Boy, If Only The "Pope" Knew
Partie Deux (That's "Part Two"--smile)
by Thomas A. Droleskey
Much is being made about the alleged reinstatement of a conciliar "archbishop" of Poznan, Poland, Juliusz Paetz, who was forced to retire on March 18, 2002, after being accused of abusing four seminarians between 1996 and 2002. "Archbishop" Paetz has maintained his innocence rather steadfastly in the past eight years despite the fact that many of his confreres in the counterfeit church of conciliarism accept the accusations against him as being true after considering the weight of the evidence that had been brought against him.
Paetz had worked as a priest in the conciliar church's Congregation for Bishops from 1967 to 1976 and then as a priest in service to the "papal" household in the Apostolic Palace, spending four years (1978-1982) under his close friend from Poland, Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II, who made Paetz the conciliar "bishop" of Loma, Poland, on December 20, 1982. He has retained his "good standing" in the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism despite the accusations and despite the fact that he was an agent for the Communist secret police, the Ministry of Public Security of Poland (MBP), when he was stationed in the Vatican in the 1970s, including the time he served in the "papal" household.
Boy, if only the "pope" knew, huh? Well, no matter what the last conciliar "pope" knew about Juliusz Paetz, which is unclear at this time, the current one, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, has known about the accusations of perverted abuse of seminarians and of his having work for the MBP. This does not matter, which is why Paetz, who remains in good standing in the conciliar church with certain conditions relating to when he can offer the conciliar liturgical rites publicly. Paetz can only simulate the Protestant and Masonic Novus Ordo service at the invitation of a particular priest or presbyter, who must have a "nihil obstat" (no objection) from his own conciliar "bishop."
There is no "story" of a "reinstatement" as there has been no "reinstatement" of Juliusz Paetz. Paetz remains in a sort of conciliar version of limbo, which is ironic in and of itself given Ratzinger/Benedict's personal disdain for Limbo that was expressed in
No Need to be in Limbo Any Longer, by the International Theological Commission three years ago now, able to make public appearances--even at youth rallies--and to receive warm, effusive praise from the current "pontiff" despite the fact that the allegations, which have been investigated without a final report having been issued thus far. This is quite similar to the manner by which the Vatican conducted its investigation into the sick, twisted corrupt founder of the Legionaries of Christ, Father Marcial Maciel Degollado, not "concluded" until 2006, prior to Maciel's death on January 30, 2008, and not accepted by the Maciel's sycophants and enablers in the Legionaries of Christ until the conciliar Vatican concluded an investigation into the entire organization (To Be More Effective Witnesses of Conciliarism and
Maciel Priest Accused of Abusing His Own Sons). Paetz is thus free to roam around at will, both in Poland and in Rome itself, and to enjoy the accolades that come his way from "true believers" of his, just as Father Marcial Maciel Degollado was able to do until he was told by the Vatican in 2006 to retire to a life of prayer and penance.
Here is a brief synopsis of Paetz's history as provided by Atila Sinke Guimaraes on the Tradition in Action site last year, which, of course, is opposed to the belief that the conciliar "popes" are not legitimate Successors of Saint Peter because they have defected from the Faith and thus cast themselves out of the Catholic Church by having violated the Divine Positive Law:
Under the pontificate of Benedict XVI, Archbishop Paetz [a morally corrupt conciliar "archbishop" who "retired" five years ago now] has continued to enjoy good standing. In May 2006 he was shown on television greeting the Pope during his pilgrimage to Poland. In June 2007 he was a top figure at the youth rally in his country. He has also assisted at several audiences with Pope Benedict in Rome, where he owns a luxury apartment. In April 2009 - as a Prelate in normal standing - he was seen participating at the anniversary celebrations of the Faculty of Theology in Poznan (The Tablet, July 4, 2009, p. 31).
But the charges against Paetz include more than the sexual abuse of seminarians. As a matter of fact, in November 2008 a Polish parliamentary commission was established to investigate his past after the press revealed that Juliusz Paetz had acted as an informant for the Communist regime while working at the Vatican in the '70s and ’80s.
Given this not-so-clean past, how can one explain the decision of Pope Benedict XVI to honor this Prelate?
I don’t have a precise explanation, but the fact is that on June 28, 2009, he sent Paetz a message for the 50th anniversary of his priestly ordination. His telegram was published by the Poznan Archdiocesan weekly Przewodnik Katolicki. In it Benedict congratulated Paetz for his “fruitful” and “salutary work for the good of the Church” he has carried out in Poland and abroad.
Benedict also stated, “Guiding your flock, you gave a testimony of faith in the resurrection of Christ that drove away all fear.” Further, he added that by “venerating Mary as Mother of the Church and Queen of Poland with a son’s love and piously venerating the saints and blessed of your land along with others, you labored for spiritual progress” (The Tablet, ibid.)
Fr. Pawel Deskur, editor of the Archdiocesan weekly, confirmed that Archbishop Paetz was “still active” in the Polish Hierarchy and that the Prelate had personally requested the Pope’s telegram be published. Catholic Polish Television (KAI) aired the High Mass in Poznan Cathedral celebrating the 50th anniversary of Paetz’ ordination.
Commenting on the Pope’s message, the daily mass-circulation Gazeta Wyborcza noted that these public appearances of Archbishop Paetz had caused “distaste among many local people.” The daily Polska said the Pope’s “great respect” for the Archbishop was “surprising in view of Benedict XVI’s severe statements on clergy who violate the vow of chastity” (The Tablet, July 4, 2009, p. 31).
I believe that my readers have the right to know about this congratulatory note, which so far I have not seen reported in our American media.
Perhaps it is not superfluous to remind here that in a recent Vatican document authorizing Bishops to defrock scandalous priests, it was carefully stated that those powers do not apply in cases of homosexual and pedophile priests. Such cases should continue to be judged by the Holy See itself.
The same protection offered to homosexual and pedophile priests would seem to apply as well to Prelates with analogous vices. The least that can be said for such procedure is that it is very consistent, indeed… (Benedict and Vatican Newspaper Praise Perverted "Bishop")
Paetz is pretty nervy. He wanted his "papal" letter for his fiftieth year of priestly ordination, which letter was replete with effusive praise that was personalized for him by Ratzinger/Benedict himself despite all of the allegations that were then known about Paetz.
None of us this should surprise us in the least. All one has to do is to remember that "Archbishop" Robert Zollitsch remains in "good standing" in the conciliar structures and is still the president of the conciliar "bishops" conference in the Federal Republic of Germany despite having denied on April 11, 2009 (that's 439 days ago for those of you keeping score at home) that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ died on the wood of the Holy Cross in atonement for our sins.
Similarly, of course, it is pretty difficult for a man, Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who is so spiritually and theologically obtuse as to not realize that he gives grave offense to God and to Catholics and non-Catholics alike worldwide by committing one Mortal Sin, objectively speaking, after another against the First and Second Commandments every time he esteems the symbols of false religions, engages in "inter-religious prayer" services, terms places of false worship as "sacred" to the true God of Divine Revelation, and speaks of the "coexistence" of world religions as the "cornerstone" of peace as those religions can help to combat the influence of irreligion in the world (see From The Potomac to the Tiber and Back), to be upset the sins of others as he does not recognize the gravity or the horror of personal sin (please see Blind to Truth, Blind to the Horror of Personal Sin). Ratzinger/Benedict even believes that those supposedly "Christian theologians" who deny the Sacred Divinity of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ "continue believing in a Christian way" (see Revealing His Inner Teilhard Yet Again).
As has been noted on this site in the past, one of the few things that can get one in real trouble with the conciliar authorities is to place into any kind of doubt whatsoever the historical accuracy of the extent of the crimes committed by agents of Adolf Hitler's Third Reich between 1933 and 1945. All manner of castigation is still being directed at Bishop Richard Williamson of the Society of Saint Pius X. Deny Our Lord died on the wood of the Holy Cross in atonement for our sins? Publicly esteem symbols of false religions and enter into false places of worship? Work as a paid agent for a Communist secret police force? No problem. Raise a point of secular history in an interview? Ah, big problems ensue for doing that, even more so if one points out that the crimes of the Nazi butchers have been used by the ancient enemies of Christ the King and Holy Mother Church to "define in a new way the relationship between the Church and the faith of Israel" (Christmas greetings to the Members of the Roman Curia and Prelature, December 22, 2005.)
Boy, if only the "pope" knew. Well, yes, indeed, he does know. He uttered those words quoted immediately above. It is he said that "Christians and Jews pray to the same Lord" while at the Rome synagogue on January 17, 2010. It is because he believes these falsehoods and promotes them publicly as the ostensible "Sovereign Pontiff" that we can conclude that he does not believe in the integrity of the Catholic Faith. The real problem in the counterfeit church of conciliarism is not with Juliusz Paetz as he is left to wallow in the splendor of his peculiar limbo or with the "bishops" and priests/presbyters who have been proved to be guilty of moral crimes. The problem is not even with the "bad" "bishops" who countenance "liturgical abuses" and who deny articles of the Faith in their own dioceses. The problem is with conciliarism itself (see
Forever Prowling the World Seeking the Ruin of Souls, part 1 and
Forever Prowling the World Seeking The Ruin of Souls, part 2).
Boy, if only the man destined to a conciliar "pope" knew on January 15, 1980, that a meeting over which he presided in the chancery office of the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising, Germany, approved the reassignment of Father Peter Hullermann, a perverted priest from the Diocese of Essen, Germany. He would have put a stop to that if only he knew, right?
Boy, if only the "pope" knew that Bishop Williamson's views on the nature and extent of the crimes of the Nazis was pretty widely known all around the world long before the interview that aired on Swedish television on January 21, 2009, that had been videotaped two months before that time. If only the "pope" knew.
Boy, if only the "pope" knew that there would be half-naked dancers awaiting him in Australia during a Novus Ordo service in Sydney, Australia, to conclude the hootenanny known as World Youth Day twenty-three months ago. If only the "pope" knew.
Boy, if only the "pope" knew beforehand that he would have to esteem those symbols of five false religions with his own priestly hands in Washington, District of Columbia, at the John Paul II Cultural Center on Thursday, April 17, 2008. If only the "pope" knew.
Boy, if only the "pope" knew that his assertion that dogmatic formulae and papal pronouncements can be understood in different ways at different times because they are framed in language that reflects the historical circumstances in which they were made had been condemned by the [First] Vatican Council and made part of Pope Saint Pius X's Oath Against Modernism, September 1, 1910. If only the "pope" knew.
Boy, if only the "pope" knew that his rejection of the "ecumenism of the return" that was denounced by, among others, Pope Pius IX in Iam Vos Omnes, September 13 1868, and Pope Pius IX, in Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.
The "pope" does know, of course. He doesn't care.
The Venerable Anne Katherine Emmerich prophesied of these very times as follows:
“I saw a strange church being built against every rule. . . No angels were supervising the building operations. In that church, nothing came from high above. . . There was only division and chaos. It is probably a church of human creation, following the latest fashion, as well as the new heterodox church of Rome, which seems of the same kind. . .
“I saw again the strange big church that was being built there (in Rome). There was nothing holy in it. I saw this just as I saw a movement led by Ecclesiastics to which contributed angels, saints and other Christians. But then (in the strange big change) all the work was being done mechanically (i.e. according to set rules and formulae). Everything was being done according to human reason. . .
“I saw all sorts of people, things, doctrines, and opinions. There was something proud, presumptuous, and violent about it, and they seemed to be very successful. I did not see a single Angel nor a single saint helping in the work. But far away in the background, I saw the seat of a cruel people armed with spears, and I saw a laughing figure which said: ‘Do build it as solid as you can; we will put it to the ground’ . . . . “(as found in Yves Dupont, Catholic Prophecy: The Coming Chastisement, TAN Books and Publishers, 1970, p. 61)
The signs are pretty clear that this prophecies are being realized in our own day, bringing to life the very words of Our Lady of La Salette:
The Church will be in eclipse, the world will be in dismay. But now Enoch and Eli will come, filled with the Spirit of God. They will preach with the might of God, and men of good will will believe in God, and many souls will be comforted. They will make great steps forward through the power of the Holy Spirit and will condemn the devilish lapses of the Antichrist. Woe to the inhabitants of the earth! There will be bloody wars and famines, plagues and infectious diseases. It will rain with a fearful hail of animals. There will be thunderstorms which will shake cities, earthquakes which will swallow up countries. Voices will be heard in the air. Men will beat their heads against walls, call for their death, and on another side death will be their torment. Blood will flow on all sides. Who will be the victor if God does not shorten the length of the test? At the blood, the tears and prayers of the righteous, God will relent. Enoch and Eli will be put to death. Pagan Rome will disappear. The fire of Heaven will fall and consume three cities. All the universe will be struck with terror and many will let themselves be lead astray because they have not worshipped the true Christ who lives among them. It is time; the sun is darkening; only faith will survive.
Now is the time; the abyss is opening. Here is the King of Kings of darkness, here is the Beast with his subjects, calling himself the Savior of the world. He will rise proudly into the air to go to Heaven. He will be smothered by the breath of the Archangel Saint Michael. He will fall, and the earth, which will have been in a continuous series of evolutions for three days, will open up its fiery bowels; and he will have plunged for all eternity with all his followers into the everlasting chasms of hell. And then water and fire will purge the earth and consume all the works of men's pride and all will be renewed. God will be served and glorified."
We have nothing to fear as long as we keep close to Our Lady, begging her to help us remain in a state of Sanctifying Grace at all times as we seek to serve her Divine Son, Christ the King, through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, especially by means of praying as many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits.
This the time that God has known from all eternity that we would be alive. While we must be concerned about the problems in the world and that plague the Faith today as we have nothing to do with the spiritual robber barons of conciliarism as we pray fervently for the conversion of men and nations to true Faith and as we seek to make reparation to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary for our sins, we know the end of the story. Our Lady's Immaculate Heart triumphs.
This should give us comfort and consolation at all times.
Aren't we willing to suffer some more for the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Immaculate Heart of Mary?
Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!
Isn't it time to pray a Rosary now?
Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon!
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us.
Saint Joseph, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
See also: A Litany of Saints