In League With Racial Engineers
Thomas A. Droleskey
One of the greatest ironies of Modernity, shaped as it is by the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King by the Protestant Revolution and institutionalized by the rise of Judeo-Masonry, is that men spend their lives supporting and promoting the very forces that have targeted their ancestors for elimination.
To wit, most "conservative" and traditionally-minded Catholics in the United States of America, no matter where they fall on the vast expanse of the ecclesiastical divide, believe that the Constitution of the United States of America needs to be "restored" in order to retard the social evils of the day, heedless of the simple fact that the social evils of the day are the direct result of the natural degeneration of the false principles of the American founding. To this end, most of these "conservative" and traditionally-minded Catholics believe that they should ally themselves with the very force that made the modern civil state possible, Protestantism, and that which helps maintain it in power, Talmudism.
Similarly, many black Americans believe that the so-called "anti-poverty" programs of the last fifty years have helped them even though they have been used by the statists and social engineers to create a new form of slavery in the name of "empowering" them when it is they, the statists and the social engineers, who have been empowered. In the process, of course, each of us has been reduced to a form of slavery to the anti-Incarnational civil state as our legitimate property is confiscated in the name of "equality" while already highly paid corporate executives, each of whom contribute mightily to to the coffers of both major organized crime families of naturalism, are enriched the more (see Recovery for the 7 Percent.)
Additionally, many black Americans have been convinced that the butchery and racial engineering practiced by the Satanic agents of the death clinics operated by the offshoot of Margaret Sanger's Birth Control, Planned Parenthood, actually helps to build strong, stable families and that violations of the Sovereignty of God over the sanctity and fecundity of marriage and the assassination of their children "liberate" them from the shackles of oppression. Generations of black Americans have listen to their slave masters of their own race convince them that Planned Parenthood and associated merchants of evil are their best friends and that they, the leaders, will never waver in "fighting" for their rights."
Enter the reigning caesar, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, who on Friday, April 26, 2013, gave one of the most reprehensible speeches of a career studded with reprehensible speech after reprehensible speech in behalf of one abject moral evil after another:
Cecile, thank you for the warm introduction, and thank you for the outstanding leadership that you’ve shown over the years. You just do a great, great job. (Applause.) I want to thank all of you for the remarkable work that you’re doing day in, day out in providing quality health care to women all across America. You are somebody that women -- young women, old women, women in between -- count on for so many important services. And we are truly grateful to you. (Remarks by the President at the Planned Parenthood Conference.)
"All of the remarkable work that you're doing day in, day out in providing quality health care to women all across America"?
Let's have a review of this "remarkable work," Mister President?
A meat-market style of assembly line abortions. Operating tables
smeared with bloody drainage not washed down between patients.
Unsterilized instruments. The abortionist didn’t wear gloves. Patients
at risk of getting hepatitis or AIDS because of unsanitary conditions.
No routine health department inspections.
This was the scenario as described by two former nurses employed at
Planned Parenthood’s Wilmington abortion facility. The two quit their
jobs inside the facility to protect their nursing licenses.
The local ABC affiliate broke the story,
showing Jayne Mitchell-Werbrich, one of the former PP nurses saying,
“It was just unsafe. I couldn’t tell you how ridiculously unsafe it was.
. . . Planned Parenthood needs to close its doors, it needs to be
cleaned up, the staff needs to be trained.”
The news report revealed that the Delaware Department of Health does
not do routine inspections and “Planned Parenthood is essentially in
charge of inspecting itself.” The report shows Mary Peterson from the
Delaware Department of Health and Human Services saying, “I am not going
to lie to you, we don’t have the manpower to do routine inspections.”
“Since January 4, five patients allegedly have been rushed from the facility to the emergency room,” the news reporter said.
Planned Parenthood officials did not appear on camera but released a
statement saying, “Ensuring high-quality care and maintaining the valued
trust of our community is of the utmost importance.” Following its
usual pattern, rather than taking the blame for any breach in ethical
medical care, it threatened to fire “any employee who does not live up
to [its] standards of patient care.”
The facility has, at least temporarily, halted surgical abortions.
The Wilmington, Delaware, ABC affiliate broke the Delaware Planned Parenthood horror story as ghastly testimony was emerging in the case of abortionist Kermit
Gosnell, charged with the grisly murder of seven newborn babies born
alive during the course of abortions, and the death of one woman who was
allegedly sedated to death in his abortion facility in Pennsylvania.
Gosnell and his employees have admitted to severing the spinal cords
of babies born alive—a process they called “snipping.” One of the
infants “screamed like a little alien” after it was born, according to a
Gosnell employee. One was so big that Gosnell joked it could walk him
to the bus station.
Testimony has shown Gosnell stored the remains of infants in cat food
containers and milk jugs. More than 40 aborted babies were stored in a
freezer. He kept a collection of severed baby feet in jars in the office
as well. Though not a Planned Parenthood facility, this, too, was a
filthy abortion center where instruments were not sterilized, blood was
not cleaned up, and women were treated with as much respect as pieces of
meat in a slaughterhouse. (Filthy meat-market assembly line: Planned Parenthood abortions halted in Wilmington
Remarkable work in the support of the devil.
I'm sorry that I could not be at the party yesterday. I understand it was a little wild. (Laughter.) That's what I heard. But as all of you know, obviously, we've gone through a pretty tough week and a half, and I was down in Texas, letting the people of West, Texas know that we all love them and care about them in their time of grieving. (Applause.)
But obviously this is a special national conference, because it’s been nearly a hundred years since the first health clinic of what later would become Planned Parenthood opened its doors to women in Brooklyn. And for nearly a century now, one core principle has guided everything all of you do -- that women should be allowed to make their own decisions about their own health. (Applause.) It’s a simple principle. (Remarks by the President at the Planned Parenthood Conference.)
And why, precisely, Mister President, did Margaret Sanger start that "health clinic" in the Brownsville section of the Borough of Brooklyn in the City of New York, New York, on October 16, 1916?
Let Margaret Sanger tell you in her very own words:
I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's
branch of the Ku Klux Klan...I saw through the door dim figures parading
with banners and illuminated crosses...I was escorted to the platform,
was introduced, and began to speak...In the end, through simple
illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen
invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered." (Margaret
Sanger: An Autobiography, p.366)
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who
never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization,
referring to immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification,"
couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in
America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117,
quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she
wrote in her "Plan for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932
On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of
thoroughbreds," she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
"More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief
aim of birth control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
On religious convictions regarding sex outside of marriage:
"This book aims to answer the needs expressed in thousands on thousands of letters to me in the solution of marriage problems... Knowledge of sex truths frankly
and plainly presented cannot possibly injure healthy, normal, young
minds. Concealment, suppression, futile attempts to veil the unveilable -
these work injury, as they seldom succeed and only render those who
indulge in them ridiculous. For myself, I have full confidence in the
cleanliness, the open-mindedness, the promise of the younger
generation." Margaret Sanger, Happiness in Marriage (Bretano's, New
On the extermination of blacks:
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro
population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more
rebellious members." Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of
Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon
On respecting the rights of the mentally ill:
In her "Plan for Peace," Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication
of those she deemed "feebleminded." Among the steps included in her evil
scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization;
segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April
1932, p. 107
A woman's physical satisfaction was more important than any marriage vow, Sanger believed. Birth Control in America, p. 11
On the Catholic Church's view of contraception:
"...enforce SUBJUGATION by TURNING WOMAN INTO A MERE INCUBATOR." The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.
"I cannot refrain from saying that women must come to recognize there is
some function of womanhood other than being a child-bearing machine."
What Every Girl Should Know, by Margaret Sanger (Max Maisel, Publisher,
1915) [Jesus said: "Daughters of Jerusalem, weep... for your children.
For, behold, the days are coming, in which they shall say, Blessed
(happy) are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the breasts
which never gave suck." (Luke 23:24)]
"The most merciful thing that a large family does
to one of its infant members is to kill it." Margaret Sanger, Women and
the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923) (Margaret Sanger Quotes.)
Nothing you can say, Mister President, can change these facts. Margaret Sanger was an agent of the devil. So are you. Your own words prove this to be an absolute fact:
So what I see in this audience, extraordinary doctors and nurses, and advocates and staff who work tirelessly to keep the doors at health centers all across the country going, then I'm reminded of those very early efforts and all the strides that we've made in subsequent decades. And I also think about the millions of mothers and daughters and wives and sisters, friends and neighbors who walk through those doors every year.
Somewhere there’s a woman who just received a new lease on life because of a screening that you provided that helped catch her cancer in time. Somewhere there’s a woman who’s breathing easier today because of the support and counseling she got at her local Planned Parenthood health clinic. Somewhere there’s a young woman starting a career who, because of you, is able to decide for herself when she wants to start a family. (Applause.)
One in five women in this country has turned to Planned Parenthood for health care. One in five. (Applause.) And for many, Planned Parenthood is their primary source of health care -- not just for contraceptive care, but for lifesaving preventive care, like cancer screenings and health counseling.
So when politicians try to turned Planned Parenthood into a punching bag, they’re not just talking about you; they’re talking about the millions of women who you serve. And when they talk about cutting off your funding, let’s be clear: They’re talking about telling many of those women, you’re on your own. They’re talking about shutting those women out at a time when they may need it most -- shutting off communities that need more health care options for women, not less. (Applause.) (Remarks by the President at the Planned Parenthood Conference.)
Here are some of the facts relating to Planned Parenthood's operations in which you, Mister President, and your "pro-life" predecessor, George Walker Bush, have helped to fund and sustain:
Planned Parenthood has slaughtered over 4 MILLION preborn babies.
Planned Parenthood kills 5,871 innocent human beings every week.
1 out of every 4 abortions is committed in a Planned Parenthood facility.
Planned Parenthood calls abortion "reproductive rights," but no one has the right to kill a child.
Planned Parenthood collected $349.6 million in government grants and contracts in 2008, and at the end of the year had $85 million in profits. (STOPP - Stop Planned Parenthood - Stats and Analysis Overview.)\
These are ugly facts. Ugly. Yet this is what you, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, call "progress:"
So the fact is, after decades of progress, there’s still those who want to turn back the clock to policies more suited to the 1950s than the 21st century. And they’ve been involved in an orchestrated and historic effort to roll back basic rights when it comes to women’s health.
Forty-two states have introduced laws that would ban or severely limit access to a woman’s right to choose -- laws that would make it harder for women to get the contraceptive care that they need; laws that would cut off access to cancer screenings and end educational programs that help prevent teen pregnancy.
In North Dakota, they just passed a law that outlaws your right to choose, starting as early as six weeks, even if a woman is raped. A woman may not even know that she’s pregnant at six weeks. In Mississippi, a ballot initiative was put forward that could not only have outlawed your right to choose, but could have had all sorts of other far-reaching consequences like cutting off fertility treatments, making certain forms of contraception a crime.
That’s absurd. It’s wrong. It’s an assault on women’s rights. And that’s why when the people of Mississippi were given a chance to vote on that initiative, they turned it down. (Applause.) Mississippi is a conservative state, but they wanted to make clear there’s nothing conservative about the government injecting itself into decisions best made between a woman and her doctor. And folks are trying to do this all across the country.
When you read about some of these laws, you want to check the calendar; you want to make sure you’re still living in 2013. (Laughter.) (STOPP - Stop Planned Parenthood - Stats and Analysis Overview.)
Yes, Mister President, we are living in 2013, a time when men such as yourself and Kermit Gosnell are considered to be pillars of the community, a time when the daily slaughter of the innocent preborn by chemical and surgical means is accepted as the masses are diverted by bread and circuses, a time when those who seek to stop this slaughter of the innocent are considered to be criminals and those who support and enable the killers are heroized as champions of "women's reproductive health."
Yes, Mister President, we are living in 2013, a time of chastisement, a time when figures of Antichrist such as yourself walk amongst us. For only a figure of Antichrist could term the prevention of the conception of children and their killing to be matter of "women's health":
Forty years after the Supreme Court affirmed a woman’s constitutional right to privacy, including the right to choose, we shouldn’t have to remind people that when it comes to a woman’s health, no politician should get to decide what’s best for you. No insurer should get to decide what kind of care that you get. The only person who should get to make decisions about your health is you. (Applause.) That’s why we fought so hard to make health care reform a reality. (Applause.) (Remarks by the President at the Planned Parenthood Conference.)
There is no "decision" to be made, Mister President. God has decreed that babies be conceived and nurtured inside of their mothers' womb as part of the very nature of the generative power which he has given to men to continue the species.
Politicians do not decide.
Insurance companies do not decide.
Health-care providers do not decide.
God has decreed, and no matter what you think or how you act, you are not the God of Divine Revelation, Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro.
Gee, the caesar does not seem to be answering me. Oh well, I will carry out without him. Boy, I really tried to engage him. I guess he just was not in a mood to discuss matters rationally.
Seriously, of course, the only thing that Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro can do is to play the role of a demagogue and to mouth untruths about the work of Planned Parenthood's providing "access to preventive care like mammograms and cancer screenings":
That principle is at the heart of the Affordable Care Act. Because of the ACA, most insurance plans are now covering the cost of contraceptive care, so that a working mom doesn’t have to put off the care she needs just so she can pay her bills on time. Because of the Affordable Care Act, 47 million women have new access to preventive care like mammograms and cancer screenings with no copay, no deductible, no out-of-pocket costs, so they don’t have to put off a mammogram just because money is tight. Because of the Affordable Care Act, young people under the age of 26 can now stay on their parent’s health care plan.
And insurance companies soon will no longer be able to deny you coverage based on preexisting conditions like breast cancer, or charge you more just because you are a woman. Those days are ending. (Applause.) Those days are ending. (Applause.)
Now, I know how hard you worked to help us pass health care reform. You and your supporters got out there -- you organized; you mobilized; you made your voices heard. It made all the difference. But here’s the thing -- if Americans don’t know how to access the new benefits and protections that they’re going to receive as we implement this law, then health care reform won’t make much of a difference in their lives.
So I’m here to also ask for your help, because we need to get the word out. We need you to tell your patients, your friends, your neighbors, your family members what the health care law means for them. Make sure they know that if they don’t have health insurance, they’ll be able to sign up for quality, affordable insurance starting this fall in an online marketplace where private insurers will compete for their business. Make sure that they know that there are plans out there right now that cover the cost of contraceptive and preventive care free of charge.
We’ve got to spread the word, particularly among women, particularly among young women, who are the ones who are most likely to benefit from these laws. We need all the women who come through your doors telling their children, their husbands, and the folks in their neighborhoods about their health care options. We need all the college students who come through your doors to call up their friends and post on Facebook talking about the protections and benefits that are kicking in.
And you are all in a unique position to deliver that message, because the women you serve know you and they trust you. And the reason for that is that you haven’t let them down before. (Remarks by the President at the Planned Parenthood Conference.)
Even the leftist organization that calls itself "Fact Check" called out Obama/Soetoro for claiming last year during the second of his debates, held on Monday, October 15, 2013, at Hofstra University in Hempstead, Long Island, New York, with the hapless Willard Mitt Romney for inaccuracy on the role of the blaspheming killers at Planned Parenthood in proving access to breast cancer screenings:
In the second presidential debate, President Barack Obama said that women
“rely on” Planned Parenthood for mammograms. Actually, mammograms are
not performed at the clinics; Planned Parenthood doctors and nurses
conduct breast exams and refer patients to other facilities for
mammograms. Individual clinics sometimes provide more than referrals,
arranging for mobile mammography vans.
Obama said: “When Governor Romney says that we should eliminate
funding for Planned Parenthood, there are millions of women all across
the country who rely on Planned Parenthood for not just contraceptive
care. They rely on it for mammograms, for cervical cancer screenings.”
Obama used a similar line again on Oct. 18, telling a Manchester,
N.H., crowd: “Governor Romney said he’d end funding for Planned
Parenthood, despite all the work it does to provide women with
mammograms and breast cancer screenings.”
Women can’t walk into a Planned Parenthood clinic and get a mammogram
on the spot. The clinics don’t have mammography equipment. Planned
Parenthood performs gynecological exams, including breast exams, and
refers women to other facilities to have mammograms performed, much like
women are referred to radiological centers by their gynecologists or
primary care physicians. (Planned Parenthood and Mammograms.)
Courtesy of Stop Planned Parenthood, which is affiliated with the American Life League, Lifesite News provided a brutally accurate nature of the farcical nature of Obama/Soetoro's contentions about Planned Parenthood that he made last when campaigning for a second term. This information is, of course, very relevant now in light of Obama/Soetoro's speech to Planned Parenthood:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America and various affiliates have
released scads of stories over the past week touting a new breast
cancer initiative. The $3 million it says will fund the initiative is
the amount Planned Parenthood claims it raised in four days in response
to the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s quickly-rescinded announcement that it would stop funding the abortion giant.
So, what about this huge investment of $3 million Cecile Richards
says she is earmarking for breast cancer screening and education? To put
it in perspective, Planned Parenthood’s total income in 2010 was $1.04
billion. The three million dollars it says it will commit to the breast
cancer initiative is less than one percent of its total annual income.
Planned Parenthood gets $1.3 million from the government each and
every day of the year. It is earmarking an amount equal to a bit more
than two days of its government income to “expand” its breast cancer
screening and education. Seriously, Planned Parenthood? You want us to
believe that you are serious about providing real healthcare services
for women? Especially when we consider that PPFA pocketed in excess of
$164 million in 2010 alone from killing innocent preborn children, and
untold millions from handing out cancer-causing birth control?
This entire expansion nonsense represents some big-time drama on the
part of Planned Parenthood, all for the hope of positive publicity and
future funding. Under attack from every direction, the abortion mogul
desperately needs to put on a good face for the public so it can
continue to improve its standing in the community, expand its government
funding, and increase its abortion business.
While it touts this “new” initiative, the fact remains that Planned
Parenthood is not licensed to do anything beyond Level 1 manual breast
exams - the same exam that a woman can do in the privacy of her own
home. According to a Reuters article from msnbc.com that quotes Planned Parenthood head Cecile Richards, her
true intention appears to be to “fund” some ultrasounds, biopsies, and
other follow-up services. A quick reading would imply that Planned
Parenthood is expanding services, but a closer look shows that, while it
may actually add some new offerings, it may very well just plan more
referrals, some of them possibly funded by Planned Parenthood. It also
plans to use the money to reach out more to Hispanic women - already a
huge item on Planned Parenthood’s agenda. It says it will provide new,
unnamed educational resources for women. And, oh yes, it will add a new,
unnamed, unexplained “screening tool for the network’s doctors and
Bottom line: Planned Parenthood has to do something to make people
think it cares about women’s health. It raised some money by bullying
the Susan G. Komen Foundation, and thought it would be wise, obviously,
to mount yet another publicity campaign to pat itself on the back for
supposedly saving women’s lives. (Planned Parenthood's cancer screening initiative is a joke.)
Planned Parenthood has never been in the "health care" business. It has been in the business of promoting licentiousness without "fear" of the consequences, propagating all manner of diabolically-inspired lies to ensnare souls, especially those of the young, into lives of what are Mortal Sins in the objective order of things. As noted in the report quoted just above, Planned Parenthood's claim to be concerned about breast cancer is truly laughable given the fact that the birth control pill is itself a carcinogen as well as being an abortifacient.
There is just one final excerpt from Obama/Soetoro's speech of Friday, April 26, 2013, to examine:
I know it’s not always easy. As Cecile described, Planned Parenthood as the only organization that she’s ever been at where there are opponents who, in her words, “literally got up every day trying to figure out how to keep us from doing our work.” Now, if she had worked in the administration -- (laughter and applause) -- she’d be more familiar with this phenomenon. (Laughter and applause.) But when it comes to your patients, you never let them down -- no matter what.
And that’s because you never forget who this is all about. This is about a woman from Chicago named Courtney who has a disease that can leave women infertile. So in college, she turned to Planned Parenthood for access to affordable contraceptive care to keep her healthy. You didn’t just help her plan for a family; you made sure she could start one. And today, she's got two beautiful kids. That’s what Planned Parenthood is about. (Applause.)
This is about a woman in Washington State named Joyce who for years could only afford health care at her local Planned Parenthood clinic. And heeding your advice, she never missed her annual exam. During one of them, your doctors helped catch an aggressive form of cervical cancer early enough to save her life. Today, she's been cancer-free for 25 years. (Applause.)
So every day, in every state, in ever center that Planned Parenthood operates, there are stories like those -- lives you've saved, women you've empowered, families that you've strengthened. That’s why, no matter how great the challenge, no matter how fierce the opposition, if there’s one thing the past few years have shown, it's that Planned Parenthood is not going anywhere. It's not going anywhere today. It's not going anywhere tomorrow. (Applause.)
As long as we've got to fight to make sure women have access to quality, affordable health care, and as long as we've got to fight to protect a woman's right to make her own choices about her own health, I want you to know that you've also got a President who's going to be right there with you fighting every step of the way. (Applause.)
Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you. God bless America. Thank you. (Remarks by the President at the Planned Parenthood Conference.)
Obama/Soetoro's self-righteous denunciation of those courageous Americans who oppose Planned Parenthood, sometimes placing themselves in jeopardy of physical assault and the threat of arrest by police officers whose predecessors arrested the baby-killers in the days before "safe and legal" baby-killing further stigmatizes those who are simply performing the Spiritual and Corporal Works of Mercy to save the lives of the innocent and, more importantly, the souls of mothers and all of those who work for Planned Parenthood and other such killing centers.
Obviously, as noted two days ago in In His Own Blood, it is good to be humiliated in the service of the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law. Those who subject others to such humiliation when they are doing only what Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ desires of them as they brave the elements to provide sidewalk counseling and pray Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary so faithfully, week in and week out, sometimes day in and day out without fail are objects to be pitied while prayers are offered to Christ the King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary for their conversion.
As this is nothing other than Catholic truth, it is perhaps useful to remind the reigning caesar that God has the final say about what happens to arrogant men in public life such as himself:
63. But another very grave crime is to be noted, Venerable Brethren, which
regards the taking of the life of the offspring hidden in the mother's womb.
Some wish it to be allowed and left to the will of the father or the mother;
others say it is unlawful unless there are weighty reasons which they call by
the name of medical, social, or eugenic "indication." Because this matter falls
under the penal laws of the state by which the destruction of the offspring
begotten but unborn is forbidden, these people demand that the "indication,"
which in one form or another they defend, be recognized as such by the public
law and in no way penalized. There are those, moreover, who ask that the public
authorities provide aid for these death-dealing operations, a thing, which, sad
to say, everyone knows is of very frequent occurrence in some places.
64. As to the "medical and therapeutic indication" to which, using their own
words, we have made reference, Venerable Brethren, however much we may pity the
mother whose health and even life is gravely imperiled in the performance of the
duty allotted to her by nature, nevertheless what could ever be a sufficient
reason for excusing in any way the direct murder of the innocent? This is
precisely what we are dealing with here. Whether inflicted upon the mother or
upon the child, it is against the precept of God and the law of nature: "Thou
shalt not kill:" The life of each is equally sacred, and no one has the
power, not even the public authority, to destroy it. It is of no use to appeal
to the right of taking away life for here it is a question of the innocent,
whereas that right has regard only to the guilty; nor is there here question of
defense by bloodshed against an unjust aggressor (for who would call an innocent
child an unjust aggressor?); again there is not question here of what is called
the "law of extreme necessity" which could even extend to the direct killing of
the innocent. Upright and skillful doctors strive most praiseworthily to guard
and preserve the lives of both mother and child; on the contrary, those show
themselves most unworthy of the noble medical profession who encompass the death
of one or the other, through a pretense at practicing medicine or through
motives of misguided pity.
65. All of which agrees with the stern words of the Bishop of Hippo in
denouncing those wicked parents who seek to remain childless, and failing in
this, are not ashamed to put their offspring to death: "Sometimes this lustful
cruelty or cruel lust goes so far as to seek to procure a baneful sterility, and
if this fails the fetus conceived in the womb is in one way or another smothered
or evacuated, in the desire to destroy the offspring before it has life, or if
it already lives in the womb, to kill it before it is born. If both man and
woman are party to such practices they are not spouses at all; and if from the
first they have carried on thus they have come together not for honest wedlock,
but for impure gratification; if both are not party to these deeds, I make bold
to say that either the one makes herself a mistress of the husband, or the other
simply the paramour of his wife."
66. What is asserted in favor of the social and eugenic "indication" may and
must be accepted, provided lawful and upright methods are employed within the
proper limits; but to wish to put forward reasons based upon them for the
killing of the innocent is unthinkable and contrary to the divine precept
promulgated in the words of the Apostle: Evil is not to be done that good may
come of it.
67. Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the
duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives
of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered
and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first
place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not
only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death
at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge
and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven. (Pope Pius XI,Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.)
And quite unlike what is held by the so-called National Right to Life Committee and most supposedly "pro-life" politicians, it is never permissible to directly seek to the kill the life of any innocent preborn baby, not even where it is alleged to be "necessary" to do so to save the life of his mother:
If there is another danger that threatens the family,
not since yesterday, but long ago, which, however, at present, is
growing visibly, it can become fatal [to societies], that is, the attack
and the disruption of the fruit of conjugal morality.
We have, in recent years, taken every opportunity
to expose the one or the other essential point of the moral law, and
more recently to indicate it as a whole, not only by refuting the errors
that corrupt it, but also showing in a positive sense, the office the
importance, the value for the happiness of the spouses, children and all
family, for stability and the greater social good from their homes up
to the State and the Church itself.
At the heart of this doctrine is that marriage is
an institution at the service of life. In close connection with this
principle, we, according to the constant teaching of the Church, have
illustrated a argument that it is not only one of the essential
foundations of conjugal morality, but also of social morality in
general: namely, that the direct attack innocent human life, as a means to an end - in this case the order to save another life - is illegal.
Innocent human life, whatever his condition, is
always inviolate from the first instance of its existence and it can
never be attacked voluntarily. This is a fundamental right of human
beings. A fundamental value is the Christian conception of life must be
respected as valid for the life still hidden in the womb against direct
abortion and against all innocent human life thereafter. There can be
no direct murders of a child before, during and after childbirth. As
established may be the legal distinction between these different stages
of development life born or unborn, according to the moral law, all
direct attacks on inviolable human life are serious and illegal.
This principle applies to the child's life, like that of mother's. Never, under any circumstances, has the Church has taught that the life of child must be preferred to that of the mother. It would be wrong to set the issue with this alternative: either the child's life or that of mother. No, nor the mother's life, nor that of her child, can be subjected to an act of direct suppression.
For the one side and the other the need can be only one: to make
every effort to save the life of both, mother and child (see Pious XI
Encycl. Casti Connubii, 31 dec. 1930, Acta Ap. Sedis vol. 22, p.. 562-563).
It is one of the most beautiful and noble
aspirations of medicine trying ever new ways to ensure both their lives.
What if, despite all the advances of science, still remain, and will
remain in the future, a doctor says that the mother is going to die
unless here child is killed in violation of God's commandment: Thou
shalt not kill! We must strive until the last moment to help save the
child and the mother without attacking either as we bow before the laws
of nature and the dispositions of Divine Providence.
But - one may object - the mother's life,
especially of a mother of a numerous family, is incomparably greater
than a value that of an unborn child. The application of the theory of
balance of values to the matter which now occupies us has already found
acceptance in legal discussions. The answer to this nagging
objection is not difficult. The inviolability of the life of an innocent
person does not depend by its greater or lesser value. For
over ten years, the Church has formally condemned the killing of the
estimated life as "worthless', and who knows the antecedents that
provoked such a sad condemnation, those who can ponder the dire
consequences that would be reached, if you want to measure the
inviolability of innocent life at its value, you must well appreciate
the reasons that led to this arrangement.
Besides, who can judge with certainty which of the two lives is actually more valuable?
Who knows which path will follow that child and at what heights it can
achieve and arrive at during his life? We compare Here are two sizes,
one of whom nothing is known. We would like to cite an example in this
regard, which may already known to some of you, but that does not lose
some of its evocative value.
It dates back to 1905. There lived a young woman of
noble family and even more noble senses, but slender and delicate
health. As a teenager, she had been sick with a small apical pleurisy,
which appeared healed; when, however, after contracting a happy
marriage, she felt a new life blossoming within her, she felt ill and
soon there was a special physical pain that dismayed that the two
skilled health professionals, who watched her with loving care. That
old scar of the pleurisy had been awakened and, in the view of the
doctors, there was no time to lose to save this gentle lady from death.
The concluded that it was necessary to proceed without delay to an
Even the groom agreed. The seriousness of the case
was very painful. But when the obstetrician attending to the mother
announced their resolution to proceed with an abortion, the mother, with
firm emphasis, "Thank you for your pitiful tips, but I can not
truncate the life of my child! I can not, I can not! I feel already
throbbing in my breast, it has the right to live, it comes from God must
know God and to love and enjoy it." The husband asked, begged, pleaded, and she remained inflexible, and calmly awaited the event.
The child was born regularly, but immediately after
the health of the mother went downhill. The outbreak spread to the lungs
and the decay became progressive. Two months later she went to
extremes, and she saw her little girl growing very well one who had
grown very healthy. The mother looked at her robust baby and saw his
sweet smile, and then she quietly died.
Several years later there was in a religious
institute a very young sister, totally dedicated to the care and
education of children abandoned, and with eyes bent on charges with a
tender motherly love. She loved the tiny sick children and as if she had
given them life. She was the daughter of the sacrifice, which now with her big heart has spread much love among the children of the destitute. The heroism of the intrepid mother was not in vain!
(See Andrea Majocchi. " Between burning scissors," 1940, p.. 21 et
seq.). But we ask: Is Perhaps the Christian sense, indeed even purely
human, vanished in this point of no longer being able to understand the
sublime sacrifice of the mother and the visible action of divine
Providence, which made quell'olocausto born such a great result? (Pope
Pius XII, Address to Association of Large Families, November 26,
1951; I used Google Translate to translate this address from the
Italian as it is found at AAS Documents, p. 855; you will have to scroll down to page 855, which takes some time, to find the address.)
As noted earlier in this commentary, we are in this mess as a result of the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King wrought by the Protestant Revolution and institutionalized by the interrelated lies that can be termed by the use of the phrase Judeo-Masonry, something that Father Robert Mader, a German priest writing in 1934 and 1935, noted very clearly and much more eloquently than anything found in this writer's poor words:
The grumbling of the nations is also directed against Jesus' Church. She, the Church with the pope, is the second accused in the dock, who is supposed to be a failure. The charge is of immense seriousness. The more victims fall in this time of catastrophes, the more dot he truly guilty shove of the responsibility onto the Catholic Church. In the coming cultural battle, all the rogues and deceivers of the earth will drag the Church as cause of all unhappiness up the hill of Calvary, in order to stone and crucify her. They claim that the Church has failed!
No one could speak more thoughtlessly and unjustly. After all, who reigns over the entire internal and foreign policy of the nations? Who holds the modern school in his grip and educates the men who tomorrow will lead the destinies of Europe? Who controls economic life, industry, trade, the banks and the stock market? Who has all the news agencies of the world and the entire mass media--this queen of public opinion--under his thumb? Liberalism, that is laicism, atheism, capitalism, Freemasonry, materialism, nationalism, militarism.
I emphasize once again: there may well exist Catholics, even Catholic areas, but far as I know there is at this time in the whole of Europe not a single Catholically governed state, not a single regionally Catholic government.
The Church enjoys a certain respect. But in reality she is bound hand and foot. Nearly everywhere her bishops as treated as lackeys by the state. Her visible head, the pope, was for years a prisoner in the Vatican. You hypocrites! You "storm with rough infantry, light cavalry and heavy artillery over the fields, just when the fruit is ripening," and then you accuse us of not having full harvests! You shut our mouths with your laws and decrees, and then you criticize us because we do not speak out. You rob us of our Church property, our monasteries and convents, and then accuse use of not being socially involved.
You nail us to the cross, and then you mock us because we do not climb down. You hypocrites, give our pope, our bishops, our priests, our laity unlimited freedom to speak, to act, to live as we wish, and then come and see if we fail! And in the meantime bear your own sinful breasts and admit that you and your fundamentals have failed to the extent of complete bankruptcy.
Grumbling against Christ is madness! It is one of the greatest and most sinister sins. It is the sin that God regards as an enemy. When one errs about God, then the foundation of religion collapses.
Oh, I understand: there are hours in the life of a person when the deep, dark night of the despair wraps the soul, and the perplexed spirit is bowed down to earth by a monstrous heaviness. Still, in such hours on the Mount of Olives faith must not falter. Even when we cannot see the way forward, we must let ourselves be led by the hand of Christ, like children, thinking: Jesus knows the way. He still reigns today!
That suffices. And when my understanding fails, I shall still bow before the Incomprehensible, I shall believe and hope. With Job, the great sufferer, I shall say: "I shall lay mine hand upon my mouth (Job 39:34). I shall keep silence. Night and clouds will pass away. The true God does not fail. The eternal light of our tabernacles is not yet extinguished. It will become the dawning of a new day.
Nobody in Bethlehem had basically anything against the new citizen Christ. But the political, social and economic conditions led to there being no room for the Messiah.
Where would Christ be born today? Doesn't the question of room for the Christchild today cause us so much pondering that we would be heartily glad to have the neutral ground of the stable?
Haven' we politicians, sociologists, economists, intellectuals and artists committed the crime of Bethlehem for at least the last hundred years? Does not the liberal sin consist in limiting, for lack of room, the universally present Christianity of past times to certain holy reservations?
Christ's Truth, is all-present, all-applicable, permanent, like the source of daylight, the sun. It is everywhere or nowhere. It is exclusively and completely sun, or it is nonexistent. It is for everyone or no one. One lives through it and dies without it. Christ the King needs too much room, in other words, all of it. That is His "misfortune"! Truth wants not only to live, but to reign absolutely and alone. Here is the reason why Christ would be born today, as then, in a stable.
Certainly He would not be born in City Hall. The government has to tread very softly on the parquetry of non-denominationalism. It may not place itself one-sidedly in the service of a particular "party," especially one which is extreme besides! If Christ had been just plain "Christian!" But he was Roman Catholic: He believed in miracles, in the Holy Trinity, in the primacy of the pope, and even defined in Matthew (16:8) the Ultramontanist dogma of infallibility! For constitutional reasons, therefore, the application of the heavenly Father for making room for Bethlehem in City Hall must be turned down. Of course no one denies the cultural value of Christianity. However, the project of the so-called Redemption absolutely must be carried out on the basis of existing state law." Because there is no room for a king."
In view of the fact that Christ is the incarnate, eternal Wisdom, perhaps Heaven would try to win over the college as the birthplace of Christ. The Senate would then consider in a lengthy meeting the problem of whether Christ may be born on the college campus. Surely it would be pointed out that one is in step with "God" in striving for the "higher things." On the other hand, the purely scientific character of the university ought not to be put in question by allowing religion to mixed into it. Therefore the application must be rejected, "because there is no room."
An application to the academy of arts would have no better chance. Today literature, painting, music, etc., have merely artistic goals. Influence on the arts through non-artistic tendencies must not be permitted. It is true that religion has provided much subject-material for the arts; nevertheless, art must not close itself to the endless realm of the beautiful by selling itself to one particular direction. Art is no more Catholic than color, canvas or paper! Christ wants too much room! He wants the catholic space, i.e., everything!
St. Joseph, give it a try, shyly and quietly. Do you see those big storehouses, factories, banks? There must be room over there! "Wrong! Those are the castles of pure economy! They there ask us" What does Christ have to do with coal, iron and silk?" St. Joseph protests with a quote form the first question in the Catholic Catechism, the fundamental question of the generous Catholic "world view." The pure economists for tactical reasons that besides Christ other "Christian" religious founders be given room in economic life. Since St. Joseph is not willing to accept this compromise, Christ the King must out of tactical considerations remain outside. No room!
Besides the purely political, purely economical and purely artistic sectors, there are also the fields of entertainment and pure sociology, where Christ naturally also has not much say. Whether on principle or for tactical reasons, one sector after another has been withdrawn from the sphere of influence o Catholic truth. There is no more room for the King.
We find the deicide on Golgotha more honest and masculine than this robbery of air, light and room to the point of asphyxiation. Even if a person means well in his sue or his permitting of these tactics, it changes nothing in the final ruin of our cause. Of what help to us is it, when one lets live in principle but kills us tactically? Of what use is a kingdom without land? Make room for the omnipresent God! How much room? All of it!
Concerning our society today, we must affirm that Jesus does not reign any longer. They have taken away His crown and scepter. Everyday life has become almost completely excluded the supernatural. The world is dechristianized, naturalized, ecologized an far from Jesus--not only the part of the world whose population is 99% heathen, but also the regions whose population is 99% Christian. As soon as one leaves the church and perhaps the family living-room, one generally does not notice that one lives among Christians.
Fifty years ago Cardinal Mermillod could already exclaim: "The notion of the supernatural--who has it anymore? It is almost nonexistent!" Since then the possibility of finding Jesus anywhere in society, except in tabernacles and in the hearts of a few pious souls, has become even more remote.
As usual, it all began in the world of ideas. Modern man's world of ideas is empty of God. The concepts of God, of Jesus, of eternity become rarer and rarer, until finally they have almost disappeared. Faith is falling asleep. Its light has gone out. Its voice is silent. It is not dead, but has ceased to be the eye and the voice of the soul. The world of thought for most Christians during their daily work hardly differs from that of the better heathens in the times before Christ: some common sense, some naturally good ideas, some sincerity. But in general it is a world without Jesus. Therefore it is a cold, empty world. (Father Robert Mader, Cross and the Crown, edited and translated by Dr. Eileen Kunze, Sarto House, 1999, pp. 65-69.)
The likes of Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro, you see, are simply the logical end-results of the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King wrought by the Protestant Revolution and cemented in place by Judeo-Masonry with which the lords of Modernism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism have made their "official reconciliation" as they champion not Social Reign of Christ the King but the very "separation of Church and State" desired by Martin Luther and has given us Obama/Soetoro and his minions.
We must take hear in the midst of this madness from these words of Pope Pius XI, contained in Quas Primas, December 11, 1925:
History, in fact, tells us that in the course of ages these festivals
have been instituted one after another according as the needs or the
advantage of the people of Christ seemed to demand: as when they needed
strength to face a common danger, when they were attacked by insidious
heresies, when they needed to be urged to the pious consideration of
some mystery of faith or of some divine blessing. Thus in the earliest
days of the Christian era, when the people of Christ were suffering
cruel persecution, the cult of the martyrs was begun in order, says St.
Augustine, "that the feasts of the martyrs might incite men to
martyrdom." The liturgical honors paid to confessors, virgins and widows
produced wonderful results in an increased zest for virtue, necessary
even in times of peace. But more fruitful still were the feasts
instituted in honor of the Blessed Virgin. As a result of these men grew
not only in their devotion to the Mother of God as an ever-present
advocate, but also in their love of her as a mother bequeathed to them
by their Redeemer. Not least among the blessings which have
resulted from the public and legitimate honor paid to the Blessed Virgin
and the saints is the perfect and perpetual immunity of the Church from
error and heresy. We may well admire in this the admirable wisdom of
the Providence of God, who, ever bringing good out of evil, has from
time to time suffered the faith and piety of men to grow weak, and
allowed Catholic truth to be attacked by false doctrines, but always
with the result that truth has afterwards shone out with greater
splendor, and that men's faith, aroused from its lethargy, has shown
itself more vigorous than before. (Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas, December 11, 1925.)
Lift high the Cross.
Pray your Rosaries.
The Immaculate Heart of Mary will triumph in the end.