and in converting the heathen. And, as we are your children, it is fair that on this account you should take great care of us and help us continually by your prayers to God. You know very well what a hard business it is to teach people who neither have any knowledge of God nor follow reason, but think it a strange and intolerable thing to be told to give up their habits of sin, which have now gained all the force of nature by long possession. Saint Francis Xavier, Letter on the Missions, to St. Ignatius de Loyola, 1549.)
Conciliarism does not speak thus of barbarians and their false religions, many of whose evil practices have been incorporated into the context of the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo service in the name of of the slogan of the "inculturation of the Gospel." Conciliarism speaks of "elements of truth" that are possessed by false religions, leaving several billion people around the world to fend for themselves throughout their lives without knowing the wonders of the true God as He has revealed Himself exclusively through the Catholic Church, without knowing how to order themselves and their societies by submitting themselves in a spirit of humility and docility to the Deposit of Fa th that God has entrusted to that Catholic Church, and without having belief in, access to or cooperation with Sanctifying Grace. "All people go to Heaven" is a commonly-held belief now amongst ordinary Catholics, including many, although not all, conciliar "bishops" and the lion's share of conciliar "priests.
The exercise that will take place at the "Pope" John Paul II Cultural Center in Washington, District of Columbia, on Thursday, April 17, 2008, is one that will be seen as yet another conciliar"papal" imprimatur put on the "worthiness" of false religions in the sight of God. This is a photo opportunity, not an exercise in "inter-religious" dialogue (as bad as that would be in its own right!), a carefully "staged" even in which Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI will show his esteem for the "gifts" presented to him by the representatives of false religions, "esteem" that will be used as valuable propaganda by adherents of false religions--and by all supporters of religious indifferentism. All of the conciliarists' protestations that their concept of false ecumenism is not an exercise in religious indifferentism is absolutely vitiated by the actions of their false "pontiffs" and false "bishops" as they "esteem" false religions and join together in the forbidden exercise of inter-religious "prayer."
Each of the representatives of the false religions who will participate in this travesty know all about the perennial teaching of the Catholic Church concerning the necessity of belief in the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as He has revealed Himself through His true Church in order to be saved. These representatives of false religions have not been living in a jungle some place out of contact with the world, people who have never heard of Our Lord or His Divine injunctions. These are people who reject Our Lord's Sacred Divinity out of hand, showing themselves to be His sworn enemies. The sworn enemies of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ are perforce the sworn enemies of social order within nations and authentic peace, that which He alone can give by means of Sanctifying Grace, among nations, and these sworn enemies of Christ the King will be given "honor" and "respect" by a man who considers himself the Vicar of Christ in a carefully planned and well-orchestrated display of sacrilege.
No one can claim that what will happen in two days was something "spontaneous" that was "thrust" upon the "poor Holy Father." The "poor Holy Father" has approved of this sacrilegious display in which he which he will commit multiple Mortal Sins against the First Commandment.
Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI desires "coexistence" with different "cultures" and "traditions," not conversion to the true Faith, certainly not the restoration of the Social Reign of Christ the King:
Of course. The purpose of the visit is precisely because I want to see again the places where I grew up, the people who touched and shaped my life. I want to thank these people. Naturally I also want to express a message that goes beyond my country, just as my ministry calls me to do. I simply let the liturgical recurrences suggest the themes to me. The basic theme is that we have to rediscover God, not just any God, but the God that has a human face, because when we see Jesus Christ we see God. Starting from this point we must find the way to meet each other in the family, among generations, and then among cultures and peoples as well. We must find the way to reconciliation and to peaceful coexistence in this world, the ways that lead to the future. We won't find these ways leading to the future if we don't receive light from above. So I didn't choose very specific themes, but rather, it is the liturgy that leads me to express the basic message of faith which naturally finds its place in everyday reality where we want to search, above all, for cooperation among peoples and possible ways that can lead us to reconciliation and peace.
Our Lord, whom Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI acknowledges as the true God, does not want "peaceful coexistence" with false religions that deny His Sacred Divinity. He wants their unconditional conversion to be sought with urgency:
Going, therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you; and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world. (Mt. 28:19-20)
To show false religions any "esteem" or "respect" whatsoever is a grave crime against the majesty and honor of God and the sanctification of human souls, upon which sanctification rests the whole of social order, a point that Pope Saint Pius X noted in Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910, and Pope Pius XI noted in Mit Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937:
Here we have, founded by Catholics, an inter-denominational association that is to work for the reform of civilization, an undertaking which is above all religious in character; for there is no true civilization without a moral civilization, and no true moral civilization without the true religion: it is a proven truth, a historical fact. The new Sillonists cannot pretend that they are merely working on “the ground of practical realities” where differences of belief do not matter. Their leader is so conscious of the influence which the convictions of the mind have upon the result of the action, that he invites them, whatever religion they may belong to, “to provide on the ground of practical realities, the proof of the excellence of their personal convictions.” And with good reason: indeed, all practical results reflect the nature of one’s religious convictions, just as the limbs of a man down to his finger-tips, owe their very shape to the principle of life that dwells in his body.
This being said, what must be thought of the promiscuity in which young Catholics will be caught up with heterodox and unbelieving folk in a work of this nature? Is it not a thousand-fold more dangerous for them than a neutral association? What are we to think of this appeal to all the heterodox, and to all the unbelievers, to prove the excellence of their convictions in the social sphere in a sort of apologetic contest? Has not this contest lasted for nineteen centuries in conditions less dangerous for the faith of Catholics? And was it not all to the credit of the Catholic Church? What are we to think of this respect for all errors, and of this strange invitation made by a Catholic to all the dissidents to strengthen their convictions through study so that they may have more and more abundant sources of fresh forces? What are we to think of an association in which all religions and even Free-Thought may express themselves openly and in complete freedom? For the Sillonists who, in public lectures and elsewhere, proudly proclaim their personal faith, certainly do not intend to silence others nor do they intend to prevent a Protestant from asserting his Protestantism, and the skeptic from affirming his skepticism. Finally, what are we to think of a Catholic who, on entering his study group, leaves his Catholicism outside the door so as not to alarm his comrades who, “dreaming of disinterested social action, are not inclined to make it serve the triumph of interests, coteries and even convictions whatever they may be”? (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)
A Christianity which keeps a grip on itself, refuses every compromise with the world, takes the commands of God and the Church seriously, preserves its love of God and of men in all its freshness, such a Christianity can be, and will be, a model and a guide to a world which is sick to death and clamors for directions, unless it be condemned to a catastrophe that would baffle the imagination.
Every true and lasting reform has ultimately sprung from the sanctity of men who were driven by the love of God and of men. Generous, ready to stand to attention to any call from God, yet confident in themselves because confident in their vocation, they grew to the size of beacons and reformers. (Pope Pius XI, Mit Brennender Sorge, March 17, 1937.)
There is only one path to the sanctification of men's souls: the Catholic Church. There is only path to the enlightenment of men's minds: the Catholic Church. There is only one path to personal and social order: the Catholic Church. Each man, whether acting individually in his own life or collectively with others in the institutions of civil governance, must submit himself at all times and without any exception whatsoever to the Deposit of Faith that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has entrusted exclusively to the Catholic Church. As the saints have taught us, there is no room for peaceful "coexistence" between the true Faith and the worship of idols of any sort, which is why the Catholic Church has sought with urgency the conversion of all men to her maternal bosom from the time of the descent of God the Holy Ghost, the Third Person of the Blessed Trinity upon the Apostles and Our Lady on Pentecost Sunday, a mission that the Catholic Church is incapable of abandoning or changing in the slightest, as Pope Pius XI noted in Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928:
So, Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, which is visible to all, and which is to remain, according to the will of its Author, exactly the same as He instituted it. During the lapse of centuries, the mystical Spouse of Christ has never been contaminated, nor can she ever in the future be contaminated, as Cyprian bears witness: "The Bride of Christ cannot be made false to her Spouse: she is incorrupt and modest. She knows but one dwelling, she guards the sanctity of the nuptial chamber chastely and modestly." The same holy Martyr with good reason marveled exceedingly that anyone could believe that "this unity in the Church which arises from a divine foundation, and which is knit together by heavenly sacraments, could be rent and torn asunder by the force of contrary wills." For since the mystical body of Christ, in the same manner as His physical body, is one, compacted and fitly joined together, it were foolish and out of place to say that the mystical body is made up of members which are disunited and scattered abroad: whosoever therefore is not united with the body is no member of it, neither is he in communion with Christ its head.
Furthermore, in this one Church of Christ no man can be or remain who does not accept, recognize and obey the authority and supremacy of Peter and his legitimate successors. Did not the ancestors of those who are now entangled in the errors of Photius and the reformers, obey the Bishop of Rome, the chief shepherd of souls? Alas their children left the home of their fathers, but it did not fall to the ground and perish for ever, for it was supported by God. Let them therefore return to their common Father, who, forgetting the insults previously heaped on the Apostolic See, will receive them in the most loving fashion. For if, as they continually state, they long to be united with Us and ours, why do they not hasten to enter the Church, "the Mother and mistress of all Christ's faithful"? Let them hear Lactantius crying out: "The Catholic Church is alone in keeping the true worship. This is the fount of truth, this the house of Faith, this the temple of God: if any man enter not here, or if any man go forth from it, he is a stranger to the hope of life and salvation. Let none delude himself with obstinate wrangling. For life and salvation are here concerned, which will be lost and entirely destroyed, unless their interests are carefully and assiduously kept in mind."
Let, therefore, the separated children draw nigh to the Apostolic See, set up in the City which Peter and Paul, the Princes of the Apostles, consecrated by their blood; to that See, We repeat, which is "the root and womb whence the Church of God springs," not with the intention and the hope that "the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth" will cast aside the integrity of the faith and tolerate their errors, but, on the contrary, that they themselves submit to its teaching and government. Would that it were Our happy lot to do that which so many of Our predecessors could not, to embrace with fatherly affection those children, whose unhappy separation from Us We now bewail. Would that God our Savior, "Who will have all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth," would hear us when We humbly beg that He would deign to recall all who stray to the unity of the Church! In this most important undertaking We ask and wish that others should ask the prayers of Blessed Mary the Virgin, Mother of divine grace, victorious over all heresies and Help of Christians, that She may implore for Us the speedy coming of the much hoped-for day, when all men shall hear the voice of Her divine Son, and shall be "careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace."
At a time when many secular newspapers are publishing articles totally misreading the mind of Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, portraying him to be a "doctrinal conservative" when he is a thorough-going Modernist and an produce of the New Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar and Henri de Lubac and Maurice Blondel and, at least to a certain extent, Karl Rahner, we must understand that the current head of the counterfeit church of conciliarism thinks nothing of giving great offenses to God as he "esteems" the symbols of false religions, thinks it of no account to God to enter into Talmudic synagogues to pay his "respects" to a false religion, and defies even the Apostle to the Gentiles, Saint Paul, by daring to engage in the forbidden exercise of the sacrilege of "inter-religious" prayer meetings, and by capping all of this off by refusing to pray in the Holy Name of the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, in "mixed company" at the former site of the twin towers of the World Trade Center in the Borough of Manhattan. Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict has remained, to use his words, "identical" in all essential things throughout his priesthood:
I've been taken apart various times: in my first phase as professor and in the intermediate phase, during my first phase as Cardinal and in the successive phase. Now comes a new division. Of course circumstances and situations and even people influence you because you take on different responsibilities. Let's say that my basic personality and even my basic vision have grown, but in everything that is essential I have remained identical. I'm happy that certain aspects that weren't noticed at first are now coming into the open. (Benedict XVI's interview with Bayerische Rundfunk, ZDF, Deutsche Welle.)
Reparation. We need to make reparation for these offenses against God and His greater honor and glory. What better day on which to make reparation than a Friday, the day on which He offered up His life to redeem us on the wood of the Holy Cross? What better way to make reparation than by praying all fifteen decades of Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary, the very spiritual weapon that she gave to Saint Dominic de Guzman, the founder of the Order of Preachers, to combat the Albigensian heresy, the very weapon that defeated the Mohammedan fleet in the Battle of Lepanto on October 7, 1571, and was used by King Jan Sobieski of Poland to vanquish the Mohammedans in the Battle at the Gates of Vienna on September 13, 1683, the very weapon that turned back Calvinist fleets before they could attack and invade Lima, Peru, and The Philippines, the very weapon that Our Lady told Jacinta and Francisco Marto and Lucia dos Santos to use to save poor sinners from Hell and to make reparation for their own sins and those of the whole world? What better weapon do we have to make reparation for our sins and those of the whole world, including those of the conciliarists as they blaspheme God and engage in unspeakable sacrileges.
Once again, let us use this coming Friday, April 18, 2008, as a day of reparation for the offenses being given to God this week by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI. May our prayers in reparation for these offenses be offered to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary. May we be content in playing a role, no matter how small, in seeking to repair the damage to the honor and glory of God and the scandalous example given to Catholics and non-Catholics alike by the horrible specter of a man purporting to be the Vicar of Christ esteeming the symbols of false religions that deny the Sacred Divinity of the very One Whose Vicar he believes, albeit falsely, to be.
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us!
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.