Ashamed of THE NAME Above All Names
Thomas A. Droleskey
For what shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? For he that shall be ashamed of me, and of my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation: the Son of man also will be ashamed of him, when he shall come in the glory of his Father with the holy angels. (Mark 8: 36-28)
And calling in the apostles, after they had scourged them, they charged them that they should not speak at all in the name of Jesus; and they dismissed them.
And they indeed went from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were accounted worthy to suffer reproach for the name of Jesus. And every day they ceased not in the temple, and from house to house, to teach and preach Christ Jesus. (Acts 5: 40-42.)
If any man speak, let him speak, as the words of God. If any man minister, let him do it, as of the power, which God administereth: that in all things God may be honoured through Jesus Christ: to whom is glory and empire for ever and ever. Amen. Dearly beloved, think not strange the burning heat which is to try you, as if some new thing happened to you; But if you partake of the sufferings of Christ, rejoice that when his glory shall be revealed, you may also be glad with exceeding joy. If you be reproached for the name of Christ, you shall be blessed: for that which is of the honour, glory, and power of God, and that which is his Spirit, resteth upon you. But let none of you suffer as a murderer, or a thief, or a railer, or a coveter of other men's things.
But if as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him glorify God in that name. For the time is, that judgment should begin at the house of God. And if first at us, what shall be the end of them that believe not the gospel of God? And if the just man shall scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear? Wherefore let them also that suffer according to the will of God, commend their souls in good deeds to the faithful Creator. (1 Peter 4: 11-19)
One of the most frightful consequences of the doctrinal and liturgical revolutions wrought by the "Second" Vatican Council and its sordid aftermath is an almost total loss of the sensus Catholicus in the souls of very large percentages of Catholics who have been exposed to nothing else but the abjectly false religion known as conciliarism. To speak as a Catholic about the events of our times to most of our fellow Catholics is to speak Swahili to them, as a true priest in the Archdiocese of New York noted at a conference on the west side of Manhattan in 1988. This is indeed quite true, truer than that monsignor realized.
To wit, I had several fruitless colloquies with students at the University of Notre Dame du Lac sixty-two months ago when the first "film festival" celebrating perversity took place on the campus of my Master's alma mater. These students, steeped in the emotionalism and irrationality wrought by conciliarism, were aghast at an article of mine that had been posted on The Remnant website that focused on our sins caused Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, the very Word Who was made Flesh in Our Lady's Virginal and Immaculate Womb by the power of God the Holy Ghost, to suffer in His Sacred Humanity during His Passion and Death and caused those Seven Swords of Sorrow to be plunged through and through Our Lady's Immaculate Heart. My article stressed the fact that we do not base our identities as human beings upon objectively sinful behavior or inclinations, that it is not act of "love" for another to persist unrepentantly in sins with that person, that we must hate our sins and seek to make reparation for them after we have received Absolution in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance. One student wrote to me quite indignantly to say, "I never learned this at Notre Dame. What kind of school did you go to?" This student, having not an iota of the sensus Catholicus, had no way of recognizing basic catechetical Catholicism when it was right in front of him as it was entirely foreign to him.
Most of the over nine thousand students I taught in various colleges and universities between January of 1974 and July of 2003 (with an eleven-day reprise during the winter intersession at the C. W. Post Campus of Long Island University from December 28, 2006, to January 11, 2007) were baptized Catholics. Most of those Catholic students knew little about the Faith, and the little that they thought they knew was wrong. The material that I presented on Special Creation and Adam's Fall and Our Lord's Redemptive Act on the wood of the Cross (one cannot understand politics without understanding human nature, and one cannot understand human nature absent the teaching of the true Church) was completely foreign to most of these Catholic students.
One student, a young man named Anthony from Westchester County, New York, despite having been through thirteen years of Catholic education, had never heard of Original Sin and Adam and Eve's Fall from Grace in the Garden of Eden. Anthony blurted out in amazement when I was lecturing on First and Last Things in an Introduction to Political Science course at the C. W. Post Campus of Long Island University in the Fall 1995 Semester, "Is this what the Faith is about? Why hasn't anyone taught this to me before?" "Because Anthony," I explained to him, "you have been the victim of Catholic educational fraud." Sadly, that young man was not then--and is not today--alone.
Millions of Catholics have graduated from Catholic high schools and universities and colleges and professional schools since the dawning of the Age of Aquarius, that is, of conciliarism. Most of these Catholics have absolutely no concept of the honor and glory and majesty of God, no less of the horror of personal sin. This is why we find people in the employ of the counterfeit church of conciliarism who aid and abet women in the murder of their preborn children (see
Abort the Faith, Abort Babies) and/or who have no problem with the mutilation of human beings so as to render them barren (see Another Fine Mess) and/or who take "neutral" positions concerning chemical potions administered to women who have been victims of violent assaults (see
Making Everyone Happy Except God). And it is why so many Catholics are so enthusiastic when the conciliar "popes" or the conciliar "bishops" blaspheme God by esteeming the symbols of false religions and participate in "interreligious prayer services" and praise the "ability" of false religious beliefs to "contribute" to the betterment of the world.
We must, my friends, always focus on root causes rather than becoming histrionic in the face of various outrages. Root causes, my friends. Root causes. We must keep focused on the fact that conciliarism is the proximate root cause (admitting that the Remote Cause for all human problems is Original Sin and that our own Actual Sins are proximate enabling causes of all human problems) of why so many ostensibly Catholics and Catholic institutions, each of which is in the grip of a false, counterfeit church can do things that offend God and make a mockery of the martyrdom of countless millions of Catholics who preferred death over the centuries rather than to do anything to deny the Holy Name of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and/or the Holy Faith that He has entrusted exclusively to the true Church that He Himself founded upon the Rock of Peter, the Pope, for Its eternal safekeeping and infallible explication.
Excellent reporting by the Catholic News Service in recent days (Georgetown Says It Covered Over Name of Jesus,
White House, Georgetown Say Covering Over Name of Jesus Was Unintended Consequence of Desire to Have Backdrop for Flags,
Georgetown Did Not Cover Over Name of Jesus When First Lady Laura Bush Spoke) has documented the scandal caused by Georgetown University's appeasement of Caesar Obamus, who gave a speech at Georgetown University on Wednesday, April 15, 2009, by the covering up of the initials "IHS," the monogram of the Holy Name of Jesus that was popularized by Saint Vincent Ferrer, O.P., the zealous Dominican friar who converted thousands upon thousands of Jews and Mohammedans in the Iberian Peninsula and southern France at the end of the Thirteenth and the beginning of the Fourteenth Centuries, and by Saint Bernardine of Siena, the great apostle of the Holy Name of Jesus, prior to its being adopted as the monogram of the Society of Jesus by Saint Ignatius of Loyola.
It is, of course, a grave scandal to cover up the Holy Name of Jesus to appease a petty statist who supports the mystical dismemberment and destruction of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the persons of innocent preborn children in their mothers' wombs under cover of the civil law. The fault here, however, rests entirely with the officials of Georgetown University for inviting the pro-abortion, pro-perversity President of the United States of America to speak, no less to accede to the requests made by his representatives to cover up all of the "signage" in the hall where he was scheduled to speak. The fault here, let me repeat, is entirely that of the officials of Georgetown University.
One possessed of the sensus Catholicus would have said some variant of the following:
"You are not welcome on this campus. We pray for you as the President of the Untied States of America as the duties of filial piety and true patria (true love of one's country) require. We pray for your conversion to the true Faith. We pray that you will publicly repent of your crimes against God and man that bring down the wrath of God on our country and that reaffirm men in sins that injurious to the common temporal good and to their eternal salvation. We will not provide you with any kind of forum on our campus, no less to deny the Divine Redeemer by covering up His Holy Name as to do so would be an act of the highest apostasy of rendering unto Caesar what does not belong to him, namely, the "right" to demand that the Name of the Divine Redeemer be blotted out to make his, Caesar's acceptable to a mass television audience. Millions of Catholics have given up their lives rather than deny the Holy Name of Jesus in public. This university will not curry favor with a public official by covering up the Holy Name of Jesus."
After decades of apostasy and betrayal, however, the officials of Georgetown University are incapable of even thinking about making such a statement. Root causes, my friends. Root causes.
Remember, Georgetown University graduated one William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, who has spoken on numerous occasions in the same Gaston Hall where his fellow pro-abort, the Marxist-trained on of a Mohammedan father, Barack Hussein Obama, spoke three days ago now. The officials of Georgetown University have had no problem with this public reprobate, Bill Clinton, whose support for abortion under cover of the civil law has always been every bit as enthusiastic as that of Obama's.
That Barack Hussein Obama was invited to speak at Georgetown, which provided an academic home to the late Father Richard McCormick, S.J., the proponent of the heretical moral principle of proportionalism (which contended that an otherwise objectively evil act could be rendered licit to pursue according to the "weight" of extenuating circumstances of the person involved), and the late Father Robert Drinan, S.J., the infamous "Father Death" who used his public career in Congress and as the head of Americans for Democratic Action to promote abortion under cover of the civil law, is not all surprising. Everything but Catholicism as it has been handed down us over the centuries without any taint of conciliarism at all is welcomed at Georgetown University.
It is also important to realize that the covering up of the Holy Name of Jesus at Georgetown University's Gaston Hall three days ago to appease Caesar Obamus, whose Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano, has issued a report warning that those opposed to abortion are among possible sources of "domestic terrorism" (a subject that will be explored in the next article on this site), is not really new in the annals of conciliarism. Not at all.
Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II removed a Crucifix from the Paul VI Audience Hall in Vatican City on April 7, 1994 on the occasion of a "Holocaust" remembrance concert, "the first time the Chief Rabbi of Rome was invited to co-officiate at a public function in the Vatican, the first time a Jewish cantor sang at the Vatican, and the first time the Vatican choir sang a Hebrew text in performance" (The Vatican, the Holocaust, and the Jews: 1945-2000, a Talmudic source for this; see also: CHRONICLE - The New York Times and YOM HASHOAH, another Talmudic source for the "concert"). It is, you see, kind of difficult for those attached to the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism to beat up on the officials of Georgetown University when one of their false "pontiffs" bent over backward to appease the ancient enemies of the Faith by removing a Crucifix, which symbolizes their own Redemption by the One Whose Holy Name they hate and seek to eradicate from public mention at any time and in any place.
Ah, we must remember that the covering up of the monograph ISH at Georgetown University is so very symbolic of how the true Catholic Faith has been covered up by the conciliarists in their perverse liturgies, in their doctrines, in their chancery offices, in their parishes and in their "educational" institutions. As I have noted in my articles about the scandal of the University of Notre Dame du Lac's pending award of an honorary doctorate to the pro-abort Barack Hussein Obama, all but a handful of the formerly Catholic universities and colleges in conciliar captivity have divested themselves of their "official" connection to the conciliar church, placing their actual, de jure control in the hands of a board of trustees that is not answerable to the local conciliar "bishop." This has permitted these institutions to accept Federal and state grant monies and to take down voluntarily what Communist regimes in the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Eastern Europe and Red China and North Vietnam and Cuba have had to do by force: to take down from their walls Our Blessed Lord and Saviour's Crucifix.
This covering up of the Catholic Faith at formerly Catholic institutions now under conciliar control has involved the hiring of non-Catholic professors and the recruiting of non-Catholic students so as to prevent professors who are of a mind to teach the Faith from doing so, especially by starting their class sessions with the Sign of the Cross and a confessionally Catholic prayer that would "offend" non-Catholic students. This sort of insidious attack on the honor and majesty and glory of God is a daily occurrence at these formerly Catholic institutions under conciliar control. It permeates the courses taught by most of their professors. It permeates the horrific "liturgies" offered on their campuses (and in the Newman Centers on the campuses of non-Catholic colleges and universities). It permeates the "advice" given in the "reconciliation room." It permeates the atmosphere of faculty meetings and the hiring decisions made by departmental personnel and budget committees. Believe me, this is not merely "academic" knowledge acquired from reading articles. This is first-hand knowledge that I have experienced in my own teaching career and second-hand knowledge that has been transmitted to me by various colleagues over the years.
To be sure, of course, I did my share of investigations as to the theological and liturgical corruption on Catholic educational institutions in conciliar captivity during my eight years of writing for The Wanderer. One of those investigations involved the scandal caused by the hiring in 1995 of a pro-abortion, law professor, Tanya Hernandez, who had worked for the Center for Reproductive Law and Public Policy, by the dean of the Saint John's University School of Law in Jamaica, Queen, New York, Rudolph Hasl, who had also removed a large Crucifix from the lobby of the then-named Fromkes Hall and replaced it with a mobile containing symbols of Judaism (a Star of David), Mohammedanism (the Islamic crescent) and Christianity (a cross without a cross), each of an equal size.
There was no room for Our Crucified Saviour in the lobby of the Saint John's University School of Law. The series of articles prompted the president of undergraduate alma mater, Father Donald Harrington, C.M., I was told by a student at a Wanderer Forum in Washington, D.C., in October of 1995, to rush into the office of a departmental chairman with a copy of The Wanderer in his hands, shouting "What are we going to about this? He's killing us", a shout that was loud enough to be heard by a professor, who related the story to the student who told it to me.
Nothing happened, of course, as a result of that series of stories. We can and must chronicle the attacks on the Faith that constitute a veritable pandemic within the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism. As those who foment these scandals always remain in perfectly good "canonical standing" in the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism, however, anyone who thinks that they are "fighting for the Faith" by seeking to "reform" these institutions from within is quite mistaken. These institutions are in the hands of apostates who are protected by apostate "bishops," who are appointed by apostate "popes."
The blame for the latest Georgetown University scandal rests squarely on the shoulders of the ethos of conciliarism, fed in very large measure by the ethos of the condemned heresy of Americanism that served as one of its principal building blocks before the "Second Vatican Council" and remains an essential pillar of the conciliar "faith," such as it is.
Sure, it is terrible that the Obama administration, which, of course, denies wanting to single out the monogram "IHS" for being covered up, has sought to obliterate the Holy Name of Jesus from public view. This, however, is to be expected. Obama is a Marxist and a statist who governs with a fascist spirit of repression against those who dare to raise their voices in opposition to his, the secular "messiah's," programs and policies. Caesar Obamus has a bevy of lackeys and gofers who play the "race card" by claiming that those who oppose him are racists and hate the fact that a black man is President of the United States of America, a reprehensible tactic reflective of the spirit of those possessed of the leftist bent of naturalism that they are infallible and that anyone who opposes their "received wisdom" is a "racist" or a "bigot" or a "reactionary" who is standing in the way of "progress," veritable "individualists" who will not let their "thinking" be guided by the communitarian sentiments of the moment that must be imposed by the rank intimidation of sloganeering. It is no surprise that the secular "messiah" does not want the Holy Name of the one and only Messiah, Our Blessed Lord Saviour Jesus Christ to overshadow him, a contingent human being who did not create himself and who must one day face Christ the King at the moment of his Particular Judgment.
What is worse, however, is that men who are thought to be Catholics bat not one eyelash at a request made to cover up the Holy Name of Jesus from public view. Such is the apostate spirit of conciliarism that alleged Catholics do not even consider for one moment how such an action offends the honor and majesty and glory of God as it renders unto Caesar a "right" to demand that which millions of Catholic martyrs refused to recognize. A steady dose of offenses given to God by the conciliar "popes," including Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, has created an environment wherein most Catholics believe that they must deny Christ before men in order not to "offend" those who do not believe in His Sacred Divinity and/or those who believe that His Holy Name--or the Holy Name of His Most Blessed Mother--must ever be invoked in public discourse, no less adored as the Name given to all men by which they are to be saved, the Name of Our King of Kings, Who must be recognized by each civil state as its King without any exception whatsoever.
Pope Leo XIII, writing in Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885, explained that state indifference to the true religion results in the triumph of practical atheism as the lowest common denominator. And it is state indifferentism to religion that has been endorsed and promoted by the counterfeit church of conciliarism, especially by Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, which spirit permeates Catholic universities in conciliar captivity, including Georgetown University. Pope Leo XIII explained fifteen years to the day later, in Tametsi Futura Prospicientibus, that secularism results in the corruption of law and makes the pursuit of the common temporal good undertaken in light of man's Last End impossible to realize:
To hold, therefore, that there is no difference in matters of religion between forms that are unlike each other, and even contrary to each other, most clearly leads in the end to the rejection of all religion in both theory and practice. And this is the same thing as atheism, however it may differ from it in name. Men who really believe in the existence of God must, in order to be consistent with themselves and to avoid absurd conclusions, understand that differing modes of divine worship involving dissimilarity and conflict even on most important points cannot all be equally probable, equally good, and equally acceptable to God. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)
We are indeed now very far removed in time from the first beginnings of Redemption; but what difference does this make when the benefits thereof are perennial and immortal? He who once hath restored human nature ruined by sin the same preserveth and will preserve it for ever. "He gave Himself a redemption for all" (1 Timothy ii., 6)."In Christ all shall be made alive" (1 Corinthians xv., 22). "And of His Kingdom there shall be no end" (Luke i., 33). Hence by God's eternal decree the salvation of all men, both severally and collectively, depends upon Jesus Christ. Those who abandon Him become guilty by the very fact, in their blindness and folly, of their own ruin; whilst at the same time they do all that in them lies to bring about a violent reaction of mankind in the direction of that mass of evils and miseries from which the Redeemer in His mercy had freed them.
Those who go astray from the road wander far from the goal they aim at. Similarly, if the pure and true light of truth be rejected, men's minds must necessarily be darkened and their souls deceived by deplorably false ideas. What hope of salvation can they have who abandon the very principle and fountain of life? Christ alone is the Way, the Truth and the Life (John xiv., 6). If He be abandoned the three necessary conditions of salvation are removed.
It is surely unnecessary to prove, what experience constantly shows and what each individual feels in himself, even in the very midst of all temporal prosperity-that in God alone can the human will find absolute and perfect peace. God is the only end of man. All our life on earth is the truthful and exact image of a pilgrimage. Now Christ is the "Way," for we can never reach God, the supreme and ultimate good, by this toilsome and doubtful road of mortal life, except with Christ as our leader and guide. How so? Firstly and chiefly by His grace; but this would remain "void" in man if the precepts of His law were neglected. For, as was necessarily the case after Jesus Christ had won our salvation, He left behind Him His Law for the protection and welfare of the human race, under the guidance of which men, converted from evil life, might safely tend towards God. "Going, teach ye all nations . . . teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you" (Matthew xxviii., 19-20). "Keep my commandments" john xiv., 15). Hence it will be understood that in the Christian religion the first and most necessary condition is docility to the precepts of Jesus Christ, absolute loyalty of will towards Him as Lord and King. A serious duty, and one which oftentimes calls for strenuous labour, earnest endeavour, and perseverance! For although by Our Redeemer's grace human nature hath been regenerated, still there remains in each individual a certain debility and tendency to evil. Various natural appetites attract man on one side and the other; the allurements of the material world impel his soul to follow after what is pleasant rather than the law of Christ. Still we must strive our best and resist our natural inclinations with all our strength "unto the obedience of Christ." For unless they obey reason they become our masters, and carrying the whole man away from Christ, make him their slave. "Men of corrupt mind, who have made shipwreck of the faith, cannot help being slaves. . . They are slaves to a threefold concupiscence: of will, of pride, or of outward show" (St. Augustine, De Vera Religione, 37). In this contest every man must be prepared to undergo hard ships and troubles for Christ's sake. It is difficult to reject what so powerfully entices and delights. It is hard and painful to despise the supposed goods of the senses and of fortune for the will and precepts of Christ our Lord. But the Christian is absolutely obliged to be firm, and patient in suffering, if he wish to lead a Christian life. Have we forgotten of what Body and of what Head we are the members? "Having joy set before Him, He endured the Cross," and He bade us deny ourselves. The very dignity of human nature depends upon this disposition of mind. For, as even the ancient Pagan philosophy perceived, to be master of oneself and to make the lower part of the soul, obey the superior part, is so far from being a weakness of will that it is really a noble power, in consonance with right reason and most worthy of a man. Moreover, to bear and to suffer is the ordinary condition of man. Man can no more create for himself a life free from suffering and filled with all happiness that he can abrogate the decrees of his Divine Maker, who has willed that the consequences of original sin should be perpetual. It is reasonable, therefore, not to expect an end to troubles in this world, but rather to steel one's soul to bear troubles, by which we are taught to look forward with certainty to supreme happiness. Christ has not promised eternal bliss in heaven to riches, nor to a life of ease, to honours or to power, but to longsuffering and to tears, to the love of justice and to cleanness of heart.
From this it may clearly be seen what consequences are to be expected from that false pride which, rejecting our Saviour's Kingship, places man at the summit of all things and declares that human nature must rule supreme. And yet, this supreme rule can neither be attained nor even defined. The rule of Jesus Christ derives its form and its power from Divine Love: a holy and orderly charity is both its foundation and its crown. Its necessary consequences are the strict fulfilment of duty, respect of mutual rights, the estimation of the things of heaven above those of earth, the preference of the love of God to all things. But this supremacy of man, which openly rejects Christ, or at least ignores Him, is entirely founded upon selfishness, knowing neither charity nor selfdevotion. Man may indeed be king, through Jesus Christ: but only on condition that he first of all obey God, and diligently seek his rule of life in God's law. By the law of Christ we mean not only the natural precepts of morality and the Ancient Law, all of which Jesus Christ has perfected and crowned by His declaration, explanation and sanction; but also the rest of His doctrine and His own peculiar institutions. Of these the chief is His Church. Indeed whatsoever things Christ has instituted are most fully contained in His Church. Moreover, He willed to perpetuate the office assigned to Him by His Father by means of the ministry of the Church so gloriously founded by Himself. On the one hand He confided to her all the means of men's salvation, on the other He most solemnly commanded men to be subject to her and to obey her diligently, and to follow her even as Himself: "He that heareth you, heareth Me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth Me" (Luke x, 16). Wherefore the law of Christ must be sought in the Church. Christ is man's "Way"; the Church also is his "Way"-Christ of Himself and by His very nature, the Church by His commission and the communication of His power. Hence all who would find salvation apart from the Church, are led astray and strive in vain.
As with individuals, so with nations. These, too, must necessarily tend to ruin if they go astray from "The Way." The Son of God, the Creator and Redeemer of mankind, is King and Lord of the earth, and holds supreme dominion over men, both individually and collectively. "And He gave Him power, and glory, and a kingdom: and all peoples, tribes, and tongues shall serve Him" (Daniel vii., 14). "I am appointed King by Him . . . I will give Thee the Gentiles for Thy inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for Thy possession" (Psalm ii., 6, 8). Therefore the law of Christ ought to prevail in human society and be the guide and teacher of public as well as of private life. Since this is so by divine decree, and no man may with impunity contravene it, it is an evil thing for the common weal wherever Christianity does not hold the place that belongs to it. When Jesus Christ is absent, human reason fails, being bereft of its chief protection and light, and the very end is lost sight of, for which, under God's providence, human society has been built up. This end is the obtaining by the members of society of natural good through the aid of civil unity, though always in harmony with the perfect and eternal good which is above nature. But when men's minds are clouded, both rulers and ruled go astray, for they have no safe line to follow nor end to aim at. (Pope Leo XIII, Tametsi Futura Prospicientibus, November 1, 1900.)
Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ is our King. None other. We must never be ashamed of the NAME above all other names. We must prefer calumny and death rather than to put into question for one moment the Sacredness of the Holy Name of Jesus or to give any credibility at all to the lie of the religiously indifferentist civil state of modernity that denies the Social Kingship of Jesus Christ, a like with which the conciliarists have made their own diabolical, demonic "reconciliation."
May I be so bold as to propose acts of reparation for the offenses given to the Holy Name of Jesus by the officials of Georgetown University who acted at the behest of Caesar Obamus? I believe it to be appropriate to recite the Litany of the Holy Name of Jesus and and the Divine Praises for nine days in reparation for this great crime committed by the apostates at Georgetown University who are so friendly with and obsequious to pro-abort politicians, who are the sworn enemies of Christ the King and His true Church. Will you join me in making reparation for these offenses against the Holy Name of Jesus?
As always, we have recourse to the Mother of God by means of total consecration to her Divine Son through her own Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart and by praying as many Rosaries each day as our states-in-life permit. We may never know the fruit that will be borne as a result of our fidelity to Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary and by our patient offering of all of our daily trials and tribulations to the Most Holy Trinity through her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart. We must be content, however, to make reparation for our our sins and those of the whole world, trusting that Our Lady will intercede for us now and the hour of our deaths for having been friends of her Divine Son, Christ the King, in the midst of a world of devils galore who are honored aplenty by formerly Catholic institutions that are now in conciliar captivity.
Viva Cristo Rey!
Immaculate Heart of Mary, triumph soon.
Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us!
Saint Joseph, Patron of Departing Souls, pray for us.
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.
Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.
Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.
Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.
Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.
Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.
See also: A Litany of Saints