Conciliarism's Weapons of Mass Destruction
by Thomas A. Droleskey
Moral corruption is a way of life in the conciliar
structures. This moral corruption has been suborned by the conciliar
"popes" and their "bishops" because they have lost the sense of the
horror of personal sin, thinking, despite all of their public words of
protest to the contrary when they are forced to make statements as a
result of "petty gossip" in the secular news media (note that they do
not respond to the earnest pleading of the sheep to help them but
respond only to the secular media!), that whatever policies and programs
they adopt, no matter how much God is offended or how many souls are
wounded and scandalized to the point of losing the Faith entirely in
some instances, are almost beyond criticism or review. This loss of the
sense of the horror of personal sin is just a manifestation of
conciliarism's incessant warfare of total destruction upon the Faith that demands the total
assent of the faithful yet attached to the structures of their false
Numerous articles on this site have attested to the manner in which the conciliar revolutionaries have sought to create a doctrinal, liturgical, pastoral, architectural, musical and educational environment that can be termed as "gay friendly."
Obviously, many conciliar officials, not a few of
them afflicted with perversity themselves, have gone of their way
to create, foster and promote a culture that has sustained and
propagated the entire agenda of homosexual collective, including
"marriage" and, quite importantly, persecuting anyone who criticizes
sodomy for what it is. There has been the systematic recruitment,
retention and promotion of homosexuals through the nooks and crannies of
the conciliar structures, including its hierarchy, such as it is, and
within parishes, schools, universities, colleges, seminaries,
professional schools, religious houses and houses of so-called
"spiritual formation." I suggest that those who have any doubt about
this fact should consider the massive amount of documented evidence that
Mrs. Randy Engel amassed in The Rite of Sodomy.
Thus it is that the counterfeit church of
concilairism, reflecting its "openness to the
world" and its falsehoods, has bought into the ideology of the
homosexual collective by building it
into programs that are taught to presbyters, teachers and children,
doing so with an special application to "touching" and expressions of
"affection" when the problem of clergy abuse that has exploded into full
public view in the past twelve years now has been caused by the
creation of an entire environment that is friendly to perversity.
Thus it is that a conciliar "bishop" in Mexico, Jose Raul Vera Lopez, the conciliar "ordinary" of the Diocese of Saltillo, Mexico, has called those who believe that "gay people" are deranged or deprived are "mentally ill."
Here is a brief report from Clerical Whispers, which, amazingly enough, defended Jose Raul Vera Lopez's assertion:
A Mexican Catholic bishop who has been a strong supporter of LGBT issues has declared that homophobia is a “mental illness.” Is that really an accurate classification?
The Billerico Project is reporting on an interview given by Bishop Jose Raul Vera Lopez to a television show, “Terra Mexico,” in which he stated:
“Why would I immediately think a gay or lesbian person is perverse or depraved the moment they approach me? That’s how people who are homophobic react. It’s a mental illness in which you see gays as depraved and promiscuous. You have to be sick in the head for that.”
“They are human beings and deserve respect. The Holy Father knows it’s a. . . .I am certain he knows because the reality is that many in the church do not want to acknowledge the scientific reality on the issue of sexuality. They want to keep homosexuality as a form of human perversion, an illness. But that is no longer the case, scientifically speaking. “
“We just have to read the Bible more carefully within a historical context and within a real context. The Biblical texts we have used to bash the heads of homosexuals to say they are condemned by the Bible? We have to read them much more carefully.” (Mexican Apostate Supports Perversity.)
This is pretty standard fare amongst the officials of the counterfeit church of conciliarism. Chancery office after chancery office around the world is composed of such men as Jose Raul Vera Lopez. Numerous parishes around the world are staffed by priests/presbyters and "pastoral assistants" who speak in the exact same manner as Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P, who was installed as a conciliar presbyter by none other than Paul The Sick on June 29, 1975, and was installed as a conciliar "bishop" by a man who protected moral derelicts, the soon-to-be "canonized" Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II on January 6, 1998.
Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P., however, has some special distinctions that qualify him to speak in the way that he did on a Mexican television station.
Randy Engel wrote an article that enumerated these distinctions that qualify Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P., to speak as he did:
The recent controversy over a Mexican "gay Catholic ministry" called the San Elredo Comunidad or the Lesbian and Gay Community of San Elredo, an official organ of the Diocese of Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico, headed by Dominican Bishop José Raúl Vera López, O.P., illustrates how well these politically-based and politically motivated Trojan horses serve the Homosexual Collective, as opposed to serving God, the Catholic Church, and the individuals caught up in the vice of sexual perversions who need to be extricated from the Collective.
The San Elredo Community is an "inclusive" ministry which caters to male homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals, transsexuals, transgenders, transvestites, leather and bondage devotees, sadomasochists, and a sundry of other "sexual orientations." It was founded in 2002 by former New York publicist, Robert F. Coogan, who was ordained a priest for the Diocese of Saltillo by Bishop Vera López.
Somewhere between his birth on June 21, 1945, in the city of Acámbaro in the southeastern corner of the Mexican state of Guanajuato, and his ordination to the priesthood in Rome by Pope Paul VI and his being awarded a series of bishoprics from 1987 to 1999 by Pope John Paul II, Bishop Vera López must have found the clerical goose that laid the golden egg. His ascent up the hierarchical career ladder appears to have been rapid and seamless.
Three years after his installation in Saltillo, the Dominican political activist bishop formally took up the cause of "Gay Liberation." His growing reputation as a pro-homosexual apologist, earned him a speaker's spot at the 15th Anniversary National Association Of Catholic Diocesan Lesbian And Gay Ministries (renamed the Catholic Association for Lesbian and Gay Ministry) held in Long Beach, California in 2008, and an invitation by the Archdiocese of Los Angeles to appear on a panel titled "Gay and Lesbian Catholics: Church Teaching and Pastoral Approaches" at one of Cardinal Roger Mahony's notorious Religious Education gigs in March 2010.
Bishop Vera López has been an open promoter of "civil unions" legislation and extended legal benefits for homosexuals in the State of Coahuila, but has "drawn the line" at homosexual "marriages." He is a vehement opponent of "homophobia" which he states needs to be erased from peoples' hearts. He believes that "gays" are victims of discrimination and societal marginalization.
The Dominican prelate backs the pro-homosexual functions and projects of the San Elredo Comunidad including its participation in "Gay Pride" celebrations, and has welcomed to his diocese homosexual activists like British ex-Dominican James Alison.
According to Alison, who makes his regular rounds to Catholic "gay parishes" in the United States including Most Holy Redeemer in the Castro District of San Francisco, "Church authority has become aware that the advent of 'matters gay' in recent years may not primarily center on sexual ethics at all. Rather, it concerns an emerging anthropological truth about a regular, normal and non-pathological variant within the human condition.
San Elredo's founder and main man, Fr. Robert Coogan, is a native of Long Island, N.Y. and is one of 14 children. His brother is also a pastor (who told the press that large family living was a "a way to learn tolerance and appreciation of diversity....") 
In the meantime, Fr. Coogan is busy teaching tolerance and acceptance of sodomy and other forms of same-sex perversions and proselytizing Mexican Catholics in the Saltillo Diocese on the virtues of "diversity" and what a "blessing" homosexuals are for the world. "The world could not exist without homosexuals," he says.  Coogan believes that God makes homosexuals, and therefore, they cannot be held responsible for their inordinate and sinful attractions and acts.
Coogan, who is one of three "spirit guides" assigned by Bishop Vera López to the group, is assisted in his "ministry" by Marco Antonio Mata, who intends to register himself and his partner under Coahuila's new civil unions law, and Special Events Coordinator, Fernando Hernández, who supports the view that homosexuals are just following their nature so there is no harm in acting out. 
Noé Ruiz Malacara, who coordinates the group's events with the Saltillo Diocese is a self-outed homosexual and an unemployed elementary school teacher in the state capital. He admits there is opposition from many traditional Mexicans, but adds that the population is gradually being softened up to accept sexual perversions as normal behavior. Sodomy is no problem, says Ruiz, as long as the couple is truly in love. He affirms that the group's "spirit guides" encourage "stable" homosexual relations over promiscuous one-night affairs, and "safe sex." 
The San Elredo Community is (mis)named after the great 12th Cistercian monk and abbot Aelred de Rievaulx, who along with Saint Sebastian and Saint John the Evangelist, vie for honors as the patron "saints" of the Homosexual Collective. 
While Coogan says the purpose of his "ministry" is to foster a deep love of God in the hearts of men and women given over to a wide-variety of sexual perversions, in truth, the San Elredo Community, aided and abetted by Bishop Vera López, simply confirms these poor souls in their sin.
The forty or so members of the San Elredo Community, mostly males in their late teens and early twenties, promote and participate in all things "gay" including "Gay Pride" events. In March 25-27, 2011, the diocesan-sponsored group held a "sexual, family and religious diversity forum" designed to promote homosexual acts and homosexual relationships in a more positive light. The bishop was present to say a mass for the gathering. 
On Good Friday, for the last four years, the San Elredo Community has held a "homosexual" Way of the Cross where homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals, transsexuals, transgenders, transvestites, leather and bondage tribes, sadomasochists, and almost certainly pederasts, clerical and lay, reinterpret the Scriptural Viacrusis to reflect the Homosexual Collective's psychic masochistic litany of "injustice collecting" including the suffering, rejection, and discrimination caused by "homophobia." 
One can learn a great deal about the pro-homosexual biases of Bishop Vera López and that of the leadership of the San Elredo Community by their language. They all speak "gayspeak." In any war, words are weapons, and the bishop and his accomplices are using "gayspeak" to make war on the Catholic faithful in state of Coahuila and beyond.
For example, the bishop's use of the word "gay" as opposed to the word "homosexual" or "sodomite" is a validation and advancement of the "Gay International." In The Politics of Homosexuality, Toby Marotta explains the origins of each of the words found in the slogan "Gay Liberation Front":
Simply by settling on a name, the radicals who met at Alternate U acknowledged that any persisting collectivity had to have an identity. Gay Liberation Front — each word in that name was selected with organizational as well as political considerations in mind. Unlike homosexual, the clinical term bestowed by heterosexuals and homophiles, the euphemism coined by cautious political forerunners, gay, which homosexuals called each other, was thought to be the word that would most appeal to homosexuals who were thirsting to be known as they knew themselves. Hence also liberation, intended to suggest freedom from constraint. Front implied a militant vanguard or coalition; it suggested that the GLF was the crest of a swelling wave destined to force people to recognize and respect the openly gay population.
Bishop Vera López publicly employs the gayspeak rhetoric of
"homophobia," a term linked to the Collective's efforts to pass itself
off as a "sexually repressed minority" in need of reclaiming its civil
and religious "rights."
Gayspeak is a defensive mechanism which insulates the homosexual in his
fantasy world, affirms his perpetual adolescence and reinforces his
perversion. It is a language that should be anathema to any Catholic prelate with a true interest in the spiritual welfare
of all his flock including those unfortunate enough to be caught up in
the damnable vice of sodomy and pederasty.
The very fact that so-called "gay ministries" exist today in the Catholic Church in almost every major diocese in the world is a testimony to the ability of heretofore sexual outlaws to successfully organize, politicize and legitimatize sexually deviant behavior even within traditional enemy camps.
Of all society's institutions, none is as important to the Homosexual Collective as organized religion, especially the Catholic Church. Religion is the supreme arbitrator and validator of human behavior. The secular State declares what acts are legal, but only the Church can declare which acts are moral and which are sinful. Hence, the Collective's preoccupation with infiltrating, colonizing, and subverting the Church using the same strategies that have proven effective in the penetration of secular institutions in order to bring it under the Collective's sphere of influence.
Clearly, under the leadership of Bishop Vera López, the Diocese of Saltillo in Coahuila has become the beachhead, the first secured area for political advancement of the "Gay Liberation Front" in Mexico.
The strategies of the Homosexual Collective in the Saltillo Diocese
The organizational and political strategies which have been followed by the San Elredo Comunidad in the Diocese of Saltillo are constructed on a refinement of Hegelian and Marxist-Leninist theories and practices. Every action is first and foremost viewed through a political prism, not a religious one. Thus far, the group appears to have successfully concealed its ultimate goals from the general public. It has also managed to control the language of public discourse. It has secured financial, personnel and material aid from both from the Diocese of Saltillo and other public sources. And it has secured control of the mass media including the liberal Catholic press both in Coahuila and the United States.
Bishop Vera López, by his words and his deeds has already "sanctified," or at least appeared to sanctify (which is just as useful) same-sex behavior and practices. Under his leadership, the group has been free to proselytize new homosexual recruits from the Catholic churches and community of Saltillo, as well as cull the diocese's Catholic population for non-homosexual fellow travelers and enlist volunteers to serve its interests. (Jose Raul Vera Lopez and "Gayspeak".
Perhaps those who run the "Clerical Whispers" website might want to rethink permitting themselves to accept very uncritically the manner in which Jose Raul Vera Lopez spoke as he caricature those who condemn homosexual attraction as disordered and who condemn the sin of Sodom and its sick culture as perverted. As has been noted on this site endlessly, there is no such thing as a "gay" person. A believing Catholic does not base his self-identification as a human being upon being attracted to the commission of certain sins, no less those that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.
Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P., is the one who is sick and twisted. It is he who has sought to project onto believing Catholics who have still blessed with a horror of personal sin, knowing as they do how our sins caused Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to suffer once in time during His Passion and Death and caused His Most Blessed Mother to suffer unspeakably as Swords of Sorrow were pierced through and through her Immaculate Heart. Believing Catholics know that the sin of Sodom carries grave consequences for those who commit it and that it destroys the stability of the family while further decaying a world that has gone insane as a result of the Protestant Revolution's overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King that gave rise to and was replaced by the organized forces of Judeo-Masonic naturalism over the course of the last three centuries.
Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P., has no care for such truths as his "religion" is the promotion of perverse, which does indeed have a firm grip on almost every older religious community operating in the counterfeit church of conciliarism, including in the corrupted version of the Order of Preachers that was founded by the great foe of heresy and sin, Saint Dominic de Guzman. Jose Raul Vera Lopez's recent remarks were not uttered casually or in an off-handed manner. He knew exactly what he was saying, and for those at Clerical Whispers to accept "gayspeak" as a sign of "sensitivity" towards those afflicted with the moral disorder of perverse attractions in light of all the evidence that is available from Jose Raul Vera Lopez's own revolutionary mouth is patently irresponsible and a disservice to the cause of truth.
Indeed, Jose Raul Vera Lopez. O.P., who is not a true priest or a true bishop, was "investigated" for the conciliar "Vatican" two years ago for his work with the "gay community," which he defended at the time by saying that he was not support the commission of perverse sins but was attempting to "undo" the "damage" caused by family members and friends who could not accept a person identifying himself as "gay." He gave an interview to Lifesite News two years ago in which he attempted to explain why there was no cause to investigate him even though he supported what he called the "depenalization" of the surgical assassination of innocent preborn babies in addition to his "support" for the homosexual collective:
MEXICO, August 9, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In an extensive interview with LifeSiteNews.com conducted last week, His Excellency Raul Vera López, bishop of the Diocese of Saltillo in the northern Mexican state of Coahuila, answered questions about his involvement with organizations that promote the homosexual lifestyle and the decriminalization and government provision of abortion services.
Bishop Vera is the president of the Fray Bartolomé de las Casas Human Rights Center, based in Chiapas, and is the founder of the Saltillo diocese’s Fray Juan de Larios Human Rights Center. A spokesman of the Fray Bartolomé Center has confirmed to LifeSiteNews that the organization supports both the decriminalization (or “depenalization”) of abortion and the provision of abortion by the government. Both groups are members of a pro-abortion alliance of civil organizations called the All Rights for Everyone Network (“Red Todos los Derechos para Todas y Todos”), and the names of both organizations have appeared on various pro-abortion “human rights” statements.
Bishop Vera recently acknowledged that he is under investigation by the Vatican for his sponsorship of a homosexual organization that is accused of denying the Catholic Church’s teaching on human sexuality. The group has also been associated with pro-abortion forces, including “Catholics for the Right to Decide.”
ter this reporter mentioned the fact that the names of two “human rights” groups led by Bishop Vera López appear on a 2008 declaration denouncing a pro-life constitutional amendment for the state of Jalisco, the bishop answered that the declaration was not pro-abortion, but rather against the penalization of abortion, something he regards as distinct. He called the penalization of abortions “the persecution of people who have abortions.”
“No, no, no, the penalization,” said Vera López regarding the document. “What is debated here is the penalization or depenalization of abortion in Mexico. That’s something else. The penalization is the persecution of people who have abortions.”
The bishop added that he knows “perfectly” that abortion is “a crime, a murder, of a child in the womb of his mother.”
“What might be subject to debate is the penalization or non-penalization, and do you know why? Because of the frightful failures we have in Mexico in the judicial process. And they have imprisoned indigenous women for miscarriages, they have imprisoned them, there, in the state of Guanajuato, indigenous women who have had miscarriages, and they are in jail.”
“So, knowing the type of justice system we have in Mexico, and that they are going to manage that, for that reason we…I personally have never entered into a discussion about that, never have entered, never have entered.”
Vera López repeated his contention that women have been imprisoned in Guanajuato for miscarriages later in the interview. This reporter observed that pro-abortion organizations had accused the government of imprisoning women for miscarriages, but in fact (in accordance with the evidence presented at their trials) the women had killed their babies following birth at full gestation. See LifeSiteNews coverage here. The bishop claimed that he knew nothing about those cases, and insisted that women had been imprisoned in Guanajuato for miscarriages.
Asked about the new Catechism of the Catholic Church’s teaching that abortion should be prohibited by law, the bishop claimed that the if the Church evangelized people properly, the government’s laws would be of no concern. He repeated his contention that it was not pro-abortion to advocate the depenalization of abortion.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states, in paragraph 2273, that “As a consequence of the respect and protection which must be ensured for the unborn child from the moment of conception, the law must provide appropriate penal sanctions for every deliberate violation of the child’s rights.”
Asked if he therefore opposed the pro-life constitutional amendment for the state of Jalisco, in accordance with the document that his organizations had signed, Bishop Vera responded: “When there has been a discussion of penalization or non-penalization, it’s that, at some point they have to make a declaration, but no, to strengthen abortion, never, never. It’s penalization or non-penalization, it’s that.” (Twisted Mexican Apostate Discusses His False Beliefs.)
It is, of course, Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P., who is sick in the mind, not those who seek to denounce two of the sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance. And it is unfortunately the case for the very well-meaning at Lifesite News, who do provide much valuable information, the so-called Catechism of the Catholic Church is a work of revolutionaries that sought to deconstruct and redefine the Catholic Faith.
Yes, you see, it is not the "Catechism of the Catholic Church" (see the Society of Saint Pius X's Is the New Catechism Catholic?, which is appended at the end of Two For The Price Of One, part two) that speaks to us with the vigor of the truths contained in the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law. For this, of course, we must look to our true popes.
Pope Leo XIII explained that Catholics are under a positive obligation to oppose unjust laws:
10. But, if the laws of the State are manifestly at variance with the divine
law, containing enactments hurtful to the Church, or conveying injunctions
adverse to the duties imposed by religion, or if they violate in the person of
the supreme Pontiff the authority of Jesus Christ, then, truly, to resist
becomes a positive duty, to obey, a crime; a crime, moreover, combined with
misdemeanor against the State itself, inasmuch as every offense leveled against
religion is also a sin against the State. Here anew it becomes evident how
unjust is the reproach of sedition; for the obedience due to rulers and
legislators is not refused, but there is a deviation from their will in those
precepts only which they have no power to enjoin. Commands that are issued
adversely to the honor due to God, and hence are beyond the scope of justice,
must be looked upon as anything rather than laws. You are fully aware, venerable
brothers, that this is the very contention of the Apostle St. Paul, who, in
writing to Titus, after reminding Christians that they are "to be subject to
princes and powers, and to obey at a word," at once adds: "And to be ready to
every good work."Thereby he openly declares that, if laws of men contain
injunctions contrary to the eternal law of God, it is right not to obey them. In
like manner, the Prince of the Apostles gave this courageous and sublime answer
to those who would have deprived him of the liberty of preaching the Gospel: "If
it be just in the sight of God to hear you rather than God, judge ye, for we
cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard." (Pope Leo XIII, Sapientiae Christianae, January 10, 1890.)
Pope Pius XI minced no words in explaining what happens to those in public life who support the destruction of the innocent preborn under cover of the civil law if they do not repent of their sins against God and man before they die:
Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the
duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the
lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives
are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we
must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And
if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their
laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of
others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent
blood which cried from earth to Heaven. (Pope Pius XI, Casti Connubii, December 30, 1930.)
Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P. does not speak in this way because he is an apostate, a man who believes, thinks, speaks and acts as one who is opposed to the Sacred Deposit of Faith that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has revealed exclusively to His true Church, the Catholic Church, who safeguards and teaches infallibly the binding precepts contained therein.
In this, however, Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P., is not alone. Indeed, he has company at the very top of his false church.
Yes, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis has adopted the "gay agenda" and uses "gayspeak" to explain his "sensitivity" to those who identify themselves on the basis of an attraction to the commission of the sin of Sodom and has stated that it is not necessary to preach about abortion as this is a "time of mercy." Go tell that to the innocent preborn. (See Francis Says ¡Viva la Revolución!, part three and Recruited By Antichrist To Be His Apologists, part one.)
Moreover, Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis believes that there is an affliction called "homophobia," which means that he believes it is legitimate for people to identify themselves on the basis of their sinful attractions and/or actions. This is why nothing is going to happen to the man some "conservatives" once believed was going to be their champion, New Jersey Governor Christopher Christie, for signing into law a bill passed by both houses of the New Jersey State Legislature that prohibits any kind of psychological therapy designed to treat and cure the disordered affliction of same-gender attraction and behavior (see Christie Signs Bill Outlawing a Gay 'Cure' ). Christie is just another naturalist who will never be sanctioned by conciliar officials even if he reverts to being what he was at one time, favorably inclined to baby-killing.
Here is but a little reminder of Bergoglio/Francis's acceptance of "gayspeak," courtesy of the layman, Justin Welby, who calls himself the "Archbishop" of Canterbury in the heretical and schismatic Anglican sect that Bergoglio/Francis has a legitimate role to play in the sanctification and salvation of souls:
On gay marriage, Welby declared he and Francis had proved to be "absolutely at one on the issues". In a press briefing at the Venerable English College of Rome, Welby added that the pair were "equally at one on our condemnation of homophobic behaviour". The pope, for his part, said in an address that he wanted to co-operate on the "importance of the institution of the family built on marriage". (Two figures of Antichrist find common ground in talks at the Vatican.)
Just as nothing will happen to Christopher Christie in New Jersey, nothing will ever happen to Jose Raul Vera Lopez in Saltillo, Mexico. Nothing. After all, what has happened to Bergoglio/Francis's hand-picked appointee, "Monsignor" Battista Ricca, as
to head of the Institute of Religious Works
(the Vatican Bank) is a sodomite. Bergoglio/Francis who has a proven track record of perverted behavior (see (On "Gay Lobby", Sandro Magister challenges the Vatican: "We have the evidence".)
Save your stamps.
Forget about the letter-writing campaign to Rome.
Jose Raul Vera Lopez, O.P., is in "good" with the likes of Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis.
Conciliar revolutionaries such as Jose Raul Vera Lopez and Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis are not, however, "in good" with God. For any one of them to be as bold as Joseph Raul Vera Lopez to claim that there needs to be a "rethinking" of Sacred Scripture's condemnation of perverted behavior is to blaspheme the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, under Whose Divine inspiration the following such condemnations were written:
And when the men rose up from thence, they turned
their eyes towards Sodom: and Abraham walked with them, bringing them on
the way. And the Lord said: Can I hide from Abraham what I am about to
do: Seeing he shall become a great and mighty nation, and in him all the
nations of the earth shall be blessed? For I know that he will command
his children, and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord,
and do judgment and justice: that for Abraham's sake the Lord may bring
to effect all the things he hath spoken unto him. And the Lord said: The cry of Sodom and Gomorrha is multiplied, and their sin is become exceedingly grievous.
I will go down and see whether they have done
according to the cry that is come to me: or whether it be not so, that I
may know. And they turned themselves from thence, and went their way to
Sodom: but Abraham as yet stood before the Lord. And drawing nigh he
said: Wilt thou destroy the just with the wicked? If there be fifty just
men in the city, shall they perish withal? and wilt thou not spare that
place for the sake of the fifty just, if they be therein? Far be it
from thee to do this thing, and to slay the just with the wicked, and
for the just to be in like case as the wicked, this is not beseeming
thee: thou who judgest all the earth, wilt not make this judgment.
And the Lord said to him: If I find in Sodom fifty
just within the city, I will spare the whole place for their sake. And
Abraham answered, and said: Seeing I have once begun, I will speak to my
Lord, whereas I am dust and ashes. What if there be five less than
fifty just persons? wilt thou for five and forty destroy the whole city?
And he said: I will not destroy it, if I find five and forty. And again
he said to him: But if forty be found there, what wilt thou do? He
said: I will not destroy it for the sake of forty. Lord, saith he, be
not angry, I beseech thee, if I speak: What if thirty shall be found
there? He answered: I will not do it, if I find thirty there.
Seeing, saith he, I have once begun, I will speak
to my Lord. What if twenty be found there? He said: I will not destroy
it for the sake of twenty. I beseech thee, saith he, be not angry, Lord,
if I speak yet once more: What if ten should be found there? And he
said: I will not destroy it for the sake of ten. And the Lord departed,
after he had left speaking to Abraham: and Abraham returned to his
place. (Genesis 16: 16-33)
And he said to him: Behold also in this, I have
heard thy prayers, not to destroy the city for which thou hast spoken.
Make haste and be saved there, because I cannot do any thing till thou
go in thither. Therefore the name of that city was called Segor. The sun
was risen upon the earth, and Lot entered into Segor. And the
Lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrha brimstone and fire from the Lord out
of heaven. And he destroyed these cities, and all the country about,
all the inhabitants of the cities, and all things that spring from the
And his wife looking behind her, was turned into a
statue of salt. And Abraham got up early in the morning and in the
place where he had stood before with the Lord, He looked towards Sodom
and Gomorrha, and the whole land of that country: and he saw the ashes
rise up from the earth as the smoke of a furnace. (Genesis 19: 21-28.)
 And into whatsoever city or town you shall enter, inquire who in it is worthy, and there abide till you go thence.  And when you come into the house, salute it, saying: Peace be to this house.  And if that house be worthy, your peace shall come upon it; but if it be not worthy, your peace shall return to you.  And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words: going forth
out of that house or city shake off the dust from your feet.  Amen I say to you, it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city. [Matthew 11:15]
For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature.  And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error.  And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient;  Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers,  Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
 Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy.  Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them. (Romans 1: 26-32.)
Blasphemers. That's what these conciliar revolutionaries are now and have been from the very beginning. Blasphemers.
Consider once again the words that a true pope, Saint Pius V, used to condemn the crime of sodomy that is accepted with such oozing "sensitivity" by the likes of Jose Raul Vera Lopez and Jorge Mario Bergoglio/Francis:
That horrible crime, on account of which corrupt and obscene
cities were destroyed by fire through divine condemnation, causes us
most bitter sorrow and shocks our mind, impelling us to repress such a
crime with the greatest possible zeal.
Quite opportunely the Fifth Lateran Council [1512-1517] issued this
decree: "Let any member of the clergy caught in that vice against nature
. . . be removed from the clerical order or forced to do penance in a
monastery" (chap. 4, X, V, 31). So that the contagion of such a
grave offense may not advance with greater audacity by taking advantage
of impunity, which is the greatest incitement to sin, and so as to more
severely punish the clerics who are guilty of this nefarious crime and
who are not frightened by the death of their souls, we determine that
they should be handed over to the severity of the secular authority,
which enforces civil law.
Therefore, wishing to pursue with the greatest rigor that which
we have decreed since the beginning of our pontificate, we establish
that any priest or member of the clergy, either secular or regular, who
commits such an execrable crime, by force of the present law be deprived
of every clerical privilege, of every post, dignity and ecclesiastical
benefit, and having been degraded by an ecclesiastical judge, let him be
immediately delivered to the secular authority to be put to death, as
mandated by law as the fitting punishment for laymen who have sunk into
this abyss. (Pope Saint Pius V, Horrendum illud scelus, August 30, 1568)
It is sin that caused the
God-Man to suffer and die on the wood of the Cross to redeem us sinful
men, to make it it possible for us to cooperate with the graces He won
for us as He shed every single drop of His Most Blessed Mother to quit
our sins and to reform our lives once and for all. Accepting sin, the
very thing that rupture man's relationship with God in the Garden of
Eden and introduced disorder even into the elements of the natural
world, as the foundation of human self-identity and protecting its
exercise under cover of the civil law is itself sinful and thus
injurious to the common temporal good, which must be pursued in light of
man's Last End, the possession of the glory of God the Father, God the
Son and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity in Heaven.
How do Catholics speak to sinners who are not intent on giving up their sins or boast of being attracted and/or attached to them?
How did Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ speak to sinners whilst He walk the face of the earth?
Our Lord did not reaffirm Saint Mary
Magdalene in her sin of adultery. He did not applaud her. He did not
excuse the gravity of violating the Sixth Commandment. He did not
explain away her sin by saying that she was genetically-predisposed to
commit it or that it was "impossible" for her to keep from committing
it. Our Lord, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity made Man in His
Most Blessed Mother's Virginal and Immaculate Womb by the power of the
Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, said the
following to her: "Go, and now sin no more" (John 8: 11.)
Our Lord told His friend from
Bethany to reform her life, to quit her sins once and for all. He tells us,
each of whom is a sinner (and I am one of the worst and most miserable,
truth be told) the same thing in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance as we
amend our lives as we pray the Act of Contrition as a true priest
administers Absolution upon our immortal souls, thereby applying the
merits His own Most Precious Blood upon them.
The counterfeit church of conciliarism is simply not the Catholic Church.
How clear does it have to get?
We must pray as many Rosaries each day as our
states-in-life permit, conscious of the fact that must make reparation
for our sins, which are so responsible for the worsening of the state of
the Church Militant and of the world-at-large, accept with joy and with
gratitude each of the sufferings and calumnies and difficulties that
come our way as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour
Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.
The path to Heaven can be trod only by those who are
willing to bear the Cross and to lift it high in their daily lives.
considering it our privilege to hear the Immemorial Mass of Tradition
offered at the hands of true bishops and priests who reject
conciliarism, seeking only to live in such a way that we will be ready
at all times to die in a state of Sanctifying Grace as a member of the
Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without
which there can be no true social order.
It's the Faith that matters, the entire Faith without
any compromises, now and for all eternity. And we cannot be concerned about what anyone thinks or says about us for our efforts,
despite our own sins and failings, to stand fast in behalf of the full
integrity of the Holy Faith as we pray for the conversion of the
conciliar revolutionaries back to that true Faith before they die.
Aren't we willing to suffer some more for the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, especially in this month of the Holy Cross and the Sorrowful Mother.
Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior and Balthasar, pray for us.
Saint Raymond Nonnatus, pray for us.
Saint Egidius, pray for us.
The Twelve Holy Brothers, pray for us.