Home Articles Golden Oldies Speaking Schedule About Christ or Chaos Links Donations Contact Us
November 3, 2013


Francis And His Balloon Boyz

by Thomas A. Droleskey

Remember Falcon Heene?

Yes, Falcon Heene. Remember him?

Time flies.

Memories fade.

Still stumped?

Well, I will get back to him in but a few moments.

To quote the thirty-ninth president of the United States of America, James Earl Carter, Jr., "Trust me."

I will get back to Falcon Heene.

Indeed, human beings are easily distracted. We tend to be distracted in our prayers as the demons do everything they can to prevent us from praying with fervor and devotion, especially while assisting at Holy Mass or as we are praying Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary.

The inability of people to focus on serious prayer, including mental prayer, is attributable, at least in large part, to the "busyness" of the Protestant and Novus Ordo service and its demand for the "full, active and conscious participation" of the faithful in the liturgy, meaning that the spirit of silence and recollection found the Immemorial Mass of Tradition that was conductive to full interior participation in the unbloody re-presentation of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Sacrifice of Himself to His Co-Equal and Co-Eternal Father on the wood of the Holy Cross in atonement for our sins produced Catholics whose prayers at Holy Mass were incomplete, passive and unconscious. Lost in this mythology is the simple fact that illiterate Catholics throughout the centuries had a precise and reverent understanding that Holy Mass is indeed the unbloody re-presentation of Calvary as treated Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Real Presence with respect and awe. Can this be said about the effects of the Novus Ordo liturgical service upon many Catholics who are as of yet attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism?

The Novus Ordo's promulgation by Giovanni Montini/Paul The Sick on April 3, 1969 (it went into effect on Sunday, November 30, 1969, the First Sunday of Advent) came at a time when television was sapping the attention-span of ordinary Americans. The advent and the widespread mass production and sale of  remote control television devices made it possible for people to change from channel to channel with abandon, and the variety of channels increased as cable and satellite networks were launched, offering them scores and scores, if not hundreds, of choices that they could make with their fingertips. The Internet has multiplied by a factor of millions the places where one can go to waste his time and lose his soul with clicks of the "mouse" on his computer or whatever "personal device" (I know nothing about those either) repeatedly over the course of the day.

The production of early video games in the 1970s, most of which had to be attached to televisions by cables, on which people could play such games as "pong," started the craze of such games, have made more and more succeeding generations of Americans incapable of concentrating for long periods of time on anything, no less of rational discourse on the Faith or current events. Everything must be in the form of the infernal "sound bite," "easy to digest." Efforts to provide sustained treatments of issues are treated by many young people with instant disdain and contempt.

The naturalists of the advertising industry on Madison Avenue know this, which is why they have fashioned commercials in a flashy manner so as to "grab" the audience's attention and place a slogan or image in their memory that will prompt them to purchase whatever good or service is being advertised. This, of course, has influenced how naturalists who belong to the two principal organized crime families of naturalism in the United States of America, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, as they rely almost exclusively upon marketing for tailoring campaign speeches and crafting their campaign strategies. Gone are the days when the naturalists of yore could give stem winders of three or four hours without any notes, thereby providing their audiences, who were starved for some kind of entertainment and had normal spans-of-attention that had not been altered by the television and computer eras, with information, with information, a lot of it bogus, upon which to base their votes. Those days are long gone. Long gone.

It was as a result of the devil's various attacks on the attention of spans of "modern man" that many of the students I taught in the last fifty to twenty years of my thirty year career as a college/university professor of political science had very lessened abilities to listen attentively to lectures, to take detailed notes that provided them with a comprehensive summary of the lectures (most lectures can be recorded pretty easily, I suppose, by various hand-held devices) to be reviewed and elongated when they reviewed those notes at night so that they truly learn the material and have a foundation for succeeding lectures, seeing how each lecture provides the foundation for the next as it proceeds from proceeding lectures. Many of these students were simply incapable of simple college level reading and had difficulty with plain college-level words spoken during lectures as their vocabularies, so underdeveloped in the American concentration camps of naturalistic, anti-Theistic ideologies called public schools, were largely at a grade school level. Many of them, with some notable exceptions from time to time, were steeped in the prevailing ethos of emotionalism, illogic and sentimentality that only increased its hold on them

This is why the infernal "sound bite" has triumphed in our popular culture today. Naturalists of the false opposites of the "left" and the "right"* [explained once again in the appendix below] have emerged who are trained to speak in the "sound bite." We now have an increasing number of Catholics who are doing so, thanks to what is referred to as "social media." (I was slow to accept the emergence of the computer in the 1980s, being attached to the typewriter, slower still to switch from DOS to Windows, even more slow to actually learn how to use e-mail an the internet, remaining utterly incompetent to this very day concerning anything to do with computer graphics and such things. I don't think, however, that I will ever grow to accept "social media" as it is not a means of sound, rational discourse based on an understanding of the Holy Faith, admitting that some make use of it to point people to such discourses.)

If you think about it for a little while, ladies and gentlemen, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis, more so than any other false "pontiff" before him, has added to the "noise" that exists in this era of supposed "news" and "information." As has been noted in many articles in the past seven months, thirteen days, it is impossible for one person to keep up with this barrage of constant noise and that this figure of Antichrist has created, no less to deal with all of the scandalous images that have been scattered far and wide displaying the man's penchant for violating the physical of others in the name of "warmth" and "caring" no matter the bounds of decency he violates in the process. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is an undisciplined mass of impulses, each of which is truly revolutionary.

This is why an increasing number of people are beginning to explore, no matter how tentatively, the canonical-doctrinal teaching of the Catholic Church concerning the inability of those who have defect even privately from one article of the Faith to hold ecclesiastical office legitimately Even Mario Francesco "Cardinal" Pompedda, the head of the conciliar Apostolic Signatura from 1997 to 2004, admitted that this is the case, although, obviously, he did not believe that it applied to the dying heretic then posing as a "pope," Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II:




It is true that the canonical doctrine states that the see would be vacant in the case of heresy. ... But in regard to all else, I think what is applicable is what judgment regulates human acts. And the act of will, namely a resignation or capacity to govern or not govern, is a human act. (Cardinal Says Pope Could Govern Even If Unable to Speak, Zenit, February 8, 2005.)

A gigantic hoax has been perpetrated by Modernist revolutionaries posing as officials of the Catholic Church as they have propagated one false doctrine after another and have dared to profane the honor and majesty and glory of the Most Blessed Trinity by means of false, sacrilegious and sacramentally barren liturgical rites and by engaging in one diabolically inspired act of so-called "inter-religious prayer" after another, going so far as to treat the representatives of false religions as having a mission from God to serve Him and to sanctify and save souls. The perpetrators of this carefully-crafted hoax have attempted to give "joint blessings" with the "clergy" of these false religions, thus conveying, no matter their words to the contrary, a spirit of religious indifferentism that have convinced countless hundreds of millions of Catholics and non-Catholics alike around the world to believe that one religion is as good as another, that all that matters is the "service of the poor."

This is where Falcon Heene comes back into the picture.

Yes, the then six year-old Falcon Heene made some fame on October 15, 2009, when he hid, at the age of nine, at his parents' direction, in his family's garage while his father and mother, Richard and Mayumi Heene, launched a balloon which they told the La rimer County, Colorado, Sheriff's office contained him. The nation's attention was riveted on the images of the balloon as its path of the fifty-mile flight that it took it all around the surrounding area before landing twelve miles northeast of Denver, Colorado, whereupon rescue teams found that Falcon Heene was not inside the balloon's capsule. It was a matter of time before the whole incident was revealed to be a hoax that had been concocted by his parents for a so-called "reality television" program that they wanted to market to some television network for a series. His parents admitted the hoax, resulting in a ninety day prison term for Richard Heene and twenty weekend days in jail for Mayumi Heene.

Falcon Heene is now thirteen years old. It was at the tender age of seven three years ago that he formed what is called a "metal band" that goes by the name of "The Heene Boyz." Here's the story in case you are interested: 'Balloon boy' Falcon Heene, 9, now part of metal band. Talk about child abuse! Pray for these poor, poor boys. Gee, when was the last time you heard a conciliar "pope" condemn" "heavy metal" and the demonic noise that it produces that is designed to agitate souls?

Well, it is because of Balloon Boy and his "metal band" that this article has been entitled "Francis and His Balloon Boyz."

The article was been so named as Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a partisan of "balloon" liturgies, which he has now brought to the Vatican directly from Buenos Aires, Argentina, and Rio di Janiero, Brazil.

See for yourselves:


Meet the New Balloon Boy


A Bunch of Phony-Baloney "Bishops" Enjoying Their Balloons at the Liturgical Travesty for "World Family Day" Saturday October 26, 2013


Look at this spectacle.

This is all a hoax that is far worse that Richard and Mayumi Heene's "Balloon Boy" of four years ago as this hoax mocked Christ the King on the day His universal Social Kingship over men and their nations was celebrated in the Catholic Church, which is in the catacombs at this time, around the world.

The counterfeit church of conciliarism is such hoax that over three thousand men and women leave the religious life every year. After all, why remain under the evangelical counsels, such as they are in the fake, phony fraud conciliar sect, when one can live in the world and continue to dress and act and go about one's daily basis as he or she did in a religious community?


The secretary of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life said in an October 29 address that over 3,000 men and women religious leave the consecrated life each year.

In the address – a portion of which was reprinted in L’Osservatore Romano – Archbishop José Rodríguez Carballo said that statistics from his Congregation, as well as the Congregation for the Clergy, indicate that over the past five years, 2,624 religious have left the religious life annually. When one takes into account additional cases handled by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the number tops 3,000.

The prelate, who led the Order of Friars Minor from 2003 until his April 2013 curial appointment, said that the majority of cases occur at a “relatively young age.” The causes, he said, include “absence of spiritual life,” “loss of a sense of community,” and a “loss of sense of belonging to the Church” – a loss manifest in dissent from Catholic teaching on “women priests and sexual morality.”

Other causes include “affective problems,” including heterosexual relationships that continue into marriage and homosexual relationships, which are “most obvious in men, but also present, more often than you think, between women.”

The world, the prelate continued, is undergoing profound changes from modernity to postmodernity – from fixed reference points to uncertainty, doubt, and insecurity. In a market-oriented world, “everything is measured and evaluated according to the utility and profitability, even people.” It is “a world where everything is soft,” where “there is no place for sacrifice, nor for renunciation.

In a culture of neo-individualism and subjectivism, he added, “the individual is the measure of everything,” and people feel “unique in excellence.” “Modern man talks a lot” but “cannot communicate in depth.”

The solution, he said, is a renewed attention to the centrality the Triune God in religious life, which in turn “brings with it the gift of oneself to others.” There must be a clear emphasis on the “radical nature of the Gospel,” rather than the “number of members or the maintenance of works.” (Vatican Revolutionary Blind to the Truth.)

More often than you think?

Perversion is rife in the religious houses and convents of communities, once strongly Catholic, now in the control of the conciliar revolutionaries. This is not news.

Moreover, Jose Rodriguez Carballo, whom you first met seven months in Francis The Feminist, was, as noted in the article above, the General Minister of Orders of Friars Minor for ten years until appointed to the conciliar for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life. Did Carballo do anything to clean up this nest of Eastern "mysticism," feminism, environmentalism and perversion? Hardly. Carballo did nothing to discipline the Franciscans who issued the following statement after William "Cardinal" Levada slapped the wrists of the Leadership Conference on Women Religious nineteen months ago:


Leaders from the seven Franciscan provinces in the U.S. publicly backed a group of American nuns on Thursday, calling a Vatican crackdown on the women "excessive."

The Franciscan friars are believed to be the first Catholic religious order to voice support for the Leadership Conference of Women Religious since the Vatican announced a full-scale makeover of the group in April.

The Vatican said the LCWR, which represents most of the nation's 57,000 nuns, does not adequately advocate against gay marriage, abortion and women's ordination.

The Vatican's "doctrinal assessment" also faulted the sisters for sponsoring conferences that featured "a prevalence of certain radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith."

Noting that many members of LCWR belong to female Franciscan orders, the friars pledged solidarity with the sisters and called the Vatican assessment "excessive, given the evidence raised."

The sisters have been wrestling with complex contemporary issues, the Franciscans said, and those deliberations should not be equated with disobedience to Catholic doctrine.

"The efforts of LCWR to facilitate honest and faithful dialogue on critical issues of our times must not result in a level of ecclesial oversight that could, in effect, quash all further discernment," the Franciscans said.

Catholics since the Middle Ages have disagreed about how to apply church doctrine to public policy, the friars argued, and seldom were those disputes deemed "equivalent to questioning the authority of the Church's magisterium."

Many church observers suspect the Vatican crackdown was at least partially a response to prominent Catholic sisters' support for President Obama's health care overhaul, despite bishops' objections.

"Rather than excessive oversight of LCWR, perhaps a better service to the people of God might be a renewed effort to articulate the nuances of our complex moral tradition," the friars said.

The LCWR itself has called the Vatican's assessment "unsubstantiated" and a source of "scandal and pain." (Franciscan friars back American nuns in Vatican spat.)

The Franciscans who issued this statement last year, of course, are in perfect harmony with the "theology" of the likes of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and Oscar Maradiaga Rodriguez, whose revolutionary outline for the Bergoglio "Petrine Ministry" is being critiqued (see Commissar of Antichrist Speaks, part one and Commissar of Antichrist Speaks, part two; part three will be completed for tomorrow's posting, God willing and Our Lady interceding).

It must also be remembered that Jose Rodriguez Carballo is the conciliar official who is persecuting the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate who have now petitioned Bergoglio himself to have an exclusive to offer/stage the 2013 version of the Immemorial Mass of Tradition:


To read the decree issued by the Vatican congregation for religious shortly before the voyage of Francis in Brazil, with the explicit approval of the pope himself, one must agree more with the latter than with the former.

The decree bears the date of July 11, 2013, the protocol number 52741/2012, and the signatures of the prefect of the congregation, Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz, a focolarino, and of the secretary of the same congregation, Archbishop José Rodríguez Carballo, a Franciscan.

Braz de Aviz is the only high-ranking official in the curia of Brazilian nationality, and because of this he has accompanied Francis on his voyage to Rio de Janeiro. He has a reputation as a progressive, although that of a scatterbrain fits him better. And he will probably be one of the first to go when the reform of the curia announced by Francis takes shape.

Rodríguez Carballo instead enjoys the pope's complete trust. His promotion as second-in-command of the congregation was backed by Francis himself at the beginning of his pontificate.

It is difficult, therefore, to think that pope Bergoglio was unaware of what he was approving when he was presented with the decree before its publication.

The decree installs an apostolic commissioner - in the person of the Capuchin Fidenzio Volpi - at the head of all the communities of the congregation of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate.

And this in itself is cause for astonishment. Because the Franciscans of the Immaculate are one of the most flourishing religious communities born in the Catholic Church in recent decades, with male and female branches, with many young vocations, spread over several continents and with a mission in Argentina as well.

They want to be faithful to tradition, in full respect for the magisterium of the Church. So much so that in their communities they celebrate Masses both in the ancient rite and in the modern rite, as moreover do hundreds of religious communities around the world - the Benedictines of Norcia, to give just one example - applying the spirit and the letter of the motu proprio “Summorum Pontificum" of Benedict XVI.

But precisely this was contested by a core group of internal dissidents, who appealed to the Vatican authorities complaining of the excessive propensity of their congregation to celebrate the Mass in the ancient rite, with the effect of creating exclusion and opposition within the communities, of undermining internal unity and, worse, of weakening the more general "sentire cum Ecclesia."

The Vatican authorities responded by sending an apostolic visitor one year ago. And now comes the appointment of the commissioner.

But what is most astonishing are the last five lines of the decree of July 11:

"In addition to the above, the Holy Father Francis has directed that every religious of the congregation of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate is required to celebrate the liturgy according to the ordinary rite and that, if the occasion should arise, the use of the extraordinary form (Vetus Ordo) must be explicitly authorized by the competent authorities, for every religious and/or community that makes the request.

The astonishment stems from the fact that what is decreed contradicts the dispositions given by Benedict XVI, which for the celebration of the Mass in the ancient rite “sine populo" demand no previous request for authorization whatsoever:

"Ad talem celebrationem secundum unum alterumve Missale, sacerdos nulla eget licentia, nec Sedis Apostolicae nec Ordinarii sui" (1).

While for Masses "cum populo" they set out a few conditions, but always guaranteeing the freedom to celebrate.

In general, against a decree of a Vatican congregation it is possible to have recourse to the supreme tribunal of the apostolic signatura, today headed by a cardinal, the American Raymond Leo Burke, considered a friend by the traditionalists.

But if the decree is the object of approval in a specific form on the part of the pope, as it seems to be in this case, recourse is not admitted

The Franciscans of the Immaculate will have to comply with the prohibition on celebrating the Mass in the ancient rite beginning Sunday, August 11.

And now what will happen, not only among them but in the whole Church?

It was the conviction of Benedict XVI that "the two forms of the usage of the Roman Rite can be mutually enriching." He had explained this in the heartfelt letter to the bishops of the whole world with which he had accompanied the motu proprio "Summorum Pontificum":

But from now on this is no longer the case, at least not for all. For the Franciscans of the Immaculate, forced to celebrate the Mass only in the modern form, there remains just one way to take to heart what Benedict XVI also hoped: to "demonstrate" in this form as well, "more powerfully than has been the case hitherto, the sacrality which attracts many people to the former usage."

The fact is that one pillar of the pontificate of Joseph Ratzinger has been cracked. By an exception that many fear - or hope - will soon become the rule. (Sandro Magister, For the First Time, Francis Contradicts Benedict.)

Jose Rodriguez Carballo cannot figure out that the cause of the defections of over three thousand men and women from religious communities rife with heresy, apostasy, sacrilege, natural and unnatural sins against Holy Purity, pantheism, environmentalism, Communism, Eastern mysticism, feminism and blasphemy is the result of the very conciliar revolution of which he, Jose Rodriguez Carballo, who was born in 1953, the same year as my only brother (who is two years, eighteen days my junior), has been and continues to be an integral player.

The principal player, however, in the conciliar revolution for the past nearly eight months, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, has had a very busy week repeating each of his usual hobby horses at the daily sessions of the Ding Dong School Of Apostasy at the Casa Santa Marta as he goes about bravely slaying one straw man after another. One of these screeds, given on Tuesday, October 29, 2013,dovetailed perfectly with Oscar Andres Maradiaga Rodriguez's lectures in Irving, Texas, on Friday, October 25, 2013, the Feast of Saints Chrysanthus and Daria, and in Miami, Florida, on Monday, October 28, 2013, the Feast of Saints Simon and Jude:


"The first Christians "depicted it as an anchor: hope was an anchor, an anchor tied to the banks" of the afterlife. And our life is just walking towards this anchor. The question comes to mind: where we anchored to ourselves, each of us? Are we anchored right there on the shore of that far away ocean or we are anchored to an artificial lagoon that we created, with our rules, our behaviour, our rhythms, our clericalism, our non-ecclesial ecclesiastical attitudes, huh? Are we anchored there? Everything comfortable, all secure, huh? That is not hope. Where is my heart anchored, there in this man-made lagoon, with really impeccable behaviour...,” Francis said.

Then the Pope spoke about another symbol of hope: childbirth: “We are waiting - he observed - this is a delivery. And hope is in this dynamic", of "giving life." But, he added, "the first fruits of the Spirit can not be seen". Yet I know that "the Spirit works". He works in us "like a mustard seed, that inside is full of life, strength, progressing" to become tree. The Spirit works like yeast. This, he added, "is how the Spirit works: you do not see it, but it is there. It's a grace we must ask for.”

"It is one thing to live in hope, because in hope we are saved and another thing to live as good Christians, and nothing more. Waiting with ardent expectation for the revelation or living true to the commandments, being anchored to the shore of the beyond or parked in our own artificial lagoon.”

Finally, Francis thought of Mary, “a young girl, when, after she heard she was to be a mother changed her attitude and went, and helped and sang a song of praise. When a woman becomes pregnant she is a woman, but she is never (just) a woman is a mother. And hope has something of this. It changes our attitude: we are who we are, but we are not only that, we are looking towards there, anchored there." (Ding Dong School Session on October 29, 2013.)

How can one not feel physically ill when reading Bergoglio's words blaspheming Our Lady.

No, this is not the first time that Bergoglio has denied the doctrinal effects of Our Lady's Immaculate Conception, which include her Perfect Integrity, in order to project onto her the disorderly orderly inclinations of one who suffers from vestigial after-effects of Original Sin. Bergoglio has done this several times before in the past eight months, demonstrating once again that he is in complete accord with his predecessor, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who did so in his three-volume work of heresy, Jesus of Nazareth, and as he gave his personal approval for the world premiere of the Protestant-produced The Nativity Story to be shown at the Paul The Sick Audience Hall in the Vatican on November 26, 2006, the First Sunday of Advent.

Nonetheless, however, Bergoglio's blasphemy against Our Lady is still sickening beyond words, especially as he is trying to say that we must change our "attitudes" about the "past" just as he contends that she did at the Annunciation.

The entirety of the passage quoted just above indicates yet again just how obsessed Jorge Mario Bergoglio is in his Lieutenant Philip Gerard-like quest to hunt down and eradicate all remaining vestiges of recognizable Catholicism in the counterfeit church of conciliarism.

Bergoglio once again--and I have lost track of how many times as he sometimes does this several times a week, if not two or three times on the same day--attempted to justify his own revolutionary agenda by the use of his disordered, undisciplined, demagogic attacks on those who are "anchored" in o an artificial lagoon that we created, with our rules, our behaviour, our rhythms, our clericalism, our non-ecclesial ecclesiastical attitude" as we keep ourselves in a "comfortable" "man-made lagoon." Catholics must be "open" to where the "spirit" leads them. Unfortunately for Bergoglio, though, his "spirit" is not of God, it is of Antichrist.

As a demagogue, you see, Jorge Mario Bergoglio uses his visceral attacks as he is incapable of true scholarly discipline. His is a revolution of emotion and the senses, which is why the more disciplined revolutionary agenda outlined by Oscar Andres Rodrigues Maradiaga Rodriguez is far more significant, especially when one considers the fact that Bergoglio has become boringly predictable with his daily screeds, the extent of which is impossible for one person to critique on a daily basis without going insane.

Bergoglio, however, is a proud little demon. He is good enough to show us exactly where his "spirit" leads him, providing us with bold displays of his desire for a "new way" to "unite" "believers" and unbelievers.

Bergoglio's spirit was on full display yesterday, the Commemoration of All Souls, as he staged the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo service at the Campo Verrano Cemetery, in white vestments, of course, as the color black is frowned upon in the conciliar church, by debuting yet another so-called "Resurrexifix":


(As found on: Rorate-Caeli Blogspot)

Some spirit.


White vestments in alleged Masses for the dead.

Well, this is what Pope Pius XII had to say in Mediator Dei, November 20, 1947, about that kind of "spirit," which is nothing other than the recrudescence of the "spirit" of the illegal Synod of Pistoia whose proportions were condemned by Pope Pius VI in Auctorem Fidei, August 28, 1794:


Assuredly it is a wise and most laudable thing to return in spirit and affection to the sources of the sacred liturgy. For research in this field of study, by tracing it back to its origins, contributes valuable assistance towards a more thorough and careful investigation of the significance of feast-days, and of the meaning of the texts and sacred ceremonies employed on their occasion. But it is neither wise nor laudable to reduce everything to antiquity by every possible device. Thus, to cite some instances, one would be straying from the straight path were he to wish the altar restored to its primitive table form; were he to want black excluded as a color for the liturgical vestments; were he to forbid the use of sacred images and statues in Churches; were he to order the crucifix so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings; and lastly were he to disdain and reject polyphonic music or singing in parts, even where it conforms to regulations issued by the Holy See.

Clearly no sincere Catholic can refuse to accept the formulation of Christian doctrine more recently elaborated and proclaimed as dogmas by the Church, under the inspiration and guidance of the Holy Spirit with abundant fruit for souls, because it pleases him to hark back to the old formulas. No more can any Catholic in his right senses repudiate existing legislation of the Church to revert to prescriptions based on the earliest sources of canon law. Just as obviously unwise and mistaken is the zeal of one who in matters liturgical would go back to the rites and usage of antiquity, discarding the new patterns introduced by disposition of divine Providence to meet the changes of circumstances and situation.

This way of acting bids fair to revive the exaggerated and senseless antiquarianism to which the illegal Council of Pistoia gave rise. It likewise attempts to reinstate a series of errors which were responsible for the calling of that meeting as well as for those resulting from it, with grievous harm to souls, and which the Church, the ever watchful guardian of the "deposit of faith" committed to her charge by her divine Founder, had every right and reason to condemn. For perverse designs and ventures of this sort tend to paralyze and weaken that process of sanctification by which the sacred liturgy directs the sons of adoption to their Heavenly Father of their souls' salvation. (Pope Pius XII, Mediator Dei, November 20, 1947. See also Francis The Ecclesiastical Agitator.)

Fifty-five years of propagandizing in behalf of a false religion in this time of the Great Apostasy that the Order of Friars Minor in conciliar captivity have now issued a prayer card to ask Catholics to ask Saint Francis of Assisi AND "Pope Francis" to "pray for us."

Courtesy of Mr. Frank Rega, the author of Saint Francis of Assisi and the Conversion of the Muslims, here is an image of the prayer card:

(See: What's Wrong With This Picture?)

There is, of course, plenty wrong with this photograph just as there is plenty wrong, starting with, say, everything, with conciliarism and its false doctrines, sacrilegious liturgy, corrupted moral teachings and truly man-made pastoral practices that are from the devil and can lead to only one place, Hell itself.

We must have nothing to do with Francis and his Balloon Boyz, and those in the Motu world who think that they can live in their own alternative universe while not bothering too much with the heretics and their balloons ought to reckon with the fact that Bergoglio is coming after each of them in his good time. He will countenance no semblance of "Pelagianism" in his false church. Part of his perverse "mission" to lead everyone in the conciliar sect out of what he thinks is a "man-made" lagoon and into the "joys" of the "Resurrexifix" and white vestments at purported funeral Masses. Yes, indeed, their day is coming very soon, which means that they better have their balloons at the ready or come to break with all human respect and recognize, no matter the cost, that none of this can come from the Catholic Church.

With prayers to the Poor Souls in this month November, especially as we offer our Rosaries for them as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, may the souls who profit from our prayers, penances, mortifications, sacrifices, sufferings, humiliations and good works this month help to provide Holy Mother Church with final relief from her sufferings at this time as we hope that our prayers will bring them such relief by virtue of their speedy entry into Heaven.


Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?


Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!

Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.



© Copyright 2013, Thomas A. Droleskey. All rights reserved.