Lyndon Baines Walker Bush Obama
(Or The Real Enemy Is Still Within)
by Thomas A. Droleskey
As critical as I was--and remain--of former President George Walker Bush, I do give the former Naturalist-in-Chief of the United States of America credit for having a set of simple, core beliefs about the world. Those beliefs were false. They were delusional. They exploded in his face over the course of the eight years of his presidency.
Nevertheless, my good and extremely few readers, George Walker Bush was committed to his belief that American "exceptionalism" had to be exported throughout the world as he stubbornly kept pouring troops and money into stabilizing a country, Iraq, that he destabilized and whose infrastructure he destroyed almost entirely. George Walker Bush, a morally obtuse man who believed that God Himself spoke ot him, will go to his grave convinced of the moral righteousness of his immoral war, which was conducted in full violations of the principles of the Just War Theory and outside of the framework of the Constitution of the United States of America itself, which happens make American military action contingent upon a declaration of war as stipulated in Section 8 of Article I.
Barack Hussein Obama has no such convictions about American military action. The speech that he gave about American military action in Afghanistan at the United States Military Academy in West Point, New York, on Tuesday, December 1, 2009, was cobbled together to give the appearance of doing something to fight the the forces of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist network and to force members of the indigenous Taliban in Afghanistan to become working partners with the corrupt government of Hamid Karzai, recently "re-elected" in an election rife with fraud, or be killed. Lyndon Baines Walker Bush Obama offered a little something for the "hawks" as he promised a commitment of 30,000 troops to be sent immediately into Afghanistan, and he offered a little something for the "doves" as he promised that he would start withdrawing American combat troops at the end of 2011, just in time for the start of the 2012 presidential primary and caucus season.
There are only a few salient points that need to be made in what I hope will be a very brief article.
First, American involvement in Afghanistan, which has been justified as a response to the attacks that took place on the United States of America on September 11, 2001, that were masterminded by Osama bin Laden and his deputies, especially Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who will be tried in a civilian court in the City of New York, New York, next year, fails according to the precepts of the Just War Theory on several grounds:
Although there has been a wound to justice caused by the attacks upon the soil of the United States of America, there is no clearly defined goal to be accomplished in the prosecution of a war against mountain tribesmen who know how to hide in rugged terrain and to wait until the heavy artillery of American forces is withdrawn
No American policy-maker, including Barack Hussein Obama, has ever been able to give a clear, coherent idea as to what would constitute "victory" in Afghanistan? The capture and killing of Osama bin Laden, for example, does not guarantee that al-Qaeda or the Taliban would be stopped for any length of time.
A commitment of military forces into a conflict that has no clearly defined goals for victory is in se immoral.
Second, Caesar Obamus has told the Taliban that all they have to do is wait until the end of 2011 for them to resume attacks to seek de facto control of most of Afghanistan, if not control of the city of Kabul itself, where "President" Karzai is largely viewed as the "Mayor" of that city and nothing more in that forces loyal to him control very little of the rest of the country.
Third, the Taliban will escalate their attacks near the end of 2011 to make it difficult, it not impossible, for Obama to withdraw American troops according to the timetable announced two days ago. Obama will thus be forced with a decision to leave Afghanistan in a mess to satisfy his "left" flank or to keep the troops to satisfy his "right" flank in the American electorate who want Afghanistan to be as much of a "success" as Iraq.
Fourth, it is sheer madness to believe that foreign forces can do anything in Afghanistan except get killed. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics lost in Afghanistan after ten grueling years there. The United States of America has been there now for ninety-eight months, just twenty-two months shy of ten years.
Fifth, al-Qaeda has shifted its operations to Pakistan, another corrupt Asian regime that is supported by the murderous Red Chinese thugs. This is why there is not real effort on the part of the United States of America to use strategic forces in Pakistan to ferret out terrorist cells. A debtor nation, the United States of America, cannot afford to offend its chief creditor, the so-called "People's Republic of China.
Sixth, there is the nasty, little inconvenient fact that Article I, Section 8, Subsection 11 of the Constitution of the United States of America states the Congress of the United States of America lone has the power to:
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
It is not possible for the government of the United States of America to stabilize all of the volatile regions of the world. Terrorist cells are going to exist in various places in the world, especially as the America government continue its slavish support for the State of Israel and its government's persecution of Palestinian Arabs. One of the ways to secure the United States of America is to secure her borders, a duty that is incumbent upon anyone serving as president of this country, and this means that the free flow of Mohammedans into this country must be stopped. One of the men involved in the February 26, 1993, bombing of the north tower of the World Trade Center in the Borough of Manhattan of the City of New York, New York, Ramzi Yousef, listed his occupation as follows on his A-95 immigration form as he entered the United States of America shortly before the bombing: "Terrorist." The man was admitted into the country without a problem. Such is the state of political correctness that the borders of the United States of America cannot be secured by keeping out those who have proved themselves to be threats to our country's national security.
Bush the Lesser, who believed that he could spread the American "way" around the world, and Obama the Red, despite all of their other myriad differences, are joined at the hip in representing the false religion of Mohammedanism as one of "peace" that has been "perverted" or "distorted" by the lies of various terrorists:
The terrorists practice a fringe form of Islamic extremism that has been rejected by Muslim scholars and the vast majority of Muslim clerics -- a fringe movement that perverts the peaceful teachings of Islam. The terrorists' directive commands them to kill Christians and Jews, to kill all Americans, and make no distinction among military and civilians, including women and children. . . .
I also want to speak tonight directly to Muslims throughout the world. We respect your faith. It's practiced freely by many millions of Americans, and by millions more in countries that America counts as friends. Its teachings are good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of Allah blaspheme the name of Allah. (Applause.) The terrorists are traitors to their own faith, trying, in effect, to hijack Islam itself. The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends; it is not our many Arab friends. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists, and every government that supports them. (Applause.) (George Walker Bush, Address to the Nation, September 20, 2001.)
As we know, these men belonged to al Qaeda – a group of extremists who have distorted and defiled Islam, one of the world's great religions, to justify the slaughter of innocents. Al Qaeda's base of operations was in Afghanistan, where they were harbored by the Taliban – a ruthless, repressive and radical movement that seized control of that country after it was ravaged by years of Soviet occupation and civil war, and after the attention of America and our friends had turned elsewhere.
Just days after 9/11, Congress authorized the use of force against al Qaeda and those who harbored them – an authorization that continues to this day. The vote in the Senate was 98 to 0. The vote in the House was 420 to 1. For the first time in its history, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization invoked Article 5 – the commitment that says an attack on one member nation is an attack on all. And the United Nations Security Council endorsed the use of all necessary steps to respond to the 9/11 attacks. America, our allies and the world were acting as one to destroy al Qaeda's terrorist network, and to protect our common security. (Barack Hussein Obama, Address on the War in Afghanistan, December 2, 2009.)
This kind of insane political correctness, which is practiced also on occasion by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, keeps American policymakers from admitting that Mohammedanism of its demonic nature is an assault against God and seeks to destroy those who will not follow its false "god" and its false teachings, therefore predisposing them to let domestic terror cells form in the United States of America as a result of immigration laws based on political correctness and electoral self-interest. Weak, cowardly American politicians have made this country unsafe by their refusal to keep out those who seek to dominate here as they are now dominating throughout parts of Europe.
Moreover, of course, the United States of America has become a target of terrorist acts in large measure because its laws impose terrorism upon nearly four thousand innocent preborn babies every day while countless thousands more are killed as a result of chemical abortifacients. No country that imposes this kind of domestic terrorism from within is going to be immune from attacks from without by committed killers who have no more regard for our lives that we do for the weakest and most defenseless amongst us, little babies in their mothers' wombs.
The pro-abortion Barack Hussein Obama, who has issued executive orders that have resulted in the deaths of innocent babies with our own taxpayer monies, had the audacity--and he is, after all, nothing if not audacious--to speak of American "values" as the foundation for securing the United States of America:
It's easy to forget that when this war began, we were united -- bound together by the fresh memory of a horrific attack, and by the determination to defend our homeland and the values we hold dear. I refuse to accept the notion that we cannot summon that unity again. (Applause.) I believe with every fiber of my being that we -- as Americans -- can still come together behind a common purpose. For our values are not simply words written into parchment -- they are a creed that calls us together, and that has carried us through the darkest of storms as one nation, as one people.
There is only one path to true peace, my good and extremely few readers, and that is through the Immaculate Heart of Mary and her Fatima Message.
Our Blessed Lord and Saviour, who was born for us in utter poverty in the wood of the manger, a feeding trough for animals, has entrusted the cause of authentic peace, that which is given by Him alone, to the Immaculate Heart of His Most Blessed Mother. We are suffering through a major chastisement as a result of the fact that two popes devoted to the Social Kinship of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Pope Pius XI and Pope Pius XII, failed to fulfill the request made by Our Lady to Sister Lucia in 1929 for the collegial consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart by a pope with all of the world's bishops.
We must suffer--and suffer well--this chastisement as we attempt to make reparation for our own sins, which are so responsible for the state of the Church Militant on earth and the state of the world-at-large, by living more penitentially, especially during this season of Advent, and accepting with joy and gratitude each cross that comes our way, recognizing that each and every cross has been perfectly fashioned for us from all eternity by the very hand of God Himself.
Although Pope Pius XI did not heed Our Lady's request, he did leave us with a great body of writing in defense of the truths of the true Faith. His very motto, "The Peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ," was reflected in his first encyclical letter, Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio, December 23, 1922:
It is, therefore, a fact which cannot be questioned that the true peace of Christ can only exist in the Kingdom of Christ -- "the peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ." It is no less unquestionable that, in doing all we can to bring about the re-establishment of Christ's kingdom, we will be working most effectively toward a lasting world peace.
Pius X in taking as his motto "To restore all things in Christ" was inspired from on High to lay the foundations of that "work of peace" which became the program and principal task of Benedict XV. These two programs of Our Predecessors We desire to unite in one -- the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Christ by peace in Christ -- "the peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ." With might and main We shall ever strive to bring about this peace, putting Our trust in God, Who when He called Us to the Chair of Peter, promised that the divine assistance would never fail Us. We ask that all assist and co-operate with Us in this Our mission. Particularly We ask you to aid us, Venerable Brothers, you, His sheep, whom Our leader and Lord, Jesus Christ, has called to feed and to watch over as the most precious portion of His flock, which comprises all mankind. For, it is you whom the "Holy Ghost hath placed to rule the Church of God" (Acts xx, 28), you to whom above all, and principally, God "hath given the ministry of reconciliation, and who for Christ therefore are ambassadors." (II Cor. v, 18, 20) You participate in His teaching power and are "the dispensers of the mysteries of God." (I Cor. iv, 1) You have been called by Him "the salt of the earth," "the light of the world" (Matt. v, 13, 14), fathers and teachers of Christian peoples, "a pattern of the flock from the heart" (I Peter v, 3), and "you shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven." (Matt. v, 19) In fine, you are the links of gold, as it were, by which "the whole body of Christ, which is the Church, is held compacted and fitly joined together" (Ephesians iv, 15, 16), built as it is on the solid rock of Peter.
Pope Pius XI, who used Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928, to exhort all non-Catholic Christians to return to the true Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there is no true social order, a return that is rejected by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, thus making him an enemy of peace in the world as they who refuse to seek with urgency the conversion of men to the true Faith are content to leave them in states of Original Sin or Mortal Sin that predispose them to commit acts of violence against each other. Indeed, there can be no peace in the world if men are at war with God either by means of their unrepentant sins. The saint whose life and work we celebrate today, Saint Francis Xavier, knew this, which is why he sought with great urgency to convert the pagans of India to Catholicism (see Always Happy to Make Room for Baal and His Friends).
Our Lady will see us safely through this chastisement. All we have to do is to keep close to her as we pray as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit. She will bring us to the stable wherein she laid her Divine Son on the first Christmas Day if we make use of these days of penance to carry the cross with joy, praying for the conversion of our country, something that she, appearing to Juan Diego in this month 478 years ago now, desires from the depths of her Immaculate Heart.
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?
Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us!
Vivat Christus Rex! Viva Cristo Rey!
Saint Joseph, pray for us.