Making Us Our Own Jailers
Thomas A. Droleskey
One of the great ironies of the situation we find ourselves in at this moment in salvation history is to be found in the simple fact that the enemies of the Social Reign of Christ the King have coerced us into becoming our own jailers. This is true on several levels (civil, socioeconomic, ecclesiastical). Bear with me as I seek to explain this reality.
Insofar as the civil state is concerned, we have been forced by the coercive power of the civil state into becoming material cooperators in and financiers of all manner of abject evils.
To wit, we are taxed to support immoral and unjust wars that put members of our own armed forces at risk needlessly as various multinational corporations are enriched by the systematic destruction and then rebuilding of sovereign nations. The careful use of slogans and the equally careful control of images broadcast over the television and on the internet desensitize us to the fact that innocent human beings have been wounded and killed to promote the myth of the "American way" of egalitarianism and "democracy" and "pluralism."
To wit, we are taxed to support the indoctrination of children in America's concentration camps--public schools--in direct violation of the basic Natural Law right of parents as the principal educators of their children. This taxpayer-subsidized indoctrination has already prepared large numbers of younger Americans to accept limitations on their legitimate liberties in the name of "helping the government manage crises" and to accept uncritically the lies of moral relativism, evolutionism, environmentalism, feminism, egalitarianism, and a whole host of other naturalist beliefs. A secular "religion" has thus been subsidized by taxpayer dollars that has created enmities between husbands and wives, many of whom battle over the content of their children's education, and between parents and children, who engage in battles engendered by the "teachers" telling children that the "old-fashioned" parents are wrong to insist on moral absolutes. This is all quite insidious. And we are compelled to fund this indoctrination.
It is no wonder that sixty-seven percent of voters between the ages of eighteen and twenty-nine voted for the Marxist-trained Barack Hussein Obama on March 4, 2009, a simple fact that those who believe that there is some "political" or "electoral" way out of our imprisonment to the lords of Modernity cannot ignore. Public schools are producing, at least for the most part, ready agents to submit passively to whatever the "government" or other agents of the leftist brand of naturalism tell them to do and to believe. The "votes" to retard this politically are not "there" now, and they won't be there in the future (as I demonstrate empirically below).
To wit, we are taxed to support the slaughter of the preborn, both by chemical and surgical means, at all three levels of government (state, local, national). We are compelled to become material cooperators in the mystical dismemberment of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the persons of innocent preborn children in their mothers' wombs under cover of law.
To wit, we are taxed to indemnify the corporate irresponsibility of the multinational entities that have "outsourced" American jobs overseas, trapped many Americans into massive amounts of debt to finance the purchasing of basic necessities (houses, cars, furniture, appliances) from which many will never be freed, and whose executives grow fat off of the usurious interest rates charged by banks to finance their lavish ways.
Mr. Stephen Hand of the Traditional Catholic Reflections blog summarized this aspect of our imprisonment to the forces of statism and corporate greed very well (and I thank him for giving me permission to use his wonderful summary of how we have become our own jailers):
--->How did the FED do it? They create a bubble. Give everyone "free" credit, plastic cards, paradise, cheap mortgages, encourage the Middle Class to buy into the stock market, creating new kinds of stocks and "savings" plans that enable them to do it. Then Pow! In the fullness of time they (The Fed) give the orders to the banks to stop all credit, call in debts, force bankruptcies, burst the bubble, forcing people on to the streets, forcing businesses to close so they can buy up the "bad assets!", everything from homes and land to the nation's infrastructure; in effect buying nations and then selling pieces to foreign interests in the interests of a homogenized "globalization". A 'World' Bank now is ready to collect 'carbon' taxes and more from all nations, a global currency too.
He who holds the purse owns the king. The joke is on us for confusing debt for wealth, and for allowing foreign, off-shore Central banks to control governments. The Fed knows the Game well and to [Hades] with the "little" people! (Traditional Catholic Reflections and Reports (c)--edited by Stephen Hand)
We are, of course, coerced by this socioeconomic realm that is now being indemnified for its irresponsibility by the money we pay (and that future generations will pay) in taxes into accepting whatever it is they sell us.
We are imprisoned into accepting genetically-altered food, which God intended of its very nature to be healthy (there is really no such thing as "health food" as food is supposed to be healthy), and into accepting "pills" made in Red China and sold by multinational pharmaceutical companies as the means to "remedy" all physical and/or emotional ailments, real or imagined, many of which ailments are caused by the food (and food additives) that is itself manufactured in Red China, which is, of course, subsidized in its various policies of repression by the fact that we are more or less coerced into buying almost everything we use from its production lines.
We are imprisoned into funding Planned Parenthood and organizations that exist to promote the "rights" of those steeped in sins against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments by the purchases we make and by the banks with which we do business.
This is all the result of the very false premises of the political and socioeconomic structures that have arisen as a result of the Protestant Revolt and the rise of Judeo-Masonry. This passage from Dr. George O'Brien's
An Essay on the Economic Efforts of the Reformation:
The thesis we have endeavoured to present in this essay is, that the two great dominating schools of modern economic thought have a common origin. The capitalist school, which, basing its position on the unfettered right of the individual to do what he will with his own, demands the restriction of government interference in economic and social affairs within the narrowest possible limits, and the socialist school, which, basing its position on the complete subordination of the individual to society, demands the socialization of all the means of production, if not all of wealth, face each other today as the only two solutions of the social question; they are bitterly hostile towards each other, and mutually intolerant and each is at the same weakened and provoked by the other. In one respect, and in one respect only, are they identical--they can both be shown to be the result of the Protestant Reformation.
We have seen the direct connection which exists between these modern schools of economic thought and their common ancestor. Capitalism found its roots in the intensely individualistic spirit of Protestantism, in the spread of anti-authoritative ideas from the realm of religion into the realm of political and social thought, and, above all, in the distinctive Calvinist doctrine of a successful and prosperous career being the outward and visible sign by which the regenerated might be known. Socialism, on the other hand, derived encouragement from the violations of established and prescriptive rights of which the Reformation afforded so many examples, from the growth of heretical sects tainted with Communism, and from the overthrow of the orthodox doctrine on original sin, which opened the way to the idea of the perfectibility of man through institutions. But, apart from these direct influences, there were others, indirect, but equally important. Both these great schools of economic thought are characterized by exaggerations and excesses; the one lays too great stress on the importance of the individual, and other on the importance of the community; they are both departures, in opposite directions, from the correct mean of reconciliation and of individual liberty with social solidarity. These excesses and exaggerations are the result of the free play of private judgment unguided by authority, and could not have occurred if Europe had continued to recognize an infallible central authority in ethical affairs.
The science of economics is the science of men's relations with one another in the domain of acquiring and disposing of wealth, and is, therefore, like political science in another sphere, a branch of the science of ethics. In the Middle Ages, man's ethical conduct, like his religious conduct, was under the supervision and guidance of a single authority, which claimed at the same time the right to define and to enforce its teaching. The machinery for enforcing the observance of medieval ethical teaching was of a singularly effective kind; pressure was brought to bear upon the conscience of the individual through the medium of compulsory periodical consultations with a trained moral adviser, who was empowered to enforce obedience to his advice by the most potent spiritual sanctions. In this way, the whole conduct of man in relation to his neighbours was placed under the immediate guidance of the universally received ethical preceptor, and a common standard of action was ensured throughout the Christian world in the all the affairs of life. All economic transactions in particular were subject to the jealous scrutiny of the individual's spiritual director; and such matters as sales, loans, and so on, were considered reprehensible and punishable if not conducted in accordance with the Christian standards of commutative justice.
The whole of this elaborate system for the preservation of justice in the affairs of everyday life was shattered by the Reformation. The right of private judgment, which had first been asserted in matters of faith, rapidly spread into moral matters, and the attack on the dogmatic infallibility of the Church left Europe without an authority to which it could appeal on moral questions. The new Protestant churches were utterly unable to supply this want. The principle of private judgment on which they rested deprived them of any right to be listened to whenever they attempted to dictate moral precepts to their members, and henceforth the moral behaviour of the individual became a matter to be regulated by the promptings of his own conscience, or by such philosophical systems of ethics as he happened to approve. The secular state endeavoured to ensure that dishonesty amounting to actual theft or fraud should be kept in check, but this was a poor and ineffective substitute for the powerful weapon of the confessional. Authority having once broken down, it was but a single step from Protestantism to rationalism; and the way was opened to the development of all sorts of erroneous systems of morality. (Dr. George O'Brien, An Essay on the Economic Efforts of the Reformation, IHS Press, Norfolk, Virginia, 2003.)
Although the Catholic Church proposes no binding, definitive "models" of civil governance or economics as these are outside of her competency, she does have the eternal truths contained in the Deposit of Faith by which to bind the consciences of men as they seek to devise forms of civil governance and economic systems that advance the common temporal good in light of man's Last End. It is the abandonment of the Social Reign of Christ the King and of the organizing of man's social and economic life according to his eternal destiny that has made us material cooperators in imprisoning ourselves to the self-interests of the leaders of the two principal organized crime families of naturalism in the United States of America, the Republican Party and the Democrat Party, leaders who are themselves tied to the self-interests of the multi-national corporations and the State of Israel which has many ties, military and economic, to Red China.
Anyone who thinks that there is a "political" way out of this jail is not really thinking too clearly. As noted a short while ago, the "votes" aren't "there" to extricate us from the spread of the errors of Russia that have made us cooperators in the transformation of the United States of America into a fully socialist state, which is, of course, but the logical consequence of the false, naturalistic, anti-Incarnational, religiously indifferentist and semi-Pelagian premises upon which the founding was based.
Just take a look at the results of 2008 presidential election to realize that the "protest" candidates," including the leftists Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney and the libertarian Bob Barr and the fully pro-life Protestant Chuck Baldwin, pulled an aggregate of 1.40% of the popular vote on November 4, 2008. That's right, 1.40% of the popular vote, and one of those votes was cast for me (and I didn't vote). Anyone who thinks that some "new" effort will change this is not looking at our situation clearly:
Other: 226,908 0.17%
How many Americans paid any attention to the campaigns of the minor party candidates? How many will do so in the future? Not many. Those who do not accept this fact are refusing to learn the lessons that the history of this country has taught us: the American electoral process produces naturalism no matter who gets elected. The false opposites of the "left" and the "right" put on a good show during election campaigns and during various policy debates. When all is said and done, however, naturalism wins. Naturalism wins all of the time. All of the time. Those who do not see or accept this will continue to spin their wheels as modern-day, real-life examples of Sisyphus as they keep getting crushed by those boulders that they attempt to push up mountains (see
It's Still a World of Sisyphuses).
One of the reasons that our imprisonment to the forces of Modernity is so intractable is that the forces of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism have made their "reconciliation" with the false premises of the modern civil state.
Catholics yet attached to the counterfeit church of conciliarism find themselves subsidizing the spiritual abortion of souls from the pulpit and in allegedly "Catholic" schools and colleges and universities and seminaries and professional schools.
Catholics attached to the counterfeit church of conciliarism have helped to subsidize the Novus Ordo, which is offensive to God in se and gives rise to abuses that are "unapproved" by the conciliar authorities, thereby accruing a massive international debt that is owed to God for these offenses.
Catholics attached to the counterfeit church of conciliarism have helped to subsidize the corruption of the young by "priests" and have subsidized the protection of these "priests" by chancery offices and the attorneys they have hired, only to be asked to help to subsidize the over $2 billion in payments that have had to be made to the victims of this "episcopal" and "clerical" corruption.
Catholics attached to the counterfeit church of conciliarism have helped to subsidize various "inter-religious" prayer meetings and youth jamborees and have paid for chancery and parish officials to attend conferences to further the doctrinal and liturgical agendas of the conciliar revolution.
Catholics attached to the counterfeit church of conciliarism have helped to subsidize "papal" offenses against God by means of their "Peter's Pence" contributions, including the establishment of an "ecumenical chapel" in the Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls in Rome, Italy, where God, who hates false religions, can be offended by various blasphemies.
It must be remembered, of course, that God hates Protestantism and wants the unconditional conversion of those steeped in this multitudinous sects to His one and only true Church, something that pope after pope has made clear, something that the Mother of God herself made clear to the apostate Pierre Port-Combet on March 25, 1656:
Heaven was watching over Pierre and after seven years, on March 25, 1656, Our Lady appeared to him. On that day, Pierre was working in the field and saw a Lady standing far away on a little hill. The Lady wore a white dress, a blue mantle and had a black veil over her head, which partly covered her face. As the Lady came toward Pierre, she suddenly picked up speed and in a flash, she stood beside him. With her beautiful, sweet voice, the Lady spoke to Pierre, "God be with you my friend!"
For a moment, Pierre stood in amazement. The Lady spoke again, "What is being said about this devotion? Do many people come?"
Pierre replied, "Yes many people come,"
Then the Lady said, "Where does that heretic live who cut the willow tree? Does he not want to be converted?"
Pierre mumbled an answer. The Lady became more serious, "Do you think that I do not know that you are the heretic? Realize that your end is at hand. If you do not return to the True Faith, you will be cast into Hell! But if you change your beliefs, I shall protect you before God. Tell people to pray that they may gain the good graces which, God in His mercy has offered to them."
Pierre was filled with sorrow and shame and moved away from the Lady. Suddenly realizing that he was being rude, Pierre stepped closer to her, but she had moved away and was already near the little hill. He ran after her begging, "Please stop and listen to me. I want to apologize to you and I want you to help me!"
The Lady stopped and turned. By the time Pierre caught up to her, she was floating in the air and was already disappearing from sight. Suddenly, Pierre realized that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary had appeared to him! He fell to his knees and cried buckets of tears, "Jesus and Mary I promise you that I will change my life and become a good Catholic. I am sorry for what I have done and I beg you please, to help me change my life…" (Our Lady of the Willow Tree.)
It is for this reason that so many who do not share “the communion and the truth of the Catholic Church” must make use of the occasion of the Council, by the means of the Catholic Church, which received in Her bosom their ancestors, proposes [further] demonstration of profound unity and of firm vital force; hear the requirements [demands] of her heart, they must engage themselves to leave this state that does not guarantee for them the security of salvation. She does not hesitate to raise to the Lord of mercy most fervent prayers to tear down of the walls of division, to dissipate the haze of errors, and lead them back within holy Mother Church, where their Ancestors found salutary pastures of life; where, in an exclusive way, is conserved and transmitted whole the doctrine of Jesus Christ and wherein is dispensed the mysteries of heavenly grace.
It is therefore by force of the right of Our supreme Apostolic ministry, entrusted to us by the same Christ the Lord, which, having to carry out with [supreme] participation all the duties of the good Shepherd and to follow and embrace with paternal love all the men of the world, we send this Letter of Ours to all the Christians from whom We are separated, with which we exhort them warmly and beseech them with insistence to hasten to return to the one fold of Christ; we desire in fact from the depths of the heart their salvation in Christ Jesus, and we fear having to render an account one day to Him, Our Judge, if, through some possibility, we have not pointed out and prepared the way for them to attain eternal salvation. In all Our prayers and supplications, with thankfulness, day and night we never omit to ask for them, with humble insistence, from the eternal Shepherd of souls the abundance of goods and heavenly graces. And since, if also, we fulfill in the earth the office of vicar, with all our heart we await with open arms the return of the wayward sons to the Catholic Church, in order to receive them with infinite fondness into the house of the Heavenly Father and to enrich them with its inexhaustible treasures. By our greatest wish for the return to the truth and the communion with the Catholic Church, upon which depends not only the salvation of all of them, but above all also of the whole Christian society: the entire world in fact cannot enjoy true peace if it is not of one fold and one shepherd (Pope Pius IX, Iam Vos Omnes, September 13, 1868.)
Catholics yet attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism have donated the monies that the lords of conciliarism have used to spit in the face of the Mother of God and of one true pope after another as they reaffirm adherents of false religions in beliefs that do not "guarantee for them the security of salvation." They have donated the monies that have been used to incorporate pagan rituals into the context of what have been purported to be Catholic "liturgies." They have donated the monies that have been used for "workshops" and "breakout sessions" and "conferences" that have deformed the souls of priests and consecrated religious and members of the laity. They have donated the monies that have been used to purchase textbooks full of heresy and moral relativism. They have donated the monies that have paid the salaries of priests living lives of unrepentant sin, both natural and unnatural, as the conciliar "bishops," having lost, at least in very large measure, a sense of sin, have themselves reaffirmed those living in such states of sin.
The apostasies and blasphemies and sacrileges propagated by the counterfeit church of conciliarism have made it more possible for Catholics to become the willing slaves of the lords of Modernity's multiple naturalist lies and schemes. A respect for errors in the Order of Grace will lead to a respect for errors in the Order of Nature and, of course, vice versa.
Pope Saint Pius X wrote about this in Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910:
Here we have, founded by Catholics, an inter-denominational association that is to work for the reform of civilization, an undertaking which is above all religious in character; for there is no true civilization without a moral civilization, and no true moral civilization without the true religion: it is a proven truth, a historical fact. The new Sillonists cannot pretend that they are merely working on “the ground of practical realities” where differences of belief do not matter. Their leader is so conscious of the influence which the convictions of the mind have upon the result of the action, that he invites them, whatever religion they may belong to, “to provide on the ground of practical realities, the proof of the excellence of their personal convictions.” And with good reason: indeed, all practical results reflect the nature of one’s religious convictions, just as the limbs of a man down to his finger-tips, owe their very shape to the principle of life that dwells in his body.
This being said, what must be thought of the promiscuity in which young Catholics will be caught up with heterodox and unbelieving folk in a work of this nature? Is it not a thousand-fold more dangerous for them than a neutral association? What are we to think of this appeal to all the heterodox, and to all the unbelievers, to prove the excellence of their convictions in the social sphere in a sort of apologetic contest? Has not this contest lasted for nineteen centuries in conditions less dangerous for the faith of Catholics? And was it not all to the credit of the Catholic Church? What are we to think of this respect for all errors, and of this strange invitation made by a Catholic to all the dissidents to strengthen their convictions through study so that they may have more and more abundant sources of fresh forces? What are we to think of an association in which all religions and even Free-Thought may express themselves openly and in complete freedom? For the Sillonists who, in public lectures and elsewhere, proudly proclaim their personal faith, certainly do not intend to silence others nor do they intend to prevent a Protestant from asserting his Protestantism, and the skeptic from affirming his skepticism. Finally, what are we to think of a Catholic who, on entering his study group, leaves his Catholicism outside the door so as not to alarm his comrades who, “dreaming of disinterested social action, are not inclined to make it serve the triumph of interests, coteries and even convictions whatever they may be”? Such is the profession of faith of the New Democratic Committee for Social Action which has taken over the main objective of the previous organization and which, they say, “breaking the double meaning which surround the Greater Sillon both in reactionary and anti-clerical circles”, is now open to all men “who respect moral and religious forces and who are convinced that no genuine social emancipation is possible without the leaven of generous idealism.” (Pope Saint Pius X, Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910.)
Just as we have paid to be imprisoned by the organized forces of naturalism that control the civil state, so is the case that Catholics yet attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism have paid for the destruction of the Faith as God Himself has been offended and blasphemed. They have paid for the construction the "strange new church" prophesied by the Venerable Anne Katherine Emmerich:
I saw a strange church being built against every rule. . . No angels were supervising the building operations. In that church, nothing came from high above. . . There was only division and chaos. It is probably a church of human creation, following the latest fashion, as well as the new heterodox church of Rome, which seems of the same kind. . .
I saw again the strange big church that was being built there (in Rome). There was nothing holy in it. I saw this just as I saw a movement led by Ecclesiastics to which contributed angels, saints and other Christians. But then (in the strange big change) all the work was being done mechanically (i.e. according to set rules and formulae). Everything was being done according to human reason. . .
I saw all sorts of people, things, doctrines, and opinions. There was something proud, presumptuous, and violent about it, and they seemed to be very successful. I did not see a single Angel nor a single saint helping in the work. But far away in the background, I saw the seat of a cruel people armed with spears, and I saw a laughing figure which said: "Do build it as solid as you can; we will put it to the ground" . . . . (as found in Yves Dupont, Catholic Prophecy: The Coming Chastisement, TAN Books and Publishers, 1970, p. 61)
Although "we" are not going to solve the problems afflicting the Church Militant on earth and society-at-large, we can extricate ourselves, at least to a certain degree, from our "imprisonment" in the social realm by coming to accept the simple truth that no political effort has thus far--or ever will--retard the growth of naturalism anywhere on the face of this earth. It is indeed quite liberating to free oneself from the lies of the naturalists and from the useless, if not sinful, expenditure of our time and money on political efforts that have no reasonable chance of success as they are ignored by somewhere around 98.6% of the electorate. And those Catholics yet attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism can free themselves from imprisonment to a false religion by fleeing from what His Excellency Bishop Robert F. McKenna, O.P., calls the "concentration camp" of their local dioceses and parishes.
The Catholic Church cannot be responsible for the apostasies and novelties and blasphemies and sacrileges associated with the "Second" Vatican Council and its aftermath, which, of course, includes the abominable Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo service. Catholics need to liberate themselves not only from the diocesan structures to recognize this, those whose view of the papacy and the nature of the Church's infallibility has been corrupted by the Gallican errors of the Society of Saint Pius X must come to accept the teaching of the Catholic Church, that she cannot give us errors of any kind, including liturgies suspected of deficiency and that give rise to one abuse after another, at any time:
As for the rest, We greatly deplore the fact that, where the ravings of human reason extend, there is somebody who studies new things and strives to know more than is necessary, against the advice of the apostle. There you will find someone who is overconfident in seeking the truth outside the Catholic Church, in which it can be found without even a light tarnish of error. Therefore, the Church is called, and is indeed, a pillar and foundation of truth. You correctly understand, venerable brothers, that We speak here also of that erroneous philosophical system which was recently brought in and is clearly to be condemned. This system, which comes from the contemptible and unrestrained desire for innovation, does not seek truth where it stands in the received and holy apostolic inheritance. Rather, other empty doctrines, futile and uncertain doctrines not approved by the Church, are adopted. Only the most conceited men wrongly think that these teachings can sustain and support that truth. (Pope Gregory XVI, Singulari Nos, May 25, 1834.)
For the teaching authority of the Church, which in the divine wisdom was constituted on earth in order that revealed doctrines might remain intact for ever, and that they might be brought with ease and security to the knowledge of men, and which is daily exercised through the Roman Pontiff and the Bishops who are in communion with him. . . . (Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.)
Ultimately, however, we must recognize that it is our sins that imprison us more and more to the falsehoods of the day. We must make extra efforts this Lent to divest ourselves of our sins as we cooperate with the graces that have been won for us by the shedding of every single drop of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Most Precious Blood that flow unto our hearts and souls through loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces, to quit our sins once and for all and to make reparation for them to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary as we pray as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit.
Saint Joseph will help us in our quest to escape from the imprisonment to the falsehoods in which we find ourselves. He will help us in our quest for personal sanctity if only we ask to him to protect us the way that he protected the Holy Family from the time Saint Gabriel the Archangel reassured him as follows:
When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child, of the Holy Ghost. Whereupon Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing publicly to expose her, was minded to put her away privately. But while he thought on these things, behold the angel of the Lord appeared to him in his sleep, saying: Joseph, son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife, for that which is conceived in her, is of the Holy Ghost. (Matthew 1: 18-20.)
Entrusting ourselves to the care of Our Lady and that of her Most Chaste Spouse, Saint Joseph, may we continue to live as free men who cling exclusively to true bishops and true priests who make no concessions to conciliarism or to the nonexistent legitimacy of its false shepherds, true bishops and true priests who recognize the lies of Modernity and Modernism and who attempt to plant the seeds for the day when all men and women will, with hearts consecrated to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, exclaim:
Viva Cristo Rey!
Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon.
Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us!
Saint Joseph, Patron of Departing Souls, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
See also: A Litany of Saints
Isn't time to pray a Rosary now?