Fratricide In The Lodge
Thomas A. Droleskey
Let the Republican fratricide begin!
Although our most recent caesar emeritus, former President George Walker Bush, whose self-delusion is surpassed only by that of the currently reigning caesar, President Barack Hussein Obama, is not a member of any Masonic lodge, he is, of course, a member in good standing of Skull and Bones, the secret society to which his father, former President George Herbert Walker Bush, and the Democratic Party presidential nominee in 2004, United States Senator John F. Kerry (D-Massachusetts), a pro-abortion Catholic belong. One does not have to be a member of the "lodge" to be infected with its anti-Incarnational spirit of naturalism, something that Pope Leo XIII noted in Humanum Genus, April 20, 1884:
For, from what We have above most clearly shown, that which is their ultimate purpose forces itself into view -- namely, the utter overthrow of that whole religious and political order of the world which the Christian teaching has produced, and the substitution of a new state of things in accordance with their ideas, of which the foundations and laws shall be drawn from mere naturalism.
What We have said, and are about to say, must be understood of the sect of the Freemasons taken generically, and in so far as it comprises the associations kindred to it and confederated with it, but not of the individual members of them. There may be persons amongst these, and not a few who, although not free from the guilt of having entangled themselves in such associations, yet are neither themselves partners in their criminal acts nor aware of the ultimate object which they are endeavoring to attain. In the same way, some of the affiliated societies, perhaps, by no means approve of the extreme conclusions which they would, if consistent, embrace as necessarily following from their common principles, did not their very foulness strike them with horror. Some of these, again, are led by circumstances of times and places either to aim at smaller things than the others usually attempt or than they themselves would wish to attempt. They are not, however, for this reason, to be reckoned as alien to the masonic federation; for the masonic federation is to be judged not so much by the things which it has done, or brought to completion, as by the sum of its pronounced opinions.
Similarly, the former Governor of the State of Alaska, Sarah Heath Palin, is not a member of any Masonic lodge. She is, however, very much infected by the Judeo-Masonic spirit of religious indifferentism as she weaves, sometimes incoherently, in her speeches from one point to another, moving in accord with the same viscera ("gut," if you will) that guided the shallow former caesar, George Walker Bush. Neither Sarah Heath Palin or George Walker Bush are serious students history. Both jumble the language without ever realizing for a moment that clear speaking is a sign of clear thinking. It is thus fairly laughable to see the George Walker Bush pot calling the Sarah Heath Palin kettle black:
WASHINGTON - Two years of retirement haven't dulled George W. Bush's political zest - and President Obama and Sarah Palin are among his under-the-radar targets.
The 43rd President has told friends the ex-Alaska governor isn't qualified to be President and criticizes Arizona Sen. John McCain for putting Palin on the 2008 GOP ticket and handing her a national platform.
"Naming Palin makes Bush think less of McCain as a man," a Republican official familiar with Bush's thinking told the Daily News.
"He thinks McCain ran a lousy campaign with an unqualified running mate and destroyed any chance of winning by picking Palin." (http://www.nydailynews.com/index.html#ixzz14QyyfnI0.)
Well, it takes one to know one, that's for sure.
George Walker Bush, whose refusal to acknowledge the ongoing carnage of Catholics in Iraq was the subject of yesterday's article, As Blind Now As He As Always Been, was stumped by interviewers throughout the course of his quest for the Republican presidential nomination in 1999 and early-2000. Merely being the son of a former vice president and president and having served as Governor of the State of Texas for precisely fifty-two months prior to the announcement that he made on June 17, 1999, that he was running for the 2000 presidential nomination of the Republican Party does not qualify one to be president of the United States of America. And while Bush the Lesser is indeed correct about the utter lack of Sarah Heath Palin's qualifications to be president, his own resume was awfully thin back in 1999 when he portrayed himself as the "compassionate conservative," although not as thin as Barack Hussein Obama's was in 2007, it should be noted.
For those of you unfamiliar with my very public criticism of Sarah Heath Palin, who was a Catholic until her father took her entire family out of the Faith when she was twelve years old in 1976, you may review my early and repeated criticism of her in 2008 by reviewing these articles:
Gradually Accepting Naturalism's False Premises,
Facts Are Troublesome Things, and
It's Still Absolute Insanity.
First, Sarah Heath Palin has no business running for any office, no less the presidency of the United States of America. Her vocation is to be with her young son, who suffers from Down Syndrome.
Second, Sarah Heath Palin is not, despite her protestations to the contrary, "pro-life." She is a full-throated supporter of contraception and believes that little babies in their mothers' wombs may be sliced and diced in cases where it is alleged that a mother's life is endangered.
Third, Sarah Heath Palin is yet another shill for the murderous policies of the State of Israel (as is Mike Huckabee, the former Governor of Arkansas who is said to be the candidate that the Obama White House fears the most, and as is Mitt Romney, the Mormon former pro-abortion and former supporter of perversity who had his "road to Damascus" conversion on those issues only after he had left the governorship of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on January 4, 2007, as he began his own question for the 2008 presidential nomination of the Republican Party). This means that Sarah Heath Palin would undertake any war that furthered the interests of the State of Israel, making her another George Walker Bush in a pants-suit.
Fourth, Sarah Heath Palin is incapable of following, no less articulating, a logical train-of-thought (see It's Still Absolute Insanity). Obviously, this is not a disqualification in a world of naturalism, where illogic and emotionalism and sentimentality reign supreme. However, the mere fact that a person can motivate large numbers of people by means of cliche-ridden speeches does not mean that that person is qualified to hold an office of public trust, no less the presidency itself.
Fifth, although I carry no brief for self-anointed Republican "gatekeepers" such as Karol Rove, who was George Walker Bush's Senior Advisor in the White House from January 20, 2001, to August 31, 2007, serving also as Deputy White House Chief of Staff from February 8, 2005, to August 31, 2007, such "gatekeepers" are entirely correct when they conclude that Barack Hussein Obama would eviscerate Sarah Heath Palin in a general election. There is no question about this at all. She would articulate nothing coherent. She would be as utterly lost in interviews with hostile interviewers then as she was so infamously with anchorette Katie Couric in 2008.
Yes, the "electability" issue was used against Patrick Joseph Buchanan in 1995 and 1996 by establishment Republicans and even by the so-called "Christian Coalition," whose executive director was the smarmy Ralph Reed, and by various establishment "pro-life" leaders, including "Father" Frank Pavone of Priests for Life and various representations of the political action committee associate with the National Right to Life Committee, an organization that takes no stand in opposition to contraception and supports the direct, intentional killing of innocent human beings in their mothers' wombs in cases where it is alleged that a mother's life is endangered.
Pat Buchanan's problem with the establishment figures in the Republican Party had nothing to do with being inarticulate or incoherent. Pat's "sin" was that he dared to criticize the policies of the State of Israel and the hold that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) had on members of both major political parties in both houses of the United States Congress. Pat was right then. His assertion that Capitol Hill is Israeli-occupied territory is correct today (see AIPAC Lauds Elections of Pro-Israel Stalwarts; two of those stalwarts are United States Representative John Boehner, who will be Speaker of the United States House of Representatives when the 112th Congress convenes on January 3, 2011, and the man who will be his party's Majority Leader, Eric Cantor; another two who were hailed were the current Speaker, Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi, and her Majority Leader, Steny Hoyer). Any discussion of the hold that Israeli and its lobbyists have on American electoral politics and national security policy is taboo. That was the real reason that Patrick Joseph Buchanan was opposed by the Republican establishment. There is only the faintest of parallels, therefore, between establishment opposition to Sarah Heath Palin by the Republican establishement now and the opposition that greeted Patrick Joseph Buchanan fifteen years ago.
There is a real possibility, however, that establishment figures in the Republican Party would go the route chosen by then former President Theodore Roosevelt in 1912 when he ran on his own third party ticket, the Progressive (or "Bull Moose" Party) against the then Governor of New Jersey, Thomas Woodrow Wilson, and Roosevelt's own hand-picked successor, President William Howard Taft, if Mrs. Palin won the Republican Party's presidential nomination. The Republican fratricide of 1912 was indeed ironic as both Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft were members of Masonic lodges (Roosevelt belonged to the Matinecock Lodge on West Main Street in Oyster Bay, New York; Taft belonged to the Kilwinning Lodge in Cincinnati, Ohio). Establishment Republicans would rather see the re-election of Barack Hussein Obama in a three-way race in 2012 than cede control of the party to Sarah Heath Palin.
Although it is far, far too early to even begin handicapping the contest for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, one can be perfectly assured that its naturalist leaders will do everything possible to prevent the voice of the "people" from being heard to their detriment. When you come right down it, of course, the Republican establishment has just as much contempt for the "people" as does Barack Hussein Obama and his band of naturalist elitists of the "left." They only have use for the "people" when they can claim that their beloved masses have given them a "mandate" to do as they please with the reins of governmental power.
Pope Pius XI analyzed this farce perfectly in Ubi Arcano Dei Consilio, December 23, 1922:
To these evils we must add the contests between political parties, many of which struggles do not originate in a real difference of opinion concerning the public good or in a laudable and disinterested search for what would best promote the common welfare, but in the desire for power and for the protection of some private interest which inevitably result in injury to the citizens as a whole. From this course there often arise robberies of what belongs rightly to the people, and even conspiracies against and attacks on the supreme authority of the state, as well as on its representatives. These political struggles also beget threats of popular action and, at times, eventuate in open rebellion and other disorders which are all the more deplorable and harmful since they come from a public to whom it has been given, in our modern democratic states, to participate in very large measure in public life and in the affairs of government. Now, these different forms of government are not of themselves contrary to the principles of the Catholic Faith, which can easily be reconciled with any reasonable and just system of government. Such governments, however, are the most exposed to the danger of being overthrown by one faction or another.
Pope Leo XIII had warned in Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885, that the concept of the "sovereignty" of the "people" was bound to produce instability, especially when the "people" are not informed by the truths of the Catholic Faith:
The sovereignty of the people, however, and this without any reference to God, is held to reside in the multitude; which is doubtless a doctrine exceedingly well calculated to flatter and to inflame many passions, but which lacks all reasonable proof, and all power of insuring public safety and preserving order. Indeed, from the prevalence of this teaching, things have come to such a pass that may hold as an axiom of civil jurisprudence that seditions may be rightfully fostered. For the opinion prevails that princes are nothing more than delegates chosen to carry out the will of the people; whence it necessarily follows that all things are as changeable as the will of the people, so that risk of public disturbance is ever hanging over our heads.
To hold, therefore, that there is no difference in matters of religion between forms that are unlike each other, and even contrary to each other, most clearly leads in the end to the rejection of all religion in both theory and practice. And this is the same thing as atheism, however it may differ from it in name. Men who really believe in the existence of God must, in order to be consistent with themselves and to avoid absurd conclusions, understand that differing modes of divine worship involving dissimilarity and conflict even on most important points cannot all be equally probable, equally good, and equally acceptable to God.
The madness of the naturalistic farce of 2010 is over. King "Money" will rule the day in the 112th Congress as it has in the 111th Congress.
The madness of the naturalistic farce of 2012 is now in its early stages. There is no place for Christ the King in this farce as it mocks His Social Reign over men and their nations, tickling the itching ears of the "people" with pious platitudes designed to win votes so as to "divvy up" power between competing sets of naturalists.
We must remember that we are in a diabolical trap created by the overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King by the Protestant Revolt and institutionalized by the ethos of Judeo-Masonry and the vast array of naturalistic ideologies and philosophies and movements allied with it. There is no secular, religiously indifferentist, nondenominational or interdenominational way by which our problems are going to be resolved. And while the naturalists in the Democratic Party will be engaging in some fratricide of their own now that Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro Pelosi has announced her intention to remain the floor leader of her substantially reduced Democratic Caucus in the United States House of Representatives, we must never mistake this fratricide as representing anything other than warfare among competing sets of naturalists who believe that men and their nations do not have to submit themselves to the Social Reign of Christ the King as It must be exercised by the Catholic Church.
Our goal must be, as ever, to plant the seeds for what Pope Saint Pius X urged us in Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910, to restore: the Catholic City:
This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.
No, Venerable Brethren, We must repeat with the utmost energy in these times of social and intellectual anarchy when everyone takes it upon himself to teach as a teacher and lawmaker - the City cannot be built otherwise than as God has built it; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; it has been in existence and still is: it is Christian civilization, it is the Catholic City. It has only to be set up and restored continually against the unremitting attacks of insane dreamers, rebels and miscreants. omnia instaurare in Christo.
We help to restore the Catholic City by remembering that this is the time that God has ordained from all eternity for us to live in, seeking therefore to cooperate with the graces He won for us by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross and that flows into our hearts and souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, the Mediatrix of All Graces, to persevere to the point of our dying breaths in states of Sanctifying Grace as members of the Catholic Church.
The final triumph belongs to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. We must never despair. We must simply ask her to be valiant, faithful and tireless champions of her Divine Son, Christ the King, at all times and in all circumstances, looking never for "results" in this life, seeking only to remain faithful to Our King through her, Our Queen, until we draw our dying breaths, pray as many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits.